This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi

From: Chris Pickett <chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 22:44:17 -0500
Subject: Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
References: <4543D05A.7080303@mail.mcgill.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701060057040.31555@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Reply-to: chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

Chris,

I see you have not received any response to this yet, so let me give
it a try.

Thanks! I unsubscribed from the list and was surprised to see this in my inbox. Please continue to CC me on replies.

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Chris Pickett wrote:

5. Fix what I have labelled as errors.


That we definitely should do.  I believe some things have been changed
in our current development tree (to become GCC 4.3) already.  It would
be great could you have a look and perhaps produce a patch for one or
more of these; is this something you could consider?

Yes, I'll look at the trunk version, and send a series of patches.

In case something ends up being longer than 10 lines, I haven't signed a copyright assignment form. I can do so, or I can waive all claim of copyright over anything I send, if that's acceptable.

Cheers,
Chris

References:
- Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]