This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: drow at false dot org (Daniel Jacobowitz)
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 02:52:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?

> Once upon a time, the --disable-bootstrap configure option wasn't
> necessary.  "make" built gcc, and "make bootstrap" bootstrapped it.
> 
> Is this behavior useful?  Should we have it back again?

Doesn't "make all-gcc" already do that?  Or do you mean including the target
libraries?

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]