This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?



By the way, as I've tried to describe here:
<http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/advisories/c-integer-overflow.php>
variable range tracking can result in reintroduction of
supposedly-fixed security vulnerabilities. 8-(

Interesting read. I agree with the proposed fix; however, note that GCC does not make the result of overflowing signed left-shifts undefined, exactly because in this case the overflow is relied upon by too many existing programs (and also because left shifts are inherently a bitwise operation, with well defined overflowing behavior on the most significant bits).


Paolo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]