gcc archive
date index for December, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2006
20:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
20:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
19:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." David Daney
19:55 Re: Link tests not allowed DJ Delorie
19:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52 RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Dave Korn
19:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
19:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
19:37 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Karl Berry
19:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
19:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
19:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
19:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bernd Schmidt
18:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruce Korb
18:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
18:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
18:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
17:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
17:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
17:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
17:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
16:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Duncan Sands
16:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
16:32 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
16:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
16:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
16:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
16:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
15:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
15:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gerald Pfeifer
15:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
15:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
15:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
15:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
14:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
14:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
14:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
14:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
14:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
14:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
14:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
14:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
14:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
14:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
14:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
13:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Michael Veksler
13:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
13:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:33 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
13:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
12:38 Re: Link tests not allowed Andrew Haley
12:15 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
12:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
12:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
11:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
11:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
11:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
11:17 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Duncan Sands
11:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Zdenek Dvorak
11:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
10:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
10:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andreas Schwab
09:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
09:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
09:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
09:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
09:32 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Michael Veksler
08:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Steven Bosscher
07:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
07:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
06:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
06:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
06:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
05:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
05:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
03:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
02:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bernd Schmidt
01:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
01:39 Re: Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs) Jan Hubicka
01:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
01:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
01:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
01:03 Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs) Steven Bosscher
01:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
01:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
00:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
00:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
00:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
00:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
00:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
00:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
00:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
00:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
00:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
00:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
00:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka

December 30, 2006
23:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
23:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
23:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
23:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
23:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
23:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
23:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
22:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
22:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
22:54 Re: getting source locations .... Andrew Pinski
22:42 getting source locations .... Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
22:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
22:14 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Andrew Pinski
22:06 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Andrew Pinski
21:01 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Andreas Tobler
20:57 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Ian Lance Taylor
20:02 RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Dave Korn
19:44 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
18:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
17:53 gcc-4.3-20061230 is now available gccadmin
17:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:38 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Andrew Pinski
17:37 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Andrew Pinski
16:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Vincent Lefevre
14:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Eric Blake
13:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
13:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
12:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
12:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
12:08 Re: Link tests not allowed Andrew Haley
12:00 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka
11:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
11:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bernd Schmidt
11:04 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Steven Bosscher
10:42 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bernd Schmidt
10:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bernd Schmidt
10:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
08:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
08:17 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Paolo Bonzini
08:15 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Paolo Bonzini
08:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
07:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
07:51 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Andrew Pinski
07:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
07:08 Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Daniel Jacobowitz
07:01 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Daniel Jacobowitz
05:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
05:43 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Richard Kenner
05:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
05:38 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Ian Lance Taylor
05:26 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
05:25 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Richard Kenner
05:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
04:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
04:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
03:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Seongbae Park
03:56 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Daniel Jacobowitz
03:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
03:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
03:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
03:02 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
02:57 Re: Link tests not allowed DJ Delorie
02:50 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
02:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
02:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
02:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
02:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
01:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
01:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
01:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruce Korb
01:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Seongbae Park
01:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
00:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
00:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
00:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
00:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Marc Espie
00:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
00:16 Re: Link tests not allowed DJ Delorie
00:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
00:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Seongbae Park

December 29, 2006
23:45 Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
23:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
23:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
23:36 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Marc Espie
23:33 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Richard Kenner
23:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
22:52 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Daniel Jacobowitz
22:48 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Richard Kenner
22:40 gcc-4.1-20061229 is now available gccadmin
22:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
22:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
22:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
22:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
21:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
21:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard B. Kreckel
21:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Jacobowitz
21:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Florian Weimer
21:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Florian Weimer
21:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
21:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
21:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Scott Robert Ladd
20:38 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
20:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
20:20 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Christian Sturn
20:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Thomas Neumann
20:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
20:03 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Robert Dewar
19:59 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Ian Lance Taylor
19:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
19:33 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Christian Sturn
19:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
19:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
19:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
18:53 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Gerald Pfeifer
18:50 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Gerald Pfeifer
18:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
17:39 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Geert Bosch
17:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
17:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
16:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
16:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
16:39 [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap" Paolo Bonzini
16:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
15:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
10:35 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib? Paolo Bonzini
08:55 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
08:20 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
07:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert

December 28, 2006
22:40 gcc-4.0-20061228 is now available gccadmin
20:40 Re: Compiler loop optimizations Daniel Berlin
19:51 Compiler loop optimizations Christian Sturz
19:05 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib? Tom Tromey
17:33 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib? Ian Lance Taylor
17:31 Re: Gprof and shared libraries Daniel Jacobowitz
17:30 Re: Gprof and shared libraries Ian Lance Taylor
16:37 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
15:00 does zlib really need to build multilib? Jack Howarth
13:08 Gprof and shared libraries Christian Sturz
08:55 Re: should fastjar be built? Gerald Pfeifer
04:58 should fastjar be built? Jack Howarth

December 27, 2006
15:09 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Toon Moene
14:38 Re: poisened macro definitions Gerald Pfeifer

December 26, 2006
17:56 gcc-4.2-20061226 is now available gccadmin

December 24, 2006
23:39 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Vincent Lefevre
22:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Vincent Lefevre
21:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Vincent Lefevre
08:09 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Zdenek Dvorak

December 23, 2006
22:45 Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop') Daniel Franke
22:36 Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop') Andrew Pinski
19:34 Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed Dominique Dhumieres
19:24 Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed Eric Christopher
18:28 building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed Dominique Dhumieres
17:57 gcc-4.3-20061223 is now available gccadmin
17:40 Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:32 x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop') Daniel Franke
17:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko
09:07 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
05:30 Re: Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1. Ian Lance Taylor

December 22, 2006
23:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko
22:43 gcc-4.1-20061222 is now available gccadmin
19:53 [mem-ssa] Updated documentation Diego Novillo
17:36 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
17:31 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
17:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
17:17 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
17:08 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
15:51 Re: Reload Pass Vladimir N. Makarov
14:44 RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Dave Korn
14:30 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
12:56 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Zdenek Dvorak
12:37 Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1. Rohit Arul Raj
11:38 Re Fixme in driver-i386.c Kai Tietz
11:23 Fixme in driver-i386.c Uros Bizjak
10:58 needed headerfiles in <machine>.c Markus Franke
08:25 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
08:23 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Roberto Bagnara
08:00 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
07:50 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
06:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Roberto Bagnara
06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
05:11 Re: Reload Pass Rajkishore Barik
04:02 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
02:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
02:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:06 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
02:03 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
01:01 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment Janis Johnson
00:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko

December 21, 2006
23:47 Re: question from imobilien Janis Johnson
23:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
23:14 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joseph S. Myers
23:08 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Marcin Dalecki
22:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Ian Lance Taylor
22:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
22:41 gcc-4.0-20061221 is now available gccadmin
22:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
22:33 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Marcin Dalecki
22:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
21:54 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Ayal Zaks
21:53 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
21:53 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Marcin Dalecki
21:43 Re: question from imobilien Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:38 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
21:19 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? David Nicol
20:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Richard B. Kreckel
20:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joseph S. Myers
20:07 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
20:03 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Daniel Berlin
19:55 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Ian Lance Taylor
19:52 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
19:37 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Daniel Berlin
19:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
19:24 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
19:18 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Zdenek Dvorak
19:17 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
19:10 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
19:06 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
19:01 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
18:57 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
18:51 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
18:47 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
18:43 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
18:15 [GCCWIKI] password reset borken? Dave Korn
18:14 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Daniel Berlin
18:11 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Ian Lance Taylor
18:03 Re: question from imobilien Janis Johnson
17:54 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
17:49 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law
17:21 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Daniel Berlin
16:55 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Diego Novillo
16:37 SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Robert Kennedy
15:34 Re: Reload Pass Ian Lance Taylor
15:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Michael Veksler
14:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
14:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Michael Veksler
13:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
13:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
12:41 3 new GCC mirrors Marco Rinaudo - Internet.bs Co
12:22 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Michael Veksler
07:49 Reload Pass Rajkishore Barik
04:34 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Robert Dewar
04:21 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Geert Bosch
04:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
04:15 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
04:09 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
03:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
03:41 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
02:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Ian Lance Taylor
02:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:38 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis

December 20, 2006
23:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Marcin Dalecki
23:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Richard B. Kreckel
23:10 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP Gordon . Schumacher
23:09 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP DJ Delorie
23:05 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP Laurynas Biveinis
23:01 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment Ben Elliston
22:57 running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment Ben Elliston
22:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? David Nicol
22:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Marcin Dalecki
22:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andreas Schwab
21:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Richard B. Kreckel
21:43 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Matthew Woehlke
20:16 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Seongbae Park
20:02 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
19:57 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Tom Tromey
17:01 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Paolo Bonzini
16:55 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Matthew Woehlke
16:37 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Joe Buck
15:50 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations Joseph S. Myers
15:23 Re: question from imobilien Ian Lance Taylor
14:42 -fwrapv enables some optimizations Bruno Haible
14:30 Re: Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 David Edelsohn
14:15 Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 jonatha at qx dot net
14:08 question from imobilien Jan Eissfeld
13:51 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
12:01 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:54 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
11:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
11:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Zdenek Dvorak
11:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4) Marcin Dalecki
10:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
08:45 Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name Rohit Arul Raj
07:53 Error due to function call while checking fn attributes Rohit Arul Raj
04:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Schlie
03:50 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Paul Schlie
03:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
03:28 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
03:27 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
02:53 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
02:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
02:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Mike Stump
02:34 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dave Korn
02:31 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
02:19 Re: alignment attribute for stack allocated objects Mike Stump
02:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
02:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
02:13 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
01:32 alignment attribute for stack allocated objects Maurizio Vitale
01:22 RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra Dave Korn
00:39 Re: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
00:28 RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra Dave Korn

December 19, 2006
23:32 [fixincludes] PR29867 - building libgfortran fails Daniel Franke
23:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4) Richard B. Kreckel
22:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
22:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko
22:32 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Dorit Nuzman
22:11 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite Dorit Nuzman
21:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Dorit Nuzman
21:54 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joe Buck
21:54 Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Bruno Haible
21:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Brook
21:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko
21:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joe Buck
20:08 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Ian Lance Taylor
19:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:05 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
18:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Denis Vlasenko
18:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
17:57 gcc-4.2-20061219 is now available gccadmin
15:05 [ecj] Bump ABI version Andrew Haley
14:05 Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
13:49 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka
13:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
13:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joseph S. Myers
13:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
13:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joseph S. Myers
13:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Florian Weimer
13:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
13:37 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Florian Weimer
13:34 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
13:23 Getting declaration tree node using func. name Rohit Arul Raj
13:23 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Joseph S. Myers
12:43 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
11:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Zdenek Dvorak
11:37 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Florian Weimer
11:18 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
11:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
10:59 Re: Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer Paolo Bonzini
10:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:38 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paolo Bonzini
10:20 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Florian Weimer
10:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
09:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
09:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
09:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
09:36 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Paul Eggert
09:04 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
08:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
08:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
08:22 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Andrew Haley
08:13 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Robert Dewar
07:43 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Brooks Moses
07:12 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4) Andrew Pinski
05:54 GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4) Ralf Wildenhues
03:49 Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer Mark Mitchell
03:11 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile" Steve Kargl
00:48 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization Shaun Jackman

December 18, 2006
23:08 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization Nils Springob
22:35 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile" Brooks Moses
22:05 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization Shaun Jackman
21:57 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization Shaun Jackman
21:50 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile" Paul Thomas
21:36 GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile" Brooks Moses
21:06 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization Anton Erasmus
20:58 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka
20:48 RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
19:34 RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Dave Korn
19:31 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Robert Dewar
19:06 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Richard Kenner
18:47 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Chris Lattner
18:44 mingw build error Bob Rossi
18:28 Re: AVR byte swap optimization Shaun Jackman
18:27 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Robert Dewar
18:26 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite Janis Johnson
18:23 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:20 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:13 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Chris Lattner
18:06 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Paul Brook
17:53 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Robert Dewar
17:40 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Chris Lattner
17:30 Re: Defining cmd line symbolic literals Ian Lance Taylor
17:24 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Robert Dewar
17:16 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Chris Lattner
14:25 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Michael Gong
13:55 Re: libgomp crash fix Bruno Haible
11:18 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite Dorit Nuzman
10:25 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Paul Schlie
06:17 Defining cmd line symbolic literals Mohamed Shafi
03:19 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Paul Brook
01:15 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Paul Schlie

December 17, 2006
21:00 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Chris Lattner
20:40 Char shifts promoted to int. Why? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:55 [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

December 16, 2006
20:57 relocatable gdb Bob Rossi
17:53 gcc-4.3-20061216 is now available gccadmin
17:15 Re: distributing g++ Denis Vlasenko
17:15 Re: distributing g++ Denis Vlasenko
03:45 Re: distributing g++ Bob Rossi
01:02 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer Joe Buck
00:47 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer Andrew Pinski
00:43 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer Joe Buck
00:24 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer Dawser Stevens

December 15, 2006
22:43 gcc-4.1-20061215 is now available gccadmin
21:30 Re: distributing g++ Ferad Zyulkyarov
21:16 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Thomas Schwinge
20:35 Re: distributing g++ Brian Dessent
20:00 distributing g++ Bob Rossi
18:58 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
18:47 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Laurent GUERBY
18:11 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Marcin Dalecki
17:56 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Andrew Pinski
17:56 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds? Eric Botcazou
17:28 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Mike Stump
15:33 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds? Mike Stump
15:18 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler Diego Novillo
15:12 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Paul Brook
13:46 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:29 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler Diego Novillo
12:11 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds? Christian Joensson
11:33 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor Eric Botcazou
11:00 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor Christian Joensson
10:45 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor Eric Botcazou
10:32 [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor Christian Joensson
10:17 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Thomas Schwinge
10:02 Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler Ferad Zyulkyarov
09:56 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Andrew Pinski
09:49 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Paolo Bonzini
09:43 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Mike Stump
09:02 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Paolo Bonzini
08:06 Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation Frank Riese
05:43 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Mike Stump
02:11 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Josh Conner
01:59 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Paul Brook
01:37 Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS Josh Conner
01:13 [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite Janis Johnson
00:07 Re: MULTILIB_MATCHES question Michael Eager

December 14, 2006
22:40 gcc-4.0-20061214 is now available gccadmin
20:40 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:17 Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects Laurent GUERBY
20:14 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:55 MULTILIB_MATCHES question Michael Eager
17:32 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Ralf Wildenhues
17:01 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Ian Lance Taylor
16:58 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Paolo Bonzini
16:47 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:30 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Ian Lance Taylor
14:53 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:56 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Daniel Jacobowitz
12:50 Re: libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode Richard Guenther
12:44 libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode Mark Shinwell
12:10 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds? Eric Botcazou
11:49 [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds? Christian Joensson
09:19 configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:43 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Paolo Bonzini
08:07 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Benoît Jacob
07:58 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Steven Bosscher
07:54 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Benoît Jacob
07:32 Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation Steven Bosscher
00:10 Eric Christopher appointed Darwin maintainer David Edelsohn

December 13, 2006
22:10 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Denis Vlasenko
21:05 Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation Frank Riese
20:46 [PATCH] Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Jan Kratochvil
18:21 Re: why no boehm-gc tests? David Daney
18:14 why no boehm-gc tests? Jack Howarth
18:11 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Michael Matz
18:10 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Michael Matz
18:02 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Michael Matz
17:49 Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10? Eric Botcazou
17:18 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Richard Guenther
17:11 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Menezes, Evandro
16:55 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Richard Guenther
16:46 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Grigory Zagorodnev
15:55 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Benoit Jacob
15:47 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Ian Lance Taylor
13:49 Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10? Stewart Stremler
13:05 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Benoît Jacob
12:13 Re: Memory allocation for local variables. Steven Bosscher
12:12 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Steven Bosscher
11:48 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. amylaar
11:33 g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll Benoît Jacob
11:12 Memory allocation for local variables. Sandeep Kumar
10:02 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. Steven Bosscher
08:05 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. Joern Rennecke
06:23 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. Ian Lance Taylor
05:42 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. Rohit Arul Raj

December 12, 2006
22:42 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Mark Mitchell
22:05 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Andrew Pinski
21:54 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Mark Mitchell
21:44 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Andrew Pinski
20:19 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc. Dale Johannesen
20:07 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc. David Edelsohn
20:03 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc. Dale Johannesen
19:42 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc. David Edelsohn
18:54 Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP Gordon . Schumacher
18:05 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Mark Mitchell
17:56 gcc-4.2-20061212 is now available gccadmin
17:35 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Mark Kettenis
17:06 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Andrew Haley
16:54 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Ian Lance Taylor
16:19 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Jakub Jelinek
15:53 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Jakub Jelinek
15:50 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Jan Kratochvil
15:39 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Ulrich Drepper
15:27 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Andrew Haley
15:20 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Ulrich Drepper
15:04 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Andrew Haley
14:54 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Mark Kettenis
13:55 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Andrew Haley
07:53 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Andrew Pinski
06:31 Re: bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Eric Botcazou
00:03 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Kaz Kojima

December 11, 2006
23:56 bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) Joe Buck
23:18 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Steven Bosscher
23:02 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Kaz Kojima
22:40 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Roland McGrath
21:30 Re: What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!? Uros Bizjak
19:34 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Meissner, Michael
19:13 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU Daniel Berlin
19:12 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Andreas Schwab
19:03 Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs Jan Kratochvil
18:34 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Steve Ellcey
18:10 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 H. J. Lu
17:35 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Menezes, Evandro
15:40 Re: Accessing CVS Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:30 Accessing CVS Rohit Arul Raj
14:33 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 and x86-64 H. J. Lu
14:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Andrew MacLeod
14:16 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Steven Bosscher
13:46 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Kaz Kojima
10:53 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Steven Bosscher
10:47 re: ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file Dan Kegel
09:37 ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file s b
08:33 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... David Daney
08:04 [dataflow]: Status for spu-elf Andrew Pinski
07:30 What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!? Zuxy Meng
07:24 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... Steven Bosscher
06:47 Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux... David Daney
06:12 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU H. J. Lu
05:46 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU H. J. Lu
05:42 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU H. J. Lu
05:27 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU Daniel Berlin
04:46 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU Daniel Berlin

December 10, 2006
20:17 "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU H. J. Lu
16:39 Build report for gcc 4.1.1 on powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0 Tomaž Slivnik
13:52 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc Richard Guenther
13:49 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc Ira Rosen
13:24 Re: Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov Tehila Meyzels
13:14 Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov Tehila Meyzels
12:50 Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov linuxkaffee
12:02 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc Ira Rosen
11:37 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc Richard Guenther
10:55 Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc Ira Rosen
10:27 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Dominique Dhumieres
06:13 Re: void* vector Daniel Jacobowitz
03:31 Re: void* vector Alexey Smirnov

December 09, 2006
22:14 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Andreas Tobler
22:12 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Andreas Tobler
22:05 failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3 Dominique Dhumieres
20:52 Re: destruction of GTY() data Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:02 gcc-4.3-20061209 is now available gccadmin
17:35 Re: void* vector Steven Bosscher
17:31 void* vector Alexey Smirnov
16:22 Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted? Daniel Berlin
16:03 Re: destruction of GTY() data Daniel Berlin
10:07 Re: destruction of GTY() data Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:14 Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted? Andrew Haley
05:26 Version of gcc , for which patch submitted? h2005421
00:09 Re: destruction of GTY() data Daniel Berlin

December 08, 2006
23:43 Re: destruction of GTY() data Basile STARYNKEVITCH
23:07 Re: destruction of GTY() data Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:43 gcc-4.1-20061208 is now available gccadmin
19:02 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Menezes, Evandro
18:55 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 H. J. Lu
18:39 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Uros Bizjak
18:06 Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 H. J. Lu
18:04 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Bradley Lucier
15:37 Re: Adding New Function Attributes Ian Lance Taylor
08:57 Picasso Events Team Picasso Middle East | Events T
07:19 Adding New Function Attributes Rohit Arul Raj
06:55 Re: messages in objective-C Andrew Pinski
06:44 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Andrew Pinski
06:09 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes. Ian Lance Taylor
05:02 ELDK Cross complier hang Rajasekaran Periyasamy
03:50 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes. Brendon Costa
00:38 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes. Ian Lance Taylor
00:34 Job openings Jobs-SA
00:34 Job openings Jobs-SA
00:22 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene

December 07, 2006
22:42 gcc-4.0-20061207 is now available gccadmin
21:24 Understanding some EXPR nodes. Brendon Costa
21:23 bootstrap failure x86/linux r119634 Benjamin Kosnik
17:09 Job openings Jobs-SA
17:09 Job openings Jobs-SA
15:52 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?] Richard Guenther
15:28 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Ferad Zyulkyarov
14:37 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Revital1 Eres
14:21 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:38 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Revital1 Eres
09:01 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Eric Christopher
07:14 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. Ian Lance Taylor
06:46 Re: DBX format support Ian Lance Taylor
06:40 Re: 32 bit jump instruction. David Daney
05:49 32 bit jump instruction. Rohit Arul Raj
04:44 Re: DBX format support RAHUL V R
03:47 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Bradley Lucier
01:02 Re: messages in objective-C Devang Patel

December 06, 2006
23:52 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string Ben Elliston
21:59 Re: messages in objective-C Mike Stump
20:46 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene
20:17 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Eric Christopher
19:49 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Ferad Zyulkyarov
18:58 Re: Implementation of C++ N2053? Beman Dawes
18:51 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Jack Howarth
18:27 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Steve Kargl
18:01 Re: Change x86 prefix order H. J. Lu
17:52 Re: Change x86 prefix order Mikael Pettersson
17:01 Re: Change x86 prefix order H. J. Lu
16:42 Re: Change x86 prefix order Randy Dunlap
16:19 messages in objective-C Come Lonfils
15:36 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released DJ Delorie
15:27 Re: Implementation of C++ N2053? Ian Lance Taylor
15:02 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:00 Implementation of C++ N2053? Beman Dawes
14:51 Re: Gimple Type System Diego Novillo
14:45 Re: Gimple Type System Richard Warburton
14:40 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:56 Re: poisened macro definitions Mohamed Shafi
13:07 Re: Gimple Type System Diego Novillo
12:59 Gimple Type System Richard Warburton
12:34 Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there? Diego Novillo
12:28 Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there? Andrew Haley
12:09 How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there? Hoehenleitner, Thomas
07:42 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Bradley Lucier
07:20 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Steve Kargl
07:10 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Bradley Lucier
07:00 Change x86 prefix order H. J. Lu
06:35 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Steve Kargl
06:12 gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0 Bradley Lucier
04:52 Re: destruction of GTY() data Daniel Berlin
01:04 Re: how to test multiple warnings? Janis Johnson

December 05, 2006
23:47 Re: how to test multiple warnings? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
23:14 Re: Packing of structure fields and whole structs Paul Brook
22:53 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
22:47 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene
22:40 Packing of structure fields and whole structs Phil Endecott
22:09 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Mike Stump
22:08 Re: how to test multiple warnings? Janis Johnson
21:13 Re: destruction of GTY() data Laurynas Biveinis
21:00 Re: poisened macro definitions Andrija Radicevic
20:44 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
20:38 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene
20:37 poisened macro definitions Markus Franke
20:28 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene
20:24 Re:: destruction of GTY() data Zack Weinberg
20:05 destruction of GTY() data Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:52 Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran Steven Bosscher
19:15 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Mike Stump
18:41 Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran Andrew Pinski
18:38 Re: Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin Daniel Berlin
18:18 expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran Andrew MacLeod
18:00 Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin Daniel Berlin
17:54 gcc-4.2-20061205 is now available gccadmin
17:37 Re: Translate C# to C Roberto COSTA
17:33 gimple-tuples-branch merged into mainline Aldy Hernandez
17:23 Translate C# to C djbomber at tiscali dot it
17:21 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Geert Bosch
16:33 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Mark Mitchell
15:55 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Richard Guenther
15:44 RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload Unruh, Erwin
15:16 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Ian Lance Taylor
15:08 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Paul Brook
15:06 Re: DBX format support Ian Lance Taylor
15:04 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Ian Lance Taylor
14:09 DBX format support RAHUL V R
13:09 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released DJ Delorie
12:34 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:12 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Diego Novillo
11:55 Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload Ulrich Weigand
11:18 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Andrew Haley
11:15 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Ferad Zyulkyarov
11:04 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Revital1 Eres
11:03 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Paolo Bonzini
10:02 RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload Unruh, Erwin
09:22 Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree Ferad Zyulkyarov
04:08 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Brooks Moses
02:53 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Joe Buck
02:32 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:27 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released DJ Delorie
02:00 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Vincent Lefevre
01:40 Re: const and strict aliasing rules Gabriel Dos Reis
01:20 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Howard Hinnant
00:56 Re: [PATCH] Canonical types (1/3) Mark Mitchell
00:30 Re: const and strict aliasing rules Andrew Pinski
00:23 Re: const and strict aliasing rules Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: Bizarre inlining type promotion effect Shaun Jackman

December 04, 2006
23:57 Re: const and strict aliasing rules Andrew Pinski
23:54 const and strict aliasing rules John L. Kulp
23:38 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
23:24 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Joseph S. Myers
23:08 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
23:00 Bizarre inlining type promotion effect Shaun Jackman
22:45 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Howard Hinnant
22:30 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer Richard Guenther
22:18 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer Richard Guenther
21:57 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
21:38 Bootstrap failures with build/genextract Art Haas
21:27 packaging Jacquelyn Brooksavi
20:57 words of caution and tuples merge update Aldy Hernandez
20:48 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer Paolo Carlini
20:40 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer Eric Botcazou
20:34 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released DJ Delorie
19:51 Re: how to test multiple warnings? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
19:13 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Joe Buck
19:05 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Richard Kenner
19:00 Re: Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication David Nicol
18:55 Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload Ulrich Weigand
18:37 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Howard Hinnant
18:20 Re: setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ? Andrew Pinski
17:48 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Joe Buck
17:25 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer Paolo Carlini
17:09 Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer David Edelsohn
16:51 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1 Andrew MacLeod
16:44 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1 Diego Novillo
16:42 Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2 Steve Kargl
16:40 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1 Mike Stump
16:32 Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2 Geert Bosch
16:27 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Richard Guenther
16:24 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1 Richard Guenther
13:52 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string Dorit Nuzman
13:48 setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ? Kimmo Fredriksson
13:48 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string Revital1 Eres
13:14 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string Diego Novillo
12:48 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level? Roberto COSTA
12:26 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level? Jan Hubicka
11:50 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level? Roberto COSTA
10:56 Reload Problem in delete_output_reload Unruh, Erwin
10:25 Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text Gabriel Dos Reis
09:10 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string Revital1 Eres
08:48 writing a new pass: association with an option string Andrea Callia D'Iddio
01:26 Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text Mark Mitchell

December 03, 2006
17:44 MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2 Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:41 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?] Gerald Pfeifer
15:41 Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.) Toon Moene
14:30 [4.2 PATCH INSTALLED]: Recommend MPFR 2.2.1 Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:57 [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1 Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:46 Re: build failure, GMP not available Gerald Pfeifer
13:03 RE: Invoking static library automatically Dave Korn
11:37 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?] Gerald Pfeifer
01:03 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Vincent Lefevre
00:51 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Vincent Lefevre
00:18 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Gerald Pfeifer

December 02, 2006
22:50 Re: Determining if a function has vague linkage Brendon Costa
21:22 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Olivier Galibert
21:04 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Joe Buck
19:38 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Bruce Korb
18:57 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:12 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Bruce Korb
17:56 gcc-4.3-20061202 is now available gccadmin
17:02 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:13 Re: About changing the tree structure in pragmas Ferad Zyulkyarov
12:56 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Thomas Gleixner
12:43 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Al Viro
12:37 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Al Viro
10:48 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Arnd Bergmann
09:24 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Kyle Moffett
06:29 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Daniel Berlin
04:33 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety David Daney
03:58 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Andrew Pinski
03:04 Determining if a function has vague linkage Brendon Costa
00:29 Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication Shaun Jackman

December 01, 2006
23:51 Re: mainline slowdown H. J. Lu
23:32 [C/C++] same warning/error, different text Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
23:12 Re: rtl dumps Steven Bosscher
22:50 rtl dumps Andrija Radicevic
22:42 gcc-4.1-20061201 is now available gccadmin
21:33 [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety Al Viro
20:49 Re: mainline slowdown Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:37 Re: mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
20:34 Re: mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
20:06 Re: mainline slowdown Daniel Berlin
19:59 Re: mainline slowdown Daniel Berlin
19:55 call for 4.3 project reviewer for amdfam10 project Jagasia, Harsha
19:18 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards Andrew MacLeod
19:13 Re: mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
19:10 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC Joe Buck
18:49 Re: mainline slowdown Daniel Berlin
18:23 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.8 is released H. J. Lu
18:18 IA64 psABI discussion group created H. J. Lu
18:16 Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a Chao-ying Fu
16:45 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards Daniel Berlin
16:28 Re: Help on compiling with Japanese Text Philipp Thomas
16:17 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards Richard Guenther
16:06 Re: mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
16:03 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC Paolo Bonzini
15:57 Re: mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
15:44 SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards Uros Bizjak
15:41 mainline slowdown Andrew MacLeod
15:35 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC Paolo Bonzini
15:19 Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo H. J. Lu
15:07 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC Daniel Berlin
15:06 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level? Jan Hubicka
14:46 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level? Paolo Bonzini
14:44 Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo H. J. Lu
13:37 block reordering at GIMPLE level? Erven ROHOU
13:27 CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:50 -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo Ryan Hill
08:12 Re: Invoking static library automatically Eric Botcazou
07:46 Invoking static library automatically Rohit Arul Raj
07:24 Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a Jakub Jelinek
02:35 Help on compiling with Japanese Text Alan Ong
01:17 Re: Submitting tuning patches in stage 1 Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
00:29 Submitting tuning patches in stage 1 Jagasia, Harsha
00:15 Re: how to test multiple warnings? Janis Johnson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3