This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:16:38 -0800
Subject: Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails
References: <200611072230.kA7MUA1Y005603@localhost.localdomain> <200611072340.01844.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0611071845360.24352@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On Nov 7, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:

Perhaps we could take a second look at this decision? The average system has increased in speed many times since then. (Although sometimes I feel like bootstrapping time has increased at an even greater pace than chip improvements over the years. :-)

Odd. You must not build java. I'd rather have one person that tests it occasionally and save the CPU cycles of all the rest of the folks, more scalable.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

References:
- Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: bootstrap on powerpc fails
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]