This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GMP test

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
Cc: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:37:14 -0700
Subject: Re: GMP test
References: <453D4D16.8090801@lu.unisi.ch> <200610232324.k9NNOICX007521@earth.phy.uc.edu> <453D5F09.2090503@lu.unisi.ch> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0610242108430.18951@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <453EE8F0.6090203@lu.unisi.ch>

On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 13:32 +0900, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I'm more content with the gmp check at the top level and don't plan to
> > submit a change to that.  Although I agree if this configure is shared
> > between binutils, gdb and gcc, and you're not compiling gcc, then it
> > shouldn't require gmp.  So maybe something like your "test -d" fragment
> > would be appropriate.  Would you please submit that one line change for a
> > configury maintainer to review?
> If I have to do it, I'll prepare the patch to move the test instead.

Again this is not user friendly to move this test.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]