This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GMP test

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at earth dot geop dot uc dot edu>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:15:34 +0900
Subject: Re: GMP test
References: <453D49BD.9050801@lu.unisi.ch> <200610232308.k9NN8b8j005459@earth.phy.uc.edu>

if test -d ${srcdir}/gcc && test x$have_gmp != xyes; then
    ...
fi
but I think that the whole test now belongs in the GCC subdirectory, not in the toplevel (it was anyway a hack for the sake of disabling Fortran).
Moving it is not really a good thing anyways as you are able to configure
and then do a "make -j3" and it is hard to figure out why the build fail
because you don't have the correct version of GMP/MPRF.

Maintainability first. If something fails with parallel make, and is reproducible with plain "make" (i.e. doesn't screw up the build directory), I don't see a reason not to move it. You'd do "make" anyway to check if a dependency is missing, wouldn't you?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- GMP test
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: GMP test
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]