This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: BFD Error a regression?
- From: Tim Prince <timothyprince at sbcglobal dot net>
- To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
- Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:57:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: BFD Error a regression?
- References: <450C2EC8.4000508@verizon.net>
- Reply-to: tprince at myrealbox dot com
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
BFD: BFD 2.16.91.0.6 20060212 internal error, aborting at
../../bfd/elfcode.h line 190 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_in
BFD: Please report this bug.
make[1]: *** [complex16] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
BFD: BFD 2.16.91.0.6 20060212 internal error, aborting at
../../bfd/elfcode.h line 190 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_in
BFD: Please report this bug.
BFD is acknowledging that it may be buggy. Does this occur with current
binutils, e.g. from ftp.kernel.org? Are you able to build g++ and
libstdc++ without hitting this or similar bug? Buggy binutils is a
chronic problem with RHEL, and is generally not fixed without 6 months
effort by an OEM with more influence than my employer. If you hit it
with a small test case, surely it will be hit with real applications
sooner or later.