This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: First cut on outputing gimple for LTO using DWARF3. Discussion invited!!!!
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, mathieu lacage <Mathieu dot Lacage at sophia dot inria dot fr>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Berlin, Daniel" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Hubicha, Jan" <jh at suse dot cz>, "Novillo, Diego" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, "Edelsohn, David" <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:07:52 -0400
- Subject: Re: First cut on outputing gimple for LTO using DWARF3. Discussion invited!!!!
- References: <44F2F642.8090408@naturalbridge.com> <44F606CD.3080803@codesourcery.com> <1157019802.2574.25.camel@mathieu> <44F76A09.7050102@codesourcery.com> <20060901123140.GA6728@nevyn.them.org> <44F8397E.6000907@naturalbridge.com>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:45:34AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Given that Mark, and for that matter no one else, did not really push
> back, I am pretty much committed not to use dwarf.
Then... what are you going to do about things like types? Invent a new
serialization for those too? I think that confusing dwarf-for-types
and dwarf-for-gimple would be a mistake.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery