This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
day to day quality report for the past 12.5 months
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- To: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 09:50:09 -0700
- Subject: day to day quality report for the past 12.5 months
If one asks Geoff's regression tester what it thinks of the day to
day quality of gcc, one gets:
256 build native
65 regress-8 native
64 regress-6 native
55 regress-5 native
48 regress-9 native
42 regress-4 native
41 regress-7 native
39 regress-3 native
33 regress-11 native
30 regress-2 native
16 regress-1 native
15 regress-10 native
12 regress-12 native
7 regress-268 native
7 regress-26 native
7 regress-25 native
4 regress-30 native
4 regress-24 native
3 regress-32 native
3 regress-200 native
3 pass native
2 regress-48 native
2 regress-31 native
2 regress-28 native
1 regress-49 native
1 regress-33 native
1 regress-27 native
1 regress-14 native
1 regress-13 native
The first number being the count, the second is the status. The
curious thing we see here is that the pass rate is 3 out of 765 runs,
that''s around 0.4%. There were 34 transitions from building to not
building.
Broken down on a per day basis:
246 regress
63 build
3 pass
meaning there were 3 days where things passed at least once that day,
63 days when things failed to build at least once that day, and 246
days when things built at least once that day but had regressions.
There were roughly 383 days in the interval.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/HEAD/log.txt.gz for all the raw data.