gcc archive
date index for July, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2006
23:55 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-07-31) Mark Mitchell
22:55 Rainer Orth appointed IRIX and Tru64 UNIX maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
22:34 Re: [PATCH] improved algorithm for gcc/expmed.c::choose_multiplier() Jim Wilson
22:14 Re: reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend Jim Wilson
20:39 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Andrew Pinski
20:38 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Ian Lance Taylor
20:20 Re: New Ada testcases Janis Johnson
19:56 Re: [OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Steven Bosscher
19:28 [OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Devang Patel
19:15 Two Library files with same name raja
19:03 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Andrew Pinski
17:55 Re: GCC missed optimization? Devang Patel
17:49 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Devang Patel
17:47 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Per Bothner
16:40 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Kazu Hirata
16:39 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Kazu Hirata
16:37 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Mark Mitchell
16:13 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Tom Tromey
15:43 A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend. Kazu Hirata
15:24 Re: reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend kernel coder
14:37 Werden sie AutoTester Lacy Enriquez
14:16 reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend Joern RENNECKE
09:44 Best world production JohnWoods
08:32 reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend kernel coder

July 30, 2006
23:38 Can we limit one bug fix per checkin please? H. J. Lu
13:14 [PATCH] improved algorithm for gcc/expmed.c::choose_multiplier() Denis Vlasenko
09:40 Review Dr. Eugene Osaseen
04:33 Re: if() and trailing ; Joe Buck
02:19 Re: if() and trailing ; Simon Boulet
00:25 Re: if() and trailing ; Dale Johannesen

July 29, 2006
23:33 if() and trailing ; Simon Boulet
19:06 Re: Patch: Support IA-64 speculation [4/5] Andi Kleen
17:54 gcc-4.2-20060729 is now available gccadmin
17:45 Re: GCC missed optimization? Dorit Nuzman
17:36 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Dorit Nuzman
17:27 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Dorit Nuzman
10:16 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Martin Michlmayr
09:46 What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches? Steven Bosscher

July 28, 2006
22:43 gcc-4.1-20060728 is now available gccadmin
18:56 converting a CALL_EXPR node without any argument into SSA form, thanks sean yang
16:49 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: _LARGE_FILES support in AIX -GCC compilation problem. David Edelsohn
15:12 Re: gcc-4.3 projects page? Mark Mitchell
14:24 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Daniel Jacobowitz
14:22 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Andrew Pinski
11:47 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Richard Guenther
11:02 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Andrew Pinski
10:48 Re: GCC missed optimization? Andrew Pinski
10:47 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Andrew Pinski
10:04 Re: GCC missed optimization? Richard Guenther
10:02 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Richard Guenther
09:45 GCC missed optimization? François-Xavier Coudert
09:44 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Jan Hubicka
09:35 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Denis Vlasenko
09:32 RE: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation Rahul Phalak
07:43 _LARGE_FILES support in AIX -GCC compilation problem. Kithsiri Lekamge
04:03 Fwd: .. Crystal Engel
02:06 RE: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT Danny Smith
01:21 Re: ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library H. J. Lu

July 27, 2006
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060727 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library Geoffrey Keating
22:33 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
15:34 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation Mike Stump
15:10 Website Suggestion Joe Butch
14:32 New Ada testcases Duncan Sands
14:06 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation Ian Lance Taylor
14:02 Re: building cross-compiler to x86_64. pthread.h: No such file Daniel Jacobowitz
13:52 building cross-compiler to x86_64. pthread.h: No such file Denis Vlasenko
13:44 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Daniel Jacobowitz
10:56 sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?! Denis Vlasenko
07:31 Suggestion required for appropriate implementation Rahul Phalak
03:41 Re: gcc-4.3 projects page? Andrew Pinski
02:27 gcc-4.3 projects page? Dan Kegel
01:37 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0 Eric Christopher
01:30 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0 Andrew de Quincey
01:21 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0 Mike Stump

July 26, 2006
22:54 Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0 Andrew de Quincey
22:36 Re: New testsuite failures with -fprofile-use Andrew Pinski
22:33 Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT Mark Kettenis
22:31 New testsuite failures with -fprofile-use Volker Reichelt
21:33 Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT Mark Kettenis
19:51 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure Diego Novillo
19:48 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure Diego Novillo
19:38 Re: Patch for PR15832 and PR28071 Vladimir Makarov
18:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Robert Dewar
18:00 Patch for PR15832 and PR28071 Jan Hubicka
17:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
17:32 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
09:21 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:50 Re: How to extract internal tree structure information? Christian Wagner
07:10 Re: Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX Kithsiri Lekamge

July 25, 2006
21:55 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure Daniel Berlin
20:21 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:31 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:56 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Jeffrey Law
17:49 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Mike Stump
17:35 Re: help installing gcc 4.0.3 Mike Stump
17:30 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results David Nicol
16:43 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Rafael EspÃndola
16:11 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Ian Lance Taylor
16:05 RE: Little help in understanding expmed.c::choose_multiplier() Dave Korn
15:26 Little help in understanding expmed.c::choose_multiplier() Denis Vlasenko
13:52 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Rafael EspÃndola
13:18 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
13:07 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
12:52 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Andrew Haley
12:38 Re: How to extract internal tree structure information? Steven Bosscher
12:25 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Andreas Schwab
12:00 How to extract internal tree structure information? Christian Wagner
12:00 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Rafael EspÃndola
11:43 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Daniel Berlin
09:37 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Andrew Haley
06:51 [Fwd: C++ cross-devel from Linux : success] Danny Backx
05:01 help installing gcc 4.0.3 Gichuru Riria
01:57 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure Daniel Berlin

July 24, 2006
23:02 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 RE: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Eric Weddington
22:19 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals Fariborz Jahanian
22:10 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals Fariborz Jahanian
22:07 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals Andrew Pinski
22:03 Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals Fariborz Jahanian
20:30 why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant? Rafael EspÃndola
19:17 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++ Danny Backx
19:03 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++ Danny Backx
18:57 Documentation for loop infrastructure Zdenek Dvorak
18:34 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++ Dave Korn
18:08 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Richard Sandiford
17:30 cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++ Danny Backx
14:40 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Andreas Schwab
14:38 Re: Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX David Edelsohn
14:34 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
13:41 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
13:29 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Andrew Pinski
11:22 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
08:50 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results Andrew Pinski
08:45 [boehms-gc] Performance results Laurynas Biveinis
08:27 Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX Kithsiri Lekamge
06:26 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend. Mike Stump

July 23, 2006
23:37 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. DJ Delorie
23:30 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Gabriel Dos Reis
23:00 [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT Danny Smith
21:57 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Ian Lance Taylor
21:15 RE: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Danny Smith
20:27 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Paul Brook
19:11 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Mark Mitchell
19:03 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
18:54 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Daniel Jacobowitz
18:53 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
18:48 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Mark Mitchell
18:40 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
18:37 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Mark Mitchell
18:29 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Paul Brook
18:27 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
18:21 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Mark Mitchell
18:05 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
17:44 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Ian Lance Taylor
16:58 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Mark Mitchell
09:07 Re: send a structure containing a pointer to another structure, over socket stream Steven Bosscher
08:52 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend. Roar Thronęs
08:44 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend. Roar Thronæs
07:50 send a structure containing a pointer to another structure, over socket stream Abid Ghufran
03:58 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
01:55 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in Rafael EspÃndola

July 22, 2006
17:53 gcc-4.2-20060722 is now available gccadmin
17:08 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Daniel Jacobowitz
16:52 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
14:44 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix. Andrew Pinski
12:40 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
08:28 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend. Andrew Pinski
08:06 gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend. Roar Thronæs

July 21, 2006
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060721 is now available gccadmin
18:51 Re: c++ variable-length array? Mike Stump
17:06 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
16:52 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
16:24 Re: Fortran fail on 4.0 branch Steven Bosscher
14:53 Fortran fail on 4.0 branch Andreas Krebbel
14:20 c++ variable-length array? Neal Becker
13:27 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:40 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does Fredrik Johansson
09:47 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

July 20, 2006
22:40 gcc-4.0-20060720 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: GCC: Linking C program with callback-functions Mike Stump
21:54 GCC: Linking C program with callback-functions shadow
21:20 Successfully built and installed GCC 4.1.1 on our Solaris 2.9 machine Herve Pages
15:58 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Dave Korn
15:25 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Ian Lance Taylor
15:14 Re: 8086 backend and stack problem Ian Lance Taylor
14:38 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:28 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:09 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Richard Earnshaw
11:05 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Dave Korn
10:31 8086 backend and stack problem Erdem Guven
06:02 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües

July 19, 2006
17:35 Re: JIT exception handling Mike Stump
15:18 Re: query regarding ivopts. Ramana Radhakrishnan
15:09 Re: query regarding ivopts. Zdenek Dvorak
14:49 Re: Indexed address problem Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:50 Re: using threads with gcc on fedora (undefined reference to pthread_create) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:49 using threads with gcc on fedora (undefined reference to pthread_create) Abid Ghufran
13:12 Re: Indexed address problem Saajan Singh Chana
12:54 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:47 Re: Project RABLET Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:12 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in Arnaud Charlet
12:09 Re: Indexed address problem Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:25 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:38 query regarding ivopts. Ramana Radhakrishnan
10:28 Re: JIT exception handling jacob navia
10:11 Re: JIT exception handling Andrew Haley
10:09 JIT exception handling jacob navia
08:44 Indexed address problem saajan . chana
08:41 Message to send to gcc development list saajan . chana
07:49 Re: revamping synth_mult() Richard Guenther
05:52 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües

July 18, 2006
23:55 revamping synth_mult() sbalfour
21:45 Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1. Ian Lance Taylor
21:38 Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1. Daniel S. Wilkerson
17:06 Re: website Daniel Berlin
16:43 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does Joe Buck
16:37 Re: website Steven Bosscher
16:35 website David A. Braun
15:09 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Michael Matz
14:31 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass Zdenek Dvorak
14:16 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass Daniel Berlin
11:35 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass Diego Novillo
07:49 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does Nathan Sidwell
02:16 Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass sean yang

July 17, 2006
23:13 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Mike Stump
22:58 Re: a question about code instrumentation in RTL level Jim Wilson
22:48 Re: Question of the LOG_LINKS field Jim Wilson
22:43 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Jim Wilson
22:38 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Ian Lance Taylor
22:17 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Carlos O'Donell
20:53 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
20:23 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
20:03 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
19:31 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
18:50 Re: gcc vs gnu-classpath Tom Tromey
18:31 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
17:19 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
17:02 Re: Importing boehm-gc 6.7? David Daney
16:44 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
16:32 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Carlos O'Donell
16:28 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
16:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Michael Matz
16:01 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Richard Guenther
15:39 Re: Importing boehm-gc 6.7? Laurynas Biveinis
15:36 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
15:32 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Mark Mitchell
15:25 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Benjamin Smedberg
15:06 Importing boehm-gc 6.7? Todd Vierling
14:37 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
14:32 Re: g77 problem for octave Michael Matz
14:24 Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does Fredrik Johansson
14:16 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
12:32 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
11:46 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node Zdenek Dvorak
11:22 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Rafael EspÃndola
07:14 Re: g77 problem for octave tyapici
04:08 a question about code instrumentation in RTL level sean yang
04:00 Re: local data flow Joern Rennecke
03:45 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-07-16) Mark Mitchell
02:05 Re: [lto] factor code common to all builtin_function Mark Mitchell
01:58 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Mark Mitchell
01:06 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Ian Lance Taylor

July 16, 2006
22:08 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
20:38 Re: g77 problem for octave Steven Bosscher
20:24 Re: g77 problem for octave Tim Prince
20:18 Re: Are 8-byte ints guaranteed? Tim Prince
20:14 Re: Are 8-byte ints guaranteed? Joern RENNECKE
20:04 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
19:46 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
19:39 Are 8-byte ints guaranteed? Thomas Koenig
19:36 Re: local data flow Joern RENNECKE
19:31 Re: where is the gcc wiki? Bobby
19:29 Re: where is the gcc wiki? Daniel Berlin
19:21 Re: local data flow Kenneth Zadeck
19:18 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Joern RENNECKE
18:20 g77 problem for octave tyapici
17:58 local data flow Joern RENNECKE
17:26 ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library H. J. Lu
16:16 Re: Question of the LOG_LINKS field Ian Lance Taylor
16:02 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links] Ian Lance Taylor
15:31 Re: where is the gcc wiki? Joern RENNECKE
15:20 Re: where is the gcc wiki? Paolo Carlini
15:20 Re: where is the gcc wiki? Andrew Pinski
15:18 where is the gcc wiki? Joern RENNECKE
15:12 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
14:00 Re: -mno-80387 and MMX autovectorisation Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
07:16 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
01:23 [lto] factor code common to all builtin_function Rafael EspÃndola

July 15, 2006
23:53 Question of the LOG_LINKS field Ling-hua Tseng
22:29 LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction? Miguel Angel
22:19 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.3 is released H. J. Lu
20:48 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links] Rodney M. Bates
17:54 gcc-4.2-20060715 is now available gccadmin
16:04 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
15:54 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Andrew Pinski
15:53 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Alfred M. Szmidt
15:49 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Alfred M. Szmidt
15:35 config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices Andrew Pinski
14:54 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Eric Botcazou
13:39 Re: expand_divmod algorithm patented? Florian Weimer
10:02 Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
09:38 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Guenther
09:29 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" Falk Hueffner
09:17 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" Mike Frysinger
09:12 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" Falk Hueffner
09:00 building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" Mike Frysinger
04:24 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Kenner
04:18 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Andrew Pinski
04:15 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Kenner
04:12 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Mark Mitchell
04:04 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Kenner
04:02 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Mark Mitchell
03:58 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Kenner
03:52 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Mark Mitchell
03:51 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Mark Mitchell
03:44 Re: why are we not using const? Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:59 Re: Question about vec_extract James E Wilson

July 14, 2006
23:38 RE:gcc trunk vs python Jack Howarth
23:36 gcc trunk vs python Jack Howarth
23:31 Re: gcc inline assembly on x86 platform Mike Stump
23:23 gcc inline assembly on x86 platform bluecoder
23:04 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060714 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:59 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Joe Buck
21:42 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Mike Stump
21:37 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Mike Stump
21:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:27 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Joe Buck
21:24 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:21 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:06 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Mike Stump
21:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
20:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
20:47 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
20:41 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
20:31 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
20:20 Searching configured and relocated prefix. Carlos O'Donell
18:49 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
18:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Joe Buck
18:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
18:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
18:29 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
18:18 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
18:17 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Geoffrey Keating
17:30 Re: why are we not using const? Ian Lance Taylor
17:30 RE: why are we not using const? Dave Korn
17:22 Re: why are we not using const? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:10 Re: x86_64 ABI Michael Matz
16:42 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node Daniel Berlin
14:25 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node Roberto COSTA
14:13 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node Andrew Pinski
14:02 Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node Roberto COSTA
13:12 other major .so version bumps? Jack Howarth
02:50 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Andrew Pinski
02:42 expand_divmod algorithm patented? Joern Rennecke
00:50 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in Daniel Jacobowitz
00:47 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in Andrew Pinski
00:41 [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in Rafael EspÃndola

July 13, 2006
23:33 campionati mondiale per stragi - la classifica elcicala
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060713 is now available gccadmin
18:36 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) jacob navia
18:27 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Daniel Jacobowitz
18:21 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Seongbae Park
17:55 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Mike Stump
17:48 x86_64 ABI Maurizio Vitale
17:15 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links] Ian Lance Taylor
16:46 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Joe Buck
16:31 gcc 4.x can not optimize access for array well Atsushi Nemoto
16:19 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Diego Novillo
15:56 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Paolo Bonzini
15:52 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Andrew Haley
15:48 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) jacob navia
15:42 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++. Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov
15:23 Re: Wiki down for a few days Daniel Berlin
15:12 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:11 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Daniel Jacobowitz
15:10 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code? jacob navia
15:08 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links DebianTux23
15:06 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) jacob navia
14:58 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued) Andrew Haley
14:53 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:47 How to insert dynamic code? (continued) jacob navia
14:46 Bug in the specs or bug in the code? jacob navia
13:08 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Andrew Pinski
13:06 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Diego Novillo
12:36 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Andrew Pinski
12:32 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Diego Novillo
12:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
11:32 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++. Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov
10:24 Re: Wiki down for a few days Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
08:30 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Paolo Bonzini
08:13 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Steven Bosscher
07:52 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Richard Guenther
07:27 BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS Andrew Pinski
06:10 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
05:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
01:15 A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links] Rodney M. Bates
01:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Ian Lance Taylor
01:03 Re: Question about vec_extract Andrew Pinski
00:57 Re: Question about vec_extract Ian Lance Taylor

July 12, 2006
23:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
23:32 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
22:43 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
22:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
22:14 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Joe Buck
22:07 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:47 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
21:33 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
21:31 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:27 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
21:25 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links Rodney M. Bates
21:24 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Benjamin Smedberg
21:08 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
19:25 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
19:20 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
19:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
19:10 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
19:09 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
19:09 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Gabriel Dos Reis
19:02 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Mike Stump
19:01 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Daniel Jacobowitz
18:55 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Diego Novillo
18:51 Wiki down for a few days Daniel Berlin
18:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley
18:42 Re: Question about vec_extract Jim Wilson
18:31 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Kenner
17:35 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Richard Guenther
17:27 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 David Edelsohn
17:20 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 Benjamin Kosnik
16:37 AVR port have a problem with reload Denis Chertykov
16:06 RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag? Joern RENNECKE
13:38 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 Mike Stump
11:45 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Andrew Pinski
11:21 Re: Question about vec_extract Paolo Bonzini
08:06 Question about vec_extract Andrew Pinski
06:58 Ben Elliston appointed DFP maintainer Mark Mitchell
06:41 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Mark Mitchell
04:41 Re: Need help Ian Lance Taylor
02:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Daniel Jacobowitz
02:02 Re: Splay Tree Ian Blanes
01:54 Re: [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm Ranjit Mathew
01:52 Need help ammalik
01:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Tristan Wibberley

July 11, 2006
23:42 Re: [lto] libelf header Gabriel Dos Reis
23:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm Mike Stump
21:46 Re: gcc visibility used by moz Jason Merrill
20:30 Re: [lto] libelf header Gabriel Dos Reis
19:53 Re: [lto] libelf header Daniel Berlin
19:52 Re: [lto] libelf header Jakub Jelinek
19:43 [lto] libelf header Gabriel Dos Reis
19:29 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code? Janis Johnson
17:58 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 Benjamin Kosnik
16:19 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 RE: How to deal with 1.#IND? Dave Korn
15:35 Re: How to deal with 1.#IND? truelies
14:18 [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm Laurynas Biveinis
14:06 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links Rodney M. Bates
13:46 Re: Someone broke darwin? Eric Botcazou
13:27 Re: Someone broke darwin? David Edelsohn
11:56 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 Andrew Pinski
11:52 New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4 Gerald Pfeifer
11:23 Re: Questions regarding __register_frame_info Andrew Haley
10:03 Re: Switch statement optimization Christian Hildner
08:47 Re: Someone broke darwin? Andreas Schwab
07:27 Re: gcc breakage Laurynas Biveinis
05:31 Re: [PATCH] Wcoercion: removed overflow check Eric Botcazou
02:40 Re: Someone broke darwin? Mike Stump
01:58 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc) David Brownell
01:54 Re: /bin/sh: build/genmodes: No such file or directory (was Re: gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available) henrik . sorensen
01:20 Someone broke darwin? Mike Stump
00:48 Re: make proto fails Jim Wilson

July 10, 2006
23:23 [PATCH] Wcoercion: removed overflow check Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
22:52 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory Benjamin Kosnik
22:32 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory Steve Ellcey
22:20 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory Daniel Jacobowitz
22:14 Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory Steve Ellcey
21:33 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc) Andrew Pinski
21:29 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc) Jim Wilson
21:09 Re: gcc breakage Mike Stump
20:40 /bin/sh: build/genmodes: No such file or directory (was Re: gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available) henrik . sorensen
20:38 Re: gcc breakage Daniel Jacobowitz
20:36 Re: gcc breakage Steve Kargl
20:25 Re: gcc breakage Laurynas Biveinis
19:56 Re: Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...) Laurynas Biveinis
19:52 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++. Mike Stump
19:49 ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc) David Brownell
19:41 Re: Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...) Laurynas Biveinis
19:38 Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...) Jan-Benedict Glaw
19:10 Re: Questions regarding __register_frame_info Mike Stump
16:40 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++. Ian Lance Taylor
16:22 Re: externs and thread local storage Richard Henderson
14:48 Re: Switch statement optimization Joern RENNECKE
13:57 Questions regarding __register_frame_info jacob navia
11:06 Re: Switch statement optimization Ben Elliston
09:39 Switch statement optimization Christian Hildner
05:52 request for new a syntactic design for C/C++. Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov

July 09, 2006
19:06 Re: problem in gcc port based on MIPS Ian Lance Taylor
18:43 [PATCH] (request for comments) Wcoercion in g++ Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
17:41 Re: externs and thread local storage Florian Weimer
15:33 Re: Splay Tree Roger Sayle
15:10 problem in gcc port based on MIPS kernel coder
10:35 gcc vs gnu-classpath Kevin F. Quinn
00:27 Splay Tree Ian Blanes

July 08, 2006
17:57 gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available gccadmin
02:56 Re: externs and thread local storage Robert Dewar
02:44 Re: In which library is __register_frame_info defined?? Mike Stump
00:59 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Mark Mitchell
00:58 Re: [PATCH] config/arm/arm.c: Use GOT instead of GOTOFF when XIP Shaun Jackman
00:41 Re: request of copyright assignment form Mike Stump
00:33 Re: request of copyright assignment form Gerald Pfeifer
00:32 Re: request of copyright assignment form Richard Kenner

July 07, 2006
23:22 Re: externs and thread local storage Richard Henderson
22:49 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code? Jim Wilson
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060707 is now available gccadmin
22:18 Re: request of copyright assignment form James E Wilson
21:39 Re: request of copyright assignment form Mike Stump
20:38 Re: request of copyright assignment form Gerald Pfeifer
19:54 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code? Mike Stump
19:40 Re: request of copyright assignment form Mike Stump
17:14 Re: replace_rtx Ian Lance Taylor
17:11 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links Ian Lance Taylor
16:34 Re: Addressing modes question Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:59 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
14:48 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
14:39 Re: In which library is __register_frame_info defined?? Andrew Haley
14:14 In which library is __register_frame_info defined?? jacob navia
12:32 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
09:34 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
09:10 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
04:08 replace_rtx Rajkishore Barik
03:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Mark Mitchell
02:10 Different invariants about the contents of static links Rodney M. Bates

July 06, 2006
23:25 Re: coercion warnings for NULL in C front end Gabriel Dos Reis
22:49 Re: Addressing modes question Jeffrey Law
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060706 is now available gccadmin
22:09 Re: Addressing modes question Ian Lance Taylor
21:54 coercion warnings for NULL in C front end Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:23 Addressing modes question Matt Lee
20:49 GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code? FX Coudert
20:48 Re: request of copyright assignment form Jim Wilson
20:42 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release) Jim Wilson
17:24 Re: RFA: new execute testcase (Was: Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check') Joern RENNECKE
16:40 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Paolo Bonzini
10:58 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
10:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
05:40 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Mark Mitchell

July 05, 2006
22:47 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
22:44 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
21:55 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
21:28 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
20:59 RFA: new execute testcase (Was: Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check') Joern RENNECKE
20:46 Notes from the BOF on DFP on x86/x86-64 at the GCC Summit Evandro Menezes
20:21 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Re: Ulrich Weigand appointed reload maintainer Ulrich Weigand
19:00 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Mike Stump
18:40 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? Rene Rebe
18:37 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-16) Jason Merrill
18:26 RE: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? Dave Korn
18:11 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? Rene Rebe
17:57 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? Mike Stump
17:54 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Andrew Haley
17:49 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release) Mike Stump
17:48 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
17:06 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
16:49 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
16:33 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
16:23 RE: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Dave Korn
16:23 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
16:19 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Daniel Jacobowitz
16:11 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Pinski
16:00 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
15:58 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Mark Mitchell
15:55 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Kazu Hirata
15:54 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Daniel Jacobowitz
15:53 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Mark Mitchell
15:50 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Daniel Berlin
15:43 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Ian Lance Taylor
15:39 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
15:29 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
15:13 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES Kazu Hirata
14:51 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? Ian Lance Taylor
14:50 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Eric Botcazou
14:46 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
14:36 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
14:12 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
13:30 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
12:20 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
11:20 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
11:05 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
09:58 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Gabriel Dos Reis
09:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Pinski
09:40 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
09:36 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
09:27 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release) J.J.Garcia
04:10 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
03:46 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Andrew Pinski
03:30 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
02:43 Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work? zhou13
00:18 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Pinski
00:07 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky

July 04, 2006
21:47 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
20:34 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release) Mike Stump
20:27 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
19:06 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
18:47 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
18:13 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
17:58 dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release) J.J.Garcia
17:51 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Andrew Haley
17:38 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check' Eric Botcazou
17:15 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Ian Lance Taylor
16:23 bootstrap failed during 'make check' Joern RENNECKE
13:05 gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type" Yuri Pudgorodsky
09:43 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Erven ROHOU
07:59 request of copyright assignment form Daniel Franke
00:04 Re: externs and thread local storage Seongbae Park

July 03, 2006
22:28 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
20:57 Re: externs and thread local storage Seongbae Park
15:30 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
12:49 Re: SP must be 8 byte aligned on entry to AAPCS-conforming functions Richard Earnshaw
09:51 problem with your change in configure/configure.in with Ada Arnaud Charlet
09:03 Re: Bootstrap broken Paolo Bonzini
08:27 Bootstrap broken Martin Reinecke
01:10 SP must be 8 byte aligned on entry to AAPCS-conforming functions Bridge Wu
00:19 Re: externs and thread local storage Seongbae Park

July 02, 2006
22:56 Ulrich Weigand appointed reload maintainer David Edelsohn
21:55 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
21:13 Re: externs and thread local storage Andrew Pinski
20:58 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
19:48 Re: externs and thread local storage Seongbae Park
19:44 Re: externs and thread local storage Andrew Pinski
19:23 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
15:59 Re: externs and thread local storage Andrew Pinski
15:20 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? Gerald Pfeifer
12:00 RE: externs and thread local storage Dave Korn
07:22 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? Paolo Bonzini
07:14 Re: externs and thread local storage Seongbae Park

July 01, 2006
21:09 RE: externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
20:53 Re: externs and thread local storage Mike Stump
20:47 Re: explaination of some gcc functions Mike Stump
18:52 Re: void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch? Andrew Haley
18:23 externs and thread local storage Gary Funck
17:59 Re: void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch? Steven Bosscher
17:54 gcc-4.2-20060701 is now available gccadmin
17:43 void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch? Elmar Krieger
15:56 Re: Notes of the libgcc-math BOF at the summit. Christopher Faylor
13:42 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Gerald Pfeifer
07:54 Re: explaination of some gcc functions kernel coder
07:14 Re: explaination of some gcc functions Eric Christopher
06:32 explaination of some gcc functions kernel coder


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3