This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Vector types and type conversions


Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> I agree with everything you have said.  I suppose I'm a bit unclear
> about this:
> 
>    already defined.  __value_cast<T> would just be an alias for
>    static_cast<T> for non-vector types, but for vector types it would do a
>    value-preserving conversion, even if C-style and static casts are
>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
>    bit-preserving, for backwards compatibility.
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> in particular the last sentence.

The point is that the existing Altivec and SPE cast syntax requires that
  a C-style cast from one vector type to another be bit-preserving.  So,
we can't change that (or static_casts, which are the kind of C++ cast
that are using to implement this kind of C-style cast) without breaking
backwards compatibility.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]