This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*


On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 20:47 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > Actually, looking more closely, the libiberty.a is the only one installed
> > > that way (from the gcc sources).  All others (for example libstdc++.a) seem
> > > to follow standard convention (32 bit in lib, 64 bit in lib/sparcv9).
> > > Hmmm... bug in gcc-4.0.2/libiberty/Makefile.in?
> > 
> > Bingo. :-)  http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16513
> 
> I wonder how many more examples like that we need before we impose
> testing after install and not in tree...
> 
> Only consequence for the few who configure with --prefix=/usr from their
> tree will be to change to --prefix=/some/user/dir so install doesn't
> break the system if the tested compiler is not up to the task.

We can do this without touching --prefix, in fact, via DESTDIR and
relocatable installs.  It's just a bit disruptive to the workflow, so I
wanted to wait until toplevel bootstrap was settled first.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]