This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:13:21 -0800
- Subject: Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
- References: <17318.64145.41810.488474@zapata.pink> <m38xuglvrk.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <17319.3754.844531.876599@zapata.pink> <m34q54lot9.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20051220073124.GA3576@redhat.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0601022227260.18683@dair.pair.com> <m33bk654uq.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:10:21PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> And flow2 calls split_all_insns before the
> prologue and epilogue insns are threaded. When did the bogus split
> happen?
There are at least 3 post-reload split points.
r~