gcc archive
date index for January, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2006
22:50 reload madness, question DJ Delorie
22:43 gcc-3.4-20060131 is now available gccadmin
21:23 Generalize ready list sorting via heuristics in rank_for_schedule. Peter Steinmetz
20:54 Successful Build Dinosaur
17:25 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Kevin Handy
17:21 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
14:27 Re: RFD: marking a variable as addressable - need new hook? (pr26004) Joern RENNECKE
10:48 Re: RFD: marking a variable as addressable - need new hook? (pr26004) Jim Blandy
10:01 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Andrew Haley
06:36 Re: Microchip PIC François Poulain
00:02 Re: Microchip PIC DJ Delorie

January 30, 2006
23:55 Re: Microchip PIC Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
21:53 Microchip PIC François Poulain
20:54 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Richard Henderson
19:50 Re: Enabling tree->rtl to generate (plus for asm() operands at O0 Andrew Pinski
19:41 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
19:41 Enabling tree->rtl to generate (plus for asm() operands at O0 Mike Stump
19:38 RFD: marking a variable as addressable - need new hook? (pr26004) Joern RENNECKE
18:42 Re: Changing the number of registers Mike Stump
18:34 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
18:26 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Richard Henderson
18:14 [gnu.org #272999] Gcc installation help Stephen Huenneke via RT
18:14 Re: libmudflap on Solaris? Aleksandar Milivojevic
17:55 Re: libmudflap on Solaris? Rainer Orth
17:50 Changing the number of registers murali
16:57 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Andrew Haley
16:12 XML tree dumps Dietmar Ebner
14:49 libmudflap on Solaris? Aleksandar Milivojevic
14:39 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Joern RENNECKE
14:30 Toplevel bootstrap only - where are we? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:11 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Thorsten Glaser
06:35 Re: Successful built of 3.4.5, failing gctest from testsuite David Fang
05:09 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Ian Lance Taylor
00:23 Re: Successful built of 3.4.5, failing gctest from testsuite Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
00:16 Re: Successful built of 3.4.5, failing gctest from testsuite David Fang

January 29, 2006
20:29 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Bernd Schmidt
19:41 Re: Reconsidering gcjx David Daney
19:12 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
19:05 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Bernd Schmidt
19:05 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Per Bothner
18:54 Large diff email silliness fixed Daniel Berlin
18:29 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
16:55 Re: Registers that must be preserved inside a function Mike Stump
04:14 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Mike Emmel
02:06 Re: reg-stack.c potpourri Ian Lance Taylor
01:00 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Adam Megacz

January 28, 2006
20:57 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Anthony Green
20:11 debug_hooks->end_prologue problem Douglas B Rupp
18:22 Registers that must be preserved inside a function Carlos Barros
17:51 gcc-4.2-20060128 is now available gccadmin
02:42 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Gabriel Dos Reis
01:59 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:23 reg-stack.c potpourri Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
01:01 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Daniel Berlin
01:00 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
00:57 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
00:41 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Per Bothner
00:23 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Gabriel Dos Reis
00:13 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Kaveh R. Ghazi

January 27, 2006
23:44 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Mark Mitchell
23:26 RE: Reconsidering gcjx Richard Kenner
23:22 RE: Reconsidering gcjx Boehm, Hans
23:20 Re: Mainline is broken on ia64 Daniel Berlin
23:19 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
22:59 NewYork Times job offer Monster
22:56 Mainline is broken on ia64 H. J. Lu
22:53 NewYork Times job offer CareerBuilder
22:44 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Laurent GUERBY
22:44 gcc-4.1-20060127 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Yoav Etsion
22:17 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Daniel Jacobowitz
22:09 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Laurent GUERBY
21:23 Re: Generic vector extensions (execute/simd-2.c)? Richard Henderson
20:42 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
19:55 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Frank Ch. Eigler
19:22 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Daniel Jacobowitz
19:03 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
18:55 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
18:49 Re: Corrupted Profile Information Dale Johannesen
18:38 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
18:36 Re: sh64-elf fails to build with gcc 4.1 Mark Mitchell
18:29 sh64-elf fails to build with gcc 4.1 Joern RENNECKE
17:36 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Yoav Etsion
17:19 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
17:08 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
16:57 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Joe Buck
16:41 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Gabriel Dos Reis
16:27 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Frank Ch. Eigler
16:24 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Frank Ch. Eigler
14:25 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:17 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Yoav Etsion
14:00 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Chris Gray
13:29 Re: Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Diego Novillo
12:38 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Per Bothner
11:17 Generic vector extensions (execute/simd-2.c)? Bernd Schmidt
10:38 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Andrew Haley
10:21 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Thomas Hallgren
10:17 Making a variable addressable in GIMPLE Yoav Etsion
07:15 Re: issue with references to weak symbols in PIEs H. J. Lu
06:05 Re: Future possible stack based optimization Frediano Ziglio
04:40 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
01:44 Re: Reconsidering gcjx Per Bothner
00:12 Reconsidering gcjx Tom Tromey
00:05 Corrupted Profile Information djp

January 26, 2006
23:47 Re: Declaration of a guard function for use on define_bypass Andreas Tobler
23:44 Declaration of a guard function for use on define_bypass Peter Steinmetz
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060126 is now available gccadmin
21:41 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
20:43 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk tbp
20:00 Re: RTL alias analysis Gabriel Dos Reis
19:46 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Vincent Lefevre
19:45 Re: RTL alias analysis Alexandre Oliva
19:06 Re: Attribute data structure rewrite? Geoffrey Keating
16:24 Re: RTL alias analysis Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Daniel Berlin
14:40 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Joern RENNECKE
14:11 Re: Attribute data structure rewrite? Joseph S. Myers
14:05 Re: RTL alias analysis Michael Veksler
13:30 Re: RTL alias analysis Alexandre Oliva
10:28 Re: Which program can I use to see VCG dumping from GCC Jie Zhang
10:20 Re: How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Bernd Schmidt
10:14 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Guenther
09:54 Which program can I use to see VCG dumping from GCC Jie Zhang
09:11 Re: Porting problem from GCC-4.0 to GCC 4.1 Richard Sandiford
08:42 Mainline not slushy Mark Mitchell
07:52 Re: Attribute data structure rewrite? Giovanni Bajo
04:28 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
02:49 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:41 Re: issue with references to weak symbols in PIEs Andrew Pinski
01:47 issue with references to weak symbols in PIEs Mike Frysinger
00:42 Re: Attribute data structure rewrite? Geoffrey Keating
00:25 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Zack Weinberg
00:13 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
00:09 Attribute data structure rewrite? Giovanni Bajo

January 25, 2006
22:43 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
22:40 Re: Results for 4.1.0 20060117 (prerelease) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 (-m64 results) Shantonu Sen
22:39 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
22:31 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
22:28 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Zack Weinberg
22:24 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
22:12 Re: Results for 4.1.0 20060117 (prerelease) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 (-m64 results) Bradley Lucier
22:10 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
22:06 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
21:57 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Zack Weinberg
21:29 Re: Future possible stack based optimization Marcel Cox
21:01 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
20:08 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
20:04 Future possible stack based optimization Frediano Ziglio
19:50 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
19:46 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk Diego Novillo
19:23 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
19:09 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
18:44 Re: Patch: Boehm GC 6.6 merge Bryce McKinlay
18:21 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Zack Weinberg
18:17 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Steve Ellcey
18:09 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Richard Henderson
17:55 Re: Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Robert Dewar
17:36 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on John David Anglin
17:29 Re: Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Igor Bukanov
17:22 Program konferencji dla gcc@gnu.org Program konferencji
17:21 Program konferencji dla gcc@gcc.gnu.org Program konferencji
17:06 Re: Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Robert Dewar
17:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:01 Re: RTL alias analysis Alexandre Oliva
16:30 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Eric Botcazou
16:29 Re: Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Igor Bukanov
16:25 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Rainer Emrich
15:36 Re: Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Paul Brook
15:32 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Zack Weinberg
15:24 Re: cp/default_conversion Andrew Pinski
15:17 Re: cp/default_conversion Volker Reichelt
15:17 Re: cp/do_poplevel Volker Reichelt
14:09 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Daniel Jacobowitz
14:06 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Diego Novillo
13:52 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Paolo Bonzini
13:47 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Diego Novillo
13:46 Porting problem from GCC-4.0 to GCC 4.1 Shrirang Khishti
13:39 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Paolo Bonzini
13:31 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Diego Novillo
13:23 Re: <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Paolo Bonzini
13:18 <bld>/gcc/testsuite disappears when recompiling Diego Novillo
11:16 Re: Patch: Boehm GC 6.6 merge Andrew Haley
11:09 Re: cp/default_conversion Marcin Dalecki
10:37 cp/do_poplevel Marcin Dalecki
10:20 Option to print word size, alignment on the target platform Igor Bukanov
07:07 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
06:52 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
06:39 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
06:03 Re: Patch: Boehm GC 6.6 merge Ranjit Mathew
05:53 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
05:44 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
05:15 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk tbp
04:55 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:59 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Zack Weinberg
03:45 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Andrew Pinski
03:41 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:31 Re: Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Andrew Pinski
03:29 Bootstrap failure on sparc*-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:49 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Zack Weinberg
01:28 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk Diego Novillo
01:24 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk tbp
00:42 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk Diego Novillo
00:40 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk tbp
00:15 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception Paolo Carlini
00:09 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception Geoffrey Keating

January 24, 2006
23:54 Updated LLVM+GCC Patch Chris Lattner
23:17 Re: bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
23:12 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
23:01 Re: x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk Richard Henderson
22:57 Re: insv vs one-bit fields Richard Henderson
22:49 Re: [patch] Merge cfo-branch, RTL sequence abstraction (part 1) Joern RENNECKE
22:39 gcc-3.4-20060124 is now available gccadmin
20:49 bootstrap broken on solaris8 Andreas Tobler
20:38 Re: sh-rtems still broken on head Joel Sherrill
18:44 Re: sh-rtems still broken on head Andrew Pinski
18:43 sh-rtems still broken on head Joel Sherrill
17:57 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
16:42 x86-64 linux, gomp ICE in trunk tbp
16:01 Re: insv vs one-bit fields Richard Henderson
15:51 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on John David Anglin
15:45 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Rainer Emrich
15:32 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on John David Anglin
15:04 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Rainer Emrich
14:58 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on John David Anglin
14:17 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Ian Lance Taylor
14:01 Re: [RFC/RFT] PR/25890 and PR/25905 Roger Sayle
12:42 Re: Regarding gcc Makefile.in Saurabh Verma
12:32 Re: Unable to access archives on gcc-patches Ranjit Mathew
12:31 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
12:09 Unable to access archives on gcc-patches pranav bhandarkar
10:56 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Rainer Emrich
10:22 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Paolo Bonzini
10:12 Regarding gcc Makefile.in Ashit Kumar
09:40 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
09:30 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Arnaud Charlet
09:11 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on Rainer Emrich
08:56 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Nathan Sidwell
06:06 Next Level Optimization. Peter Dolding
05:53 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
04:46 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
03:29 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
02:07 Re: Results for 4.1.0 20060117 (prerelease) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 (-m64 results) Shantonu Sen
01:42 Re: cannot find -lm Andrew Pinski
01:41 cannot find -lm Eric Fisher
01:39 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
01:38 Re: cannot find -lm Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:33 Re: cannot find -lm Eric Christopher
01:26 cannot find -lm Eric Fisher

January 23, 2006
23:46 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Richard Henderson
23:42 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on John David Anglin
23:20 Re: bootstrap failure for Ada gcc 4.1 Revision 110108 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Laurent GUERBY
22:15 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
22:06 Re: mudflap extention request Frank Ch. Eigler
21:58 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Geoffrey Keating
21:51 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
21:40 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Marcin Dalecki
21:31 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Andrew Pinski
20:59 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Geoffrey Keating
20:54 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Andrew Pinski
20:39 mudflap extention request Herman ten Brugge
20:37 Re: [RFC/RFT] PR/25890 and PR/25905 Jan-Benedict Glaw
20:36 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
20:30 Re: sh-rtems (elf) does not build on head Andrew Pinski
20:29 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Andrew Pinski
20:27 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
20:27 Re: sh-rtems (elf) does not build on head Joel Sherrill
20:26 m68k-rtems (elf) does not build on head Joel Sherrill
20:25 sh-rtems (elf) does not build on head Joel Sherrill
20:23 Questions about --enable-__cxa_atexit Laurent GUERBY
20:17 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Andrew Pinski
20:10 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
20:04 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Andrew Pinski
19:56 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
19:47 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
19:40 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Joe Buck
19:26 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Mike Stump
19:20 Re: bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Zack Weinberg
19:16 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
19:16 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
19:13 bootstrap broken on ppc-linux Richard Henderson
18:19 [RFC/RFT] PR/25890 and PR/25905 Paolo Bonzini
17:09 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Joe Buck
16:50 Re: RTL alias analysis Bernhard R. Link
15:42 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Andrew Pinski
15:31 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
15:29 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Arnaud Charlet
15:19 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
15:05 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
14:58 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
14:23 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
14:11 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Arnaud Charlet
14:11 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Daniel Jacobowitz
14:08 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
13:49 bootstrap failure for ADA gcc4.1 Revision 110108 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Rainer Emrich
12:27 Re: [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Richard Guenther
12:25 Re: Build on mainline broken Paolo Bonzini
11:58 [CFARM] Automatic bootstrap & check of each svn commit on the GCC Compile Farm Laurent GUERBY
10:43 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
09:06 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Arnaud Charlet
07:45 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
05:49 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Mark Mitchell
05:33 gcc-4.1_beta20060120 ICE in xorg-server's mesa Christian Trefzer
02:19 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Gabriel Dos Reis
02:09 Re: Build on mainline broken Andrew Pinski
02:08 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Andrew Pinski
00:25 Re: Help - Crash gcc 3.4.2 64 bits Shared Library Ben Elliston
00:20 Re: Build on mainline broken Jan-Benedict Glaw

January 22, 2006
20:54 Re: Build on mainline broken Jan-Benedict Glaw
20:49 Re: Build on mainline broken Zdenek Dvorak
20:43 Build on mainline broken Jan-Benedict Glaw
19:29 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
19:29 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Kenneth Zadeck
18:46 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Kenneth Zadeck
18:10 Re: branch_target_register_class - receipt for a crash Marcin Dalecki
17:50 Re: RTL alias analysis Ian Lance Taylor
17:14 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Graham Stott
17:12 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Sandiford
16:08 Re: branch_target_register_class - receipt for a crash Daniel Jacobowitz
16:01 branch_target_register_class - receipt for a crash Marcin Dalecki
15:42 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
15:07 Re: RTL alias analysis Joseph S. Myers
14:58 Re: RTL alias analysis Joseph S. Myers
14:31 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Marcin Dalecki
13:27 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:56 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Guenther
12:43 Re: RTL alias analysis Alexandre Oliva
12:01 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Richard Guenther
11:07 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:31 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Giovanni Bajo
10:14 Re: RTL alias analysis Kai Henningsen
10:10 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Sandiford
10:06 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Gabriel Paubert
08:01 Re: Results for 4.1.0 20060117 (prerelease) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 (-m64 results) Eric Christopher
05:53 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
04:10 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Richard Kenner
03:35 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Andrew Pinski
03:29 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Marcin Dalecki
03:17 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Andrew Pinski
03:07 Re: floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Marcin Dalecki
03:03 Re: Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Mark Mitchell
03:01 floot_log2() - two functions with the same name in GCC. Marcin Dalecki
01:36 Re: RTL alias analysis Ian Lance Taylor
01:34 Re: RTL alias analysis Ian Lance Taylor

January 21, 2006
23:13 RE: RTL alias analysis Dave Korn
23:04 RE: error found in get_ivts_expr() function. Dave Korn
22:59 RE: insv vs one-bit fields Dave Korn
21:45 Re: Cross-compiler error Eric Christopher
21:43 Re: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Gabriel Dos Reis
20:55 Re: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Andrew Pinski
20:47 Re: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
20:27 Re: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17 Re: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Andrew Pinski
20:10 warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
19:22 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Ian Lance Taylor
18:59 Re: RTL alias analysis Kai Henningsen
18:30 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andrew Pinski
18:14 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) John David Anglin
18:10 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
17:54 gcc-4.2-20060121 is now available gccadmin
17:51 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
17:42 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andrew Pinski
17:38 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
17:01 Cross-compiler error Travis Athougies
15:59 Re: RTL alias analysis Daniel Berlin
14:33 Re: RTL alias analysis Jan Hubicka
13:41 Re: may have found a wrong warning? Joseph S. Myers
13:35 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Stephane Carrez
12:20 ssp check Peter S. Mazinger
11:54 may have found a wrong warning? Georg Steffers
08:38 Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
04:57 Re: RTL alias analysis Ian Lance Taylor
04:20 Re: help with the conception of floating point Ian Lance Taylor
04:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Ian Lance Taylor
02:44 Re: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Mark Mitchell
02:10 Re: GCC Error Codes Philipp Thomas
02:07 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
01:45 Re: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Joe Buck
01:12 Request for 48 hours of just regression/bug fixes Andrew Pinski
00:45 error found in get_ivts_expr() function. Uttam Pawar

January 20, 2006
22:44 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
22:40 gcc-4.1-20060120 is now available gccadmin
22:11 Re: insv vs one-bit fields Richard Henderson
22:07 Re: libgomp & solaris Eric Botcazou
22:02 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
22:00 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Henderson
21:56 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
21:55 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS Richard Henderson
21:53 Re: libgomp & solaris Andreas Tobler
21:50 Re: insv vs one-bit fields Richard Henderson
21:46 Re: libgomp & solaris Richard Henderson
21:44 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
21:39 Re: insv vs one-bit fields Richard Henderson
21:27 Re: libgomp & solaris Andreas Tobler
21:26 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
21:24 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Guenther
21:18 Re: libgomp & solaris Andreas Tobler
21:05 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Henderson
20:49 Re: Contributing to GCC (for avr target). Denis Chertykov
18:27 Re: RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
17:51 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
17:38 Re: RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
17:38 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
17:37 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Guenther
17:33 Re: RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
17:21 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
17:04 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
17:04 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Roger Sayle
17:03 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Eric Botcazou
17:00 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
16:48 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:45 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
16:31 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Eric Botcazou
16:23 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:19 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
16:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
15:35 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Roger Sayle
15:33 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS Jakub Jelinek
15:29 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Daniel Berlin
15:22 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Arnaud Charlet
15:17 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
15:17 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
15:10 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS David Edelsohn
15:06 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Zdenek Dvorak
15:01 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Daniel Berlin
14:50 Help - Crash gcc 3.4.2 64 bits Shared Library Frederico Faria
14:33 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Olivier Hainque
14:10 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
13:04 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
11:45 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Andreas Krebbel
11:36 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Andreas Jaeger
11:34 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Andreas Jaeger
09:49 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Guenther
09:17 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Kenneth Zadeck
08:43 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS Jakub Jelinek
07:46 Re: libgomp & solaris Uros Bizjak
06:18 help with the conception of floating point Eric Fisher
05:42 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Daniel Berlin
05:24 Mainline bootstrap failure (revision 110017) Ranjit Mathew
04:55 Re: What does this character mean in gcc's md file? Ian Lance Taylor
02:57 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
02:44 Re: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Mark Mitchell
01:49 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS David Edelsohn
01:25 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
01:11 Re: matrix linking Robert Dewar
00:12 Re: libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS Jakub Jelinek

January 19, 2006
23:47 Re: RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
23:35 libgomp and OMP_NUM_THREADS Walter Szeliga
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060119 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: libgomp & solaris Richard Henderson
21:45 libgomp & solaris Andreas Tobler
20:19 Re: matrix linking Mike Stump
19:17 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Geoff Keating
17:56 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Ioannis E. Venetis
17:37 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Olivier Hainque
17:08 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Peter O'Gorman
16:29 RE: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Dave Korn
16:18 Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:05 RE: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Dave Korn
15:40 Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:21 Re: Parallel build failure in c-pragma.o missing gt-c-pragma.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:09 Draft: 12 Jan 06 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Mark K. Smith
12:15 Thread support in GCC Leif Ekblad
11:23 Re: What does this character mean in DLX's md file? Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:45 Re: What does this character mean in DLX's md file? Paolo Bonzini
10:06 What does this character mean in DLX's md file? ZengNan
09:59 What does this character mean in gcc's md file? ZengNan
06:33 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
06:22 Re: matrix linking george
04:53 Re: help with the conception of floating point Ben Elliston
04:14 Successful build of gcc 3.4.4 [alphaev56-dec-osf5.1] Arthur Barrett
03:54 Re: Excluding C++ Library Code 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
03:34 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception Mike Stump
03:26 Re: Excluding C++ Library Code Mike Stump
03:15 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Mike Stump
02:49 help with the conception of floating point Eric Fisher

January 18, 2006
21:14 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
20:29 RE: Excluding C++ Library Code Eric Lemings
20:26 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception Perry Smith
19:13 Re: Debug infos Jim Blandy
18:47 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
18:07 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception Andrew Pinski
18:02 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Andrew Pinski
17:54 Re: Calls to malloc during an exception H. J. Lu
17:41 Calls to malloc during an exception Perry Smith
17:32 Re: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Joe Buck
17:29 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Chris Douty
17:21 Results for 4.1.0 20060117 (prerelease) testsuite on powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 (-m64 results) Bradley Lucier
17:13 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Joe Buck
17:06 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Alexandre Oliva
16:46 [patch, RFC] add attribute externally_visible to ansidecl.h Bernhard Fischer
16:26 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit David Edelsohn
14:51 Debug infos Hardy Smith
14:49 Re: The testsuite is way broken right now H. J. Lu
14:42 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Andrew Pinski
13:30 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
13:26 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
13:12 Re: -msep-data without -fPIC ? Gunther Nikl
13:04 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
13:01 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Gabriel Dos Reis
12:54 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
12:44 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
12:41 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
12:37 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Ioannis E. Venetis
11:13 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Eric Botcazou
10:19 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
09:11 Re: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Mike Stump
08:50 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Olivier Hainque
08:17 Re: The testsuite is way broken right now Andreas Jaeger
07:45 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
04:46 Re: Command line options and pragmas Mike Stump
04:38 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Perry Smith
04:31 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Mike Stump
03:59 Re: matrix linking Mike Stump
03:07 Re: Microchip Pic-18F port on GNU/Gcc DJ Delorie
03:03 Re: Static coverage analysis with 'gcov'. Mike Stump
02:59 Re: Microchip Pic-18F port on GNU/Gcc Mike Stump
02:00 Re: The testsuite is way broken right now Andrew Pinski
01:46 The testsuite is way broken right now Andrew Pinski
01:24 Re: [HELP] GCC 4.1 branch Ada status on powerpc-darwin? Chris Douty
01:16 RE: Forward declaration issue on gcc 3.4.3(New) Jian-ping . Hui
00:28 Re: Libmudflap and MIPS, does it work? David Daney
00:17 Re: [PATCH] Re: conversion warnings in c++ Eric Christopher

January 17, 2006
23:31 Re: Libmudflap and MIPS, does it work? Andrew Pinski
23:12 Re: -msep-data without -fPIC ? Philippe De Muyter
22:57 Re: Libmudflap and MIPS, does it work? Frank Ch. Eigler
22:56 Re: PATCH[m68k] : ColdFire : Allow addq/subq to memory Andreas Schwab
22:47 Re: Libmudflap and MIPS, does it work? Eric Christopher
22:39 gcc-3.4-20060117 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Successful build and install of gcc-3.4.5 stephengw
22:24 Successful build and install of gcc 3.4.5 stephengw
21:54 Libmudflap and MIPS, does it work? David Daney
21:38 Re: PATCH[m68k] : ColdFire : Allow addq/subq to memory Philippe De Muyter
21:22 Re: PATCH[m68k] : ColdFire : Allow addq/subq to memory Andreas Schwab
21:19 -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1 Daniel Jacobowitz
19:09 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Bernd Trog
18:36 Importing GNU Classpath 0.20 Mark Wielaard
18:28 Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Steve Ellcey
18:21 Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15) John David Anglin
17:05 Note about 1.3 server large commit issue Daniel Berlin
17:04 Re: How to submit suggestions? David Edelsohn
16:50 How to submit suggestions? Perry Smith
15:58 successfully built and installed GCC Joseph Huang
13:43 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Zdenek Dvorak
12:53 Re: -msep-data without -fPIC ? Gunther Nikl
12:36 Re: -msep-data without -fPIC ? Philippe De Muyter
11:11 Re: -msep-data without -fPIC ? Gunther Nikl
11:04 RE: Forward declaration issue on gcc 3.4.3(New) Dave Korn
10:01 Forward declaration issue on gcc 3.4.3(New) Jian-ping . Hui
09:55 Problem with Trampolines initialization Sandeep Kumar
09:33 Forward declaration issue on gcc 3.4.3 dahui dahui
08:52 Re: Location for gcc402.zip Ben Elliston
08:36 Location for gcc402.zip Anandan, Amrith (STSD)
07:40 Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15) Eric Botcazou
07:27 Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15) Eric Botcazou
04:53 Re: coding system in ChangeLog text Peter O'Gorman
04:51 Parallel build failure in c-pragma.o missing gt-c-pragma.h Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:48 Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15) Laurent GUERBY
04:39 coding system in ChangeLog text DJ Delorie
04:12 Re: [reload] paradoxical mems DJ Delorie
04:06 Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:31 Re: GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Joe Buck
00:22 GCC can't stop using GNU libiconv if it's in /usr/local Kaveh R. Ghazi

January 16, 2006
22:46 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Dominique Dhumieres
22:15 Re: HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:14 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
22:02 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Dominique Dhumieres
21:32 Re: Building a native compiler from a cross compiler Paul Brook
20:55 Re: Building a native compiler from a cross compiler Paul Brook
20:42 Re: HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:35 Building a native compiler from a cross compiler Leif Ekblad
20:07 Re: PATCH: Mainline failed to bootstrap Eric Botcazou
20:05 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) DJ Delorie
20:04 Re: PATCH: Mainline failed to bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
20:03 Re: PATCH: Mainline failed to bootstrap Andrew Pinski
20:02 Re: Mainline failed to bootstrap Eric Botcazou
20:00 PATCH: Mainline failed to bootstrap H. J. Lu
19:55 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
19:53 Mainline failed to bootstrap H. J. Lu
19:52 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Joe Buck
19:43 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) DJ Delorie
19:38 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Joe Buck
19:37 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) DJ Delorie
19:34 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Ian Lance Taylor
19:28 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
18:59 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
18:58 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
18:24 RE: distinguishing .text SYMBOL_REF's from .data SYMBOL_REF's Dave Korn
18:23 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Guenther
18:21 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) DJ Delorie
18:18 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
18:16 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
18:09 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Guenther
18:04 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
17:58 Re: [RFC] Not using VAR_DECLs for temporary variables Zdenek Dvorak
17:39 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Shantonu Sen
17:38 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:37 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
17:33 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
17:33 Re: Question about the internal compiler error in verify_local_live_at_start Daniel Jacobowitz
17:32 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paul Brook
17:26 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Shantonu Sen
17:23 Re: What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Dorit Nuzman
17:04 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
16:56 Re: What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Paolo Bonzini
16:52 Re: What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Dorit Nuzman
16:50 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paul Brook
16:46 Re: What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Kazu Hirata
16:40 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
16:24 Re: What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Eric Botcazou
16:22 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Guenther
16:10 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:09 What shall we do with gcc.dg/vect/vect-11.c? Kazu Hirata
16:07 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
16:00 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Guenther
16:00 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
15:54 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
15:29 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
15:22 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
15:20 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
15:06 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
15:05 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Daniel Berlin
15:02 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
15:01 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Eric Botcazou
14:54 Re: [RFC] Not using VAR_DECLs for temporary variables Diego Novillo
14:49 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
14:48 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
14:47 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
14:43 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
14:38 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
14:38 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
14:23 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:18 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Eric Botcazou
14:18 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
14:17 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
14:14 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
14:06 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
14:06 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
14:05 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:01 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Arnaud Charlet
13:57 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
13:52 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:44 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
13:40 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Giovanni Bajo
13:40 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Arnaud Charlet
13:31 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
13:24 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
13:17 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
13:11 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
13:03 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
12:52 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Paolo Bonzini
12:48 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Richard Kenner
10:18 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
09:31 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Arnaud Charlet
07:49 PATCH[m68k] : ColdFire : Allow addq/subq to memory Philippe De Muyter
03:50 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-01-15) Mark Mitchell
03:10 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2006-01-15) Mark Mitchell
02:58 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15) Mark Mitchell
02:31 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Daniel Berlin
00:58 Re: RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Mark Mitchell
00:34 Re: [RFC] Not using VAR_DECLs for temporary variables Mark Mitchell
00:20 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Gabriel Dos Reis

January 15, 2006
23:44 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
23:35 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Daniel Berlin
23:28 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
23:24 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
22:56 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Daniel Berlin
22:53 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Daniel Berlin
22:47 Re: Cleanups of TARGET_EXPR Mark Mitchell
22:42 Re: Cleanups of TARGET_EXPR Zdenek Dvorak
22:34 Re: Cleanups of TARGET_EXPR Mark Mitchell
22:13 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Joseph S. Myers
21:33 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
21:30 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
21:24 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Steven Bosscher
21:24 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Tobias Schlüter
21:14 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) John David Anglin
21:05 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Dominique Dhumieres
20:49 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Richard Guenther
20:42 Bugs in cross-compilation Leif Ekblad
20:26 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
20:21 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:19 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Tobias Schlüter
20:14 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Tobias Schlüter
20:09 Changes in default exception handling? Leif Ekblad
19:52 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Dominique Dhumieres
19:44 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
19:43 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
19:38 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Dominique Dhumieres
19:35 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) John David Anglin
18:53 Re: _Pragma3.c failure on gcc 4.1 branch for darwin 8.4.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
18:52 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
18:36 Re: Compilation time has more than doubled on some Polyhedron tests Tobias . Schlueter
18:20 Re: GCC Error Codes rubicant rubicant
18:12 Re: [C++] enumerators and check_initializer Mark Mitchell
18:02 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
17:56 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
17:46 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
17:41 [C++] enumerators and check_initializer Gabriel Dos Reis
17:25 Re: _Pragma3.c failure on gcc 4.1 branch for darwin 8.4.0 Jack Howarth
17:16 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Ian Lance Taylor
17:15 Re: GCC Error Codes Frans Englich
16:40 Re: GCC Error Codes Perry Smith
16:28 Re: GCC Error Codes Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14 Re: GCC Error Codes rubicant rubicant
16:00 Re: GCC Error Codes Andreas Schwab
15:29 Re: GCC Error Codes Perry Smith
13:49 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Michael Veksler
13:47 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:45 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:39 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:31 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
11:01 distinguishing .text SYMBOL_REF's from .data SYMBOL_REF's Philippe De Muyter
11:00 GCC Error Codes rubicant rubicant
10:56 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
10:52 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
10:49 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
10:37 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Ian Lance Taylor
10:36 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Andreas Schwab
10:06 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
09:59 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Steven Bosscher
09:54 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
09:47 Re: Status of -fstack-usage? Olivier Hainque
09:35 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Robert Dewar
09:25 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Paul Schlie
05:24 Re: Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) Ian Lance Taylor
04:17 Storage for uninitialized objects (PR 24626) John David Anglin
03:10 Re: [PATCH] Re: conversion warnings in c++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:43 re: Shareholders Update Elmer Combs
01:39 Re: AIX cross compile environment on the Mac David Edelsohn
01:32 AIX cross compile environment on the Mac Perry Smith
01:25 Re: R: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Gabriel Dos Reis

January 14, 2006
22:52 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Bradley Lucier
22:52 Re: _Pragma3.c failure on gcc 4.1 branch for darwin 8.4.0 Joseph S. Myers
22:44 Re: Command line options and pragmas Robert Dewar
22:24 collect2 possible enhancements Perry Smith
22:09 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
20:03 _Pragma3.c failure on gcc 4.1 branch for darwin 8.4.0 Jack Howarth
19:20 Re: stab strings on AIX David Edelsohn
18:20 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
17:58 stab strings on AIX Perry Smith
17:53 gcc-4.2-20060114 is now available gccadmin
17:45 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Perry Smith
17:32 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Robert Dewar
17:22 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
17:06 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Andrew Pinski
17:01 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
16:58 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
16:39 Re: Command line options and pragmas Robert Dewar
16:19 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Robert Dewar
16:15 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Perry Smith
16:12 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit David Edelsohn
15:32 Re: R: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Marcin Dalecki
15:01 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
14:25 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit David Edelsohn
14:18 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
14:05 R: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Bonzini Paolo
13:40 Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Eric Botcazou
13:38 Re: BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit David Edelsohn
13:28 BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT on AIX 32-bit Eric Botcazou
12:25 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Giovanni Bajo
12:12 Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap) Bonzini Paolo
11:47 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Alfred M\. Szmidt
11:28 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Steven Bosscher
04:58 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Ian Lance Taylor
04:58 Re: C++ parsing regression? Mark Mitchell
04:47 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Andrew Pinski
04:32 Re: [reload] paradoxical mems Ian Lance Taylor
04:01 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
01:21 -msep-data without -fPIC ? Philippe De Muyter
01:18 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Alfred M\. Szmidt
01:16 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Joe Buck
01:15 Re: conversion warnings in c++ Eric Christopher
01:14 Re: [PATCH] Re: conversion warnings in c++ Eric Christopher
00:59 dfp tests fail for powerpc*-linux*, patch in the works Janis Johnson
00:57 Re: Pending bugs for GNU Steven Bosscher
00:55 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
00:51 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Jason Merrill
00:50 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Marcin Dalecki
00:48 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Janis Johnson
00:43 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Marcin Dalecki
00:42 Pending bugs for GNU Alfred M\. Szmidt
00:14 Re: libjava bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler

January 13, 2006
23:56 libjava bootstrap failure Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola
23:29 Re: config.cache question Christophe Jaillet
22:59 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Eric Botcazou
22:53 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Richard Kenner
22:50 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Nix
22:49 Re: config.cache question Nix
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060113 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Jason Merrill
21:53 Re: [reload] paradoxical mems DJ Delorie
21:42 Re: C++ parsing regression? Richard Guenther
21:05 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
20:41 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
20:27 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Janis Johnson
19:53 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
19:19 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
18:09 Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Eric Botcazou
17:35 Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation? Aleksandar Milivojevic
16:13 Re: conversion warnings in c++ Dan Kegel
15:31 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Diego Novillo
15:30 How to reverse patch reversal in cfgcleanup.c (Was: RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code) Joern RENNECKE
15:27 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Richard Guenther
15:25 Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool Leif Ekblad
15:20 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Diego Novillo
15:18 Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool Ralf Wildenhues
15:15 RFA: re-instate struct_equiv code (Was: Re: Huge compile time regressions) Joern RENNECKE
15:12 Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool Leif Ekblad
09:04 THREAD_MODEL_SPEC should just be deleted. Marcin Dalecki
05:20 Re: [PATCH] Re: conversion warnings in c++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:59 Re: [reload] paradoxical mems Ian Lance Taylor
03:35 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. DJ Delorie
02:34 Question about the internal compiler error in verify_local_live_at_start Eric Fisher
02:08 [reload] paradoxical mems DJ Delorie

January 12, 2006
23:38 Re: config.cache question Ben Elliston
23:21 config.cache question Christophe Jaillet
22:48 [PATCH] Re: conversion warnings in c++ Eric Christopher
22:42 gcc-4.0-20060112 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Contributing to GCC (for avr target). Anatoly Sokolov
20:28 Re: Announcement: 2006 GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit: Call for Papers Paolo Carlini
20:25 Announcement: 2006 GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit: Call for Papers Andrew J. Hutton
20:09 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Daniel Berlin
20:01 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Richard Henderson
19:57 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Diego Novillo
19:50 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Richard Henderson
19:46 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Diego Novillo
19:39 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Richard Henderson
19:30 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Diego Novillo
19:27 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Joe Buck
19:24 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Joe Buck
19:22 Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Roger Sayle
18:43 Re: Scoping bug in gcc 4.0.1 Andrew Pinski
18:41 [OT] RE: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Dave Korn
18:40 Scoping bug in gcc 4.0.1 Jon BLOOMFIELD
18:24 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Robert Dewar
18:23 Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here? Diego Novillo
17:44 Re: __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ Perry Smith
17:18 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
17:13 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Daniel Berlin
17:09 Re: __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:46 Re: __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ Perry Smith
16:16 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
16:14 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
16:04 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Michael Veksler
16:03 Re: __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:01 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Christian . Iseli
15:57 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
15:54 RE: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Dave Korn
15:47 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Christian . Iseli
15:45 __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ Perry Smith
15:38 Re: Cross compiling libstc++-v3 fails Leif Ekblad
15:24 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
15:14 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Perry Smith
15:02 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Diego Novillo
14:59 Re: warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Peter Barada
14:56 Re: Problems with gcc 4.0 for powerpc David Edelsohn
14:53 warning: '<some_var>' may be used uninitialized in this function Christian . Iseli
14:20 Re: libgcc2.c help needed Perry Smith
13:31 Re: merges Joern RENNECKE
12:16 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. DJ Delorie
11:56 Re: merges Jakub Jelinek
10:55 Re: Cross compiling libstc++-v3 fails Leif Ekblad
10:20 Re: Cross compiling libstc++-v3 fails Leif Ekblad
10:12 Re: merges Giovanni Bajo
09:35 Re: merges Bernd Schmidt
08:48 RE: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. Ina Pandit
08:40 Problems with gcc 4.0 for powerpc Dmytro Bablinyuk
05:33 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. DJ Delorie
04:40 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. Perry Smith
04:37 Re: libgcc.a, et. al. Perry Smith
04:18 Re: libgcc2.c help needed Ian Lance Taylor
04:12 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. Ian Lance Taylor
02:23 Re: merges Daniel Berlin
02:17 libgcc2.c help needed Perry Smith
02:11 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. DJ Delorie
01:57 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. Ian Lance Taylor
01:45 Re: conversion warnings in c++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:35 conversion warnings in c++ Eric Christopher
01:19 Updated LLVM+GCC Patch Chris Lattner
00:34 Re: Mapping C code to generated asm code Andi Kleen
00:12 Re: merges Bernd Schmidt
00:12 Re: Mapping C code to generated asm code Jim Blandy
00:12 Re: merges Daniel Berlin
00:12 Re: merges Daniel Berlin
00:12 Re: Mapping C code to generated asm code Ron McCall
00:12 Re: Mapping C code to generated asm code Diego Novillo
00:10 Re: Mainline build failure Kenneth Zadeck
00:10 Re: Cross compiling libstc++-v3 fails Daniel Jacobowitz
00:10 Re: bootstrap broken Kazu Hirata
00:10 Re: Mainline build failure Kenneth Zadeck
00:10 Re: Mainline build failure Steven Bosscher
00:10 Mainline build failure Steven Bosscher
00:10 bootstrap broken Andreas Jaeger

January 11, 2006
22:12 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. DJ Delorie
22:02 Mapping C code to generated asm code Perry Smith
21:43 Re: ggc 3.3.2 on aix 5.2 long long type? sabreman (sent by Nabble.com)
17:31 Re: powerpc-rtems fails to build on head Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
17:10 Re: ggc 3.3.2 on aix 5.2 long long type? Jack Lloyd
16:31 Re: powerpc-rtems fails to build on head David Edelsohn
16:18 powerpc-rtems fails to build on head Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:12 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Zdenek Dvorak
15:05 Re: What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Zdenek Dvorak
14:49 What should -fdump-tree-...-details include? (was Re: Patch ping) Diego Novillo
13:15 Re: Missing GNAT docs Nix
13:14 Fwd: Re: matrix linking george
11:07 Cross compiling libstc++-v3 fails Leif Ekblad
09:28 Re: ggc 3.3.2 on aix 5.2 long long type? Michael Veksler
01:10 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo

January 10, 2006
23:33 Re: libgcc.a, et. al. Perry Smith
22:39 gcc-3.4-20060110 is now available gccadmin
22:36 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Bernd Schmidt
21:39 Status of -fstack-usage? Bernd Trog
21:25 Missing GNAT docs (was Broken Links on Your Online Docs Web Page?) Jonathan Wakely
21:18 ggc 3.3.2 on aix 5.2 long long type? sabreman (sent by Nabble.com)
18:28 Re: matrix linking Sean Callanan
18:27 Broken Links on Your Online Docs Web Page? Chris Miller
16:39 Re: Memory leak in bt-load.c ? Philipp Thomas
13:55 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo
13:44 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Bernd Schmidt
13:39 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo
13:36 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo
13:35 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo
13:35 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Bernd Schmidt
13:19 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Bernd Schmidt
12:43 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Giovanni Bajo
12:30 matrix linking george
11:39 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Bernd Schmidt
09:34 Factoring _POSIX_SOURCE (Was: PATCH: m68k PIC touchup) Bernardo Innocenti
09:21 Re: PATCH: m68k PIC touchup Bernardo Innocenti

January 09, 2006
23:45 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
23:30 Re: Command line options and pragmas Robert Dewar
21:47 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
21:38 Re: Command line options and pragmas David Taylor
21:25 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
21:25 Re: Command line options and pragmas David Taylor
20:16 -symbolic unsupported Peter S. Mazinger
20:13 PATCH: m68k PIC touchup Peter S. Mazinger
19:50 Re: Command line options and pragmas Gabriel Dos Reis
19:47 Re: RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Andrew Pinski
19:46 Re: RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Diego Novillo
19:45 Re: RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:42 Re: RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Andrew Pinski
19:41 Re: Command line options and pragmas Gabriel Dos Reis
19:36 Re: Command line options and pragmas Robert Dewar
19:31 RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0? Diego Novillo
19:30 Re: Command line options and pragmas DJ Delorie
19:13 Re: Command line options and pragmas Joe Buck
19:00 Memory leak in bt-load.c ? Christophe Jaillet
18:53 Re: Command line options and pragmas Robert Dewar
18:46 Command line options and pragmas David Taylor
18:01 Fix PR/25677, rare bug in combine Paolo Bonzini
17:44 Re: Atomic operations on Sparc in libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik
16:41 Static coverage analysis with 'gcov'. sjhill
16:06 Re: RFC: generalize STARTFILE/ENDFILE_SPEC for linux Peter S. Mazinger
15:47 Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem Andrew MacLeod
15:42 Re: A questionable predicate in sh/predicates.md Joern RENNECKE
14:18 Re: RFC: generalize STARTFILE/ENDFILE_SPEC for linux Jakub Jelinek
13:38 RFC: generalize STARTFILE/ENDFILE_SPEC for linux Peter S. Mazinger
07:12 [M16C-ELF] : Problem with double and float data types. Ina Pandit
02:49 Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem Ranjit Mathew
01:19 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Daniel Berlin
00:21 Re: [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem Zdenek Dvorak
00:05 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Bradley Lucier

January 08, 2006
23:37 Microchip Pic-18F port on GNU/Gcc fpoulain
19:46 Re: libgcc.a, et. al. David Edelsohn
18:20 Re: libgcc.a, et. al. Perry Smith
17:13 Re: libgcc.a, et. al. David Edelsohn
16:47 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Bradley Lucier
16:25 [gcjx] Tree-SSA Operands Processing Problem Ranjit Mathew
15:48 Re: on data depenence Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:26 gcc 4.0.2 compiled on AIX 5.3 (53A) Perry Smith
15:12 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Daniel Berlin
15:10 libgcc.a, et. al. Perry Smith
15:04 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Andreas Schwab
13:30 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Pedro Lamarão
13:27 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 Pedro Lamarão
12:39 A questionable predicate in sh/predicates.md Kazu Hirata
06:56 Re: successful bootstrap Eric Botcazou
06:30 successful bootstrap John Sonnenschein

January 07, 2006
22:42 Atomic operations on Sparc in libstdc++ Piotr Wyderski
17:52 gcc-4.2-20060107 is now available gccadmin
12:35 Re: HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) Bernd Jendrissek
07:20 Re: svn access on RHEL 4.0 H. J. Lu
04:35 svn access on RHEL 4.0 Bradley Lucier
02:00 Re: question about registers that are set on entry to a function. Kenneth Zadeck
01:05 RFC: adjusting spill preferences DJ Delorie

January 06, 2006
22:48 Re: pr11135: make PIC register a pseudo Richard Henderson
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060106 is now available gccadmin
21:28 GCC talk at LinuxWorld Janis Johnson
20:19 Cleanups of TARGET_EXPR Zdenek Dvorak
18:59 Re: Do the current gcc 3.4 and glibc 2.3 in CVS work on ia64? H. J. Lu
18:09 Do the current gcc 3.4 and glibc 2.3 in CVS work on ia64? H. J. Lu
06:42 Re: build fails with shared libs intalled in non-standard locations Eric Botcazou

January 05, 2006
22:39 gcc-4.0-20060105 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: Huge compile time regressions Joern RENNECKE
22:10 Re: Huge compile time regressions Joern RENNECKE
22:06 Re: Huge compile time regressions Joern RENNECKE
21:40 Re: pr11135: make PIC register a pseudo Ian Lance Taylor
21:29 Re: question about registers that are set on entry to a function. Ian Lance Taylor
21:17 Re: question about registers that are set on entry to a function. Kenneth Zadeck
20:51 Re: question about registers that are set on entry to a function. Ian Lance Taylor
20:51 DWARF Debugging Standard Version 3 Released Michael Eager
19:39 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Diego Novillo
19:18 question about registers that are set on entry to a function. Kenneth Zadeck
18:08 pr11135: make PIC register a pseudo Stuart Hastings
15:41 Successful built of 3.4.5, failing gctest from testsuite Michal Dovciak
15:39 build fails with shared libs intalled in non-standard locations Aleksandar Milivojevic
14:10 Re: Time to add new copyright years... Richard Kenner
13:54 Re: Devirtualizing method calls Daniel Berlin
13:37 Re: Devirtualizing method calls Andrew Haley
13:33 Re: Devirtualizing method calls Andrew Pinski
13:25 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Diego Novillo
13:22 Re: RFD: CSiBE failure: typeof sometimes copies toplevel const qualifiers Joern RENNECKE
13:08 Devirtualizing method calls Andrew Haley
12:23 Re: Time to add new copyright years... Robert Dewar
10:44 Re: Tree broken by (partial) gomp merge Richard Guenther
09:56 Tree broken by (partial) gomp merge Richard Guenther
08:40 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
07:09 Re: Time to add new copyright years... DJ Delorie
05:57 Re: Time to add new copyright years... Ranjit Mathew
05:21 Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available Daniel Berlin
05:07 Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available Ranjit Mathew
04:52 to map binary addresses to instructions sean yang
03:48 VCG and cfg.vcg display sean yang

January 04, 2006
22:23 Re: RFD: CSiBE failure: typeof sometimes copies toplevel const qualifiers Richard Guenther
22:12 Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Diego Novillo
21:28 RFD: CSiBE failure: typeof sometimes copies toplevel const qualifiers Joern RENNECKE
16:48 Re: Time to add new copyright years... Daniel Jacobowitz
16:41 Re: Time to add new copyright years... Joseph S. Myers
16:29 Time to add new copyright years... Paolo Bonzini
14:04 Re: Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available Daniel Berlin
10:17 Slightly OT: Subversion 1.3.0 Now Available Ranjit Mathew
09:15 Re: C++ parsing regression? Richard Guenther
07:17 Re: about REG_DEP_OUTPUT dependence Ian Lance Taylor
06:24 Re: test for excess errors Ben Elliston
06:23 Re: Patches for RDOS (version 4.1 of GCC) Ben Elliston
06:21 about REG_DEP_OUTPUT dependence Liu Haibin
03:24 Accessing the file scope C++ data structs in GIMPLE Prateek Saxena
01:35 Re: insv vs one-bit field Paul Schlie

January 03, 2006
23:02 Re: RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
23:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Mike Stump
22:48 Re: Testing GCC install (was: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*) Laurent GUERBY
22:40 gcc-3.4-20060103 is now available gccadmin
22:06 Ben Elliston appointed libdecnumber maintainer Mark Mitchell
21:47 Re: insv vs one-bit fields DJ Delorie
21:41 Re: Testing GCC install (was: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*) Daniel Jacobowitz
21:39 Testing GCC install (was: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris*) Laurent GUERBY
21:28 Re: Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed Gerald Pfeifer
21:25 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Laurent GUERBY
21:02 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Daniel Jacobowitz
20:48 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Richard Kenner
20:43 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Laurent GUERBY
20:43 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
20:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Laurent GUERBY
20:31 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
20:28 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Kai Ruottu
20:07 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
20:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Diego Novillo
19:57 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
19:51 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Diego Novillo
19:46 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Andrew Haley
19:44 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Eric Botcazou
19:42 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
19:37 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Aleksandar Milivojevic
19:16 Re: inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Eric Botcazou
19:12 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
17:55 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Richard Earnshaw
17:51 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:35 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Jeffrey A Law
17:26 Re: HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) Joern RENNECKE
17:24 Re: keeping branch up to date with mainline Diego Novillo
17:17 keeping branch up to date with mainline mcrosier
17:16 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
16:54 inconsistency in location of static and shared libraries on sparc64-sun-solaris* Aleksandar Milivojevic
16:40 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
16:34 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Richard Earnshaw
16:29 Re: RTL alias analysis Richard Henderson
16:13 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Richard Henderson
16:12 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
15:43 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Richard Earnshaw
15:38 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
13:23 Re: Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Richard Earnshaw
13:05 Re: Thumb optimization question Richard Earnshaw
09:29 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
08:59 Re: C++ parsing regression? Richard Guenther
06:36 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:23 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Jim Blandy
04:10 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Ian Lance Taylor
03:35 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:16 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie

January 02, 2006
23:03 Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project Tomas Bily via RT
22:13 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Mike Stump
22:07 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Mike Stump
21:41 Re: -fpic no optimization... Mike Stump
18:32 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Laurent GUERBY
17:47 Re: gcc 4.0.2 paragw (sent by Nabble.com)
17:15 Re: C++ parsing regression? Mark Mitchell
16:55 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
16:48 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
15:52 Bootstrap failure on Linux/i686 in Ada Rainer Emrich
15:31 Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project gerald at pfeifer dot com via
15:31 Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project gerald at pfeifer dot com via
15:31 Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project Gerald Pfeifer
15:26 Regarding delayed branches and CFGs Saurabh Verma
15:22 gcc 4.0.2 Anatoly Krivitsky
15:17 Re: fake edges for const and pure functions Jan Hubicka
14:39 Re: [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project Tomas Bily via RT
13:40 Re: -fpic no optimization... Frediano Ziglio
13:35 fake edges for const and pure functions Paolo Bonzini
10:51 C++ parsing regression? Richard Guenther
08:33 Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
07:54 The Extension IDE - EXTEIDE EXTEIDE (sent by Nabble.com)
05:45 Re: RTL alias analysis Daniel Berlin
00:37 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar

January 01, 2006
21:35 Successful Build: gcc-4.1-20051230 i686-pc-mingw32 Parag Warudkar
18:27 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
18:27 Re: RTL alias analysis Jan Hubicka
18:23 Re: RTL alias analysis Mark Mitchell
18:11 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
17:57 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
17:26 -fpic no optimization... Frediano Ziglio
17:21 RTL alias analysis Steven Bosscher
17:17 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Michael Veksler
16:56 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
16:23 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:15 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
14:40 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:31 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
05:26 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
02:10 gfortran 2005 year end stats Steve Kargl


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3