This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
It highly depends on what you define to be pointer arithmetic.Yes, but the only defined semantics of these conversions is that you get the same
Given the conversions
pointer -> integer type
integer type -> pointer
T* -> U*
I think your sentence is way to restrictive and does not capture CWell part of the trouble is that there are really two models here, the one in the
models.
There is no obligation standard-wise to say anything at all about these conversions,Richard, to resolve this issue, we need to be more precise about our mappings for
pointer -> integer type integer type -> pointer T* -> U*
conversions. This is not an issue to resolved in isolation, piece meal.
-- Gaby
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |