gcc archive
date index for December, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2005
23:33 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:12 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
23:06 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Mike Stump
22:56 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
20:42 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Domagoj D
20:26 Xscale big endian tool-chain (how to build it?) Karel Gardas
18:57 Re: Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Robert Dewar
18:51 Might a -native-semantics switch, forcing native target optimization semantics, be reasonable? Paul Schlie
17:51 gcc-4.2-20051231 is now available gccadmin
16:03 Re: tree-ssa alias constraints Daniel Berlin
13:50 Re: Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Kai Henningsen
08:36 objc - missing current_function_returns_abnormally global variable initialization? Marcin Dalecki
07:12 tree-ssa alias constraints Andrew Pinski

December 30, 2005
22:41 gcc-4.1-20051230 is now available gccadmin
21:46 [gnu.org #247501] Submitting to the Gnu Project Jonas Jacobson via RT
19:58 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
19:10 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries H. J. Lu
19:08 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries David Daney
19:05 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries Jakub Jelinek
19:02 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries Andrew Pinski
18:58 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries H. J. Lu
18:56 Re: RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries Andrew Pinski
18:54 RFC: An option to link against static gcc libraries H. J. Lu
18:46 Re: Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed Jon Brisbin
17:30 Re: Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed Joe Wilson
17:13 Re: Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed H. J. Lu
16:53 Re: Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed Jon Brisbin
15:49 Installing GCC 4.1-20051223 on FreeBSD 6 failed Jon Brisbin
14:59 Re: Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Leif Ekblad
00:19 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Gabriel Dos Reis

December 29, 2005
22:40 gcc-4.0-20051229 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Domagoj D
22:04 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
21:56 Re: Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Mike Stump
21:29 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:02 Re: Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Leif Ekblad
20:57 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
20:20 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:15 Re: Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Mike Stump
20:02 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
19:45 Porting GCC to RDOS and C++ issues Leif Ekblad
19:36 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:27 Re: Targets Ian Lance Taylor
19:14 Re: extract register input, output and operator from rtl right before peepholes Ian Lance Taylor
19:13 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
18:52 Re: Objective-C exceptions on the GNU runtime? Andrew Pinski
18:39 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Domagoj D
18:39 Re: Objective-C exceptions on the GNU runtime? Mike Stump
18:17 Targets Matt Ritchie
18:11 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
16:37 Re: Objective-C exceptions on the GNU runtime? Andrew Pinski
14:21 extract register input, output and operator from rtl right before peepholes Liu Haibin
13:06 Objective-C exceptions on the GNU runtime? Dan Villiom Podlaski Christian
08:38 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Domagoj D
07:31 Re: Assembly to c Mike Stump
07:30 Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Mike Stump
07:08 Assembly to c rpai
04:49 Hack in gcc/c-decl.c? Domagoj D

December 28, 2005
22:56 Patches for RDOS (version 4.1 of GCC) Leif Ekblad
21:02 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Geoff Keating
20:18 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran John David Anglin
20:10 Failed to build cross-compiler gcc-4.1 20051228 build system i686-pc-linux-gnu target system i686-pc-mingw32 Rainer Emrich
16:25 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Andrew Pinski
16:15 Re: on data depenence Ian Lance Taylor
13:03 on data depenence Liu Haibin
09:33 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Jakub Jelinek
07:48 Re: Question about implicit memset invocation Ian Lance Taylor
07:21 Question about implicit memset invocation Eric Fisher
03:24 Re: test for excess errors Andrew Pinski
03:20 test for excess errors Eric Fisher
00:46 [RFC/RFT] Should we hoist FP constants on x87? Roger Sayle

December 27, 2005
23:40 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Andrew Pinski
23:36 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Jakub Jelinek
22:38 gcc-3.4-20051227 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Geoff Keating
17:38 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Andrew Pinski
17:05 Re: zero and pointer conversions in g++ Jack Lloyd
09:49 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Jakub Jelinek
07:33 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Geoff Keating
05:47 Re: A query Ranjit Mathew

December 26, 2005
21:41 Thumb optimization question Ivan Petrov
20:04 zero and pointer conversions in g++ Thomas Braxton
16:22 A query Harsh Chandra
04:51 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Richard Henderson
03:35 Re: weakref miscompiling libgfortran Geoff Keating
02:55 Re: Gcc Register Allocation Dueway Qi
02:22 Gcc Register Allocation Eric Fisher

December 25, 2005
23:08 weakref miscompiling libgfortran Richard Henderson

December 24, 2005
21:53 Re: tree level aliasing and call clobber Daniel Berlin
21:20 tree level aliasing and call clobber Andrew Pinski
17:53 gcc-4.2-20051224 is now available gccadmin
02:46 Re: Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Kaveh R. Ghazi

December 23, 2005
22:41 gcc-4.1-20051223 is now available gccadmin
19:52 Re: Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Janis Johnson
19:33 Re: Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Janis Johnson
19:27 Re: Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:19 Updated LLVM+GCC Patch Chris Lattner
18:09 Re: Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:50 Your request for Express Transfer - attn: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Bank of Oklahoma N . A .
16:51 Re: GCC 3.x and -fvtable-thunks Nathan Sidwell
16:24 Examples of callee returning struct, but caller allocating space? Carlos O'Donell
16:09 Re: [M16C-ELF] : Problem accessing "constant" data that is placed in ROM. DJ Delorie
15:58 Cleaning up the last g++ testsuite nit from 3.4 Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:56 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
15:45 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
15:41 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
15:17 Bootstrap problems on ia64 Andrey Belevantsev
14:59 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
14:49 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
13:36 Re: selection or target tools Daniel Jacobowitz
13:32 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
13:03 [M16C-ELF] : Problem accessing "constant" data that is placed in ROM. Prafulla Thakare
12:58 Christmas Ronny Peine
12:32 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
12:29 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
12:18 Re: selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
09:50 Re: selection or target tools Jan Beulich
09:08 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
03:23 tweaking cse DJ Delorie
00:54 GCC 3.x and -fvtable-thunks John Daniels

December 22, 2005
22:40 gcc-4.0-20051222 is now available gccadmin
21:11 auto and typedecl pvderste
21:03 Re: asm label generation bug? Mike Stump
20:54 Re: how to add source or header file in gcc Mike Stump
17:50 Re: How can I register gcc build status for HP-UX 11i Janis Johnson
17:16 Re: selection or target tools Daniel Jacobowitz
17:04 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
16:54 Re: selection or target tools Daniel Jacobowitz
16:50 Re: selection or target tools Paolo Bonzini
16:39 Re: selection or target tools Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33 selection or target tools Gunther Nikl
14:39 re: An odd behavior of dynamic_cast Shin-ichi MORITA
13:40 Re: asm label generation bug? Steven Bosscher
13:34 Re: asm label generation bug? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:30 asm label generation bug? Piotr Wyderski
12:40 Error -- Question Not Submitted Rowley Support
10:27 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Haley
10:17 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther
10:03 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther
10:02 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Haley
09:58 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther
09:54 how to add source or header file in gcc Liu Haibin
09:46 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther
01:07 How can I register gcc build status for HP-UX 11i 김성박

December 21, 2005
23:42 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
23:30 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:16 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
20:07 Re: HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) DJ Delorie
19:06 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:04 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:01 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:52 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
18:51 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Paolo Carlini
18:51 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Haley
18:50 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:49 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Pinski
18:47 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:40 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
18:39 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
18:36 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Paolo Carlini
18:26 HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK_FOR_CLASS Might Be Nice (tm) Bernd Jendrissek
18:12 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? chris jefferson
18:10 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
17:41 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:31 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
17:15 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
16:59 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:56 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:24 Re: [PATCH] make two combine functions more simplify_rtx-like Paolo Bonzini
16:08 [PATCH] make two combine functions more simplify_rtx-like Paolo Bonzini
15:37 [RFC] Not using VAR_DECLs for temporary variables Zdenek Dvorak
15:06 Re: WouldBeNice/Optimisation: const variable-parameter-list for printf Paolo Bonzini
13:50 WouldBeNice/Optimisation: const variable-parameter-list for printf Etienne Lorrain
13:34 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
13:27 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Robert Dewar
13:07 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Haley
12:52 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther
12:44 Re: PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Andrew Haley
12:34 PR 25512: pointer overflow defined? Richard Guenther

December 20, 2005
23:13 Re: porting gcc/binutils Frank Ch. Eigler
22:58 Re: Will there be a GCC 4.0.3 ? Mark Mitchell
22:56 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.5 is released H. J. Lu
22:39 gcc-3.4-20051220 is now available gccadmin
22:20 Re: GCC 4.1 ICE during CPU2000/177.mesa build Steven Bosscher
21:56 RE: porting gcc/binutils Meissner, Michael
21:53 Re: porting gcc/binutils DJ Delorie
21:43 RE: porting gcc/binutils Andrija Radičević
21:13 Will there be a GCC 4.0.3 ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
20:47 Re: GCC 4.1 ICE during CPU2000/177.mesa build Jakub Jelinek
20:40 Important admin
20:04 GCC 4.1 ICE during CPU2000/177.mesa build Grigory Zagorodnev
19:52 Re: RFC: combine simplification change: 2-for-2-with-lesser-cost Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:51 RE: porting gcc/binutils Meissner, Michael
17:52 RE: Why is this C++ code incorrect? Jiutao Nie
17:24 Re: Why is this C++ code incorrect? Jim Blandy
16:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Daniel Jacobowitz
16:09 re: An odd behavior of dynamic_cast Dan Kegel
15:56 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Richard Kenner
15:51 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
15:49 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
15:47 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
15:44 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
15:42 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
15:41 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
15:37 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada David Edelsohn
15:29 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
15:22 Re: Why is this C++ code incorrect? Nathan Sidwell
15:20 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
15:10 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
15:06 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Richard Kenner
15:03 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
14:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
14:46 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
14:44 An odd behavior of dynamic_cast Shin-ichi MORITA
14:13 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
14:00 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
13:26 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
13:23 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
13:18 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
13:15 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
13:13 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
13:10 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
13:08 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Paolo Bonzini
11:34 Re: RFC: combine simplification change: 2-for-2-with-lesser-cost Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:22 Why is this C++ code incorrect? Jiutao Nie
10:13 Re: RFC: combine simplification change: 2-for-2-with-lesser-cost Steven Bosscher
10:10 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Andreas Jaeger
09:50 RFC: combine simplification change: 2-for-2-with-lesser-cost Hans-Peter Nilsson
09:40 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Jim Blandy
09:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
09:36 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Bonzini
09:12 A question about the global variables initialization. Eric Fisher
08:32 Re: Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Arnaud Charlet
08:17 Bootstrap failure on Linux/x86-64 in Ada Andreas Jaeger
08:16 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-12-19) Mark Mitchell
07:37 Re: A question about the global variables initialization. Steven Bosscher
07:31 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Richard Henderson
07:17 A question about the global variables initialization. Eric Fisher
07:05 Re: A question about the global variables initialization. Andrew Pinski
07:02 A question about the global variables initialization. Eric Fisher
06:34 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
06:32 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
03:46 struct: link to next field patrick jayet
03:39 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Ben Elliston
02:33 #pragma pack vs. zero-width bitfields Mark Mitchell
02:05 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Mike Stump
01:34 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Jim Blandy

December 19, 2005
23:19 Re: i was told that i could get a awnser to this question here. Mike Stump
23:06 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Mike Stump
22:56 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Jim Blandy
22:11 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Ian Lance Taylor
19:48 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Andrew Haley
19:41 Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Ian Lance Taylor
19:10 Does lang_checks_parallel only support check-gcc? H. J. Lu
18:23 RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P Andrew Haley
15:56 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Richard Earnshaw
15:28 Re: creating a new branch webpage Gerald Pfeifer
15:08 An odd behavior of dynamic_cast Shin-ichi MORITA
14:23 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
13:58 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Daniel Jacobowitz
13:41 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Paolo Bonzini
13:32 Re: Huge compile time regressions Joern RENNECKE
13:26 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Richard Earnshaw
13:19 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Richard Earnshaw
13:19 Re: Found error in g77 documentation Ben Elliston
09:45 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Paolo Bonzini
00:32 [PATCH] Removed two unused vars from Makefile.tpl Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola
00:21 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Gerald Pfeifer
00:11 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner

December 18, 2005
22:29 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Geoff Keating
22:17 i was told that i could get a awnser to this question here. Kevin Andrew Kaploe
19:07 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:00 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Daniel Jacobowitz
18:57 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Mike Stump
18:57 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Andrew Pinski
18:49 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Mark Kettenis
18:41 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Daniel Jacobowitz
18:22 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner
18:03 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:59 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner
17:39 Re: [patch] for PR24793 Daniel Berlin
17:22 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:06 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner
16:49 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure Daniel Jacobowitz
16:43 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Daniel Jacobowitz
16:42 Build successful for GCC 3.2.2 on FC4, or backward bootstrap compatibility Avi Kivity
16:38 Re: PR25413 - data alignment question Richard Guenther
15:22 Re: PR25413 - data alignment question Dorit Naishlos
13:22 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner
12:28 Bootstrap comparison failure Mark Kettenis
06:26 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
06:12 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Geoff Keating
04:35 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Daniel Jacobowitz
04:33 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:32 Re: weakref and static Geoffrey Keating
02:35 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Richard Kenner
02:18 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Daniel Jacobowitz
01:57 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Mike Stump
01:35 PR25130, too hard for me :-( Steven Bosscher
01:10 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Gerald Pfeifer
00:19 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? Tim Prince

December 17, 2005
21:54 Re: [OT] RE: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Russ Allbery
21:48 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Andrew Pinski
21:08 What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?) Gerald Pfeifer
18:09 Re: weakref and static Jakub Jelinek
17:53 gcc-4.2-20051217 is now available gccadmin
17:17 Re: long double on ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
14:08 long double on ppc-darwin FX Coudert
12:57 Re: weakref and static Alexandre Oliva
12:32 Re: weakref and static Alexandre Oliva
11:25 [Ada] on trunk fron sparc/sparc64 linux: Error detected at make.adb:7541:23 Christian Joensson
09:05 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Paolo Bonzini
03:51 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
02:25 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Eric Christopher
01:59 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
00:24 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Mike Stump

December 16, 2005
23:50 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Richard Kenner
23:36 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ is 403 Mike Stump
23:05 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ is 403 Richard Guenther
22:52 Build success for gcc 3.4.5 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
22:40 gcc-4.1-20051216 is now available gccadmin
20:16 Re: 8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Daniel Berlin
20:01 Re: 8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Chris Lattner
19:47 Re: 8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Daniel Berlin
19:40 Re: Performance comparison of gcc releases Ronny Peine
19:27 Re: 8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Chris Lattner
19:16 8 Dec 05 notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call Mark K. Smith
19:13 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Mike Stump
19:10 Re: Performance comparison of gcc releases Dale Johannesen
18:43 RE: Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machine description Ivan Petrov
18:31 re: Performance comparison of gcc releases Dan Kegel
18:28 RE: creating a new branch webpage Dave Korn
17:57 creating a new branch webpage mcrosier
17:23 Re: Performance comparison of gcc releases Ronny Peine
16:10 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
16:05 Re: Performance comparison of gcc releases Sebastian Pop
15:23 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
15:15 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Paolo Bonzini
15:14 [PATCH] BOOT_CFLAGS vs profiled_bootstrap on the mainline Paolo Bonzini
14:57 Re: Adding an instruction to gcc (pass through) Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:48 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Richard Kenner
14:23 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Daniel Berlin
14:23 Adding an instruction to gcc (pass through) Burt Walsh
14:20 Re: make install is broken on powerpc-darwin starting with a 3.3 compiler Gabriel Dos Reis
14:19 Re: make install is broken on powerpc-darwin starting with a 3.3 compiler Gabriel Dos Reis
14:01 remaining phases of dfp-branch merge Ben Elliston
13:54 Re: make install is broken on powerpc-darwin starting with a 3.3 compiler Daniel Jacobowitz
13:46 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:42 Re: Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Daniel Jacobowitz
13:19 Re: Huge compile time regressions Bernd Schmidt
12:48 Re: Mainline profiledbootstrap broken Paolo Bonzini
12:34 Mainline profiledbootstrap broken Martin Reinecke
11:22 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Giovanni Bajo
11:06 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Volker Reichelt
10:51 RE: Compile-time / memory regression Dave Korn
10:31 Re: Compile-time / memory regression David Edelsohn
10:12 Re: What happened to bubblestrap? Tobias . Schlueter
10:06 Found error in g77 documentation Matteo Boschini
09:46 Compile-time / memory regression Richard Guenther
09:33 Re: What happened to bubblestrap? Paolo Bonzini
09:30 Re: What happened to bubblestrap? Christian Joensson
09:21 Re: What happened to bubblestrap? Tobias Schlüter
09:15 Re: Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Paolo Bonzini
09:03 Re: make install is broken on powerpc-darwin starting with a 3.3 compiler Paolo Bonzini
09:00 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
08:56 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Christian Joensson
08:53 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Paolo Bonzini
08:36 Re: How to rebuild stage 1? Paolo Bonzini
08:31 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Per Abrahamsen
05:02 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
04:57 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Ben Elliston
04:03 BOOT_CFLAGS vs profiled_bootstrap on the mainline Andrew Pinski
03:44 Re: m68k peephole weirdness Paul Brook
02:35 Re: m68k peephole weirdness Andreas Schwab
02:23 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
02:03 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? David Daney
01:39 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
00:31 Performance comparison of gcc releases Ronny Peine
00:22 Re: Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:09 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? David Daney

December 15, 2005
23:35 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? Daniel Jacobowitz
23:32 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? David Daney
23:32 Re: unable to build head on Fedora Laurent GUERBY
23:24 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
23:00 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? David Daney
22:48 m68k peephole weirdness Paul Brook
22:44 gcc-4.0-20051215 is now available gccadmin
22:17 make install is broken on powerpc-darwin starting with a 3.3 compiler Andrew Pinski
22:16 Re: Add revision number to gcc version? H. J. Lu
21:39 How to rebuild stage 1? H. J. Lu
21:29 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Paul Thomas
20:25 Re: [OT] RE: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:20 [OT] RE: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Dave Korn
20:01 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Janne Blomqvist
19:33 Re: Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Christian Joensson
19:18 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Will L (sent by Nabble.com)
19:11 Re: porting gcc/binutils Mauricio Alvarez
18:57 Re: Hard to tell which stage the build is at. Toon Moene
18:40 Re: Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Daniel Jacobowitz
18:26 Hard to tell what stage the bootstrap is on Andrew Pinski
18:21 Re: GCC middle-end Giovanni Bajo
18:18 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Daniel Berlin
18:02 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Giovanni Bajo
17:57 Re: make all vs make bootstrap Paolo Carlini
17:54 make all vs make bootstrap Andrew Pinski
17:29 Performance comparison of gcc releases Ronny Peine
14:00 GCC middle-end Thomas Lavergne
13:49 Re: [PATCH] Do not stage the final build results Daniel Jacobowitz
13:05 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Paolo Bonzini
12:54 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Ranjit Mathew
12:52 Re: PR25413 - data alignment question Richard Guenther
12:47 PR25413 - data alignment question Dorit Naishlos
12:30 Re: unable to build head on Fedora Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:20 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Per Abrahamsen
10:53 Re: [PATCH] Do not stage the final build results Ranjit Mathew
10:11 Re: [CFARM] maintenance ok Clemens Koller
09:01 [PATCH] Do not stage the final build results Paolo Bonzini
08:53 Re: heads up - gcc toplevel bootstrap activated Ranjit Mathew
08:16 Re: options for compiling C using C++ compiler [trying 1 more time] Paolo Bonzini
08:03 Re: Problems with ?: operator Falk Hueffner
07:58 Need help Ivan Petrov
07:31 Problems with ?: operator Sulabh Nangalia
02:54 Re: Huge compile time regressions Daniel Berlin
02:49 options for compiling C using C++ compiler [trying 1 more time] John R
02:12 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
01:15 Re: porting gcc/binutils Mike Stump

December 14, 2005
23:48 Huge compile time regressions Steven Bosscher
23:34 [CFARM] accounts & use Laurent GUERBY
22:31 porting gcc/binutils Andrija Radičević
22:28 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Paul Thomas
22:20 Re: unable to build head on Fedora Jakub Jelinek
21:41 [CFARM] SCSI disk Laurent GUERBY
21:28 unable to build head on Fedora Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:04 Re: unrecognized option '-no-cpp-precomp' on Mac OS X (10.4.3) Mike Stump
20:55 Re: unrecognized option '-no-cpp-precomp' on Mac OS X (10.4.3) Daniel Jacobowitz
20:52 unrecognized option '-no-cpp-precomp' on Mac OS X (10.4.3) Paul Martinolich
20:39 Re: "Bag of pages" algorithm? Daniel Berlin
20:38 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Richard Guenther
20:21 Re: "Bag of pages" algorithm? Domagoj D
20:17 Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Henderson
19:28 Re: "Bag of pages" algorithm? Daniel Berlin
19:17 "Bag of pages" algorithm? Domagoj D
19:00 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} FX Coudert
18:34 Re: gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Steve Kargl
18:03 heads up - gcc toplevel bootstrap activated Paolo Bonzini
17:57 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Frank Ch. Eigler
17:37 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Mike Stump
17:30 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Olly Betts
17:07 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Christopher Faylor
15:38 Solaris/GCC 3.4.x/4.0.x issue: _GLIBCXX_HAVE_ASINL & others. Karel Gardas
13:28 Re: [CFARM] maintenance ok Richard Guenther
13:11 [CFARM] maintenance ok Laurent GUERBY
07:46 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Paolo Bonzini
04:03 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:55 Re: GCC CompileFarm Project Tom Tromey
02:16 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 DJ Delorie
01:39 Re: GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Olly Betts
00:44 GCC mailing list archive search omits results after May 2005 Kaveh R. Ghazi

December 13, 2005
23:56 Re: Ada and TYPE_SIZE of ARRAY_TYPEs Richard Kenner
22:39 gcc-3.4-20051213 is now available gccadmin
21:40 Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jakub Jelinek
21:29 Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jakub Jelinek
21:27 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
21:26 Re: [PATCH] Fix bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joern RENNECKE
21:21 [PATCH] Fix bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jakub Jelinek
21:13 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Joern RENNECKE
20:50 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
20:50 Re: mainline bootstrap broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joern RENNECKE
20:46 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Andrew Haley
20:15 GCC CompileFarm: maintenance within two hours Laurent GUERBY
20:00 Re: mainline and 4.1 bootstrap broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Jakub Jelinek
19:55 Re: mainline and 4.1 bootstrap broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Laurent GUERBY
19:45 Re: mainline bootstrap broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Joern RENNECKE
19:32 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Joern RENNECKE
19:31 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory David Daney
19:11 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
19:00 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Jeffrey A Law
18:47 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Tom Tromey
18:37 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Joern RENNECKE
16:34 Re: GCC CompileFarm Project Sebastian Pop
15:18 Ada and TYPE_SIZE of ARRAY_TYPEs Richard Guenther
14:24 Re: SVN tags, branches and checkouts John David Anglin
12:29 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Sebastian Pop
12:26 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Richard Kenner
12:24 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Richard Kenner
10:37 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Arnaud Charlet
10:33 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Richard Guenther
10:28 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Arnaud Charlet
10:25 mainline bootstrap broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Martin Reinecke
10:22 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Richard Guenther
10:13 Re: Testing/debugging single Ada tests Arnaud Charlet
10:06 Testing/debugging single Ada tests Richard Guenther
09:36 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Nathan Sidwell
08:25 Re: SVN tags, branches and checkouts Giovanni Bajo
07:58 Re: RFC: Make is a HUGE memory hog Paolo Bonzini
07:55 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Jan Beulich
04:25 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
04:03 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Ian Lance Taylor
03:33 options for compiling C using C++ compiler John R
02:30 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
02:25 Re: RFC: REG_LABEL not sufficient, cbranchM4 causes ambiguity Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:40 SVN tags, branches and checkouts John David Anglin
00:40 Re: bootstrap GCC-4.1-20051202 on Mac OS X (10.3.9) Andrew Pinski
00:33 Re: bootstrap GCC-4.1-20051202 on Mac OS X (10.3.9) Mike Stump

December 12, 2005
23:36 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Philipp Thomas
22:47 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Mark Mitchell
21:40 Re: Error with released manuals for GCC v3.4.5 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:15 Error with released manuals for GCC v3.4.5 Peter Ward
21:08 GCC CompileFarm Project Laurent GUERBY
21:05 Eliminating R_PPC_REL32 relocations Joshua N. Edmison
20:33 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Nathan Sidwell
20:27 Re: Lots of new failures in objc testsuite Andrew Pinski
20:24 Lots of new failures in objc testsuite Andreas Jaeger
20:21 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Mark Mitchell
17:34 GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:10 Re: default cflags to compile Nuno Lopes
16:26 gfc_build_addr_expr vs. build_fold_addr_expr{,_with_type} Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Andrew Haley
10:42 Re[2]: How can I get access to tree representation Alexander
10:09 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Mark Wielaard
08:50 Re: How can I get access to tree representation Gabriel Dos Reis
07:58 How can I get access to tree representation Alexander
07:35 RFC: REG_LABEL not sufficient, cbranchM4 causes ambiguity Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:59 Re: default cflags to compile Nix

December 11, 2005
23:21 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Gerald Pfeifer
22:43 Re: [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Paul Schlie
20:57 Re: weakref and static Jakub Jelinek
20:46 Re: weakref and static Alexandre Oliva
20:29 Re: Implicit Type Conversions Warning Richard Falk
20:12 Implicit Type Conversions Warning Richard Falk
19:03 Re: [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:12 Re: [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Paul Schlie
08:18 Mirrors anthony l. bryan
03:40 Re: [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Ian Lance Taylor

December 10, 2005
23:06 [C, C++] fundamental type object representation Gabriel Dos Reis
22:09 Re: slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Gabriel Dos Reis
22:07 Re: slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Gabriel Dos Reis
22:05 Re: slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Gabriel Dos Reis
20:32 Re: slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Paolo Carlini
20:04 Re: slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Paolo Carlini
19:19 Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4 Jan Hubicka
18:58 Re: htsearch broken? Will L (sent by Nabble.com)
18:36 Re: I can not catch the exception of Ada. Y.Tomino
17:51 gcc-4.2-20051210 is now available gccadmin
17:37 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Bernd Trog
16:10 Re: I can not catch the exception of Ada. Arnaud Charlet
15:55 I can not catch the exception of Ada. Y.Tomino
15:54 I can not catch the exception of Ada. Y.Tomino
13:49 Re: funny problem with g++ Jonathan Wakely
13:45 Re: htsearch broken? Jonathan Wakely
11:02 slice valarrays with std::string -> segfault Jhair Tocancipa Triana
06:18 Re: RELOAD_OTHER bug? Ian Lance Taylor
04:40 Re: htsearch broken? Will L (sent by Nabble.com)
04:18 RELOAD_OTHER bug? DJ Delorie
03:01 Re: htsearch broken? Olly Betts
02:10 Re: htsearch broken? Hans-Peter Nilsson

December 09, 2005
22:39 gcc-4.1-20051209 is now available gccadmin
22:27 PATCH for Re: Missing link to changes.html for 4.1... Gerald Pfeifer
21:24 Nathan Sidwell as Morpho Technologies Co-Maintainer Mark Mitchell
17:19 Re: GNU violation? Joe Buck
15:00 Re: GNU violation? Martin Reinecke
14:31 Re: GNU violation? KrÃpl Zsolt
14:28 GNU violation? KrÃpl Zsolt
14:01 Re: GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gabriel Dos Reis
13:33 Re: GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gerald Pfeifer
13:24 Re: GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gabriel Dos Reis
13:22 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Gerald Pfeifer
12:14 Re: GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gerald Pfeifer
08:54 build breakage due to r108059 Jan Beulich
00:25 RFC: Make is a HUGE memory hog H. J. Lu

December 08, 2005
23:42 Re: [RFC] Type of long double on ColdFire Richard Henderson
22:42 gcc-4.0-20051208 is now available gccadmin
21:59 Re: [RFC] Type of long double on ColdFire Mike Stump
21:50 Re: GCC 3.4.5 status? Gerald Pfeifer
19:16 Re: Archived GCC Online Doc Releases Joe Buck
18:51 default cflags to compile Nuno Lopes
18:33 Archived GCC Online Doc Releases Chris Miller
18:16 htsearch broken? Paul Martinolich
18:14 GCC CompileFarm online Laurent GUERBY
16:05 [RFC] Type of long double on ColdFire Paul Brook
16:02 Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4 Richard Guenther
15:48 Re: Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4 Steven Bosscher
15:25 bootstrap GCC-4.1-20051202 on Mac OS X (10.3.9) Paul Martinolich
14:42 Re: Problem with gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c on dataflow Daniel Berlin
14:42 Stack protector, switches and macros Kevin F. Quinn
12:12 Interesting observations wrt FDO and tramp3d-v4 Richard Guenther
10:02 ARM, THUMB, INTERWORK override HarmEr
08:45 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Arnaud Charlet
06:06 Help requested .... Sridhar Murthy
05:21 Re: Problem with gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c on dataflow Roger Sayle
04:59 Problem with gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c on dataflow Daniel Berlin
04:22 update Allen Stajkowski
04:18 unsubscibe Allen Stajkowski
03:51 Re: C++ parser: Should we get rid of cp_parser_declarator_id? Mark Mitchell
01:44 Re: crtstuff sentinels Paul Brook
01:28 Re: I need to create New project on GCC, I want to know how to do it. Mike Stump
00:53 Re: crtstuff sentinels DJ Delorie

December 07, 2005
23:53 Re: funny problem with g++ Tristan Wibberley
23:45 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Tom Tromey
22:54 I need to create New project on GCC, I want to know how to do it. JongMin Han
21:55 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Florian Weimer
21:48 Re: funny problem with g++ Joe Buck
21:43 Re: funny problem with g++ Michael Veksler
21:40 Re: gcc-4.1 code size Robert Bowdidge
21:21 Re: funny problem with g++ Richard Guenther
21:14 Re: funny problem with g++ Morten Welinder
20:54 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Richard Kenner
20:41 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Andrew Haley
20:34 Re: GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic Florian Weimer
20:17 Re: funny problem with g++ Andrew Haley
20:15 Re: funny problem with g++ Tommy Vercetti
19:40 GCC 3.4.6 Release status Gabriel Dos Reis
19:37 GNAT package GNAT.Traceback.Symbolic David Gressett
19:28 GCC 3.4.5 has been released Gabriel Dos Reis
18:07 Re: C++ 3.4.5 packed reference warning Nathan Sidwell
18:06 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Nathan Sidwell
17:22 Re: C++ parser: Should we get rid of cp_parser_declarator_id? Volker Reichelt
17:01 Re: testsuite issue Jan Beulich
16:54 4.1: Many 64-bit failures on powerpc-apple-darwin8.3.0 Bradley Lucier
16:54 Re: testsuite issue Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:47 RE: C++ 3.4.5 packed reference warning Steven L. Zook
16:35 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Jan Beulich
16:21 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Nathan Sidwell
16:13 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Jan Beulich
16:03 Re: C++ 3.4.5 packed reference warning Nathan Sidwell
15:59 Re: C++ parser: Should we get rid of cp_parser_declarator_id? Nathan Sidwell
15:57 Re: g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Nathan Sidwell
15:27 Re: funny problem with g++ Richard Guenther
15:15 funny problem with g++ Tommy Vercetti
14:39 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Dorit Naishlos
09:11 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Richard Guenther
09:06 Re: testsuite issue Jan Beulich
08:18 Re: testsuite issue Jan Beulich
05:43 RE: Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets Nitin Shah
05:42 [gomp] gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c:8795: error: too many arguments to function `gen_compare_reg' Christian Joensson
05:34 Re: Any who heard about genmd? Ranjit Mathew
05:04 Re: Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets jimmy
05:02 Re: Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets DJ Delorie
04:56 RE: Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets Nitin Shah
02:27 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Mike Stump
01:38 Any who heard about genmd? ZengNan
01:26 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Andreas Killaitis
01:14 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Mike Stump
01:01 Re: gcc 4.1 code size Giovanni Bajo
00:35 gcc 4.1 code size Andreas Killaitis
00:33 Re: Updated gcc+llvm patch Chris Lattner
00:32 Re: Updated gcc+llvm patch Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola
00:31 C++ 3.4.5 packed reference warning Steven L. Zook

December 06, 2005
22:38 gcc-3.4-20051206 is now available gccadmin
21:28 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Jim Wilson
21:22 Updated gcc+llvm patch Chris Lattner
20:19 Re: C++ parser: Should we get rid of cp_parser_declarator_id? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:14 Re: testsuite issue Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:07 C++ parser: Should we get rid of cp_parser_declarator_id? Volker Reichelt
19:36 Re: gcc generates incorrect code with -Os VÃclav Haisman
19:34 Re: Documentation for 4.0.2 Domagoj D
19:16 Missing link to changes.html for 4.1... David Daney
18:59 Re: java broken on Linux/x86-64 Tom Tromey
18:49 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Andrew Walrond
18:46 Re: Questions about long long type Ian Lance Taylor
18:40 Re: java broken on Linux/x86-64 Tom Tromey
18:34 gcc-prs mailing list archives Theodore Papadopoulo
18:10 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Diego Novillo
18:09 Re: MIPS: comparison modes in conditional branches Adam Nemet
18:00 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Andrew Haley
17:58 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Florian Weimer
17:41 Re: Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Richard Guenther
17:38 Mention gcc 4.1 in News/Announcements Jurij Rosenthal
17:02 testsuite issue Jan Beulich
16:02 Re: Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets DJ Delorie
15:50 gcc generates incorrect code with -Os Krzysztof Halasa
15:05 g++.dg/ext/packed3.C Jan Beulich
13:50 Renaming build_function_call_expr? Volker Reichelt
13:18 Building errors for sh, h8300 and m32c targets Nitin Shah
12:10 [fortran] round and related builtins Richard Guenther
11:36 Re: GCC 3.4.5 status? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:27 Re: GCC 3.4.5 status? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:14 Re: java broken on Linux/x86-64 Ranjit Mathew
09:17 Questions about long long type Eric Fisher
08:21 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
08:01 java broken on Linux/x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
07:59 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mathieu Lacage
05:33 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
05:29 Why is -Wstrict-null-sentinel (C++ only)? Chris Shoemaker
04:49 Re: GCC 3.4.5 status? Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:41 Re: GCC 3.4.5 status? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:32 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Gabriel Dos Reis
03:11 Re: c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Jack Howarth
03:10 Re: crtstuff sentinels Paul Brook
02:56 crtstuff sentinels DJ Delorie
02:39 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
02:23 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Andrew Pinski
02:07 Re: Possible size-opt patch Bernd Schmidt
01:50 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Chris Lattner
01:45 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Chris Lattner
01:43 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
01:35 Re: ARM spurious load Jim Wilson
01:28 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
01:06 Re: Problem with bugzilla account Jim Wilson
01:01 Re: problem with gcc 3.2.2 Jim Wilson
00:43 Re: more strict-aliasing questions Jim Wilson
00:33 Re: MIPS: comparison modes in conditional branches Jim Wilson
00:29 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Mike Stump
00:04 GCC 3.4.5 status? Steve Ellcey

December 05, 2005
23:58 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Steven Bosscher
23:39 Re: c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Mike Stump
23:26 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Joseph S. Myers
23:23 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Jim Blandy
23:17 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Mike Stump
22:52 Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX John David Anglin
22:36 Re: c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Jack Howarth
22:33 Problem with bugzilla account Eric Weddington
22:03 Re: c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Mike Stump
21:23 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Chris Lattner
20:14 Accessing const object during constructor without this pointer Pankaj Gupta
20:08 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Steven Bosscher
19:14 Re: new gcc/g++ 4.1.0 flags? Ian Lance Taylor
19:01 Re: LTO, LLVM, etc. Ian Lance Taylor
18:14 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Dale Johannesen
18:10 Re: more strict-aliasing questions Andrew Haley
18:04 more strict-aliasing questions Jack Howarth
17:53 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness schopper-gcc
17:43 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness Joe Buck
17:11 Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX Steve Kargl
15:57 Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX Steve Ellcey
14:28 Re: RFD: C pointer conversions that differ in unsignedness schopper-gcc
13:55 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Jack Howarth
08:31 Re: gcc-4.0-20051124-4.0-20051201.diff.bz2 is TERRIBLE!!! Paolo Bonzini
08:03 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Giovanni Bajo
07:12 MIPS: comparison modes in conditional branches Adam Nemet
05:23 Re: c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Joe Buck
03:40 Re: Documentation for 4.0.2 Ben Elliston
01:10 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Jack Howarth
00:52 Re: GNU Classpath development and gcc integration Gerald Pfeifer
00:48 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Jack Howarth

December 04, 2005
23:14 problem with gcc 3.2.2 Mohamed Ghorab
23:13 c++ speed 3.3/4.0/4.1 Jack Howarth
23:05 Re: identifying c++ aliasing violations Richard Guenther
22:54 identifying c++ aliasing violations Jack Howarth
22:03 Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX Gerald Pfeifer
18:00 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Ian Lance Taylor
16:49 Re: Is libgfortran in 4.1 compatible with 4.2? Steven Bosscher
16:48 Is libgfortran in 4.1 compatible with 4.2? H. J. Lu
15:15 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Mark Wielaard
15:02 GNU Classpath development and gcc integration Mark Wielaard
12:03 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Alan Modra
11:45 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Andrew Haley
10:46 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Mark Wielaard
10:34 Re: GMP on IA64-HPUX Richard Guenther
10:16 GMP on IA64-HPUX FX Coudert
04:31 Re: GCC back-ends Ian Lance Taylor
03:42 Re: Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Alan Modra

December 03, 2005
23:35 Installing libgcj consumes huge amounts of memory Gerald Pfeifer
19:43 LTO, LLVM, etc. Mark Mitchell
17:52 gcc-4.2-20051203 is now available gccadmin
08:11 gcc-4.0-20051124-4.0-20051201.diff.bz2 is TERRIBLE!!! J.C.
07:23 Re: build1, build1_v and friends Paul Thomas
07:19 Re: build1, build1_v and friends Paul Thomas
03:07 new gcc/g++ 4.1.0 flags? Jack Howarth
03:00 Re: weakref and static John David Anglin

December 02, 2005
22:46 gcc-4.1-20051202 is now available gccadmin
21:38 GCC back-ends Domagoj D
19:52 Possible size-opt patch Giovanni Bajo
18:57 Re: [PATCH] New predicate covering NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR Giovanni Bajo
18:54 Re: STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor Benjamin Kosnik
11:02 Re: Different Object Model in g++-2.95 and g++-3.3.5? Andrew Haley
10:52 Different Object Model in g++-2.95 and g++-3.3.5? holderlin
10:37 STL mt_allocator crash in global construcutor Neil Bird
10:22 [4.0/4.1 regression] Joost VandeVondele
05:54 FAIL: gcc.dg/sparc-ret.c scan-assembler Christian Joensson
05:02 Re: fold_build1 (NOP_EXPR, ...) vs. fold_build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, ...) Roger Sayle
01:32 Documentation for 4.0.2 Domagoj D

December 01, 2005
23:44 ARM spurious load Shaun Jackman
22:40 gcc-4.0-20051201 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: Declaration of flags in 4.0.2 Ian Lance Taylor
22:16 Declaration of flags in 4.0.2 Domagoj Flanks
19:37 Re: [C++] cp_token::type and cp_token::keyword Mark Mitchell
18:30 Re: new c++ restrictions? Nathan Sidwell
17:51 Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html Aldy Hernandez
17:44 Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html Nathan Sidwell
17:33 Re: MS1 backend not listed in backends.html Aldy Hernandez
17:18 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Mark Mitchell
16:55 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Aldy Hernandez
15:57 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Mark Mitchell
15:17 MS1 backend not listed in backends.html Steven Bosscher
14:08 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Aldy Hernandez
14:05 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c Aldy Hernandez
12:39 Re: Help required - ICE in GCC for my target DJ Delorie
11:36 fold_build1 (NOP_EXPR, ...) vs. fold_build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, ...) Richard Guenther
10:46 weakref and static Geoffrey Keating
10:40 [4.0 Regression + Patch] PR23282 Joost VandeVondele
10:04 GCC-3.4.6 status Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03 Re: SVN Problem? Paolo Bonzini
09:33 successfully built and installed GCC version 4.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian Sarge 3.1 Axel Bernhard Freyn
09:02 gcc-4.2-20051201 is now available gccadmin
08:40 RE: Help required - ICE in GCC for my target Shrirang Khishti
06:10 Re: Help required - ICE in GCC for my target DJ Delorie
05:52 Help required - ICE in GCC for my target Shrirang Khishti
01:44 new c++ restrictions? Jack Howarth


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3