This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:48:50 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
References: <200511231856.24635.paul@codesourcery.com> <4384F301.8030000@codesourcery.com> <m3oe4bdj5m.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> So the question is why, before his change, those *-elf targets didn't
> have an explicit fixproto=no, and I'm sure the answer is simply
> laziness and/or lack of knowledge.  fixproto is more or less a no-op
> when run on modern header files, so it's not like anybody would notice
> anything even in cases where it did run.

That's comforting.  I'd rather hoped that newlib wouldn't require
fixing...  So, Paul, perhaps the short answer is "turn it off for 68k
and check that it doesn't seem too broken."

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]