This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Douglas B. Jones" <douglas at gpc dot edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:50:21 -0800
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
References: <PHEKJLKKDLGCAEJLJPHMEELLEEAA.douglas@gpc.edu> <200511182117.11759.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20051118202403.GS15434@synopsys.com> <200511182135.28214.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:35:28PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> > "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
> 
> No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.

We are using the term in a differnent way, it appears.

Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  - From: Douglas B. Jones
- Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]