This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Null pointer check elimination

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: "Michael N. Moran" <mike at mnmoran dot org>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 14 Nov 2005 22:06:14 +0100
Subject: Re: Null pointer check elimination
References: <m3slu1vb2x.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><200511122101.jACL17FV008454@earth.phy.uc.edu><20051114173736.GB15434@synopsys.com> <4378DADA.1080508@mnmoran.org><20051114190406.GD15434@synopsys.com> <4378F8D0.9020209@mnmoran.org>

"Michael N. Moran" <mike@mnmoran.org> writes:

[...]

| Do we want to hide the error by not crashing? Why not just do the
| math and keep running? This seems like a run-time check that
| is not a part of the C/C++ language as I understand it.

defined by which standards?

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Michael N. Moran

References:
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Michael N. Moran
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Null pointer check elimination
  - From: Michael N. Moran

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]