23:55 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status |
Joe Buck |
22:47 |
Re: Wiki pages on tests cases |
Jonathan Wakely |
22:26 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
22:14 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Andrew Pinski |
21:57 |
Re: matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2 |
Jonathan Wakely |
21:55 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
21:05 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Laurent GUERBY |
20:52 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Andrew Haley |
20:49 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Tom Tromey |
20:48 |
Re: Warning bug with -fPIC? (was Re: Some testsuite cleanups (mostly for -fPIC)) |
Mike Stump |
20:40 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Andrew Pinski |
20:35 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Tom Tromey |
20:25 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
20:21 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
20:18 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
20:01 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
19:56 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
19:53 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
19:22 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
19:12 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
19:05 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
18:52 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
18:50 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Kenner |
18:42 |
Warning bug with -fPIC? (was Re: Some testsuite cleanups (mostly for -fPIC)) |
Kean Johnston |
18:28 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
18:14 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
18:08 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Joe Buck |
17:53 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:44 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:41 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Andrew Pinski |
17:35 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:29 |
RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Dave Korn |
17:28 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Kenner |
17:22 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:20 |
Re: C++ vague linkage data |
Joe Buck |
17:19 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Andrew Pinski |
17:14 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:11 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Mike Stump |
17:00 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status |
Mark Mitchell |
15:22 |
Re: C++ vague linkage data |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
15:20 |
Re: C++ vague linkage data |
Jakub Jelinek |
15:11 |
C++ vague linkage data |
Lubos Lunak |
14:49 |
s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1 |
Jakub Jelinek |
13:09 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Paolo Bonzini |
11:13 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
11:01 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Earnshaw |
10:32 |
GCC-3.4.5 Release Status |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
09:11 |
Re: How implemented "typeof" |
Nathan Sidwell |
09:03 |
How implemented "typeof" |
Alexander |
08:45 |
Re: Wiki pages on tests cases |
Jim Blandy |
08:31 |
matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2 |
anandi.thirunavukkarasu |
03:39 |
Re: ppc-linux and s390-linux compilers requiring 64-bit HWI? |
Ulrich Weigand |
02:54 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
02:32 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
23:57 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Diego Novillo |
23:52 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
23:43 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Russ Allbery |
23:42 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
David Edelsohn |
23:35 |
Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong? |
Scott Gilbertson |
23:23 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Diego Novillo |
23:05 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Eric Botcazou |
23:01 |
The actual LLVM integration patch |
Chris Lattner |
22:59 |
trees |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
22:58 |
Re: Broken link to documentation |
Joseph S. Myers |
22:58 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Peter Bergner |
22:52 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
22:51 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Steven Bosscher |
22:50 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
22:44 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
22:39 |
Broken link to documentation |
Simon Wright |
22:39 |
gcc-3.4-20051122 is now available |
gccadmin |
22:31 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
22:28 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Eric Botcazou |
22:27 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Chris Lattner |
22:19 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Steven Bosscher |
22:15 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Steven Bosscher |
22:06 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Steven Bosscher |
22:02 |
Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO) |
Steven Bosscher |
21:55 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Steven Bosscher |
21:04 |
Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO) |
Jan Hubicka |
20:39 |
RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Dave Korn |
20:34 |
Re: Target processor detection |
James E Wilson |
20:20 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
20:19 |
Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO) |
Scott Robert Ladd |
20:17 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
20:10 |
Re: failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for target unix/-m32 |
James E Wilson |
20:09 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
20:04 |
Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO) |
Jan Hubicka |
19:58 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
19:55 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
19:48 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
19:37 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
19:28 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
David Edelsohn |
19:26 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Peter Bergner |
19:21 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Benjamin Kosnik |
19:10 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
19:07 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Benjamin Kosnik |
19:06 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Richard Henderson |
19:06 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
19:02 |
RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Dave Korn |
18:59 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
18:53 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
18:50 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Richard Henderson |
18:47 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
18:38 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
18:34 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
18:27 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
18:20 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
18:17 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Benjamin Kosnik |
18:03 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Scott Robert Ladd |
17:49 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
17:40 |
Re: New SVN repo is up |
Joseph S. Myers |
17:37 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
17:28 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
17:11 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
17:08 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 pre-release available |
Joe Buck |
16:57 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Steven Bosscher |
16:45 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Berlin |
16:37 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Rafael Espíndola |
16:37 |
Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
16:30 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Daniel Berlin |
16:22 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Paul Brook |
16:20 |
Thoughts on LLVM and LTO |
Diego Novillo |
16:16 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Kenner |
16:12 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
16:11 |
Re: New SVN repo is up |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
16:10 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Robert Dewar |
16:09 |
Re: Copies of the GCC repository |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
16:02 |
Re: New SVN repo is up |
Daniel Berlin |
15:56 |
RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
15:54 |
Re: New SVN repo is up |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
15:52 |
RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Earnshaw |
15:40 |
Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
15:33 |
RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Dave Korn |
15:22 |
m68k exception handling |
Kövesdi György |
14:49 |
Gcc help pages about __mode__ keyword |
Anton Soppelsa |
14:26 |
Build results for gcc 4.0.2 on SuSE 9.2 |
Walter Zimmer |
13:44 |
Re: failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for target unix/-m32 |
Rainer Emrich |
13:27 |
RE: typedefs |
Dave Korn |
12:05 |
unable to find a register to spill in class |
Nemanja Popov |
10:45 |
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!) |
Richard Earnshaw |
09:53 |
Re: Target processor detection |
Richard Guenther |
09:39 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Anthony Shipman |
05:46 |
Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems |
Kaveh R. Ghazi |
05:06 |
Re: GCC 4.2 |
Mark Mitchell |
04:53 |
Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
03:20 |
Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems |
Kaveh R. Ghazi |
02:52 |
Re: Ada on ARM |
Ralf Corsepius |
01:43 |
Re: A question about having multiple insns for one operation |
Jim Wilson |
01:24 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Chris Lattner |
01:23 |
Re: typedefs |
Giovanni Bajo |
01:19 |
Re: Vectorizer in GCC 4.0 |
Dorit Naishlos |
01:01 |
Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal |
Joseph S. Myers |
00:34 |
Re: Target processor detection |
Jim Wilson |
00:27 |
RE: Vectorizer in GCC 4.0 |
Balaji V. Iyer |
23:34 |
Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout |
Andreas Schwab |
23:18 |
dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong? |
Scott Gilbertson |
23:01 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
22:55 |
Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong? |
David Daney |
22:50 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Joe Buck |
22:45 |
Sta cekate? |
avalanche |
22:05 |
Re: RTEMS GCC Status Report |
Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp |
22:04 |
Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout |
Pankaj Gupta |
21:55 |
Re: RTEMS GCC Status Report |
Laurent GUERBY |
21:53 |
Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout |
Andrew Pinski |
21:47 |
Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout |
Pankaj Gupta |
21:21 |
Re: Issue with find_tail_calls |
Richard Henderson |
21:07 |
RTEMS GCC Status Report |
Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp |
20:34 |
Re: Pragma callback to insert text in input buffer? |
Richard Henderson |
20:31 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
20:24 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Joe Buck |
20:12 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Eric Botcazou |
20:09 |
Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336) |
Aldy Hernandez |
19:34 |
Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Joe Buck |
19:24 |
GCC 4.0.2 build report on Fedora Core 3 |
Josef Nygrin |
19:23 |
Re: Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis |
Prateek Saxena |
18:52 |
compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9 |
Douglas B. Jones |
18:43 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Mike Stump |
18:35 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Mike Stump |
18:30 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Mike Stump |
18:15 |
Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Mike Stump |
17:47 |
Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Mark Mitchell |
17:43 |
Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu |
Rainer Emrich |
17:41 |
Re: Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation] |
Jim Blandy |
17:32 |
Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change |
Thomas Quinot |
17:29 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Michael Matz |
17:24 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Nathan Sidwell |
17:04 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Steven Bosscher |
16:46 |
Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Diego Novillo |
16:31 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Michael Matz |
16:24 |
Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Mark Mitchell |
15:28 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Andrew MacLeod |
13:54 |
Re: Issue with find_tail_calls |
Richard Kenner |
13:43 |
Re: Issue with find_tail_calls |
Richard Guenther |
13:37 |
Issue with find_tail_calls |
Richard Kenner |
13:22 |
Pragma callback to insert text in input buffer? |
Jan Hoogerbrugge |
12:51 |
Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries |
François-Xavier Coudert |
12:25 |
Target processor detection |
Piotr Wyderski |
12:04 |
Re: Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation] |
Laurent GUERBY |
11:43 |
Re: Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis |
Diego Novillo |
11:40 |
Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation] |
Andrew Haley |
11:29 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Richard Earnshaw |
11:26 |
Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Diego Novillo |
11:19 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Robert Dewar |
11:01 |
Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values |
Neil Booth |
09:53 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Giovanni Bajo |
09:29 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Bernd Schmidt |
09:13 |
Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis |
Prateek Saxena |
08:59 |
failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnufor target unix/-m32 |
Rainer Emrich |
08:54 |
Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
Rainer Emrich |
08:53 |
Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Rainer Emrich |
08:51 |
Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on mips-sgi-irix6.5 |
Rainer Emrich |
08:49 |
Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 |
Rainer Emrich |
08:48 |
GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18) |
Mark Mitchell |
08:38 |
Results for 4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) testsuite on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 |
Rainer Emrich |
06:24 |
Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336) |
Mark Mitchell |
06:18 |
Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values |
Mark Mitchell |
03:27 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
03:11 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Geert Bosch |
02:55 |
Re: Register Allocation |
Mark Mitchell |
02:35 |
Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender |
Jim Wilson |
02:33 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Dale Johannesen |
02:13 |
Re: Link-time optimzation |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
02:06 |
Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender |
Jim Wilson |
01:35 |
Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0? |
Jim Wilson |
01:07 |
Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses |
Richard Henderson |
01:06 |
Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values |
Richard Henderson |
00:46 |
Re: question about gcc |
Paul Albrecht |
00:43 |
Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values |
Aldy Hernandez |
00:26 |
Re: question about gcc |
Jim Wilson |
00:25 |
Re: question about gcc |
Paul Albrecht |
00:19 |
Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses |
Steven Bosscher |