This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: using multiple trees with subversion

From: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:56:42 +0200
Subject: Re: using multiple trees with subversion
References: <19c433eb0510190119x163b989en28b37f3dbe71b6b5@mail.gmail.com> <025c01c5d492$81e920a0$bc4a2597@bagio>

> Not that I know of. As Daniel Berlin said, Subversion 1.4 will probably have
> support for checking out repositories with compressed local copies (or no copy
> at all -- but I wouldn't suggest this, as you'd start to be slow in "svn diff",
> "svn stat", etc).

I guess no local copy would be fine with me. diff and stat should not
be much slower than in CVS, and since very rarely do a full tree
diff/stat, this is quite acceptable.

Is that so hard to implement that it's not done already? Or am I the
only person to find that disk is expensive (or working on his own
hardware, maybe)?

> You may want to look into svk though

Thanks for the link, I'll give it a try.

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using multiple trees with subversion
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: using multiple trees with subversion
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: using multiple trees with subversion
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- using multiple trees with subversion
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: using multiple trees with subversion
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]