This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Asher Langton <langton2 at llnl dot gov>,Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:06:47 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0509301432170.3425-100000@vv620.math.wisc.edu> <200509302301.53768.stevenb@suse.de>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:01:53PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2005 21:36, Asher Langton wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > > Asher,
> > > Any progress on the paperwork?
> >
> > None. I haven't received anything from the FSF. I just pinged them
> > again. The FSF does have a disclaimer from LLNL, which seems like it
> > should be sufficient, according to:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal
>
> Can someone with access to these FSF lists check if this is correct?
>
> This is taking far longer than necessary, and it's annoying both for
> our users and (especially) our contributor here that it's taking such
> a long time :-(
This does not seem to be true. The only reference to LLNL in the
copyright assignments is a disclaimer of changes (by someone else, not
by Asher); they'd need a blanket assignment, or a disclaimer for Asher
in which case he would need an individual assignment.
Beyond that you'll have to contact the assignments clerk directly.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC