This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
- From: rridge at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca (Ross Ridge)
- To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Ross Ridge <rridge at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:51:01 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
> I was not asking the general question, I was asking how it fails
> to conform wrt the particular technical issue at hand.
Since GCC doesn't have any code that does (A), (B), or (C) it doesn't
place a burden on GCC to require it to do (B). That's sufficient to
answer the techinical issue at hand. While that implies GCC doesn't
conform, I said so explictly because Paul Eggert said that c99 is often
implemented using GCC.
Ross Ridge
--
l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo] rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rridge/
db //