gcc archive
date index for August, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2005
22:58 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Eric Christopher
22:40 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
20:06 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Gerald Pfeifer
19:44 [gfortran] Change language name from "f95" to "fortran" FX Coudert
19:28 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Ian Lance Taylor
19:25 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gerald Pfeifer
19:21 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Re: mmx register moves through memory Vahur Sinijärv
18:27 Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c) Eric Botcazou
18:25 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Joe Buck
18:21 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
18:16 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Andrew Pinski
18:16 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Shantonu Sen
18:02 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Ian Lance Taylor
17:57 Running ranlib after installation - okay or not? Gerald Pfeifer
17:55 Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c) Steve Ellcey
17:38 Re: mmx register moves through memory Vahur Sinijärv
17:16 Re: mmx register moves through memory Richard Henderson
16:13 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Volker Reichelt
15:08 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Peter Steinmetz
14:22 Improved aliasing branch todo list Daniel Berlin
14:16 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Richard Earnshaw
13:50 RE: question about pass management Daniel Berlin
12:26 Re: mmx register moves through memory Richard Guenther
12:05 Re: mmx register moves through memory Vahur Sinijärv
11:44 GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
11:34 Re: mmx register moves through memory Prakash Punnoor
11:21 mmx register moves through memory Vahur Sinijärv
09:50 RE: question about pass management Dave Korn
09:27 Re: doloop-opt deficiency Sebastian Pop
09:07 Re: question about pass management Paolo Bonzini
09:06 Re: doloop-opt deficiency Zdenek Dvorak
09:03 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Zdenek Dvorak
07:29 question about pass management Prateek Saxena
04:33 Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c) Eric Botcazou
01:25 Re: doloop-opt deficiency Dale Johannesen
00:45 Re: GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c) Mike Stump

August 30, 2005
23:45 gcc-3.4-20050830 is now available gccadmin
23:35 GCC testsuite timeout question (gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c) Steve Ellcey
19:58 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Joern RENNECKE
19:03 gcc -I- feature nmake Technical Support
17:57 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Peter Steinmetz
17:12 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
17:11 Re: tree-ipa-type-escape slow Kenneth Zadeck
16:39 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Sebastian Pop
16:24 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Nix
16:24 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Jan Hubicka
16:21 Re: doloop-opt deficiency Sebastian Pop
16:12 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Peter Steinmetz
16:05 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Daniel Berlin
16:01 Re: More NEWS on GCC? Daniel Berlin
15:58 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Steven Bosscher
15:53 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Peter Steinmetz
15:46 tree-ipa-type-escape slow Richard Guenther
14:19 I wiki-ized the GCC Patch Tracker instructions Kelley Cook
13:37 Re: "invalid operand to binary operator" problem Daniel Berlin
13:32 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Sebastian Pop
13:32 Re: More NEWS on GCC? Timothy Miller
13:21 Re: More NEWS on GCC? Nicholas Nethercote
11:34 Re: More NEWS on GCC? Diego Novillo
10:02 Re: More NEWS on GCC? Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
09:29 Re: gcc 4.0.x: MMX built-ins regression Prakash Punnoor
08:39 "invalid operand to binary operator" problem Ferenc Kovacs
07:37 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Kai Ruottu
07:15 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Kai Ruottu
06:33 Re: gcc 4.0.x: MMX built-ins regression Uros Bizjak
04:50 More NEWS on GCC? Timothy Miller
04:14 Re: parallell build on cygwin... does it work? Christian Joensson
02:49 Segfault with gcc4 and LD_PRELOAD (was: Need help to fill bug report(gcc 4.0.1 and above)) Mathieu Malaterre
00:33 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Diego Novillo
00:03 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Steven Bosscher

August 29, 2005
23:56 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Joe Buck
23:48 Re: [DEAD] APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605]memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Ross Ridge
23:44 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Joe Buck
23:40 doloop-opt deficiency Dale Johannesen
23:34 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Steven Bosscher
23:26 Re: What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Joe Buck
22:20 What to do about compile time slowdowns for 4.1? Steven Bosscher
21:17 Re: Global variables Mike Stump
21:12 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Mike Stump
20:44 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Richard Henderson
20:02 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Gerald Pfeifer
20:02 Re: help: about enum Mike Stump
19:48 building gcc 4.0.1 using CAS (part of the sun v8plus arch) Andrew B. Lundgren
16:42 Re: parallell build on cygwin... does it work? Ian Lance Taylor
15:33 Re: [DEAD] APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605]memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Daniel Berlin
15:14 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Andy Smith
15:11 gcc 4.0.x: MMX built-ins regression Prakash Punnoor
14:54 Re: Removing operand normalizaiton in get_expr_operands Diego Novillo
13:38 Re: unused variable warning skaller
13:36 Re: Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -owith -c or -S and multiple compilations Peter O'Gorman
12:34 Global variables Primrose.Mbanefo
12:14 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org is turning away MS Internet Explorer 5 Jonathan Wilson
10:15 parallell build on cygwin... does it work? Christian Joensson
10:06 http://gcc.gnu.org is turning away MS Internet Explorer 5 Mike Ainley
08:00 Re: unused variable warning Ian Lance Taylor
06:59 MASK_GNU_AS == MASK_GAS Fred Fish
05:41 Re: Status of --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
05:31 [DEAD] APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset()Optimization on x86-32 bit Kevin McBride
04:51 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Joe Buck
04:50 unused variable warning skaller
02:05 Status of --enable-mapped-location Andrew Pinski

August 28, 2005
23:37 Re: Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -owith -c or -S and multiple compilations Kean Johnston
23:30 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Ian Lance Taylor
23:28 Re: APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset()Optimization on x86-32 bit Daniel Berlin
22:46 APPEAL to steering committee: [Bug target/23605] memset() Optimizationon x86-32 bit Kevin McBride
21:17 Successful Build and Installation of GCC David Webb
20:49 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ken Raeburn
18:13 Re: memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Ian Lance Taylor
17:42 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Daniel Jacobowitz
16:57 Re: Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations Andrew Walrond
16:35 Re: 206 GCC HEAD regressions, 196 new, with your patch on 2005-08-23T19:50:19Z. Richard Henderson
16:06 Re: Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -owith -c or -S and multiple compilations Kean Johnston
15:11 Re: Question about pre_edge_insert () in gcse.c Daniel Berlin
14:56 Question about pre_edge_insert () in gcse.c Leehod Baruch
13:51 Need help to fill bug report (gcc 4.0.1 and above) Mathieu Malaterre
12:03 Re: Redundant limit check for switch Paolo Bonzini
06:27 Re: Redundant limit check for switch Piotr Fusik
03:41 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Paul C. Leopardi

August 27, 2005
22:07 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Alexandre Oliva
15:30 Re: Incoming Message webmaster
13:18 Re: Uninitialized use warning message Kean Johnston
10:43 Re: Uninitialized use warning message Falk Hueffner
08:54 RE: help: about enum Gaurav Gautam, Noida
08:36 Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations Andrew Walrond
08:25 help: about enum Gaurav Gautam, Noida
07:48 Re: Uninitialized use warning message Eyal Lebedinsky
03:56 memset() Optimization on x86-32 bit Kevin McBride
03:05 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Daniel Jacobowitz
01:11 Re: Uninitialized use warning message Kean Johnston
00:29 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
00:08 Re: Uninitialized use warning message Eyal Lebedinsky

August 26, 2005
22:06 Uninitialized use warning message Kean Johnston
21:31 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
21:23 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
20:42 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Russ Allbery
20:39 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Nix
20:12 Re: 206 GCC HEAD regressions, 196 new, with your patch on 2005-08-23T19:50:19Z. Richard Henderson
19:15 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Scott Robert Ladd
19:08 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Tristan Wibberley
18:06 Re: ia32: clearing a 7116 bytes struct inserted as "C.171.8759:.zero 7116 ... memcpy()" with gcc-4.0.2 James E Wilson
18:02 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Laurent GUERBY
17:22 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Ian Lance Taylor
17:15 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Sergei Organov
17:11 RE: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Dave Korn
16:55 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Ian Lance Taylor
16:48 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Mike Stump
16:27 java type layout (Was: Re: 206 GCC HEAD regressions, 196 new, with your patch on 2005-08-23T19:50:19Z.) Joern RENNECKE
16:03 Re: 206 GCC HEAD regressions, 196 new, with your patch on 2005-08-23T19:50:19Z. Joern RENNECKE
14:28 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Sergei Organov
14:20 Re: PCH / ObjC issue with gcc 4.0.2-pre Andrew Pinski
14:14 PCH / ObjC issue with gcc 4.0.2-pre Helge Hess
12:01 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
11:28 gcc-4.1-20050826 is now available gccadmin
11:18 RE: How do I disable classes of test? Dave Korn
10:48 How do I disable classes of test? Daniel Towner
10:44 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Laurent GUERBY
09:44 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Ranjit Mathew
08:47 Re: ia32: clearing a 7116 bytes struct inserted as "C.171.8759: .zero 7116 ... memcpy()" with gcc-4.0.2 Etienne Lorrain
07:56 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Kai Ruottu
03:21 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Christopher Faylor
02:51 Re: Text message support
02:33 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Ross Ridge
01:08 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Mike Stump
01:04 re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Daniel Kegel
01:01 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Eric Christopher
00:53 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Ivan Novick
00:48 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Mike Stump
00:09 Cross Compiler Unix - Windows Ivan Novick
00:05 gcc-4.0-20050825 is now available gccadmin
00:01 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie

August 25, 2005
23:24 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
23:23 FW: wow ! angels at optimum dot com
22:34 Re: ia32: clearing a 7116 bytes struct inserted as "C.171.8759: .zero 7116 ... memcpy()" with gcc-4.0.2 James E Wilson
21:57 Re: RFC: bug in combine James E Wilson
21:14 Re: Warnung & Error Messages James E Wilson
20:43 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Richard Henderson
20:16 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
20:06 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Tristan Wibberley
20:06 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Andrew Pinski
20:02 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Fariborz Jahanian
20:01 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
19:55 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
19:47 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse H. J. Lu
19:37 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Ian Lance Taylor
19:16 Re: RFC: bug in combine Ian Lance Taylor
18:59 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
18:52 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
18:29 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Daniel Jacobowitz
18:29 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
18:27 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Daniel Jacobowitz
18:19 Re: RFC: bug in combine Florian Weimer
18:16 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Andrew Pinski
18:14 Re: RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Fariborz Jahanian
18:14 Re: RFC: bug in combine Florian Weimer
18:11 RFC - COST of const_double for x86 prevents constant copy propagation in cse Fariborz Jahanian
18:11 Re: fix pr23546, exposed by using VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR for vectors Laurent GUERBY
18:03 RFC: bug in combine Dale Johannesen
18:01 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Richard Henderson
17:46 Re: Dom patch Jeffrey A Law
17:41 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
17:40 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
17:33 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Joe Buck
17:27 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Ian Lance Taylor
17:19 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Mike Stump
17:14 Re: help on compile error (4.0.1) Mike Stump
16:59 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Gabriel Paubert
16:27 RE: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Douglas B Rupp
16:22 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support H. J. Lu
16:10 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Florian Weimer
16:06 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Jeffrey A Law
16:03 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Jeffrey A Law
15:59 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Jeffrey A Law
15:56 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Richard Henderson
15:56 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Ranjit Mathew
15:18 Re: Assembling pending decls before writing their debug info Tom Tromey
15:08 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Tom Tromey
15:05 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
15:04 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Robert Dewar
15:02 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
15:01 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
14:59 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
14:53 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
13:19 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin Kolhe
12:56 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Marcin Dalecki
12:40 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Paolo Bonzini
12:39 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin Kolhe
11:57 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Paolo Bonzini
11:52 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Paolo Bonzini
11:36 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Marcin Dalecki
11:14 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Robert Dewar
11:13 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin Kolhe
11:12 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Robert Dewar
11:09 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin Kolhe
11:05 [GCC 4.2 Project] Sub-Target specific math routines library Richard Guenther
10:51 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:49 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Andi Kleen
10:45 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:44 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Andrew MacLeod
10:34 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Richard Kenner
10:31 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Andi Kleen
09:45 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Steven Bosscher
09:42 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Paolo Bonzini
08:50 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin
07:42 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
07:32 Re: help on compile error (4.0.1) Eric Christopher
07:23 Re: help on compile error (4.0.1) Yao Qi
07:14 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Christoph Hellwig
07:07 Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST) Ranjit Mathew
06:42 Dom patch James Morrison
05:40 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
05:35 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
05:32 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
05:30 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support DJ Delorie
05:22 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
05:13 Re: 4.2 Project: "@file" support Christoph Hellwig
04:50 4.2 Project: "@file" support Mark Mitchell
01:27 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Daniel Berlin
00:25 Re: Wiki Broken? Kurt Wall

August 24, 2005
23:23 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Andrew MacLeod
22:55 help on compile error (4.0.1) Jiang Long
22:28 Re: SSA_NAMEs not always released Daniel Berlin
22:20 SSA_NAMEs not always released Andrew Pinski
21:40 Re: TREE_READONLY vs TREE_CONSTANT Josh Conner
20:03 Re: Assembling pending decls before writing their debug info Daniel Berlin
19:34 Re: TREE_READONLY vs TREE_CONSTANT Richard Henderson
19:33 Re: Assembling pending decls before writing their debug info James E Wilson
19:07 Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST) Andrew Pinski
19:03 Re: m64 James E Wilson
18:57 Re: compile error for 990203-1.c James E Wilson
18:51 Re: compile error for 990203-1.c James E Wilson
18:38 Re: V850 ABI? James E Wilson
18:10 TREE_READONLY vs TREE_CONSTANT Josh Conner
17:45 Re: Removing operand normalizaiton in get_expr_operands Daniel Berlin
17:41 Re: Removing operand normalizaiton in get_expr_operands Richard Henderson
17:37 Re: Removing operand normalizaiton in get_expr_operands Jeffrey A Law
17:30 RE: Wiki Broken? Dave Korn
17:27 Re: Wiki Broken? Patrick McFarland
17:23 Re: Wiki Broken? Daniel Berlin
17:22 Removing operand normalizaiton in get_expr_operands Daniel Berlin
17:07 Re: Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Richard Henderson
17:06 Re: Wiki Broken? Niko Matsakis
17:01 Re: Wiki Broken? Paolo Bonzini
16:16 Wiki Broken? Niko Matsakis
15:42 Re: gcc newbie and open projects Paolo Bonzini
15:21 Re: GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST) Scott Gilbertson
14:31 gcc newbie and open projects Brian Makin
14:08 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
13:49 Re: SSE builtins for ia32 Paul Koning
13:48 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Peter Bergner
13:38 Problem with peephole to peephole2 conversion Ashwin
11:12 ia32: clearing a 7116 bytes struct inserted as "C.171.8759: .zero 7116 ... memcpy()" with gcc-4.0.2 Etienne Lorrain
08:10 Warnung & Error Messages Ralf Schubert
07:53 Re: Searching for a branch for the see optimization. Leehod Baruch
07:47 GCJ Interpreter Aborts (2005-08-24 IST) Ranjit Mathew
04:10 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
03:10 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Peter Bergner

August 23, 2005
23:44 gcc-3.4-20050823 is now available gccadmin
22:44 Re: SSE builtins for ia32 Richard Henderson
21:46 Re: Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work with autoreconf again) Ian Lance Taylor
20:51 Re: Searching for a branch for the see optimization. Mark Mitchell
20:47 Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int Mark Mitchell
20:32 SSE builtins for ia32 Paul Koning
20:30 Re: Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work with autoreconf again) Tom Tromey
20:21 RE: pushl vs movl + movl on x86 Menezes, Evandro
20:08 Re: pushl vs movl + movl on x86 Richard Henderson
19:32 Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end Giovanni Bajo
19:26 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Bernd Schmidt
19:08 Re: Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work withautoreconf again) Benjamin Kosnik
18:43 pushl vs movl + movl on x86 Dan Nicolaescu
18:33 Re: Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work withautoreconf again) DJ Delorie
18:29 Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int DJ Delorie
18:26 Re: Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work withautoreconf again) Benjamin Kosnik
18:15 Automake versions (was: Patch to make libgcj work with autoreconf again) Kelley Cook
17:51 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc James E Wilson
17:29 Re: Bug in builtin_floor optimization Dale Johannesen
17:25 Re: Assembling pending decls before writing their debug info Andrew Pinski
17:16 Assembling pending decls before writing their debug info Nick Clifton
16:53 Re: Bug in builtin_floor optimization Richard Henderson
16:09 Re: please update the gcj main page John M. Gabriele
15:45 Re: Question about an rtx expression. Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Re: Bug in builtin_floor optimization Roger Sayle
15:40 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
15:13 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Steven Bosscher
15:08 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Bernd Schmidt
14:57 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
14:44 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Bernd Schmidt
14:30 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Andreas Krebbel
14:09 Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end Paolo Bonzini
13:34 Re: [GCC 4.x][AMD64 ABI] variadic function Florian Weimer
12:14 Re: Warning Behavior jlh
11:34 m64 ji an
09:34 [GCC 4.x][AMD64 ABI] variadic function Matteo Emanuele
09:31 Re: Question about an rtx expression. Paolo Bonzini
09:10 Question about an rtx expression. Leehod Baruch
09:07 Successful build off gcc-3.4.4 on Mac OS X 10.2.8 Xavier Dectot
08:48 Re: Memory usage reduction in loop.c ? Giovanni Bajo
08:40 Re: please update the gcj main page Florian Weimer
07:58 Re: Warning Behavior Andreas Schwab
07:09 Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int Jakub Jelinek
06:55 Re: Warning Behavior Paolo Bonzini
06:46 Warning Behavior Ivan Novick
02:51 compile error for 990203-1.c ibanez
00:38 gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int DJ Delorie

August 22, 2005
23:35 Bug in builtin_floor optimization Dale Johannesen
22:50 Re: Question about pointer arithmetics in GIMPLE Daniel Berlin
22:39 Re: Question about pointer arithmetics in GIMPLE Jeffrey A Law
22:30 Memory usage reduction in loop.c ? Christophe Jaillet
22:24 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-08-21) Mark Mitchell
21:19 Re: [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end David Edelsohn
20:37 Re: Building of fixincludes with 4.0.1 uses wrong gcc James E Wilson
20:06 [RFA] Nonfunctioning split in rs6000 back-end Paolo Bonzini
20:01 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.3 is released H. J. Lu
19:25 Re: Where have all the conditional moves gone? James E Wilson
19:13 Re: Question of pipeline description James E Wilson
18:49 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-08-21) Ian Lance Taylor
16:30 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Richard Henderson
14:42 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Paolo Bonzini
14:35 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-08-21) Mark Mitchell
14:27 Re: Searching for a branch for the see optimization. Steven Bosscher
14:23 Re: [patch] Fix behavior of TER on unrolled loops Steven Bosscher
14:12 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Leehod Baruch
13:49 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Roger Sayle
13:37 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Paolo Bonzini
13:33 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Leehod Baruch
12:46 Searching for a branch for the see optimization. Leehod Baruch
12:40 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-08-21) Andrew Pinski
12:30 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Kai Ruottu
12:24 Re: Redundant limit check for switch Paolo Bonzini
11:53 Re: Redundant limit check for switch Giovanni Bajo
11:38 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Richard Kenner
11:23 PR/23303 (not using leal on ix86) Paolo Bonzini
09:00 Build report for AIX 5.1 Mario Linke
08:11 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? WU Yongwei
07:56 Redundant limit check for switch Piotr Fusik
07:38 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Paolo Bonzini
07:28 Re: [patch] Fix behavior of TER on unrolled loops Paolo Bonzini
07:10 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Paolo Bonzini
05:28 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-08-21) Mark Mitchell
04:27 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Richard Henderson
03:32 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Daniel Berlin
02:48 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Andrew Pinski
02:45 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Richard Henderson
01:36 Re: how to compile gcc Yao qi
01:36 Re: how to compile gcc Yao qi

August 21, 2005
18:32 Question about pointer arithmetics in GIMPLE Falk Hueffner
17:54 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Leehod Baruch
16:55 Re: Question about merging two instructions. Roger Sayle
13:52 Question about merging two instructions. Leehod Baruch
11:07 V850 ABI? Torsten Mohr
09:53 Re: Help with Dependency question Sebastian Pop
05:40 Building of fixincludes with 4.0.1 uses wrong gcc h dot michael dot foerster at
02:33 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Daniel Berlin
02:16 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Richard Henderson

August 20, 2005
23:53 Re: Problem with instrumenting GIMPLE for adding a global variable Prateek Saxena
23:20 Problem with instrumenting GIMPLE for adding a global variable Prateek Saxena
21:07 Help with Dependency question shreyas krishnan
16:46 Re: how to compile gcc Mike Stump
13:49 Re: how to compile gcc drizzle drizzle
13:13 Re: how to compile gcc Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
10:30 Where have all the conditional moves gone? Piotr Wyderski
01:34 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Daniel Berlin
00:29 Re: Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Andrew Pinski
00:28 Re: Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Stephane Wirtel
00:21 Re: Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Eric Christopher
00:17 Re: Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Stephane Wirtel
00:07 Re: Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Andrew Pinski
00:02 Gcc and a Garbage Collector. Stephane Wirtel

August 19, 2005
23:26 how to compile gcc Jiang Long
23:08 Re: Fwd: [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Ian Lance Taylor
22:53 Fwd: [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Dale Johannesen
22:44 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Laurent GUERBY
22:37 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Laurent GUERBY
22:17 Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin8 with Ada Chris Douty
21:17 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
21:11 Re: Internal Behavior of G++ Mike Stump
20:57 Re: Internal Behavior of G++ Aoun Raza
20:30 Re: Internal Behavior of G++ Joe Buck
20:28 Internal Behavior of G++ Aoun Raza
19:40 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Tom Tromey
16:48 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? Andreas Schwab
16:31 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? Joe Buck
15:19 Question of pipeline description Ling-hua Tseng
13:59 gcc successful builds on aix 5.3 ml 2 rhyatt
11:51 Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Joseph S. Myers
11:09 gcc-4.1-20050819 is now available gccadmin
10:32 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Vincent Lefevre
10:20 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? Alisdair Meredith
08:27 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? Jonathan Wakely
08:20 Re: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? Jonathan Wakely
03:39 ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new? WU Yongwei
03:33 Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Yao qi
03:30 Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Andrew Pinski
03:25 Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Yao qi
03:08 Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Andrew Pinski
03:05 Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC Yao qi
02:56 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
02:23 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Robert Dewar
01:34 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking James E Wilson
01:08 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Alan Modra
00:54 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Joe Buck
00:08 gcc-4.0-20050818 is now available gccadmin

August 18, 2005
22:51 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Mike Stump
21:52 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Vincent Lefevre
19:54 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Branko Äibej
19:48 Ian Lance Taylor appointed "middle-end" maintainer David Edelsohn
19:10 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Mike Stump
18:39 Re: Ian Lance Taylor appointed "middle-end" maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
18:31 Ian Lance Taylor appointed "middle-end" maintainer David Edelsohn
16:38 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:41 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Alan Modra
12:46 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:09 RE: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Dave Korn
12:00 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Florian Weimer
12:00 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Florian Weimer
11:56 RE: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Dave Korn
11:25 Re: Hi I want to implement new target AVR MCU's for GCC E. Weddington
07:35 Re: ppc assembler problem Gunther Nikl
07:25 Re: Hi I want to implement new target AVR MCU's for GCC Abhijit Gupta
07:00 Bedankt donkergezien
05:41 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem Erik Christiansen
03:42 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Alan Modra
03:07 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:50 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
02:08 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:01 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:20 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
01:00 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Giovanni Bajo

August 17, 2005
22:45 Re: Hi I want to implement new target AVR MCU's for GCC N V Krishna
22:45 Re: Hi I want to implement new target AVR MCU's for GCC Mike Stump
22:37 Hi I want to implement new target AVR MCU's for GCC Rikard S
20:25 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Florian Weimer
20:00 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
19:53 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem James E Wilson
19:45 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Florian Weimer
19:41 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem James E Wilson
19:33 Re: ppc assembler problem James E Wilson
19:29 Re: Help with GCC James E Wilson
19:25 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
19:25 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Mike Stump
19:19 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Florian Weimer
19:15 Re: [PATCH]: Proof-of-concept for dynamic format checking Ian Lance Taylor
19:13 Re: How do I delete redundant prologue/epilogue instructions? James E Wilson
15:37 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Marcel Moolenaar
15:09 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Andrew Pinski
15:01 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Marcel Moolenaar
12:16 RE: ppc assembler problem Williams Jr, Ernest L.
12:05 Re: ppc assembler problem F. Heitkamp
10:28 beginnings of a gcc interface for the language machine Peri Hankey
07:18 missed-optimization issue count Dan Kegel
07:11 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Gerald Pfeifer
00:58 Re: SPEC sixtrack regression on 64 bits machines Daniel Berlin
00:41 Re: SPEC sixtrack regression on 64 bits machines Sebastian Pop
00:26 gcc-3.4-20050816 is now available gccadmin

August 16, 2005
20:48 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem Torsten Mohr
20:25 Re: Question of the suitable time to call `free_bb_for_insn()' Richard Henderson
18:44 SPEC sixtrack regression on 64 bits machines Steven Bosscher
18:09 Re: gcc installation on PowerPC James E Wilson
18:02 Re: ppc assembler problem James E Wilson
17:51 Re: Inlining vs the stack Richard Henderson
15:10 How do I delete redundant prologue/epilogue instructions? Daniel Towner
14:14 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Daniel Berlin
13:52 Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc Andreas Krebbel
08:15 Re: [PATCH]: kill HOST_PTR_PRINTF Segher Boessenkool
08:15 Re: Inlining vs the stack Segher Boessenkool
08:15 Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Segher Boessenkool
06:38 Help with GCC Balaji V. Iyer
03:04 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem Erik Christiansen

August 15, 2005
23:30 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Sebastian Pop
22:59 Re: gcc installation on PowerPC Patrick McFarland
22:37 gcc installation on PowerPC Vijaya Kishore Idimadakala
20:12 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Marcel Moolenaar
20:10 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Diego Novillo
20:08 Re: GCC build goes into endless loop Andrew Pinski
20:03 GCC build goes into endless loop Gerald Pfeifer
19:04 Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? John David Anglin
18:22 Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:59 Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? Zack Weinberg
17:53 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf, linker problem Torsten Mohr
15:17 Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? Nix
14:01 Re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Peter Zijlstra
13:53 Re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Daniel Jacobowitz
13:51 Re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Andrew Pinski
13:48 Re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Peter Zijlstra
13:36 re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Peter Zijlstra
13:33 Re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Andrew Pinski
13:24 re: C++ vs. pthread_cancel Dan Kegel
12:42 ppc assembler problem F. Heitkamp
09:18 Re: [SUMMARY] Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Sebastian Pop
08:38 C++ vs. pthread_cancel Peter Zijlstra

August 14, 2005
17:30 Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? Zack Weinberg
16:45 Re: Problems with bootstrapping 4.0.1 Kevin McBride
16:13 Re: Inlining vs the stack Daniel Berlin
16:07 Re: Inlining vs the stack Andrew Pinski
16:03 Re: Inlining vs the stack Bernd Jendrissek
15:54 Re: Question of the suitable time to call `free_bb_for_insn()' Ling-hua Tseng
15:40 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Berlin
15:29 What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:18 Re: [SUMMARY] Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Laurent GUERBY
13:29 Re: Question on updating ssa for virtual operands (PR tree-optimization/22543) Dorit Naishlos
11:10 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
09:04 Re: current 4.0 branch doesn't compile Tommy Vercetti
05:40 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf for c, c++ and java? Torsten Mohr
01:49 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Ian Lance Taylor
01:38 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VA Robert Dewar
01:36 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Berlin
01:16 Question of the suitable time to call `free_bb_for_insn()' Ling-hua Tseng
00:36 Re: --target=v850-unknown-elf for c, c++ and java? James E Wilson
00:25 Re: Question of 2nd instruction scheduling pass James E Wilson
00:11 Re: Problems with bootstrapping 4.0.1 James E Wilson

August 13, 2005
23:39 current 4.0 branch doesn't compile Tommy Vercetti
23:07 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
22:13 Re: DFA recognizer Ian Lance Taylor
21:34 DFA recognizer Balaji V. Iyer
20:38 Re: bubblestrap on the 3.4 branch? James E Wilson
20:25 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding James E Wilson
18:08 gcc-4.1-20050813 is now available gccadmin
18:08 Re: Serious performance regression on Jul 29 Martin Reinecke
16:33 Re: Question on updating ssa for virtual operands (PR tree-optimization/22543) Zdenek Dvorak
15:01 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Paul Brook
14:03 Problems with bootstrapping 4.0.1 Kevin McBride
13:40 Re: Serious performance regression on Jul 29 Daniel Berlin
11:24 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VA Robert Dewar
10:24 Serious performance regression on Jul 29 Martin Reinecke
08:37 --target=v850-unknown-elf for c, c++ and java? Torsten Mohr
04:11 bubblestrap on the 3.4 branch? Christian Joensson
03:54 Re: Lost gccbug submission Gabriel Dos Reis

August 12, 2005
23:11 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VA Mike Stump
22:45 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involvingTYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VA Laurent GUERBY
22:19 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VA Kai Henningsen
22:02 Question of 2nd instruction scheduling pass Ling-hua Tseng
21:16 Re: Inlining vs the stack Ian Lance Taylor
20:53 Re: Inlining vs the stack Mike Stump
20:47 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
20:35 Re: Inlining vs the stack Jan Hubicka
20:06 Re: Inlining vs the stack Andrew Pinski
19:59 Re: Inlining vs the stack Dale Johannesen
19:25 Re: Inlining vs the stack Paul Koning
19:10 Re: Inlining vs the stack Mike Stump
18:18 Re: Lost gccbug submission Rainer Orth
18:10 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Tom Tromey
17:57 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
17:53 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
17:48 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involvingTYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Laurent GUERBY
17:47 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
17:38 Inlining vs the stack Dale Johannesen
17:31 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
17:30 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
17:27 Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Jan Hubicka
17:10 Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Mike Stump
17:05 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
16:19 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
16:17 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
16:15 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
16:13 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Giovanni Bajo
16:12 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
16:08 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
16:05 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
15:58 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
15:55 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
15:50 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
15:41 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
15:37 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
15:19 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
15:10 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE(Ada RFC) Robert Dewar
15:08 Re: Lost gccbug submission Daniel Berlin
14:58 Re: Lost gccbug submission Andrew Pinski
14:56 Re: Question on updating ssa for virtual operands (PRtree-optimization/22543) Daniel Berlin
14:54 Re: Lost gccbug submission Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52 Re: Lost gccbug submission Daniel Berlin
14:47 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
14:38 Re: Lost gccbug submission Daniel Berlin
12:06 Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Etienne Lorrain
11:25 Re: Lost gccbug submission Gabriel Dos Reis
11:07 Re: GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Richard Guenther
11:02 [SUMMARY] Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Laurent GUERBY
10:40 GCC-4.0.2 20050811: should GCC consider inlining functions in between different sections? Etienne Lorrain
09:23 Re: Lost gccbug submission Rainer Orth
02:16 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math H. J. Lu

August 11, 2005
23:51 gcc-4.0-20050811 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math Nix
20:41 Re: Lost gccbug submission Daniel Berlin
20:23 Re: Question of the DFA scheduler Richard Henderson
19:48 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding James E Wilson
18:34 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
18:20 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
18:00 Re: [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Dale Johannesen
15:40 Re: Question of the DFA scheduler Michael Meissner
14:37 Question on updating ssa for virtual operands (PR tree-optimization/22543) Dorit Naishlos
12:50 Re: Question of the DFA scheduler Ling-hua Tseng
11:03 Re: Two typoes in rtl.texi Richard Sandiford
10:49 Re: Question of the DFA scheduler Richard Sandiford
10:23 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Andrew Haley
09:24 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Andreas Schwab
09:05 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Jerome Guitton
07:20 Two typoes in rtl.texi Wu Zhou
04:00 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Ross Ridge
03:57 gcc 4.0.1 on mac os x tiger Bobby Philip
02:13 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Tom Tromey
01:57 Re: Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding James E Wilson
00:13 Question of the DFA scheduler Ling-hua Tseng

August 10, 2005
23:21 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Joe Buck
23:12 Re: [gfortran] add ISATTY and TTYNAM intrinsics Andrew Pinski
22:32 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Mark Mitchell
22:17 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Andreas Schwab
22:12 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing FX Coudert
22:01 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Marcin Dalecki
21:34 Re: [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Dale Johannesen
21:30 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
21:20 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Ross Ridge
19:52 Re: [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Andrew Pinski
19:45 [RFC] - Regression exposed by recent change to compress_float_constant Fariborz Jahanian
19:05 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
18:53 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
18:46 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Joe Buck
18:41 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Mark Mitchell
18:39 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
18:37 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure DJ Delorie
17:58 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
17:38 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Mark Mitchell
17:33 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Daniel Jacobowitz
17:31 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math Richard Henderson
17:05 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Mark Mitchell
15:48 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math H. J. Lu
15:13 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math H. J. Lu
14:19 Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math Jakub Jelinek
14:09 PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math H. J. Lu
13:22 Re: [gfortran] add ISATTY and TTYNAM intrinsics FX Coudert
12:58 Re: [gfortran] add ISATTY and TTYNAM intrinsics Jack Howarth
07:22 bubblestrap and gnat: is gnat always rebuilt whenever I bubblestrap gcc? Christian Joensson
02:42 Re: RFH: _inter_-procedure optimizations"CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" Daniel Berlin
01:09 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:52 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Replacements for CSE path following Giovanni Bajo
00:14 gcc-3.4-20050809 is now available gccadmin

August 09, 2005
23:05 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? H. J. Lu
22:57 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Berlin
22:14 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Kegel
21:59 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? Richard Henderson
21:55 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? H. J. Lu
21:45 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? Robert Dewar
21:30 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? H. J. Lu
21:02 Re: RFH: _inter_-procedure optimizations "CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" BjÃrn Haase
21:01 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? H. J. Lu
20:35 Re: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? Richard Henderson
19:57 [ADMINISTRIVIA] email screw up at sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org/cygwin.com Christopher Faylor
19:47 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure FX Coudert
18:20 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Daniel Berlin
18:11 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Laurent GUERBY
18:03 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Andrew Pinski
18:02 Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE? H. J. Lu
18:01 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Kegel
16:23 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Joe Buck
15:37 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
14:55 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
13:26 Re: Your patch to skip local statics Jan Hubicka
12:53 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Daniel Berlin
12:46 Re: Can empty DWARF location list ranges be deleted? Daniel Berlin
12:28 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Sebastian Pop
11:29 Can empty DWARF location list ranges be deleted? Daniel Towner
10:54 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Laurent GUERBY
09:38 Your patch to skip local statics Gabriel Dos Reis
09:10 [GCC 4.2 Project] Section Anchor Optimisations Richard Sandiford
08:57 Re: Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Sebastian Pop
08:11 [GCC 4.2 Project] Replacements for CSE path following Paolo Bonzini
07:33 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Paolo Bonzini
07:24 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Paolo Bonzini
00:28 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Ross Ridge

August 08, 2005
22:48 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Nix
22:48 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Joe Buck
21:21 Old machine cluster for GCC compile/testing Laurent GUERBY
19:58 Re: Question about std templates Jari Sundell
18:39 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
18:31 Re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
17:58 Re: [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure Christopher Faylor
17:40 Re: GCC 4.0.1 - iostream: No such file or dir.... Chris Garrett
16:27 RE: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Dave Korn
16:12 re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Daniel Berlin
15:51 re: [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Dan Kegel
14:17 Re: Question about std templates Nathan Sidwell
13:17 Question about std templates stefano luceri
12:29 [GCC 4.2 Project] Omega data dependence test Sebastian Pop
12:03 RE: How can I build gcc on my Windows PC? Dave Korn
11:57 Re: untarring gcc-g++-3.4.4.tar.gz / bz2 michael . hobbs
11:33 untarring gcc-g++-3.4.4.tar.gz / bz2 michael . hobbs
05:58 Re: [NOD32: deleted] Does it matter? actual
04:10 Re: GCC 4.0.1 - iostream: No such file or dir.... Mike Stump
03:59 Re: How can I build gcc on my Windows PC? Mike Stump

August 07, 2005
22:10 Re: RFH: _inter_-procedure optimizations "CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" Steven Bosscher
21:58 Preissenkung bei Get-Time!! Preissenkung bei Get-Time!!
21:46 Preissenkung bei Get-Time!! Preissenkung bei Get-Time!!
20:19 Re: GCC 4.0.1 - iostream: No such file or dir.... Chris Garrett
12:03 Re: RFH: _inter_-procedure optimizations "CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" BjÃrn Haase
10:45 Re: RFH: intra-procedure optimizations "CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" Steven Bosscher
08:12 Re: Problems bootstrapping mainline on cygwin: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o ./cc1obj-checksum.o ./cc1plus-checksum.o libgcc/_chkstk.o differ Danny Smith
07:36 Re: How can I build gcc on my Windows PC? BjÃrn Haase
07:31 RFH: intra-procedure optimizations "CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS" BjÃrn Haase
06:07 [3.4] Remaining gcc testsuite failures on sparc64-*-linux-gnu Christian Joensson
05:57 How can I build gcc on my Windows PC? David Nowak
02:42 Re: -b vs -bundle James E Wilson

August 06, 2005
23:46 re: c++ performance regressions in gcc > 2.95.3 dank
19:20 Re: IPA branch Jan Hubicka
18:04 gcc-4.1-20050806 is now available gccadmin
15:49 re: GCC 4.0.1 - iostream: No such file or dir.... dank
11:47 Re: CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Joseph S. Myers
11:37 [patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure FX Coudert
08:54 Re: IPA branch Steven Bosscher
06:15 Re: IPA branch Andrew Pinski
05:36 PACTH: Fix dejagnu for SMP H. J. Lu
04:52 GCC 4.0.1 - iostream: No such file or dir.... Chris Garrett
01:05 Re: IPA branch Canqun Yang
00:57 c++ performance regressions in gcc > 2.95.3 Anthony Danalis

August 05, 2005
22:31 Re: Problems bootstrapping mainline on cygwin: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o./cc1obj-checksum.o ./cc1plus-checksum.o libgcc/_chkstk.o differ James E Wilson
21:42 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
21:36 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
21:13 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
21:11 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
21:04 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
21:04 Re: Wrong ChangeLog entries Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
20:49 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
20:33 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
20:21 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
20:15 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Florian Weimer
20:12 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Kenner
20:04 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE (Ada RFC) Richard Henderson
18:31 Re: Template instantiation stack messages "staggered" -- why? James Widman
18:21 Template instantiation stack messages "staggered" -- why? James Widman
17:58 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involvingTYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE Jeffrey A Law
17:17 successful gcc 4.0.1 build on alpha ev68 Andreas Bolka
16:39 RE: GNU Fortran Compiler Dave Korn
16:35 Re: PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE Roger Sayle
16:14 RE: GNU Fortran Compiler Nicholas Nethercote
16:09 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
16:03 Re: GNU Fortran Compiler Diego Novillo
15:59 RE: GNU Fortran Compiler Dave Korn
15:52 GNU Fortran Compiler hvkarl
14:35 Re: IPA branch Gerald Pfeifer
14:00 PR 23046. Folding predicates involving TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE Diego Novillo
12:16 Problems bootstrapping mainline on cygwin: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o ./cc1obj-checksum.o ./cc1plus-checksum.o libgcc/_chkstk.o differ Christian Joensson
08:41 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Carl Whitwell
07:35 Re: IPA branch Jan Hubicka
03:57 Re: -b vs -bundle Peter O'Gorman
03:14 Re: -b vs -bundle James E Wilson
02:53 Re: using recog_data.operand in ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE James E Wilson
00:06 Re: RFA: Combine issue Eric Botcazou

August 04, 2005
23:58 Re: RFA: Combine issue Josh Conner
23:46 gcc-4.0-20050804 is now available gccadmin
23:38 RFA: Combine issue Josh Conner
20:05 Management of new ports Mark Mitchell
18:58 using recog_data.operand in ASM_OUTPUT_OPCODE Tabony, Charles
18:32 Re: IPA branch Steven Bosscher
17:12 Re: IPA branch Jan Hubicka
16:57 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Ian Lance Taylor
16:55 IPA branch Jan Hubicka
15:15 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Paul C. Leopardi
15:09 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Christian Joensson
15:06 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
14:43 successfully built and installed GCC version 4.0.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnuDebian Sarge 3.1 Klaus Zerwes
13:47 can -fstack-protector-all be used to find leaks Jack Howarth
12:44 Re: -b vs -bundle Peter O'Gorman
12:43 Re: ICE hunting in gcc-4.1 Daniel Berlin
12:40 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
12:02 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Gunther Nikl
06:56 Successfull gcc-3.4.4 build on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 frankj
06:09 Re: ICE hunting in gcc-4.1 Eric Christopher
06:05 ICE hunting in gcc-4.1 Dan Kegel
06:01 RE: FW: what happened to service routines like getarg, iargc, ... in gfortran Winfrid.Tschiedel
05:18 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Jack Howarth
04:42 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Ian Lance Taylor
04:30 Re: -b vs -bundle James E Wilson
03:50 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Richard Henderson
03:32 General problem with x86 and PIC Kean Johnston
03:00 Re: FW: what happened to service routines like getarg, iargc, ...in gfortran James E Wilson
01:42 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Jack Howarth
01:15 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Jack Howarth
01:03 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Richard Henderson
00:54 Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Eric Christopher
00:52 does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8? Jack Howarth

August 03, 2005
23:42 G++ Modification Question Brendon Costa
21:26 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Richard Henderson
18:56 Re: i_am_not_a_leaf() and -fno-unit-at-a-time Dwayne Grant McConnell
18:19 RE: memcpy to an unaligned address Dave Korn
18:15 Re: non canonical tree in java Andrew Pinski
18:15 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
18:09 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Richard Henderson
18:05 Re: non canonical tree in java Nathan Sidwell
18:00 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Richard Henderson
17:57 Re: Wrong ChangeLog entries Mark Mitchell
17:55 Re: non canonical tree in java Andrew Pinski
17:50 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Ian Lance Taylor
17:49 non canonical tree in java Nathan Sidwell
17:40 Re: Question on accessing and using binfos Ian Lance Taylor
17:16 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
16:34 Re: Request to reopen a PR Joe Buck
16:31 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Volker Reichelt
16:19 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Daniel Berlin
16:16 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Dan Kegel
15:27 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Gunther Nikl
15:18 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Paul C. Leopardi
14:53 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Nathan Sidwell
14:50 Re: inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Nathan Sidwell
14:40 inserting instructions into prologue/epilogue Gunther Nikl
11:29 Question on accessing and using binfos Primrose.Mbanefo
10:32 FW: what happened to service routines like getarg, iargc, ... in gfortran Winfrid.Tschiedel
04:56 Request to reopen a PR Greg Schafer
03:35 Partial Success Building 4.0.1 on x86_64-slackware-linux Kurt Wall
03:07 PATCH: Add export to linker map (Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ...) H. J. Lu
02:27 Attempt for rotating register allocation Chunjiang Li

August 02, 2005
23:57 gcc-3.4-20050802 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Daniel Berlin
22:29 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
22:26 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
22:17 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
22:15 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
22:12 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Joe Buck
21:34 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Joe Buck
21:30 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Mike Stump
21:11 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Joe Buck
21:05 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Mike Stump
20:55 GCC 4.2 Projects Mark Mitchell
20:46 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
20:45 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Ian Lance Taylor
20:38 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Andrew Pinski
20:29 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Mike Stump
20:29 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
20:15 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
20:10 GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48 RE: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
19:40 RE: memcpy to an unaligned address Dave Korn
19:34 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Daniel Berlin
19:26 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
19:19 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Paul Koning
19:13 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
18:03 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Mike Stump
17:53 RE: splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Tabony, Charles
17:48 Re: memcpy to an unaligned address Falk Hueffner
17:45 Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? James E Wilson
17:43 RE: memcpy to an unaligned address Dave Korn
17:32 memcpy to an unaligned address Shaun Jackman
17:21 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Ian Lance Taylor
17:08 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Diego Novillo
17:06 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Richard Henderson
16:42 Re: #pragma support to guide autovectorizer Devang Patel
16:31 RE: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Linthicum, Tony
16:15 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
14:32 Re: bug in gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 20050727 (Red Hat 4.0.1-5) Mark Frazer
14:16 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Andreas Schwab
14:10 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Diego Novillo
14:05 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:57 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... H. J. Lu
13:48 Re: bug in gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 20050727 (Red Hat 4.0.1-5) Mark Frazer
13:47 Re: bug in gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 20050727 (Red Hat 4.0.1-5) Mark Frazer
13:46 Re: bug in gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 20050727 (Red Hat 4.0.1-5) Richard Guenther
13:40 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:34 bug in gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 20050727 (Red Hat 4.0.1-5) Mark Frazer
13:09 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Diego Novillo
12:57 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Richard Guenther
12:51 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Richard Guenther
12:33 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Diego Novillo
09:59 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
09:22 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
07:50 Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? ibanez
07:09 Re: #pragma support to guide autovectorizer Dorit Naishlos
05:14 Re: LHS of assignment James A. Morrison
05:12 Re: More fun with aliasing - removing assignments? Ian Lance Taylor
03:24 Re: i_am_not_a_leaf() and -fno-unit-at-a-time Roland McGrath
01:28 LHS of assignment shreyas krishnan
00:35 debug info omitted for uninitialized variables Devang Patel

August 01, 2005
22:52 Re: mudflap: compiler flags changed? Frank Ch. Eigler
21:39 i_am_not_a_leaf() and -fno-unit-at-a-time Dwayne Grant McConnell
21:27 Re: -b vs -bundle Jack Howarth
20:52 Re: -b vs -bundle Geoff Keating
20:47 Re: -b vs -bundle Jack Howarth
20:28 Re: -b vs -bundle Geoff Keating
19:56 ICE and reg class problems in 3.4.5-20050801 in g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C Kean Johnston
18:52 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen
16:59 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Dan Nicolaescu
16:12 Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? Joern RENNECKE
15:55 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... H. J. Lu
15:08 On implicit_builtin_decls and/or assert at cp/call.c:322 Richard Guenther
15:00 Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations? Sebastian Pop
14:43 Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations? Daniel Berlin
14:37 Re: Daniel Berlin
14:30 Re: Doubt about Pseudo register uses. Chunjiang Li
14:26 Re: [autovect] Why all these redundant computations? Dorit Naishlos
14:25 Also about the Pseudo reg usage problem. Chunjiang Li
14:18 Chunjiang Li
12:31 [autovect] Why all these redundant computations? Sebastian Pop
12:18 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Steven Bosscher
12:10 Bugzilla mail interface Gabriel Dos Reis
11:56 Re: Doubt about Pseudo register uses. Ian Lance Taylor
09:59 Doubt about Pseudo register uses. Chunjiang Li
09:53 re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
09:45 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
09:39 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
08:42 Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? ibanez
04:21 Re: SPECINT 2000 176.gcc compilation Steven Bosscher
04:18 SPECINT 2000 176.gcc compilation Rajkishore Barik
03:41 Re: please update the gcj main page Daniel Berlin
03:17 Re: please update the gcj main page Richard Kenner
03:08 Re: please update the gcj main page Daniel Berlin
02:58 std::string:;assign fail in multi-threaded program Suet Lung Cheung
02:57 Re: does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? Ian Lance Taylor
02:50 Re: please update the gcj main page Robert Dewar
02:48 does the instruction combiner regards (foo & 0xff) as a special case? ibanez
00:03 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortranindex.html Gerald Pfeifer


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3