This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: volatile semantics
Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> writes:
| On Jul 17, 2005, at 4:48 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > C++ has resisted, for two decades, the temptation of "improving" the
| > meaning of volatile :-) considering that it is C's baby.
|
| Do you know what the semantics of:
|
| a;
|
| are in C and C++?
|
| :-(
As much as I hate it; the rule was not designed to "improve" over
C-semantics of volatile. It is in the same exception-family I mentioned
in the previous message.
-- Gaby