Re: Existing tree functionality?

[Michael Tegtmeyer <tegtmeye at mail dot eecis dot udel dot edu>]

I'm using gcc initially to do some static analysis with the resuts being 
sent somewhere else for the time being. I basically just need to gather 
the variables with visibility outside of the current function. In addition 
I need as little tree transformation prior to this collection as 
possible-ie introduction of new temporaries etc. I scheduled a new pass 
before pass_all_optimizations that simply has pass_referenced_vars and 
pass_foo as subpasses where pass_foo does the analysis (simply calls 
debug_referenced_vars() for the moment). Things seem to work for the most 
part but I'm getting crashes for non-trivial code-mostly templates-that 
otherwise compiles fine. Am I missing something? Does something else need 
to be scheduled before pass_reference_vars? I'm using the release version 
of gcc-4 because I didn't feel like chasing a moving target but is this a 
known issue where I should be building against the snapshot?

Thanks again,
Mike Tegtmeyer

BTW Diego, I spent about a year doing OpenMP work using your CSSAME 
library. Small world eh?

> > Thanks-intraprocedural is all I need.
> >
> > Sorry, bit new to gcc internals (coming from SUIF), is anything missing
> > from referenced_vars list or is it complete? docs in tree-dfa.c state
> > that it doesn't look in statement operands. Does it just collect this 
> from
> > the symbol tables?
> No.  It collects only the variables that are actually referenced
> in the function body.

> If you give us a few details of what you're looking for, we can
> probably help you better.
>
>
> Diego.