This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3
Paolo Carlini writes:
> Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> >>hmm, I get a few libstdc++ testsuite failuers....
> >>
> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00304.html
> >>
> >>other than that, looks pretty fine.
> >>
> >>
> >Did you get them with 4.0.0 too? If no, the libstdc++ folks will have to say
> >whether they are really regressions (the testsuite harness has changed).
> >
> Yes, I would definitely encourage a little more analysis. I'm rather
> puzzled. We have got very nice testsuites on sparc-solaris and on
> *-linux, in general, and those failures certainly are not expected.
> However, missing additional details, it's very difficult to guess: can
> be almost anything, from a weirdness in the installed localedata to a
> defect of the testsuite harness, to a code generation bug, to a latent
> bug in the generic code of the library exposed only by that target, and
> only now.
I don't see these regression on Debian unstable, not exactly built
from the snapshot, but from CVS at the same date. Test results at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00280.html
However, there are 8 gfortran regressions, compared to 4.0.0:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O0 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O1 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O2 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -O3 -g execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/f2c_2.f90 -Os execution test