gcc archive
date index for July, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2005
23:36 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortran index.html Steve Kargl
23:31 Re: please update the gcj main page Gerald Pfeifer
23:19 Re: please update the gcj main page Daniel Berlin
23:19 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortranindex.html Gerald Pfeifer
23:17 Re: please update the gcj main page Daniel Berlin
23:12 Re: please update the gcj main page Joseph S. Myers
23:02 Re: please update the gcj main page Gerald Pfeifer
23:00 Re: please update the gcj main page Daniel Berlin
22:30 Re: please update the gcj main page Gerald Pfeifer
20:09 Replacing phpwiki with other wiki software Daniel Berlin
19:06 -b vs -bundle Jack Howarth
16:51 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Uros Bizjak
15:34 Re: Symbol versions for inlined symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
13:52 Re: Symbol versions for inlined symbols Mike Hearn
06:04 Re: Symbol versions for inlined symbols dank
04:57 Re: Symbol versions for inlined symbols Daniel Jacobowitz
04:44 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Mike Stump
00:31 Re: gcov weirdness: local lable being declared Ian Lance Taylor

July 30, 2005
23:00 Symbol versions for inlined symbols Mike Hearn
21:07 Re: gcov weirdness: local lable being declared Kean Johnston
20:32 Re: gcov weirdness: local lable being declared Kean Johnston
20:21 Re: gcov weirdness: local lable being declared Ian Lance Taylor
19:20 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Jan Hubicka
18:06 gcc-4.1-20050730 is now available gccadmin
17:24 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Andrew Haley
17:15 gcov weirdness: local lable being declared Kean Johnston
16:22 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Jack Howarth
16:15 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Jack Howarth
16:09 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Andrew Pinski
15:55 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Jack Howarth
15:19 re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... dank
15:18 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Andrew Pinski
13:42 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Jack Howarth
13:36 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Giovanni Bajo
13:26 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Nix
12:57 mudflap - missed violation Eyal Lebedinsky
09:50 Re: strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Andreas Schwab
09:02 Re: mudflap: main objects are inited too late for a shared libraryconstructor [patch] Eyal Lebedinsky
08:47 strange error on gcc 4.1.0 Jack Howarth
08:02 mudflap: compiler flags changed? Eyal Lebedinsky
07:10 mudflap: main objects are inited too late for a shared library constructor Eyal Lebedinsky

July 29, 2005
23:04 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen
22:32 Re: Minor documentation problem Ian Lance Taylor
22:32 Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Peter O'Gorman
22:14 Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Bill Northcott
22:03 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
21:18 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Mike Stump
20:23 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
20:19 Porting IDL language to gcc? Tarmo Pikaro
20:19 Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ... Florian Weimer
19:49 Large, modular C++ application performance ... michael meeks
19:16 Re: Minor documentation problem James E Wilson
15:21 Re: Insertng a call function Diego Novillo
15:06 Re: Insertng a call function drizzle drizzle
14:52 Re: Insertng a call function Diego Novillo
14:28 Re: Insertng a call function drizzle drizzle
13:20 Re: (SOLVED) Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead ofnewly bootstrapped g++ Nix
11:17 Re: Minor documentation problem Ioannis E. Venetis
09:14 Sr Compiler Development Opportunity Nathan Sanders
08:15 Wrong ChangeLog entries Giovanni Bajo
05:53 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux crosscompiler... Alan Modra
05:32 Re: D compiler Ranjit Mathew
05:11 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... Richard Sandiford
03:36 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linuxcrosscompiler... David Daney
03:20 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux crosscompiler... Daniel Jacobowitz
02:55 Re: D compiler Kurt Wall
02:44 Re: D compiler Robert Dewar
02:40 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux crosscompiler... David Daney
02:10 D compiler Christian Hartung
01:07 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux crosscompiler... dank
00:44 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linuxcross compiler... David Daney
00:43 Re: Can't find values-Xa.o when cross compiling H. J. Lu
00:35 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... Mike Frysinger
00:31 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... H. J. Lu
00:22 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linuxcross compiler... James E Wilson
00:22 gcc-4.0-20050728 is now available gccadmin

July 28, 2005
23:58 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... Greg Schafer
23:41 Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Jack Howarth
23:36 Re: Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. Tom Tromey
23:34 Re: Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. Tom Tromey
23:24 Re: could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Geoffrey Keating
23:03 Re: Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. James E Wilson
22:49 Re: -Wstrict-aliasing=2 does not warn about all problems Ian Lance Taylor
22:38 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do? Janis Johnson
22:33 Re: Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. Joe Buck
22:26 Re: Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. Mark Wielaard
21:47 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... Richard Henderson
21:26 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linuxcross compiler... James E Wilson
21:09 could gfortran be tested on Darwin regress builds of 4.1? Jack Howarth
21:02 Re: Insertng a call function drizzle drizzle
20:54 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Mike Stump
20:54 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linuxcross compiler... David Daney
20:37 Re: RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler... H. J. Lu
20:33 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
20:15 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48 RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux crosscompiler... David Daney
19:48 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do? Andrew Pinski
19:43 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
19:31 Re: Can't find values-Xa.o when cross compiling James E Wilson
19:20 Re: -Wstrict-aliasing=2 does not warn about all problems James E Wilson
19:17 Copyright assignments and java/libgcj. David Daney
19:08 Re: how to write a define_peephole2 that uses custom registers innios2 James E Wilson
19:05 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Mike Stump
18:54 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Daniel Jacobowitz
18:54 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Mike Stump
18:32 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
18:16 Re: Insertng a call function Diego Novillo
18:03 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do? Daniel Berlin
17:57 Re: Can't find values-Xa.o when cross compiling Mark Cuss
17:54 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Daniel Jacobowitz
17:49 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
17:41 Re: Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do? Steve Kargl
17:26 Middle-end and optimization regressions: what should we do? François-Xavier Coudert
17:15 Insertng a call function drizzle drizzle
16:37 Re: Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:20 Re: (SOLVED) Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Joe Buck
16:12 Guidance please: static or extern __inline__ Kean Johnston
15:46 (SOLVED) Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
14:11 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
12:28 Re: how to write a define_peephole2 that uses custom registers in nios2 Liu Haibin
02:59 Re: PLEASE HELP!! Chris Garrett
02:41 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Ian Lance Taylor
02:14 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
02:14 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ H. J. Lu
02:10 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Ian Lance Taylor
02:04 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
01:05 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Ian Lance Taylor
00:53 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
00:40 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Mike Stump
00:26 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Ian Lance Taylor
00:21 Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
00:07 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen

July 27, 2005
23:53 -Wstrict-aliasing=2 does not warn about all problems Ian Lance Taylor
21:19 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Richard Henderson
19:41 Error repair in the C++ parser Ziemowit Laski
19:37 FW: wow, check this out ! bingo at lilsin dot com
19:14 Re: how to write a define_peephole2 that uses custom registers innios2 James E Wilson
18:59 Re: Questions about the new M32C target DJ Delorie
18:25 Questions about the new M32C target glagnar
17:57 Re: Inserting a call statement Daniel Berlin
17:39 Re: Inserting a call statement drizzle drizzle
17:12 Re: Inserting a call statement Daniel Berlin
17:07 Re: Inserting a call statement Daniel Berlin
16:58 Re: Inserting a call statement drizzle drizzle
16:55 Re: Inserting a call statement Paul Brook
16:46 Re: Inserting a call statement Daniel Berlin
16:33 Inserting a call statement drizzle drizzle
16:18 Re: Minor documentation problem Ian Lance Taylor
14:18 Re: Latent PTA bug? Daniel Berlin
14:02 Re: Latent PTA bug? Richard Guenther
13:59 Re: Mailing list archive header wrong for fortran Christopher Faylor
13:27 Re: Latent PTA bug? Diego Novillo
13:09 Re: Latent PTA bug? Richard Guenther
12:48 Re: Latent PTA bug? Diego Novillo
12:42 Re: Latent PTA bug? Daniel Berlin
11:55 Minor documentation problem Ioannis E. Venetis
11:08 Latent PTA bug? Richard Guenther
10:14 Re: Mailing list archive header wrong for fortran Gerald Pfeifer
09:32 Mailing list archive header wrong for fortran Steven Bosscher
06:11 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen
05:49 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Bob Proulx
05:38 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib forld-linux.so.2 Ranjit Mathew
05:07 Re: gcc binary Ian Lance Taylor
05:07 Re: gcc binary Joe Buck
04:36 gcc binary Simon Tsai
00:21 Re: Annotations in tree Daniel Berlin
00:08 Re: Annotations in tree drizzle drizzle

July 26, 2005
23:54 Re: Annotations in tree Daniel Berlin
23:45 gcc-3.4-20050726 is now available gccadmin
23:43 Re: Annotations in tree drizzle drizzle
23:10 Re: Annotations in tree Daniel Berlin
22:39 Re: Annotations in tree drizzle drizzle
22:34 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen
22:27 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Louis LeBlanc
21:52 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Robert Dewar
21:06 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Louis LeBlanc
20:31 Re: Annotations in tree Diego Novillo
20:21 Annotations in tree drizzle drizzle
19:32 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Mark Cuss
19:29 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Haren Visavadia
19:17 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Mark Cuss
19:02 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Mark Cuss
18:20 #pragma support to guide autovectorizer mcrosier
18:10 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
18:00 Re: Is there a way to exclude a dir from multilibing? Andrew Pinski
17:58 Is there a way to exclude a dir from multilibing? Kean Johnston
15:05 Re: Please help with __attribute__ weak H. J. Lu
14:16 Re: Please help with __attribute__ weak Dimitry Golubovsky
14:01 Re: Please help with __attribute__ weak H. J. Lu
11:20 Please help with __attribute__ weak Dimitry Golubovsky
10:03 how to write a define_peephole2 that uses custom registers in nios2 Liu Haibin
07:51 Re: rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Paolo Bonzini
07:38 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Paolo Bonzini
07:19 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:00 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Jan Hubicka
04:51 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Bernardo Innocenti
04:43 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Geoff Keating
04:07 Re: gcc 4.0.1 regressions with friend injection William Beebe
01:10 rfa (x86): 387<=>sse moves Dale Johannesen
01:09 Re: gcc 4.0.1 regressions with friend injection Gabriel Dos Reis
00:55 gcc 4.0.1 regressions with friend injection Mike Stump

July 25, 2005
23:08 Re: volatile semantics Olivier Galibert
23:00 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Dale Johannesen
22:50 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Giovanni Bajo
22:25 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Mark Mitchell
22:06 RE: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Danny Smith
22:00 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Louis LeBlanc
21:59 Re: [C++ RFC] Debug info for anonymous aggregates Devang Patel
21:41 Re: gcc front end Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
21:33 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
21:24 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
21:09 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
20:49 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
20:29 Re: front-end that translate C++ to C Chris Lattner
20:29 Re: front-end that translate C++ to C Vladimir A. Merzliakov
20:17 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
19:57 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Kean Johnston
19:53 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
19:29 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Kean Johnston
19:18 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
19:05 Can't find values-Xa.o when cross compiling Mark Cuss
19:00 Re: front-end that translate C++ to C Tom Tromey
18:09 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Kean Johnston
17:57 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
17:43 Re: front-end that translate C++ to C Daniel Berlin
17:39 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
17:36 Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Daniel Berlin
17:15 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Dale Johannesen
16:57 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of theprintf's format argument Robert Dewar
16:52 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of theprintf's format argument Paolo Carlini
16:49 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Gabriel Dos Reis
16:30 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Mike Stump
15:23 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Louis LeBlanc
15:22 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
15:15 Re: gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Giovanni Bajo
14:55 gcc 3.3.6 - stack corruption questions Louis LeBlanc
13:56 Re: [wwwdocs] Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
13:38 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 François-Xavier Coudert
11:31 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Denis Zaitsev
11:15 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Gerald Pfeifer
11:06 FW: error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token with gcc 3.4.3 Hegde, Ramesh
10:49 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Gerald Pfeifer
10:47 [wwwdocs] Re: GCC-3.4.5 status report Gerald Pfeifer
10:02 Re: front-end that translate C++ to C Vladimir A. Merzliakov
09:43 GCC-3.4.5 status report Gabriel Dos Reis
09:36 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of theprintf's format argument Paolo Bonzini
09:23 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of theprintf's format argument Robert Dewar
09:05 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Denis Zaitsev
09:04 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikes again) Gabriel Dos Reis
08:57 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of theprintf's format argument Paolo Carlini
08:51 Re: [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Richard Guenther
08:41 [BUG] gcc-3.4.5-20050531 (i386): __FUNCTION__ as a part of the printf's format argument Denis Zaitsev
08:33 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikes again) Haren Visavadia
08:27 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Kean Johnston
08:17 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikes again) Haren Visavadia
07:53 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Kean Johnston
06:59 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikes again) Haren Visavadia
06:49 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Kean Johnston
05:47 Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Ebke, Hans-Christian
04:15 Re: Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Michael Veksler
02:26 front-end that translate C++ to C Yi-kwon Hwang
01:22 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Gabriel Dos Reis

July 24, 2005
22:32 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Daniel Berlin
22:29 Stack protector documentation still missing Steven Bosscher
22:18 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Gabriel Dos Reis
20:28 Re: Surprising behavior of __attribute__((deprecated)) in ctor Mathieu Malaterre
20:22 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Daniel Berlin
20:08 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Gabriel Dos Reis
19:45 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Daniel Berlin
19:22 Re: Surprising behavior of __attribute__((deprecated)) in ctor Mike Stump
19:04 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Gabriel Dos Reis
18:00 Re: Bugzilla querys via email interface Daniel Berlin
17:45 Bugzilla querys via email interface Gabriel Dos Reis
10:32 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Manfred Hollstein
08:36 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 François-Xavier Coudert
06:50 Re: Local variables optimization Hanzac Chen
05:55 Re: Local variables optimization Ian Lance Taylor
03:52 Local variables optimization Hanzac Chen
03:49 Re: Surprising behavior of __attribute__((deprecated)) in ctor Ian Lance Taylor
03:44 Re: [C++ RFC] Debug info for anonymous aggregates Mark Mitchell
01:13 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Paul Schlie
00:42 Surprising behavior of __attribute__((deprecated)) in ctor Mathieu Malaterre

July 23, 2005
18:39 Re: cxx-reflection branch Larry Evans
18:36 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
18:11 gcc-4.1-20050723 is now available gccadmin
17:31 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Richard Henderson
17:21 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Dale Johannesen
17:17 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
17:08 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Richard Henderson
16:03 Re: volatile semantics Mike Stump
14:30 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
13:53 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Daniel Berlin
13:40 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Tobias Schlüter
11:56 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Mark Kettenis
11:44 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
11:39 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
09:50 Re: volatile semantics Geoff Keating
09:50 Re: volatile semantics Geoff Keating
09:23 GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++ Paul C. Leopardi
07:36 gcc-4.0.1: ICE in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:2203 Daniel Kegel
06:29 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Thomas Koenig
06:10 Re: Problem with getchar method! Ian Lance Taylor
06:03 Re: volatile semantics Ian Lance Taylor
05:04 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Andrew Pinski
05:02 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
03:01 Problem with getchar method! DC A
02:59 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
01:28 Re: volatile semantics Geoff Keating
01:14 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Richard Henderson
00:53 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
00:44 Re: Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Jerry DeLisle

July 22, 2005
23:33 Re: volatile semantics Ian Lance Taylor
23:20 Re: volatile semantics Geoffrey Keating
23:20 Re: volatile semantics Geoffrey Keating
23:20 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Geoffrey Keating
23:12 Someone broke bootstrap with gfortran, again! Steve Kargl
21:23 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Mark Mitchell
21:19 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Andrew Pinski
21:15 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Chris Lattner
21:08 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Mark Mitchell
21:07 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Andrew Pinski
21:05 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Mark Mitchell
21:02 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Andrew Pinski
20:41 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Chris Lattner
20:30 Re: New Fortran regression Andrew Pinski
20:24 New Fortran regression Thomas Koenig
20:22 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-07-22) Mark Mitchell
20:22 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Mark Mitchell
20:15 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Ross Ridge
20:14 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Richard Henderson
19:42 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Andrew Pinski
19:38 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Chris Lattner
19:33 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Mike Stump
18:34 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Mark Mitchell
18:30 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Chris Lattner
18:27 Re: Minimum target alignment for a datatype Dale Johannesen
18:07 Minimum target alignment for a datatype Chris Lattner
17:32 warning control project status DJ Delorie
16:30 RE: How can I create a const rtx other than 0, 1, 2 Meissner, Michael
16:29 Can I use SCHED_GROUP_P to make the VLIW bundle in the final pass? Ling-hua Tseng
14:11 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN Michael Matz
11:54 Re: Help on -Wl option Brian Dessent
11:25 Re: Help on -Wl option Karel Gardas
11:22 Help on -Wl option steven . gay
11:08 Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Gabriel Dos Reis
10:50 Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Giovanni Bajo
10:40 AW: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Ebke, Hans-Christian
10:27 Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Giovanni Bajo
10:06 extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw Ebke, Hans-Christian
09:17 Re: How can I create a const rtx other than 0, 1, 2 Uros Bizjak
08:42 How can I create a const rtx other than 0, 1, 2 Liu Haibin
08:39 Re: No download link from gcc.gnu.org Jonathan Wakely
06:38 Re: on define_peephole2 Liu Haibin
02:37 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN Paul Brook
02:27 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN Canqun Yang
01:18 Re: No download link from gcc.gnu.org Russ Allbery
00:58 [C++ RFC] Debug info for anonymous aggregates Devang Patel
00:47 No download link from gcc.gnu.org bhiksha
00:45 RE: splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Tabony, Charles
00:42 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Dale Johannesen
00:16 Re: splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Dale Johannesen
00:04 RE: splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Tabony, Charles
00:01 Re: RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Richard Henderson

July 21, 2005
23:55 RFA: Darwin x86 alignment Dale Johannesen
23:49 Re: splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Dale Johannesen
23:44 gcc-4.0-20050721 is now available gccadmin
23:36 splitting load immediates using high and lo_sum Tabony, Charles
22:08 Re: PR22336 (was: Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost) Richard Henderson
21:42 Problem compiling libstdc++ is current 4.0.2 cvs (volatile strikesagain) Kean Johnston
21:15 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
20:06 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 Richard Henderson
19:29 Re: -malign-double vs __alignof__(double) Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Ross Ridge
18:03 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Kelley Cook
17:48 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
17:32 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Ross Ridge
16:49 Re: Building mips cross compiler on mingw Dave Murphy
16:28 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.2 is released H. J. Lu
16:19 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
13:24 Re: Merged CVS repository of gcc and old-gcc Joseph S. Myers
13:03 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Jan Hubicka
13:02 Re: Merged CVS repository of gcc and old-gcc Daniel Berlin
12:52 Re: Merged CVS repository of gcc and old-gcc Volker Reichelt
11:08 Re: Needs advises on rotating register allocation for IA64 in GCC Andrey Belevantsev
10:33 on define_peephole2 Liu Haibin
09:33 Re: Needs advises on rotating register allocation for IA64 in GCC Steven Bosscher
09:02 Needs advises on rotating register allocation for IA64 in GCC 李春江
08:09 GCC Summit 2005 Proceedings Ranjit Mathew
08:00 Linking order Sampath Kumar Herga
06:55 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Paolo Bonzini
06:20 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Ross Ridge
03:36 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
03:27 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
03:27 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
03:05 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
03:00 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Daniel Jacobowitz
02:58 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Daniel Jacobowitz
02:58 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
02:51 should mixed buffered i/o be indeterminant? Jack Howarth
02:40 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
02:25 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 DJ Delorie
02:14 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Daniel Jacobowitz
02:10 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
01:26 -malign-double vs __alignof__(double) Dale Johannesen

July 20, 2005
23:38 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
22:44 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Jan Hubicka
21:02 Re: Multilibbing threaded supports Kean Johnston
20:31 Re: Multilibbing threaded supports David Edelsohn
20:27 Multilibbing threaded supports Kean Johnston
20:16 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
19:01 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Janis Johnson
17:45 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
16:59 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use Steven Bosscher
16:53 -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use girish vaitheeswaran
16:06 Re: Problems on Fedora Core 4 Kevin Handy
16:03 Re: Function inlining for FORTRAN Paul Brook
15:58 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN Steven Bosscher
15:52 Re: Function inlining for FORTRAN Joost VandeVondele
15:25 Re: Headsup - New PCH Failures on 3.4.x under Linux-2.6.12 Mike Stump
15:24 Re: Function Inlining for FORTRAN Paul Brook
14:26 Function Inlining for FORTRAN Canqun Yang
11:05 RE: Building mips cross compiler on mingw Dave Korn
11:03 Re: Problems on Fedora Core 4 chris jefferson
11:00 Re: Problems on Fedora Core 4 Giovanni Bajo
10:56 RE: Building mips cross compiler on mingw Dave Korn
10:53 Problems on Fedora Core 4 Michael Gatford
10:21 Building mips cross compiler on mingw Dave Murphy
08:09 Re: -fprofile-arcs Jan Hubicka
02:26 Headsup - New PCH Failures on 3.4.x under Linux-2.6.12 Greg Schafer
00:20 gcc-3.4-20050719 is now available gccadmin

July 19, 2005
20:50 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Mark Mitchell
20:35 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Gabriel Dos Reis
20:21 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:14 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
20:14 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Mark Mitchell
20:04 Question of vector type extending Ling-hua Tseng
20:03 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 FX Coudert
19:52 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
19:47 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Gabriel Dos Reis
19:17 [gnu.org #247501] Assignment form Ted Teah via RT
18:48 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Mark Mitchell
18:44 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Jason Merrill
18:32 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
18:32 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Steve Kargl
18:21 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
17:56 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
17:44 Comparisons between GCC and other compilers Stefan
17:44 Re: Assignment form Kurt Wall
17:37 Patch Queue Source Daniel Berlin
17:31 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Steve Kargl
17:17 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Daniel Berlin
17:02 bootstrap of gcc mainline on apple-x86-darwin is broken Fariborz Jahanian
14:47 Patch queue set up Daniel Berlin
14:11 Re: Two new info files: hacking vmintegration Gerald Pfeifer
13:35 gcc front end Sean PH
13:31 Assignment form Tomas Bily
11:40 [rfc] libstdc++ include directories for biarch builds Matthias Klose
10:22 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
09:55 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
09:25 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
09:07 PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32 FX Coudert
08:46 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 FX Coudert
08:38 Re: implementing rvalue references to g++ Paolo Carlini
07:37 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic FX Coudert
07:27 Re: volatile semantics Kai Henningsen
07:07 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
07:04 Re: implementing rvalue references to g++ russell.yanofsky
06:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
06:04 Re: dw2 frame unwinder - unaligned access Ian Lance Taylor
05:34 dw2 frame unwinder - unaligned access Vasanth
03:11 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Steve Kargl
03:02 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Andrew Pinski
02:45 Re: Someone broke complex arithmetic Steve Kargl
02:31 Someone broke complex arithmetic Steve Kargl
01:40 Re: [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortranindex.html Brooks Moses
01:20 [patch, wwwdocs] Include "documentation" section on gfortran index.html Brooks Moses

July 18, 2005
20:05 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30 Re: volatile semantics Mike Stump
19:06 Re: 4.0.1 build failure on powerpc64-linux Karel Gardas
19:01 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Andreas Jaeger
19:00 Re: cxx-reflection branch Gabriel Dos Reis
19:00 Re: Bug in PPC inline assembly? Stefan
18:28 Re: 4.0.1 build failure on powerpc64-linux Janis Johnson
18:12 Re: cxx-reflection branch Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Tom Tromey
16:58 Re: Two new info files: hacking vmintegration Tom Tromey
16:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
16:34 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
15:47 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
15:30 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Gabriel Dos Reis
15:26 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Bryce McKinlay
15:25 Re: cxx-reflection branch Gabriel Dos Reis
15:19 Backend: combine compare & arithmetic instructions ibanez
15:07 Re: -fprofile-arcs Rajkishore Barik
14:49 successful build and install gcc 3.4.4 Graham Mark, CCN-12
14:31 Re: -fprofile-arcs Jan Hubicka
14:30 Re: 4.1 news item Gerald Pfeifer
14:25 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Mark Mitchell
14:10 -fprofile-arcs Rajkishore Barik
14:04 Two new info files: hacking vmintegration Gerald Pfeifer
13:27 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
13:21 Re: mirror health Gerald Pfeifer
13:13 Re: volatile semantics Gerald Pfeifer
13:13 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Paul Koning
13:09 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Paul Koning
12:59 Re: cxx-reflection branch Gerald Pfeifer
12:31 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
12:27 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
12:24 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
12:17 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
12:12 Re: volatile semantics Paolo Bonzini
12:11 Re: volatile semantics Jonathan Wakely
11:20 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
10:53 4.0.1 build failure on powerpc64-linux Karel Gardas
10:15 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Giovanni Bajo
08:57 RE: on nios2 difine_insn indirect_call Jonah Graham
06:48 on nios2 difine_insn indirect_call Liu Haibin
06:36 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
05:54 Re: gfortran documentation Steve Kargl
05:45 Re: What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir? Ian Lance Taylor
05:40 Re: gfortran documentation Brooks Moses
05:09 Re: inconsistent CFLAGS between toplevel and gcc/ Ben Elliston
04:38 Re: inconsistent CFLAGS between toplevel and gcc/ Andrew Pinski
04:32 inconsistent CFLAGS between toplevel and gcc/ Ben Elliston
03:13 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions D. Hugh Redelmeier
01:49 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Vincent Lefevre
01:29 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
01:11 Re: Bug in PPC inline assembly? Alan Lehotsky

July 17, 2005
23:44 "insn_dependent_p" substitution for GCC 4.0 Balaji V. Iyer
23:27 What's the best way of including extra files for gcc lib dir? Kean Johnston
23:19 Re: Bug in PPC inline assembly? David Edelsohn
23:15 Bug in PPC inline assembly? Stefan
20:34 Re: volatile semantics Mark Mitchell
20:07 Re: MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Mark Mitchell
19:05 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Daniel Berlin
18:50 O Sorry Tut mir Leid!! Osman Coskun
18:45 O Sorry Tut mir Leid!! Osman Coskun
18:38 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Daniel Berlin
18:33 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Richard Henderson
18:30 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Steven Bosscher
17:58 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
17:48 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Daniel Berlin
17:42 Re: Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Daniel Berlin
16:55 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Paul Koning
16:54 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
16:44 Re: volatile semantics Richard Henderson
16:18 Re: volatile semantics Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 Re: volatile semantics Richard Henderson
16:06 Re: volatile semantics Falk Hueffner
16:05 Compile time increases on Diego's SPEC box Steven Bosscher
16:04 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
15:45 Re: volatile semantics Richard Henderson
15:38 MEMBER_TYPE and CV qualifiers Nathan Sidwell
15:30 Re: volatile semantics Michael Veksler
14:33 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
14:10 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Thorsten Glaser
13:32 successful build of gcc 4.0.1 on Mac OSX 10.2.8 Paolo Greppi
12:49 Re: volatile semantics Joseph S. Myers
12:03 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
11:50 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
11:41 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
11:41 Re: profiledbootstrap insn-attrtab.c compile taking forever R Hill
10:14 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Andreas Jaeger
10:11 Re: volatile semantics Andrew Haley
08:25 Re: volatile semantics Ian Lance Taylor
07:54 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
07:53 Re: volatile semantics Andrew Pinski
07:40 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
07:33 Re: volatile semantics Michael Veksler
06:45 howto multilib gcc mainline on sparc-linux? Christian Joensson
05:31 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
05:27 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
05:19 Re: volatile semantics Michael Veksler
04:38 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
04:32 Re: volatile semantics Michael Veksler
03:27 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
03:14 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
03:08 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
02:36 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
02:27 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
02:24 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
01:41 Re: profiledbootstrap insn-attrtab.c compile taking forever R Hill
01:37 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
01:34 Re: 4.1 news item Daniel Berlin

July 16, 2005
22:57 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:34 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
22:25 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:19 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:17 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
22:06 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:59 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:41 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
21:36 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
21:30 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
21:29 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:24 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:18 Re: cxx-reflection branch Gabriel Dos Reis
21:17 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:10 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
21:07 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
21:07 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
20:52 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
20:35 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
20:15 cxx-reflection branch Maurizio Monge
19:20 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
19:05 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
18:35 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
18:14 gcc-4.1-20050716 is now available gccadmin
17:53 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
17:40 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Andreas Schwab
17:33 Re: volatile semantics Andrew Haley
17:32 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
17:26 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
16:56 Re: volatile semantics Daniel Berlin
16:51 Re: volatile semantics D. Hugh Redelmeier
16:28 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Andreas Schwab
15:56 Re: Big Classpath Merge warning Andreas Jaeger
15:52 Re: implementing rvalue references to g++ Paolo Carlini
15:03 implementing rvalue references in g++ russell.yanofsky
14:26 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
12:45 implementing rvalue references to g++ russell.yanofsky
12:12 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Georg Bauhaus
12:04 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Georg Bauhaus
11:49 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Vincent Lefevre
04:33 Re: [Flex] Getting the absolute input file position Henrik Sorensen
02:59 Re: Can't turn off overflow_warning? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: scheduling insn on none Ian Lance Taylor
02:35 Re: Can't turn off overflow_warning? DJ Delorie
02:33 Re: Can't turn off overflow_warning? Andrew Pinski
02:27 Can't turn off overflow_warning? Bradley Lucier

July 15, 2005
23:33 scheduling insn on none Tabony, Charles
21:22 Re: ИнфоПространство
21:04 Re: [Q] Class instance layout details Andrew Pinski
21:02 Re: [Q] Class instance layout details Ian Lance Taylor
20:48 Re: please update the gcj main page Tom Tromey
20:06 gcc vs Darwin memcmp Dale Johannesen
19:41 [Q] Class instance layout details Bharadwaj Yadavalli
17:20 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Gerald Pfeifer
16:57 Re: please update the gcj main page Andrew Pinski
16:47 Re: please update the gcj main page John M. Gabriele
16:39 Re: please update the gcj main page John M. Gabriele
15:54 Successful gcc4.0.1 build (Redhat 9. Kernel 2.4.25) Jeff Clifford
15:43 Re: please update the gcj main page Bryce McKinlay
15:29 Re: please update the gcj main page Bryce McKinlay
15:21 Re: please update the gcj main page John M. Gabriele
15:03 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
14:59 Re: The origin of scalar evolutions? Robert van Engelen
14:36 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF Daniel Jacobowitz
14:31 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Dave Korn
13:33 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Georg Bauhaus
13:20 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Georg Bauhaus
11:13 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib forld-linux.so.2 Kai Ruottu
10:24 Re: How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib forld-linux.so.2 Kai Ruottu
09:03 Merged CVS repository of gcc and old-gcc Ian Lance Taylor
07:22 Get $266/mo extra Erick Windom
07:18 Re: please update the gcj main page Ranjit Mathew
07:04 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Avi Kivity

July 14, 2005
23:49 gcc-4.0-20050714 is now available gccadmin
23:44 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF DJ Delorie
23:37 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF Joe Buck
22:07 How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Daniel Kegel
21:58 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
21:52 How to make an application look somewhere other than /lib for ld-linux.so.2 Mark Cuss
21:07 GCC and types, a request for help Andrew Pinski
20:35 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Koning
20:13 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
19:45 Big Classpath Merge warning Tom Tromey
19:33 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Robert Dewar
19:28 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
19:13 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Robert Dewar
19:09 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
18:36 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Paul Koning
17:57 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Matthew Woodcraft
17:44 Re: addsi3 with set condition register Nathan Sidwell
17:02 please update the gcj main page John M. Gabriele
16:43 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF DJ Delorie
16:37 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF Joe Buck
16:36 Successful gcc 4.0.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1b Tru64(c,c++,f95,objc,java,treelang) Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
16:20 Splitting an immediate using define_expand Tabony, Charles
15:33 Re: gnuplot for mandrake 10.2 Paolo Carlini
15:31 RE: gnuplot for mandrake 10.2 Dave Korn
15:17 gnuplot for mandrake 10.2 Alain Moïse Dikandé
14:09 Re: addsi3 with set condition register David Edelsohn
14:05 Why is libgnat defaulted to STATIC? (see gcc/ada/link.c) Scott McConnell
13:54 gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:2228 Dan Kegel
12:11 successful build of gcc 4.0.1 on i686-pc-cygwin, cohexist with gcc 3.4.1 Paolo Greppi
10:55 Re: profiledbootstrap insn-attrtab.c compile taking forever Richard Guenther
10:07 addsi3 with set condition register ibanez
09:47 Re: isinf Andreas Schwab
09:35 Re: isinf Jakub Jelinek
09:27 Re: isinf Hiroshi Fujishima
09:10 Re: isinf Eric Botcazou
08:59 Re: isinf Andreas Schwab
08:45 profiledbootstrap insn-attrtab.c compile taking forever Richard Guenther
07:56 Re: isinf Michael Veksler
07:33 Re: isinf Eric Botcazou
07:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Marc Espie
06:52 Re: isinf Michael Veksler
06:50 gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE Dan Kegel
06:48 gcc-4.1-20050702: ICE in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:12618 Dan Kegel
06:27 Re: isinf Eric Botcazou
05:28 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie
01:59 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Robert Dewar
01:56 Re: [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF DJ Delorie
01:53 [toplevel] Update COPYING.LIB from FSF Kelley Cook
01:10 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signedintegers? Paul Schlie

July 13, 2005
23:48 Re: isinf Hiroshi Fujishima
23:39 Re: isinf Dale Johannesen
23:29 Re: isinf Joe Buck
23:17 Re: isinf Hiroshi Fujishima
22:59 Re: isinf Eric Botcazou
22:32 Re: isinf Hiroshi Fujishima
22:11 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Eric Christopher
21:42 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Olivier Galibert
21:21 Re: Homepage: Update of page "Releases" Gerald Pfeifer
21:05 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Mike Stump
20:53 Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
19:58 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Robert Dewar
19:39 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Eric Christopher
19:36 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Mike Stump
19:08 Re: isinf Eric Botcazou
19:00 Re: more on duplicate decls Giovanni Bajo
18:45 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Eric Christopher
18:42 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Devang Patel
17:07 isinf Hiroshi Fujishima
15:18 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question DJ Delorie
14:16 Re: Error building 4.0.1: input.h: No such file... Chris Garrett
14:09 Re: attribute initialized Sylvester Diehl
13:53 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Morten Welinder
12:43 Re: more on duplicate decls Kenneth Zadeck
10:02 .rodata gcc 3.3.3 gcc 2.95.2 Michael Trimarchi
08:47 Re: RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
07:59 Re: RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
07:57 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
06:23 Re: The origin of scalar evolutions? Sebastian Pop
04:25 Re: more on duplicate decls Mark Mitchell
03:47 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Nicholas Nethercote
02:44 Re: RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Richard Kenner
02:31 Re: RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Josh Conner
02:02 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Joe Buck

July 12, 2005
23:51 gcc-3.4-20050712 is now available gccadmin
23:28 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Falk Hueffner
23:27 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Michael Meissner
23:18 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Michael Meissner
23:17 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Joe Buck
23:13 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Michael Meissner
23:04 Re: AMD 64 Problem with assembling Michael Meissner
22:46 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Joe Buck
22:38 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Falk Hueffner
22:28 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Erik Trulsson
22:09 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Joe Buck
21:42 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Erik Trulsson
21:23 Re: 64-bit on A64 running 32-bit Adam Wood
21:13 Re: 64-bit on A64 running 32-bit Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: Failure building Ada on i686-pc-mingw32 Danny Smith
21:00 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Andreas Schwab
20:59 64-bit on A64 running 32-bit David Rasmussen
20:37 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Alexandre Oliva
20:07 Re: RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
19:20 Re: Error building 4.0.1: input.h: No such file... Dave Murphy
19:03 Error building 4.0.1: input.h: No such file... Chris Garrett
18:50 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Ian Lance Taylor
18:47 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Diego Novillo
18:39 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Ian Lance Taylor
18:00 Homepage: Update of page "Releases" Franz Fritsche
17:56 RFC: improving estimate_num_insns Josh Conner
17:47 Failure building Ada on i686-pc-mingw32 David Gressett
17:08 Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuitefailures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures] Dan Kegel
17:03 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions chris jefferson
16:53 RE: Pointers in comparison expressions Dave Korn
16:47 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Joseph S. Myers
16:45 Re: Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Joe Buck
16:32 Re: Pointers in comparison expressions Daniel Berlin
16:24 Pointers in comparison expressions Mirco Lorenzoni
15:21 more on duplicate decls Kenneth Zadeck
14:41 Some tests in gcc.c-torture rely on undefined behaviour? Nicholas Nethercote
14:31 [gomp] mainline merge as of 2007-07-12 Diego Novillo
14:21 bootstrap build results for GCC 4.0.1 Brett Neumeier
13:55 Re: PR22336 (was: Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost) Zdenek Dvorak
13:48 Re: PR22336 (was: Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost) Richard Kenner
12:22 Re: libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures] Jonathan Wakely
11:55 libstdc++ required binutils version [was: Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuitefailures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures] Karel Gardas
11:45 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Jonathan Wakely
11:24 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpectedgcc failures Karel Gardas
11:04 Re: PR22336 (was: Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost) Zdenek Dvorak
10:57 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Jonathan Wakely
10:21 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Christian Joensson
10:04 gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 11 unexpected libstdc++ failures Christian Joensson
10:04 PR22336 (was: Problem withtree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost) Laurent GUERBY
09:56 RE: attribute initialized Dave Korn
09:56 Re: attribute initialized Falk Hueffner
09:34 RE: attribute initialized Dave Korn
09:24 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Robert Thorpe
09:08 Re: Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org (fwd) Mark Mitchell
08:48 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Bernd Schmidt
08:16 [ATTN: Steering Committee] Management of new ports Giovanni Bajo
07:48 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Christian Joensson
07:31 Re: gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Eric Botcazou
07:15 gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: libstdc++-v3 check-abi Christian Joensson
07:02 gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 22 unexpected g++ failures Christian Joensson
06:55 gcc 4.0.1 testsuite failures on sparc64-linux: 59 unexpected gcc failures Christian Joensson
03:46 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Jason Molenda
01:18 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Daniel Jacobowitz
01:12 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Jason Molenda
00:56 Re: Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Daniel Jacobowitz
00:37 Reducing debug info for C++ ctors/dtors Devang Patel
00:36 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Kurt Wall

July 11, 2005
22:59 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Andreas Schwab
22:51 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
22:47 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
22:38 Re: Some notes on the Wiki chris jefferson
22:32 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:30 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:21 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Joe Buck
22:13 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Steven Bosscher
22:10 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
22:08 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Gabriel Dos Reis
22:07 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
22:07 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Joseph S. Myers
21:36 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Steven Bosscher
21:34 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
21:32 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Gerald Pfeifer
21:23 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Andreas Schwab
21:13 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
21:05 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
21:02 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Nicholas Nethercote
20:54 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Paul Koning
20:53 Re: 4.0.1, Solaris10/x86, bootstrap failed Joseph S. Myers
20:48 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Gabriel Dos Reis
20:44 4.0.1, Solaris10/x86, bootstrap failed Guenter Feldmann
20:43 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Kevin Handy
20:28 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
20:10 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Robert Thorpe
19:06 Re: attribute initialized Joe Buck
19:03 Re: HEADS-UP: tree-optimize.c and passes.c heavily modified Diego Novillo
18:07 attribute initialized Sylvester Diehl
17:57 RE: 'main' enters in gcc-4.1 Dave Korn
17:54 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Richard Henderson
17:43 Bugzilla back up (was Re: Bugzilla is temporarily down) Daniel Berlin
17:40 Re: 'main' enters in gcc-4.1 Mike Stump
17:29 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noatin effect" while compiling Linux kernel Dan Kegel
17:20 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Mike Stump
17:07 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Richard Henderson
17:04 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Dave Korn
17:01 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noatin effect" while compiling Linux kernel Dan Kegel
16:55 Bugzilla is temporarily down Daniel Berlin
16:55 Re: why are there many copies of function_decls that have the sameinformation including the same uid? Kenneth Zadeck
16:48 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Richard Henderson
16:47 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Richard Henderson
16:41 Re: should libgcc depend on libc? Richard Henderson
16:10 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Richard Kenner
16:07 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Nicholas Nethercote
15:46 Re: ix86_value_regno and callers Richard Guenther
15:31 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Steven Bosscher
15:31 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
15:30 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Steven Bosscher
15:23 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Dave Korn
15:23 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Daniel Berlin
15:21 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Andrew Haley
15:19 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Joseph S. Myers
15:18 Re: Overflow in Fortran (was: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers?) Paul Brook
15:15 Re: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Nathan Sidwell
15:10 Re: ix86_value_regno and callers Richard Guenther
15:07 RE: Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Dave Korn
15:03 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Haren Visavadia
14:58 Where does the C standard describe overflow of signed integers? Nicholas Nethercote
14:54 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Steven Bosscher
14:53 Re: Offset and Bit Mask for Bit Fields? Manu Abraham
14:51 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Bernd Schmidt
14:50 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Diego Novillo
14:44 Re: Warnings when build gcc-4.0.2 H. J. Lu
14:41 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Haren Visavadia
14:28 Warnings when build gcc-4.0.2 Feng Wang
14:22 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Steven Bosscher
14:19 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Diego Novillo
14:16 'main' enters in gcc-4.1 Perret Yannick
14:13 Re: Offset and Bit Mask for Bit Fields? Andrew Haley
14:11 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Steven Bosscher
14:08 Offset and Bit Mask for Bit Fields? Dimitry Golubovsky
14:05 Re: why are there many copies of function_decls that have the same information including the same uid? Andrew Pinski
13:57 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noatin effect" while compiling Linux kernel Dan Kegel
13:54 Re: Re: Some notes on the Wiki Paul Koning
12:54 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register whilenoat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Paul Koning
12:50 Re: why are there many copies of function_decls that have the sameinformation including the same uid? Daniel Berlin
12:40 why are there many copies of function_decls that have the same informationincluding the same uid? Kenneth Zadeck
12:05 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Rainer Orth
11:58 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Russell Shaw
11:21 Re: Re: Some notes on the Wiki Joseph S. Myers
11:18 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Giovanni Bajo
11:13 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Jonathan Wakely
11:11 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Joseph S. Myers
10:27 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Giovanni Bajo
08:50 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Michael Cieslinski
08:35 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support Jeroen Scheerder
07:10 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Paolo Bonzini
07:03 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Paolo Bonzini
07:00 Re: Some notes on the Wiki Paolo Bonzini
06:58 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register whilenoat in effect" while compiling Linux kernel Falk Hueffner
06:23 Re: Re: Re: help:how to get the Nth argument stmt from CALL_EXPR stmt tree alert7
05:35 Re: Some notes on the Wiki R Hill
03:38 Re: ICE in tree.c Steve Kargl
03:02 Re: ICE in tree.c Steve Kargl
02:56 Re: ICE in tree.c Andrew Pinski
02:53 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:52 ICE in tree.c Steve Kargl
01:51 gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:445 (was:Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517) Dan Kegel
01:35 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: alpha: "macro requires $at register while noatin effect" while compiling Linux kernel Dan Kegel

July 10, 2005
23:41 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:39 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:38 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
22:19 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
21:50 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
21:40 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Andrew Pinski
21:35 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Steven Bosscher
21:30 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Steven Bosscher
20:55 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
20:50 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
20:47 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) David Edelsohn
20:37 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
19:55 Re: Broke swim interchange through aliasing Daniel Berlin
19:50 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
19:49 Broke swim interchange through aliasing Daniel Berlin
19:45 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:43 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Joseph S. Myers
18:41 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Richard Kenner
18:26 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
18:15 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
17:53 Re: Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Daniel Berlin
17:31 Some notes on the Wiki (was: 4.1 news item) Gerald Pfeifer
16:37 Re: Using gcc compiler on IXDP425 using eCos Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517 Dan Kegel
14:41 Re: named address spaces (update) Martin Koegler
13:07 Re: gcc 4.1 compile time and memory usage graphs Daniel Berlin
13:02 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517 Falk Hueffner
12:45 gcc 4.1 compile time and memory usage graphs Serge Belyshev
12:23 Re: gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517 Joseph S. Myers
06:17 Using gcc compiler on IXDP425 using eCos Rohit Agarwal
05:19 gcc-4.1-20050709: ICE in loop_givs_rescan, at loop.c:5517 Dan Kegel

July 09, 2005
22:40 Re: 4.1 news item Steven Bosscher
22:17 Re: 4.1 news item Gerald Pfeifer
20:37 Re: AMD 64 Problem with assembling Mike Stump
20:23 AMD 64 Problem with assembling Florian Michel
19:56 Re: updating libtool, etc. Thorsten Glaser
19:49 should libgcc depend on libc? Thorsten Glaser
18:07 gcc-4.1-20050709 is now available gccadmin
13:12 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Florian Weimer
11:47 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Adam Nielsen
11:33 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Lion Vollnhals
11:28 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Florian Weimer
11:25 Re: Calling a pure virtual function Lion Vollnhals
10:42 Calling a pure virtual function Adam Nielsen
10:07 Re: Namespace lookup: g++ 4.0.0 -> g++ 4.0.1 regression? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:50 Namespace lookup: g++ 4.0.0 -> g++ 4.0.1 regression? Jhair Tocancipa Triana
04:18 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Dan Kegel
01:02 Re: 4.1 news item Daniel Berlin
00:48 Re: x86 build is broken Fariborz Jahanian
00:48 Re: x86 build is broken Fariborz Jahanian
00:41 Re: x86 build is broken Andrew Pinski
00:36 Re: x86 build is broken Daniel Berlin
00:34 Re: 4.1 news item Mark Mitchell
00:32 Re: move specs documentation to internals manual? Joseph S. Myers
00:32 Re: move specs documentation to internals manual? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
00:23 Re: move specs documentation to internals manual? Daniel Jacobowitz
00:14 x86 build is broken Fariborz Jahanian

July 08, 2005
23:29 move specs documentation to internals manual? Geoffrey Keating
21:47 Re: gcc-4.1-20050702 ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990 Andrew Pinski
21:40 Re: 4.1 news item Gerald Pfeifer
21:34 4.1 news item Daniel Berlin
18:56 Re: Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org (fwd) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:17 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer
18:10 Re: Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org (fwd) Gerald Pfeifer
17:16 Re: RFA: -mfpmath=sse -fpic vs double constants Richard Henderson
16:45 Re: RFA: -mfpmath=sse -fpic vs double constants Richard Henderson
15:57 Re: MIPS-X Eric Christopher
15:38 Re: RFA: -mfpmath=sse -fpic vs double constants Paolo Bonzini
14:40 Re: gcc-4.0.1 ada build failed Oliver Kellogg
13:51 Re: gcc-4.0.1 ada build failed Laurent GUERBY
13:41 gcc-4.0.1 ada build failed Oliver Kellogg
13:21 Returned post for gcc-announce@gcc.gnu.org (fwd) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:44 Re: MIPS-X IM.Nobody
07:48 GCC 4.0.1 Released Mark Mitchell
07:41 Re: port gcc for bits processor Ian Lance Taylor
07:34 port gcc for bits processor Taoufik HNIA
01:55 Re: named address spaces (update) Paul Schlie
00:44 gcc-4.0-20050707 is now available gccadmin
00:29 RFA: -mfpmath=sse -fpic vs double constants Dale Johannesen

July 07, 2005
22:27 Re: [PATCH] Modify MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Eric Botcazou
20:11 Re: [PATCH] Modify MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX James E Wilson
18:59 Re: Stage 2 ends? Mark Mitchell
18:52 Inappropriate ChangeLog entry Mark Mitchell
17:53 Re: Existing tree functionality? Diego Novillo
17:28 Re: Existing tree functionality? Michael Tegtmeyer
17:19 Re: draft release notes for 4.0.1 Mark Mitchell
17:19 RE: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Dave Korn
16:51 Re: Existing tree functionality? Daniel Berlin
16:48 Re: Existing tree functionality? Diego Novillo
16:42 Re: Existing tree functionality? Michael Tegtmeyer
15:38 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
15:23 Re: Existing tree functionality? Daniel Berlin
14:47 Re: Existing tree functionality? Michael Tegtmeyer
14:46 Re: Existing tree functionality? Diego Novillo
12:01 [PATCH] Modify MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Eric Botcazou
11:45 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Kaz Kojima
09:58 Stage 2 ends? Giovanni Bajo
08:55 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
07:57 'main' enters in gcc-4.1 Perret Yannick
02:59 Re: named address spaces (update) James E Wilson

July 06, 2005
23:37 Re: GCC 3.3.6 Compile / Make problem James E Wilson
23:15 Re: Files containing the grammar for C and C++ James E Wilson
23:03 Re: No documentation of -rdynamic Andreas Schwab
22:39 Re: Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Eric Christopher
22:12 Re: No documentation of -rdynamic Andrew Pinski
22:04 No documentation of -rdynamic Wolfgang Bangerth
21:59 Re: Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Doug Evans
21:07 Re: Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Eric Christopher
21:03 Re: Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Daniel Kegel
20:55 Re: Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Joe Buck
20:00 Re: GCC Build historians: $with_multisrctop: is this ever set? DJ Delorie
19:50 Building cross-compilers with sibling package trees Doug Evans
19:03 Re: ix86_value_regno and callers Richard Henderson
18:58 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Eric Botcazou
18:42 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
18:41 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Paolo Carlini
18:34 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Jakub Jelinek
16:22 Fwd: GCC on linux, question on -m32 switch Kevin Neelands
16:13 Re: draft release notes for 4.0.1 Paolo Carlini
16:08 Re: draft release notes for 4.0.1 Joe Buck
15:48 RE: some errors compiling a free program with gcc-3.2, gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. Dave Korn
15:41 Re: Re: help:how to get the Nth argument stmt from CALL_EXPR stmttree Daniel Berlin
15:31 Re: Re: help:how to get the Nth argument stmt from CALL_EXPR stmt tree alert7
15:18 Re: some errors compiling a free program with gcc-3.2, gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. Giovanni Bajo
14:58 Re: [PR22319] Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Daniel Berlin
14:49 some errors compiling a free program with gcc-3.2, gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. wangxiuli
14:46 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Matthias Klose
14:43 Re: Existing tree functionality? Kenneth Zadeck
14:33 Re: [PR22319] Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Richard Kenner
14:32 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Paolo Carlini
14:24 Question of `internal consistency failure' in the backend pass 32 (sched2) Ling-hua Tseng
14:23 GCC Build historians: $with_multisrctop: is this ever set? Kelley Cook
14:22 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Eric Botcazou
14:18 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Paolo Carlini
14:18 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
14:11 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Paolo Carlini
14:10 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
14:02 Re: sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Eric Botcazou
14:01 Re: Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Richard Kenner
13:53 Re: Existing tree functionality? Daniel Berlin
13:50 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:49 Re: Existing tree functionality? Diego Novillo
13:40 Re: Existing tree functionality? Michael Tegtmeyer
13:38 sparc-linux results for 4.0.1 RC3 Christian Joensson
13:06 Re: Existing tree functionality? Daniel Berlin
13:04 Re: [PR22319] Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Andrew Pinski
13:01 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Avi Kivity
12:54 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
12:54 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: Existing tree functionality? Diego Novillo
12:46 Re: Existing tree functionality? Daniel Berlin
12:41 Re: [PR22319] Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Daniel Berlin
12:38 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Avi Kivity
12:32 Existing tree functionality? Michael Tegtmeyer
10:54 Re: [PR22319] Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Geert Bosch
10:17 Re: Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Andreas Schwab
09:50 Re: draft release notes for 4.0.1 Paolo Carlini
09:43 Re: Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Laurent GUERBY
07:49 Ada broken with ICE in tree-ssa-structalias... Andreas Jaeger
01:57 draft release notes for 4.0.1 Joe Buck
01:09 Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX James E Wilson

July 05, 2005
23:49 gcc-3.4-20050705 is now available gccadmin
23:35 Re: gcc-4.1-20050702 ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990 Andrew Pinski
23:24 Re: Compatibility between cxx and g++ Mike Stump
22:41 Re: help:how to get the Nth argument stmt from CALL_EXPR stmt tree Daniel Berlin
21:21 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
21:02 Re: gcc-4.1-20050702 ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990 Daniel Kegel
20:50 Re: Advice needed on GCC port to new (virtual) architecture Nathan Sidwell
20:47 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
20:41 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
20:36 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
20:24 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:22 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
20:18 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
19:59 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
19:58 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Joe Buck
19:52 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
19:24 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:18 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07 Re: Advice needed on GCC port to new (virtual) architecture Gareth The Great
19:05 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds DJ Delorie
19:01 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
18:57 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
18:42 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
18:38 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Andrew Pinski
18:33 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds DJ Delorie
18:32 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:30 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Vladimir Makarov
18:12 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
18:10 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Joe Buck
18:08 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Joe Buck
18:06 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:59 [fwd] RE: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:41 Re: gcc-4.1-20050702 ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990 Jan Hubicka
17:22 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Ian Lance Taylor
17:04 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
17:01 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 H. J. Lu
16:56 Re: Advice needed on GCC port to new (virtual) architecture Nathan Sidwell
16:37 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
16:33 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
16:29 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Paul Brook
16:22 gcc-4.1-20050702 ICE in cgraph_early_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:990 Daniel Kegel
16:18 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
16:18 HEADS-UP: tree-optimize.c and passes.c heavily modified Paolo Bonzini
16:12 Re: Compatibility between cxx and g++ Falk Hueffner
16:04 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
15:57 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:45 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds David Edelsohn
15:43 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
15:35 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Mark Mitchell
15:27 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Mark Mitchell
15:22 ix86_value_regno and callers Richard Guenther
15:19 help:how to get the Nth argument stmt from CALL_EXPR stmt tree alert7
15:14 ix86_value_regno and callers Richard Guenther
15:03 Compatibility between cxx and g++ Julio Garvia Honrado
14:51 Advice needed on GCC port to new (virtual) architecture gareth
14:28 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:32 Re: tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Paolo Carlini
13:10 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Daniel Jacobowitz
13:05 tr1::unordered_set<double> bizarre rounding behavior (x86) Michael Veksler
10:53 Ada character types : tree code and DW_AT_encoding Jerome Guitton
09:58 Re: CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Paolo Bonzini
09:10 RE: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Dave Korn
08:32 Re: Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost Laurent GUERBY
07:29 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Jakub Jelinek
07:25 Re: MIPS-X IM.Nobody
06:25 Re: [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Mark Mitchell
06:25 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
06:25 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
05:45 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Richard Sandiford
05:40 Re: A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Andrew Pinski
05:27 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Balaji S
05:02 bubblestrap and current gcc trunk gnattools Christian Joensson
04:50 A trouble with libssp in one-tree builds Kazu Hirata
04:31 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 John David Anglin
03:54 Re: Ada is broken in a clean directory Andrew Pinski
03:49 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Andreas Tobler
03:36 Re: The origin of scalar evolutions? Daniel Berlin
03:20 Re: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
01:15 RE: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Sung-Gu
00:18 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 David Edelsohn

July 04, 2005
22:22 Re: MIPS-X Richard Sandiford
22:06 [st20] seeking implementation advice for stack architectures (long) Dimitri Gorokhovik
22:01 Re: initializing wider-than-pointers Richard Henderson
19:29 Re: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
18:45 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Ian Lance Taylor
17:56 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Andrew Pinski
17:48 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 H. J. Lu
17:30 Re: Bugzilla does not let me in Daniel Berlin
17:25 SVN test repo updated and call for help Daniel Berlin
16:55 The origin of scalar evolutions? Robert van Engelen
15:59 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Joern RENNECKE
14:46 Re: matching '-Wl,' in a specs file Gunther Nikl
13:00 MIPS-X IM.Nobody
12:48 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Ulrich Weigand
12:40 Re: Bugzilla does not let me in Giovanni Bajo
12:38 Re: Can I trace the process of C++ template Instantiation? Giovanni Bajo
12:14 Re: matching '-Wl,' in a specs file Andrew Haley
11:46 Re: matching '-Wl,' in a specs file Gunther Nikl
11:07 Bugzilla does not let me in Ilya Mezhirov
10:52 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Steven Bosscher
10:41 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Balaji S
10:01 Re: Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Steven Bosscher
09:39 Can I trace the process of C++ template Instantiation? zheng wang
06:12 RE: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Sung-Gu
06:01 Re: byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Mike Stump
05:59 Problem with Delayed Branch Scheduling Balaji S
05:57 byteswap.c and endian.c for gcc? Sung-Gu
05:55 Re: updating libtool, etc. Mike Stump

July 03, 2005
23:38 Zack's Farewell Message Mark Mitchell
22:28 Re: updating libtool, etc. Nathanael Nerode
20:54 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Eric Botcazou
18:21 GCC 4.0.1 RC3 Mark Mitchell
16:32 Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Eric Botcazou
16:13 Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Steve Ellcey
14:31 Re: named address spaces (update) Martin Koegler
13:41 Need a new branch for w new port Dimitri Gorokhovik
12:13 Re: Double checked locking and GCJ? Andrew Haley
12:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:10 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
10:02 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Florian Weimer
09:54 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
09:49 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
06:53 Re: Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 FX Coudert
02:54 Re: "cycle advancing states" versus "cycle advancing arcs" Vladimir N. Makarov
00:20 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:16 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:07 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis

July 02, 2005
23:28 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
23:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
23:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
23:15 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Robert Dewar
23:12 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Nicholas Nethercote
19:07 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Giovanni Bajo
18:05 gcc-4.1-20050702 is now available gccadmin
17:15 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Florian Weimer
17:06 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Florian Weimer
16:51 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Robert Dewar
16:48 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Robert Dewar
16:47 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Robert Dewar
16:45 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Robert Dewar
15:39 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Michael Veksler
10:04 Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX Eric Botcazou
09:18 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Giovanni Bajo
02:23 Re: defaults.h silliness James E Wilson
01:54 Re: Files containing the grammar for C and C++ Stephen Torri
01:49 Re: named address spaces (update) James E Wilson
01:41 Re: Files containing the grammar for C and C++ Russell Shaw
01:28 Re: initializing wider-than-pointers DJ Delorie
01:20 "cycle advancing states" versus "cycle advancing arcs" Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
01:19 Re: initializing wider-than-pointers James E Wilson
01:04 Re: [PATCH] Minor documentation fix. James E Wilson

July 01, 2005
22:45 Re: MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK on IA-64/HP-UX James E Wilson
22:19 Re: matching '-Wl,' in a specs file James E Wilson
20:36 GCC 3.3.6 Compile / Make problem James Kosin
19:42 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Paul Schlie
19:00 Files containing the grammar for C and C++ Stephen Torri
18:55 Re: updating libtool, etc. Alexandre Oliva
18:30 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Alexandre Oliva
18:26 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Giovanni Bajo
18:22 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Diego Novillo
18:22 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Alexandre Oliva
18:16 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Giovanni Bajo
17:20 Re: updating libtool, etc. Geoffrey Keating
17:15 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Paul Schlie
16:27 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Devang Patel
16:24 Re: potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:53 Re: updating libtool, etc. Ralf Wildenhues
15:51 potential simple loop optimization assistance strategy? Paul Schlie
14:54 [PATCH] Minor documentation fix. Sergei Organov
14:44 Re: updating libtool, etc. Kelley Cook
14:13 Re: var_tracking question DJ Delorie
14:03 Re: var_tracking question Daniel Berlin
13:01 Re: updating libtool, etc. Daniel Jacobowitz
09:50 Re: var_tracking question Jakub Jelinek
09:24 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
09:17 Re: sizeof() function parameter array: known problem? Jonathan Wakely
09:17 Re: sizeof() function parameter array: known problem? Andrew Haley
08:48 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
08:45 sizeof() function parameter array: known problem? Etienne Lorrain
08:43 Re: Ada is broken in a clean directory Arnaud Charlet
06:58 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Joost VandeVondele
05:02 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:58 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:53 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Andrew Pinski
04:15 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Andrew Pinski
04:07 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:16 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Daniel Berlin
02:17 Re: updating libtool, etc. Geoff Keating
02:02 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Daniel Berlin
01:47 Re: [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
01:41 Re: updating libtool, etc. Daniel Jacobowitz
01:40 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:37 Re: updating libtool, etc. Geoff Keating
01:35 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
01:26 Re: updating libtool, etc. David Edelsohn
01:26 var_tracking question DJ Delorie
01:25 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
01:23 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:21 updating libtool, etc. Geoff Keating
01:04 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
01:03 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Andrew Pinski
00:49 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:17 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler James E Wilson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3