This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada front-end depends on signed overflow


> > Right, the code generated by the front end is not pretty either, but at
> > least the front-end knows what it is doing Ada-wise.  -ftrapv is so dumb
> > at the moment that it emits checks for virtually anything.
>
> No, it just emits it for signed operations.

Of course, it is not so dumb as to blatantly violate its specification.

> If we use -ftrapv, then we have to make sure that operations labeled by the
> front end as not requiring an overflow check are transformed into unsigned
> operations by gigi. 

I think it would be dangerous to take that path.

> I don't see that's so terrible, the jmp will be free in practice anyway
> so I don't think you will find this slows things down.

You missed the point; the overflow check has been optimized away by one of the 
RTL optimization passes.

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]