This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC and Floating-Point

From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <linux at carewolf dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 17:19:37 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC and Floating-Point
References: <1116918251.4292d1eb490f6@ssl.kss-loka.si> <200505262049.13842.linux@carewolf.com> <20050527115152.GR5967@ay.vinc17.org>

On Friday 27 May 2005 13:51, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> So, yes, -ffast-math by default would really be a bad idea and would
> make gcc much worse than other compilers.
>
Thanks for the tests. I had no idea GCCs fast-math was that different from  
other compilers.

 Maybe the real goal like other have mentioned should be to divide the 
-ffast-math into multiple switches.

`Allan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC and Floating-Point
  - From: Paul Koning

References:
- Re: GCC and Floating-Point
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: GCC and Floating-Point
  - From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen
- Re: GCC and Floating-Point
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]