This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:57:08 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <1116322155.13457.86.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <7770C019-5E13-4543-ABD9-8054CD628F59@dalecki.de> <200505172103.35084.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 21:03, Paul Brook wrote:
[building of gfortran]
> It does require gmp/mpfr on the host, but in most cases the host is native, 
> and they are dead easy to cross compile anyway.

And it's long been my contention that we shouldn't even be doing that.  

I still feel these packages should be brought in-tree, especially since
specific minimum versions are needed.

R.

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Marcin Dalecki
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]