This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: chris jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Michael Cieslinski <micis at gmx dot de>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 13:03:05 -0700
Subject: Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator
References: <22931.1115373391@www25.gmx.net> <427B70B0.3070103@cs.york.ac.uk> <70253b0fe3880a4b3b249aeadc02a07e@physics.uc.edu>

> The problem with C++ is in fold as we now have to disable the 
> optimization
> which converted "a >= b ? b : a" to MIN_EXPR.

Which begs the question of why it doesn't happen when we get into
the tree optimizers and have lvalues there.


r~

References:
- How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator
  - From: Michael Cieslinski
- Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator
  - From: chris jefferson
- Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]