gcc archive
date index for May, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2005
23:53 gcc-3.4-20050531 is now available gccadmin
23:40 ERROR in the gfortran testsuite Andrew Pinski
23:30 Improving GCC Floating-Point [was: What is wrong with Bugzilla?] Scott Robert Ladd
22:58 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
22:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
20:11 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
19:58 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:53 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Geoff Keating
19:27 RFA: Fix PR21767 (Was: Re: RFD: what to do about stale REG_EQUAL notes in dead_or_predictable) Joern RENNECKE
19:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
18:40 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
18:35 Your Resume for the position of Business Analyst InactiveJob
17:44 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
17:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Jakub Jelinek
17:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:22 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
17:21 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:17 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:14 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:14 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Dave Korn
17:12 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
17:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Hugh Sasse
17:03 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
17:01 RE: Hello,Gnu Dave Korn
17:01 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
16:53 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
16:05 Re: Hello,Gnu Jonathan Wakely
15:58 Hello,Gnu dk zhou
15:11 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
15:10 FYI: Upgrading sourceware mysql to 4.x Daniel Berlin
14:34 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Jeffrey A Law
14:32 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
14:13 Re: GCC Compiler sjhill
14:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
13:57 GCC Compiler Thomas Bernard
13:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
13:35 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
13:34 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
13:17 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C Paolo Bonzini
13:02 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:51 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C Ulrich Weigand
12:48 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:46 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
12:27 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
12:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
12:17 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:16 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andrew Haley
12:13 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
12:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:04 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
11:24 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Geert Bosch
09:11 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
07:40 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in Cwith -O2 Paolo Bonzini
06:04 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
05:56 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? R Hill
03:50 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
03:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
03:06 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
02:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] R Hill

May 30, 2005
23:51 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Paul Brook
23:44 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Gary Funck
23:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] chris jefferson
23:15 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy chris jefferson
22:15 successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.4.1 Bojan Antonovic
21:36 Re: configure test for a mmap flag Steve Kargl
21:31 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
21:17 Re: configure test for a mmap flag Florian Weimer
21:10 configure test for a mmap flag Steve Kargl
20:50 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
20:46 make check on FreeBSD AMD64 5.4Release DJ Vincent
20:34 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Jakub Jelinek
20:32 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
20:20 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Toon Moene
20:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
20:13 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Ulrich Weigand
20:12 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
20:05 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
20:04 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
19:59 Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
19:54 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
19:39 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
19:22 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Andrew Pinski
19:17 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Andrew Pinski
18:59 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Ulrich Weigand
18:38 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
18:11 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gary Funck
18:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
18:03 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Bernhard R. Link
17:34 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
17:31 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:26 Re: ifcvt.c question Roger Sayle
17:26 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:18 Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Diego Novillo
17:03 Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Jeffrey A Law
16:32 Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Diego Novillo
16:07 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:48 ifcvt.c question Steven Bosscher
15:48 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:43 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
15:40 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Zack Weinberg
15:39 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? William Beebe
15:36 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:34 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:34 Extension: GCC warnings for pure/reentrant functions David Austin
15:31 Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Victor STINNER
15:31 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
15:30 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Bernhard R. Link
15:29 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:25 question in generating rtl code zouq
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:19 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
15:19 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

May 29, 2005
20:58 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer
20:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joe Buck
20:13 Re: bug or not ? ada loop in gcc-4.1-20050528 Andrew Pinski
20:09 bug or not ? ada loop in gcc-4.1-20050528 Marc Espie
19:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
19:16 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
18:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
18:32 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joseph S. Myers
18:23 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Brian Dessent
18:16 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
18:16 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Brian Dessent
18:05 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Russ Allbery
17:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] William Beebe
17:25 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
17:23 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Marc Espie
15:57 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
15:38 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:18 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
12:54 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
12:07 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
10:54 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Giovanni Bajo
10:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Giovanni Bajo
10:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
09:56 [wwwdocs] Re: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Gerald Pfeifer
07:51 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
07:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Roger Sayle
06:22 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gabriel Dos Reis
06:07 Re: A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. N V Krishna
05:57 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released R Hill
05:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] R Hill
04:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joe Buck
04:37 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Ross Smith
03:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Geoffrey Keating
02:22 Re: A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. Ian Lance Taylor
01:47 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
01:30 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis

May 28, 2005
23:57 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
23:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Kai Henningsen
23:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kai Henningsen
23:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kai Henningsen
23:02 A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. N V Krishna
22:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
22:47 C++ PATCH: PR 2922 Douglas Gregor
20:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] William Beebe
19:07 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
18:08 gcc-4.1-20050528 is now available gccadmin
17:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
17:02 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key imacat
16:10 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
15:55 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gerald Pfeifer
15:44 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gabriel Dos Reis
15:26 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gerald Pfeifer
15:15 What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Uros Bizjak
14:38 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Tobias Schlüter
14:28 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
14:21 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Joseph S. Myers
14:09 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Andrew Pinski
13:48 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
13:39 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Andrew Pinski
12:35 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
12:11 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
11:57 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Joseph S. Myers
11:43 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
11:26 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer
10:44 Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
08:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Toon Moene
06:42 Induction Variable Rajkishore Barik
05:02 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
04:32 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released R Hill
01:12 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Russ Allbery

May 27, 2005
23:43 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gary Funck
23:01 Recall: Tony Mueller
21:44 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
21:16 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
20:55 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
20:39 Re: mixing gcc-4.0 and g++-3.3 generated code Mike Stump
20:39 Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key imacat
19:55 Numerous ObjC DejaGNU failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ziemowit Laski
19:27 Re: Bootstrap problem Andrew Pinski
18:51 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:45 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Andrew Pinski
18:43 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:32 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Andrew Pinski
18:29 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:28 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Dale Johannesen
18:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Paul Koning
18:23 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Ian Lance Taylor
18:07 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
18:06 More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
17:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Richard Guenther
17:33 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
15:32 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
15:28 Re: Removal of 4.0.0 last minute page from Wiki? Mark Mitchell
15:25 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Paul Koning
15:19 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
15:09 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:58 Removal of 4.0.0 last minute page from Wiki? Giovanni Bajo
14:21 Re: [Fwd: Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection] Camm Maguire
14:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
13:56 mixing gcc-4.0 and g++-3.3 generated code Jack Howarth
13:42 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
13:37 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Olivier Galibert
13:21 Re: How can I get rid of __main ? Nathan Sidwell
13:12 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
12:42 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Vincent Lefevre
12:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
12:03 GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
11:59 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
11:52 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
11:31 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Daniel Berlin
11:29 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
10:48 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
09:36 How can I get rid of __main ? Monika Chaddha
04:04 Re: help, cvs screwed up Mike Stump
03:47 Re: help, cvs screwed up Ian Lance Taylor
03:10 help, cvs screwed up Mike Stump
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:44 GCC 4.0.1 Status Report (2005-05-26) Mark Mitchell
00:43 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
00:39 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
00:18 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
00:05 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd

May 26, 2005
23:59 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
23:57 gcc-4.0-20050526 is now available gccadmin
23:56 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
23:52 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
23:31 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
23:25 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
21:33 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
21:17 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Steven Bosscher
21:15 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
20:58 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Uros Bizjak
20:50 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
20:26 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Richard Henderson
19:35 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
19:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
19:14 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
18:50 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
18:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
18:38 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Joseph S. Myers
18:32 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
18:30 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
18:22 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Pinski
18:12 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
18:10 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:56 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Morten Welinder
17:55 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:53 RFD: what to do about stale REG_EQUAL notes in dead_or_predictable Joern RENNECKE
17:41 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
17:40 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
17:37 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:35 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
17:29 GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gabriel Dos Reis
17:27 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Morten Welinder
17:27 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
17:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:23 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy David Daney
17:14 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kevin Handy
17:01 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
16:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
16:09 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
16:05 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:48 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Richard Henderson
15:45 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
15:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paolo Carlini
15:21 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
14:35 Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
13:55 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
13:48 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Paul Brook
13:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
13:14 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Daniel Berlin
12:05 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Richard Guenther
11:57 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
08:15 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
08:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
08:03 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Jaeger
06:11 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
05:57 Re: Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
01:30 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:35 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie

May 25, 2005
22:39 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Menezes, Evandro
22:03 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Steven G. Johnson
21:52 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
21:46 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Schwab
21:41 Re: Ada Status in mainline Diego Novillo
21:37 Re: Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
20:52 Re: [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Jan Hubicka
20:50 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Jan Hubicka
19:48 Re: [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Richard Henderson
19:27 [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Richard Guenther
18:44 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
18:31 hidden enum constants (Was: Compiling GCC with g++: a report) Giovanni Bajo
18:15 Re: Ada Status in mainline Diego Novillo
18:08 Re: Ada Status in mainline Richard Kenner
17:35 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Uros Bizjak
17:27 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Kenner
17:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
16:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
16:12 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Menezes, Evandro
15:59 Re: Ada Status in mainline Richard Guenther
15:56 Re: Ada Status in mainline Graham Stott
15:42 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
15:22 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Schwab
15:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Jason Merrill
15:18 Re: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Olly Betts
15:04 Re: Ada Status in mainline Steven Bosscher
14:59 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Dave Korn
14:58 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
14:57 Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
14:52 Re: %dil in x86 inline asm Ian Lance Taylor
14:51 RE: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Dave Korn
14:35 Re: %dil in x86 inline asm Florian Weimer
14:28 Re: GCC and Floating-Point chris jefferson
14:18 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
14:13 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
13:54 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Paolo Carlini
13:53 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Gabriel Dos Reis
13:45 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Theodore Papadopoulo
13:38 Bootstrap problem Andrew Pinski
13:33 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Theodore Papadopoulo
13:30 %dil in x86 inline asm Phil Endecott
13:30 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:48 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Paolo Carlini
12:44 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Theodore Papadopoulo
12:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:46 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Florian Weimer
09:51 Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Vincent Deffontaines
08:36 libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Paolo Carlini
07:45 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
06:10 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Christoph Hellwig
05:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Bernardo Innocenti
05:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
03:45 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Jason Merrill
03:34 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
03:20 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
03:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
02:36 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
02:24 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
02:20 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:50 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
01:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:40 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:36 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:24 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:16 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:12 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:55 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
00:48 gcc-3.4-20050524 is now available gccadmin
00:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Ian Lance Taylor
00:37 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Carlini
00:37 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:29 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Russ Allbery
00:11 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
00:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:06 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg

May 24, 2005
23:53 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
23:45 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Carlini
23:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
23:41 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Henderson
23:38 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Ian Lance Taylor
23:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
23:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
23:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
21:50 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
21:40 Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection Camm Maguire
20:43 Re: Profile-based inliner status? Paolo Carlini
20:41 Profile-based inliner status? Daniel Kegel
18:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kevin Handy
17:49 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
17:25 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kevin Handy
17:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Dale Johannesen
16:44 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Joe Buck
16:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Guenther
16:07 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Diego Novillo
15:11 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
15:03 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Andreas Schwab
14:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Koning
13:41 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
13:18 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Michael Meissner
10:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Bonzini
08:48 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
08:32 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kai Henningsen
08:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:39 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:38 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Florian Weimer
07:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
07:09 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
07:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:04 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Uros Bizjak
07:04 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
06:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
06:43 Slush Mark Mitchell
06:31 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:29 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:25 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:13 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:04 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
05:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
05:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:57 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:03 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Andrew Pinski
03:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
03:55 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
02:11 Re: Best Practices Russell Shaw

May 23, 2005
23:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Joseph S. Myers
23:51 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
23:06 Re: Best Practices Mike Stump
22:58 Best Practices Ron Hudson
22:20 Re: [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit Mark Mitchell
21:25 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
20:27 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Mark Mitchell
20:12 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
20:00 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
19:59 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mike Stump
19:57 Re: tree ssa and type issues Thomas R. Truscott
19:27 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Mark Mitchell
19:20 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Paolo Carlini
19:13 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mark Mitchell
19:07 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
19:01 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mark Mitchell
18:43 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
18:04 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
17:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Steven Bosscher
17:32 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Tom Tromey
17:23 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Daniel Kegel
16:37 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:34 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
16:26 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
16:21 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:19 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Daniel Berlin
16:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
15:43 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
15:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Sandiford
15:34 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
15:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
15:15 GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
13:19 Re: i387 control word reg definition is missing Sylvain Pion
12:22 Re: gcc-specific? Marcel Cox
11:50 gcc-specific? Erik Poupaert
08:28 i387 control word reg definition is missing Uros Bizjak
08:26 i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
07:47 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
07:40 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Kai Ruottu
06:31 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Ranjit Mathew
06:15 Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis

May 22, 2005
20:18 Re: expand_main_function/PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY on ppc Olivier Hainque
18:10 gcc-4.1-20050522 is now available gccadmin
15:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Dorit Naishlos
14:29 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andreas Jaeger
14:26 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
14:23 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Dorit Naishlos
12:02 Re: Problem in assembly and linking(gcc-4.0) Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:52 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
07:57 question in porting gcc front end zouq
05:09 Reduction rule for Kleene's Closure in replacement of Thompson's algorithm Erik Poupaert
04:32 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Zack Weinberg
01:28 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Gabriel Dos Reis

May 21, 2005
23:44 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Schwab
23:42 gcc-4.0-20050521 is now available gccadmin
23:42 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Giovanni Bajo
23:28 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Daniel Berlin
23:26 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
23:20 [wwwdocs] make release download more prominent (was: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html) Gerald Pfeifer
23:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Steven Bosscher
23:04 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Gabriel Dos Reis
23:00 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Gerald Pfeifer
22:45 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Paolo Carlini
22:43 Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
22:39 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Gerald Pfeifer
22:17 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
22:06 gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Paolo Carlini
21:58 Spread snapshot building more evenly throughout the week Gerald Pfeifer
20:21 Re: tree ssa and type issues Steven Bosscher
20:21 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
20:15 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
19:48 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
19:45 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
19:18 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:49 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
18:49 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:46 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:43 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:34 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:32 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:17 Re: tree ssa and type issues Tom Tromey
18:08 Problem in assembly and linking(gcc-4.0) Virender Kashyap
17:51 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
17:31 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Jaeger
17:23 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
16:55 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Jaeger
16:50 tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
14:43 basic-block and tree statement iterator enums Gabriel Dos Reis
13:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
13:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Kai Henningsen
12:03 RE: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Joseph S. Myers
09:27 RE: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
09:13 [PR21029] [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, ping... Christian Joensson
08:59 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
08:45 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
08:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andreas Jaeger
08:33 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
08:28 A constant pool and addressing mode question Ling-hua Tseng
07:08 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
02:45 RE: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Gary Funck
01:54 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Daniel Berlin
00:24 gcc-3.4-20050520 is now available gccadmin
00:22 Re: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Joseph S. Myers

May 20, 2005
23:28 C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Gary Funck
23:22 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
22:15 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
22:07 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
22:05 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Zack Weinberg
21:48 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Bill Northcott
21:25 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
21:15 Re: [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit (was: GCC 3.4.4 Released) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:15 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
20:55 [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit (was: GCC 3.4.4 Released) Gerald Pfeifer
20:02 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Richard Henderson
19:40 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
19:25 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Jonathan Wakely
19:00 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
18:46 fixincludes running too often? Diego Novillo
18:40 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Richard Henderson
18:24 RE: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Dave Korn
18:15 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
18:08 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Mike Stump
17:42 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
17:15 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Mark Mitchell
17:12 Re: Problems building gcc on my mandrake Jonathan Wakely
16:55 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
16:48 RE: GCC 3.4.4 Released Dave Korn
16:38 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Florian Weimer
16:35 Problems building gcc on my mandrake Mehul
16:24 GCC 3.4.4 Released Mark Mitchell
16:01 Re: typo in french error message Segher Boessenkool
15:45 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Giovanni Bajo
15:40 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Etienne Lorrain
15:32 Re: typo in french error message Boris Mansencal
15:29 Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
15:23 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
15:23 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Falk Hueffner
15:20 Re: typo in french error message E. Weddington
15:18 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Ian Lance Taylor
15:17 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Ian Lance Taylor
15:16 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paolo Carlini
15:13 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paul Brook
15:06 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paolo Carlini
14:56 GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Etienne Lorrain
14:44 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
14:41 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
12:42 Re: subscription to gcc mailing list Haren Visavadia
12:37 subscription to gcc mailing list drugdesign
11:14 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Daniel Berlin
09:13 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Tomasz Chmielewski
08:49 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
08:08 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Segher Boessenkool
08:08 Re: typo in french error message Segher Boessenkool
08:08 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Segher Boessenkool
07:02 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Paolo Bonzini
07:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Paolo Bonzini
06:56 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Marcin Dalecki
04:55 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
04:54 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
04:23 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Bill Northcott
02:09 -fstack-check harmful in main tread (on Linux) Waldek Hebisch
01:15 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion David Daney
00:25 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Andrew Pinski
00:12 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
00:11 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont

May 19, 2005
23:53 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Andrew Pinski
23:49 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Mike Stump
23:09 ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
23:08 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Jonathan Wilson
21:59 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mike Stump
21:53 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Bryce McKinlay
21:24 Re: The VLIW bundle output questions Vladimir Makarov
20:08 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Sandiford
20:06 The VLIW bundle output questions Ling-hua Tseng
19:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Sandiford
19:41 Re: [rfc] mainline slush David Daney
19:40 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Gerald Pfeifer
19:26 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andrew Pinski
19:08 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Joe Buck
19:08 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Joe Buck
18:59 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mike Stump
18:56 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andrew Pinski
18:47 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Mike Stump
18:29 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
17:58 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:12 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
17:02 Re: How to know the DEF operand that corresponds to a specificargument of a call to function? Davide Pozza
15:46 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
15:46 Re: How to know the DEF operand that corresponds to a specific argument of a call to function? Diego Novillo
15:45 Re: How to know the DEF operand that corresponds to a specificargument of a call to function? Daniel Berlin
15:07 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Jonathan Wakely
14:48 How to know the DEF operand that corresponds to a specific argument of a call to function? Davide Pozza
14:45 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Marcin Dalecki
14:41 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Paolo Bonzini
13:42 typo in french error message Boris Mansencal
13:39 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
13:36 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
13:24 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
10:32 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure Jan Hubicka
10:15 Anything wrong with the link? Or I was wrong? Kein Yuan
10:03 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Ranjit Mathew
10:01 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Ranjit Mathew
09:45 spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Bill Northcott
09:38 GPU-aware compiling? Tomasz Chmielewski
08:55 matching '-Wl,' in a specs file Gunther Nikl
07:54 Re: just 2 assertive David Ayers
07:53 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Ranjit Mathew
07:41 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Paolo Bonzini
06:54 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
05:47 Bootstrap Times Improvements? Ranjit Mathew
05:14 Re: Bootstrap failure in libobjc Andreas Jaeger
04:42 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
02:07 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Kenneth Zadeck
01:17 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Joe Buck
01:10 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Joseph S. Myers
00:48 Re: [rfc] mainline slush David Edelsohn
00:39 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Diego Novillo
00:38 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
00:31 [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
00:30 Re: gcc-3.3-20050518 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis
00:30 Re: gcc-3.3-20050518 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis
00:21 Re: gcc-3.3-20050518 is now available Joseph S. Myers
00:15 Re: gcc-3.3-20050518 is now available Joe Buck

May 18, 2005
23:53 gcc-3.3-20050518 is now available gccadmin
23:20 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Neil Booth
22:56 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Richard Henderson
22:06 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Andreas Schwab
22:02 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
21:29 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Joe Buck
21:18 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Richard Henderson
21:17 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Christoph Hellwig
21:17 just 2 assertive Mike Stump
21:16 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Christoph Hellwig
21:08 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Paolo Carlini
21:04 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure Jan Hubicka
21:02 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Paul Brook
20:59 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
20:45 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
20:43 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
20:32 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
20:31 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure Jan Hubicka
20:03 Re: Bootstrap failure in libobjc Mike Stump
19:54 LLVM 1.5 is out Chris Lattner
19:19 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Richard Henderson
19:13 Re: [RFC] Fix ADDR_EXPR type mismatches in C++ frontend Richard Guenther
19:10 Re: expand_main_function/PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY on ppc Richard Henderson
19:09 Re: [RFC] Fix ADDR_EXPR type mismatches in C++ frontend Richard Henderson
19:03 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Richard Henderson
18:42 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Paul Koning
18:30 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Richard Henderson
17:09 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Dan Kegel
17:07 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
17:05 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Gabriel Dos Reis
17:04 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Paul Koning
16:54 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ian Lance Taylor
16:51 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
16:34 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR fromc-typeck.c:build_function_call Paul Schlie
16:32 powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure Janis Johnson
15:42 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
15:33 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Paul Koning
15:30 Re: Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImodeat "oplower" pass? Paolo Bonzini
15:28 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Jonathan Wakely
15:27 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Marcin Dalecki
15:22 Re: Type mismatch in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5436 (rewrite_address_base) Zdenek Dvorak
15:19 Re: Problem with -ftree-ter and loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
15:11 Why the V4QImode vector operations are expanded into many SImode at "oplower" pass? Ling-hua Tseng
14:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Robert Dewar
14:22 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Gabriel Dos Reis
14:17 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Richard Guenther
14:13 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Gabriel Dos Reis
14:05 Re: Problem with -ftree-ter and loop unrolling Andrew MacLeod
13:51 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR fromc-typeck.c:build_function_call Paul Schlie
13:45 Re: genmddeps s390 bootstrap failure Ian Lance Taylor
13:43 Type mismatch in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:5436 (rewrite_address_base) Richard Guenther
13:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
13:34 AIX bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
13:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Robert Dewar
13:24 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Richard Guenther
13:24 Re: Problem with -ftree-ter and loop unrolling Steven Bosscher
13:21 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR fromc-typeck.c:build_function_call Daniel Berlin
13:13 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Jakub Jelinek
13:11 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
13:07 Problem with -ftree-ter and loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
13:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
12:46 expand_main_function/PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY on ppc Olivier Hainque
12:42 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Joseph S. Myers
12:40 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
12:08 [RFC] Fix ADDR_EXPR type mismatches in C++ frontend Richard Guenther
11:59 Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Richard Guenther
11:45 Bad type mismatch in ADDR_EXPR from cp/class.c:build_vtbl_initializer Richard Guenther
11:28 Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call Richard Guenther
10:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
10:13 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
10:02 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Andreas Schwab
09:36 libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Stephan Bergmann
09:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
08:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
08:24 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Jonathan Wakely
08:05 genmddeps s390 bootstrap failure Andreas Krebbel
07:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Sandiford
07:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:37 Bootstrap failure in libobjc Andreas Jaeger
05:14 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ranjit Mathew
04:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
04:34 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Richard Henderson
04:12 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Sam Lauber
01:51 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Per Bothner
00:37 Your Article Submitted (#) nobody
00:00 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mike Stump

May 17, 2005
23:48 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Zack Weinberg
23:47 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Zack Weinberg
23:16 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Neil Booth
23:09 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jonathan Wilson
23:05 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mike Stump
23:01 libjava build failure? Mike Stump
23:00 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
22:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
22:52 [wwwdocs] bugs.html cleanup (was: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines)only? Gerald Pfeifer
22:41 preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Per Bothner
22:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
22:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Toon Moene
22:16 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
22:16 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mike Stump
22:00 Re: libiberty requirements and ISO C90 Ian Lance Taylor
21:56 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Hugh Sasse
21:44 Re: libiberty requirements and ISO C90 Mark Kettenis
21:24 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
21:21 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
21:19 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Nathan Sidwell
21:13 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:11 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Mark Mitchell
21:11 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
21:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
21:03 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Andi Kleen
20:36 GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
20:14 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
20:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gerald Pfeifer
20:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paul Brook
19:56 Re: "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor Paul Koning
19:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
19:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
19:24 Re: "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor Gabriel Dos Reis
19:13 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Daniel Berlin
19:11 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:04 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Richard Henderson
18:59 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Richard Kenner
18:56 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
18:31 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
18:12 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Daniel Berlin
17:56 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
17:47 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Richard Henderson
17:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
17:22 Re: My evil plans for the next few weekends Zack Weinberg
17:19 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
17:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
17:09 My evil plans for the next few weekends Daniel Berlin
16:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
16:34 Re: "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor Jonathan Wakely
16:26 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Richard Guenther
16:25 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jonathan Wakely
16:13 Re: "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor Joe Buck
16:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:02 "No matching function" -- not finding copy constructor Paul Koning
15:41 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
14:40 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Jonathan Wakely
14:29 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Richard Guenther
14:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
14:06 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Ian Lance Taylor
14:04 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Richard Guenther
14:01 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Ian Lance Taylor
13:50 Re: Why doesn't gcc.pot use gcc-internal-format? Joseph S. Myers
13:36 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Andreas Schwab
12:59 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Ian Lance Taylor
12:18 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Richard Guenther
11:40 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Nathan Sidwell
11:39 Why doesn't gcc.pot use gcc-internal-format? Jakub Jelinek
11:37 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
10:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
10:50 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 (& ada/Make-lang.in) Georg Bauhaus
10:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Eric Botcazou
10:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
10:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
10:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
10:01 Kiutaltunk egy "Eurorest" hotelcsekket Eurorest Információs Iroda
09:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
09:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jonathan Wakely
09:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
09:14 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
08:27 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Jakub Jelinek
06:40 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
04:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Michael Veksler
04:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
03:27 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Alexandre Oliva
03:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
03:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
03:11 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 John David Anglin
02:17 Re: some question about gc Ian Lance Taylor
02:13 Re: updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Nicholas K Rivers
01:58 Re: Default value for libiconv in target-supports.exp? Mark Mitchell
01:40 GCC Porting advice needed Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
01:32 Re: Default value for libiconv in target-supports.exp? David Edelsohn
01:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
01:26 Default value for libiconv in target-supports.exp? Mark Mitchell
01:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
01:11 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
01:09 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
00:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
00:58 Re: some question about gc zouq
00:56 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting DJ Delorie
00:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
00:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? DJ Delorie
00:41 GCC 3.4.4 Mark Mitchell
00:27 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell

May 16, 2005
23:21 Re: updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Janis Johnson
22:41 [wwwdocs] Re: Wiki on home page Gerald Pfeifer
22:18 Re: updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Zack Weinberg
22:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
22:11 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
22:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
22:02 Re: updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Nicholas K Rivers
22:00 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ralf Corsepius
21:44 Re: [gnu.org #232556] GNU Mirror: SWITCHmirror replaces Swiss SunSITE Gerald Pfeifer
21:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? DJ Delorie
21:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
21:24 Re: updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Mike Stump
21:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
21:13 updating /testsuite/gcc.misc-tests Nicholas K Rivers
20:34 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? DJ Delorie
20:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
20:13 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
20:03 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
19:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joseph S. Myers
19:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mike Stump
19:40 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Florian Weimer
19:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Hugh Sasse
19:13 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Georg Bauhaus
19:09 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? DJ Delorie
19:04 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Russ Allbery
18:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
18:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Pinski
18:48 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? DJ Delorie
18:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
18:26 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Karel Gardas
18:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Russ Allbery
18:19 Re: Bootstrap broken Richard Sandiford
18:13 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? Paul Albrecht
18:13 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Georg Bauhaus
18:09 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
18:03 Re: Bootstrap broken David Edelsohn
17:51 Re: Bootstrap broken Richard Sandiford
17:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
17:49 Re: Bootstrap broken Richard Sandiford
17:44 Bootstrap broken David Edelsohn
17:26 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
17:23 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Janis Johnson
17:18 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Janis Johnson
17:08 Daniel Berlin and Sebastian Pop maintainerships David Edelsohn
17:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paolo Bonzini
16:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
16:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
16:04 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
15:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
15:46 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
15:28 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steven Bosscher
14:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
14:17 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
14:08 Re: some question about gc Ian Lance Taylor
14:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paul Koning
13:39 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
13:26 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
12:38 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
12:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
11:03 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Etienne Lorrain
10:37 Re: some question about gc Nix
10:30 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
09:58 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
09:33 Re: some question about gc zouq
09:24 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
09:11 Default expansion of builtin_longjmp Øyvind Harboe
09:01 Re: Auto-vectorization with gcj Andrew Haley
08:27 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++program using gcc? Carlo Corridore
08:07 Re: libiberty requirements and ISO C90 Gabriel Dos Reis
06:18 Re: On fold_indirect_ref Richard Henderson
04:32 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Eric Botcazou
04:26 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
04:18 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Eric Botcazou
04:11 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
03:44 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
03:32 Re: some question about gc Ian Lance Taylor
03:20 Re: libiberty requirements and ISO C90 Ian Lance Taylor
03:18 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Mike Stump
03:09 Re: gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compiler testing Ian Lance Taylor
02:37 libiberty requirements and ISO C90 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:13 gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp does not supported installed-compilertesting Mark Mitchell
00:08 Re: Link to GCC Wiki? Gerald Pfeifer
00:05 Dresden 1945 brrjmsbroderick
00:04 Link to GCC Wiki? jjcogliati-r2

May 15, 2005
23:36 Blutige Selbstjustiz tony
23:25 The Whore Lived Like a German humanres
23:02 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
22:20 Volk wird nur zum zahlen gebraucht! hf . distribuzione
22:13 Re: collab.net have a spam open relay in operation at the moment. please give them grief about it. Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
22:11 Auf Streife durch den Berliner Wedding dpetras
21:55 4,8 Mill. Osteuropaeer durch Fischer-Volmer Erlass brrjmsbroderick
21:52 Re: collab.net have a spam open relay in operation at the moment. please give them grief about it. Mike Stump
21:46 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Mike Stump
21:46 S.O.S. Kiez! Polizei schlaegt Alarm scottb
21:36 Properly setting the pkcconfig directory (was: Moving the pkgconfigdirectory from lib/ to libdata/?) Gerald Pfeifer
21:21 Multi-Kulturell = Multi-Kriminell wcannon
21:07 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Mike Stump
21:05 Massenhafter Steuerbetrug durch auslaendische Arbeitnehmer arensb
20:37 Blutige Selbstjustiz mauru
20:24 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
20:06 Verbrechen der deutschen Frau Brianmcnight
20:05 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
19:52 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
19:44 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? William Beebe
19:19 S.O.S. Kiez! Polizei schlaegt Alarm mauru
19:19 Tuerkei in die EU help-gnu-utils
19:12 Re: Auto-vectorization with gcj Andrew Pinski
18:52 Re: [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Mike Stump
18:17 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
18:14 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? Paul Albrecht
18:13 gcc-4.1-20050515 is now available gccadmin
17:44 Armenian Genocide Plagues Ankara 90 Years On orders
17:22 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Christian Joensson
17:18 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
16:53 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Andreas Schwab
16:37 [lkcl@lkcl.net: has gcc been reworked so that code/templates can be "outsourced" e.g. to perl yet?] Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
16:23 Auf Streife durch den Berliner Wedding ch . grueni
16:02 Re: On fold_indirect_ref Roger Sayle
16:00 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
15:59 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
15:34 Re: On fold_indirect_ref Richard Guenther
15:33 Graeberschaendung auf bundesdeutsche Anordnung info
15:23 Re: On fold_indirect_ref Roger Sayle
15:12 Verbrechen der deutschen Frau courrier . rato
15:10 some question about gc zouq
14:50 Trotz Stellenabbau pldapps
14:15 Trotz Stellenabbau aoliva
14:10 Deutsche Buerger trauen sich nicht ... ajm204
13:38 On fold_indirect_ref Richard Guenther
13:23 Multi-Kulturell = Multi-Kriminell John . Ramsell
13:18 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Joseph S. Myers
13:00 Tuerkei in die EU update
12:57 Auslaender bevorzugt tim . costello
12:24 Auf Streife durch den Berliner Wedding infos
12:14 Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion is too optimistic Richard Guenther
12:04 tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion is too optimistic Richard Guenther
12:02 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Andreas Schwab
11:32 S.O.S. Kiez! Polizei schlaegt Alarm jobs
10:59 Trotz Stellenabbau bmz
10:46 collab.net have a spam open relay in operation at the moment. please give them grief about it. Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
10:44 Auf Streife durch den Berliner Wedding search
10:34 S.O.S. Kiez! Polizei schlaegt Alarm tky999
09:46 Armenian Genocide Plagues Ankara 90 Years On Beatrix . Strohmaier
09:02 Paranoider Deutschenmoerder kommt in Psychiatrie denis
08:43 Multi-Kulturell = Multi-Kriminell bewerbung
08:14 Paranoider Deutschenmoerder kommt in Psychiatrie jcp_bcn
07:32 Schily ueber Deutschland reingold
07:17 4,8 Mill. Osteuropaeer durch Fischer-Volmer Erlass hruby
06:45 Graeberschaendung auf bundesdeutsche Anordnung jobs
06:03 4,8 Mill. Osteuropaeer durch Fischer-Volmer Erlass info
05:55 Dresden 1945 royer
05:31 Re: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Ralf Corsepius
05:23 Paranoider Deutschenmoerder kommt in Psychiatrie comments
05:22 Schily ueber Deutschland M . Rainforth
05:08 Problems in FAO MailServ Reply command processing FAO MailServ Reply
01:23 Dresden 1945 jobs . at
01:15 Re: Tuerkei in die EU respondersupport
00:43 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Andrew Pinski
00:13 Re: RFC: (use) useful for avoiding unnecessary compare instructions during cc0->CCmode ?! BjÃrn Haase
00:11 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Greg Schafer
00:09 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Laurent GUERBY
00:03 Re: RFC: (use) useful for avoiding unnecessary compare instructions during cc0->CCmode ?! Ulrich Weigand
00:01 Re: GCC 2.95.3 on Red Hat Entreprise Linux ES 3.0 Mike Stump

May 14, 2005
23:54 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Ulrich Weigand
23:49 gcc-4.0-20050514 is now available gccadmin
21:11 RFC: (use) useful for avoiding unnecessary compare instructionsduring cc0->CCmode ?! Paul Schlie
20:07 Re: Are 'goto' + trampolines broken? Øyvind Harboe
19:40 Re: RFC: (use) useful for avoiding unnecessary compare instructions during cc0->CCmode ?! Alexandre Oliva
19:29 Re: Are 'goto' + trampolines broken? Richard Henderson
18:41 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Laurent GUERBY
16:48 Re: AMD64: dead-lock issue with gcc-4_0-branch libstdc++ and POSIX write locks. Andrew Pinski
16:41 Re: AMD64: dead-lock issue with gcc-4_0-branch libstdc++ and POSIXwrite locks. Karel Gardas
12:18 AMD64: dead-lock issue with gcc-4_0-branch libstdc++ and POSIX writelocks. Karel Gardas
09:59 Are 'goto' + trampolines broken? Øyvind Harboe
09:04 RFC: (use) useful for avoiding unnecessary compare instructions during cc0->CCmode ?! Björn Haase
08:19 Re: a question about peephole2 Richard Henderson
06:28 GCC 2.95.3 on Red Hat Entreprise Linux ES 3.0 maha lakshmi
04:35 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Paul C. Leopardi
04:04 Re: Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Andrew Pinski
02:44 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Greg Schafer
02:16 Need help creating a small test case for g++ 4.0.0 bug Paul C. Leopardi
01:37 Re: a question about peephole2 zouq

May 13, 2005
23:54 gcc-3.4-20050513 is now available gccadmin
22:45 GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Mark Mitchell
22:15 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? William Beebe
21:52 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Richard Henderson
21:49 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Paul Koning
21:41 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
21:40 Re: unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Andrew Pinski
21:33 unexpected hidden symbol in gcc 4.0.0 Paul Koning
21:33 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for ac/c++ program using gcc? Daniel Berlin
21:32 Re: rtl printing Daniel Berlin
19:51 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? Paul Albrecht
19:06 Re: Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++program using gcc? E. Weddington
18:35 Re: rtl printing Richard Henderson
18:31 rtl printing Andrew MacLeod
18:30 Re: a question about peephole2 Richard Henderson
18:29 Re: sh-elf tree-ssa failure Joern RENNECKE
18:23 Re: sh-elf tree-ssa failure Andrew Pinski
18:18 sh-elf tree-ssa failure Joern RENNECKE
18:12 Is there a way to generate a cross reference listing for a c/c++ program using gcc? Paul Albrecht
17:55 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Andrew Pinski
16:55 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) H. J. Lu
16:50 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Andreas Jaeger
16:49 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Andreas Jaeger
16:07 RE: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Dams, Dennis (Dennis)
15:42 a question about peephole2 zouq
15:25 Re: check_ext_dependent_givs Canqun Yang
13:35 Re: Mainline broken Joern RENNECKE
12:58 Mainline broken Steven Bosscher
09:42 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Graham Stott
09:36 Re: Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Christian Joensson
09:13 Wiki on home page dmdlf
08:54 Re: enable __mt_alloc? R Hill
08:14 enable __mt_alloc? Ola R=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=F6nnerup
05:53 Stage2 Miscompilaton of Ada? Andreas Jaeger
02:37 Re: Why doesn't operand_equal_p check pointer equality first? Daniel Berlin
02:20 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) Diego Novillo
01:43 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Peter O'Gorman
00:33 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) H. J. Lu
00:20 Re: Why doesn't operand_equal_p check pointer equality first? Jeffrey A Law

May 12, 2005
23:37 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) H. J. Lu
22:37 Re: Why doesn't operand_equal_p check pointer equality first? Richard Henderson
21:33 Re: ld and R_386_GOTOFF relocs Peter S. Mazinger
21:28 Link to reporter's article regarding Borland patent. E. Weddington
21:08 Re: mixing warning flags DJ Delorie
21:08 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Aldy Hernandez
21:04 Re: ld and R_386_GOTOFF relocs H. J. Lu
20:55 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mike Stump
20:45 Re: mixing warning flags Daniel Jacobowitz
20:41 Re: mixing warning flags Joseph S. Myers
20:24 Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed atarbitrary locations? Daniel Kegel
19:46 mixing warning flags DJ Delorie
19:24 Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Ian Lance Taylor
19:15 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
18:36 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Jason Bucata
18:19 i386.md:17581: warning: operand 1 missing mode? Thomas Koenig
17:59 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Theodore Papadopoulo
17:46 Re: Is -static a link-only switch? Ian Lance Taylor
17:20 Looking for cheap high-quality software? Bartholomew
17:14 Why doesn't operand_equal_p check pointer equality first? Diego Novillo
17:02 Re: GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with -ftree-loop-linear Sebastian Pop
17:01 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
17:00 Re: GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with-ftree-loop-linear Daniel Berlin
16:43 Re: GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with -ftree-loop-linear Sebastian Pop
16:43 Re: GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with-ftree-loop-linear Zan Lynx
16:30 Re: GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with-ftree-loop-linear Daniel Berlin
16:29 RE: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Gary Funck
16:10 Re: check_ext_dependent_givs Paolo Bonzini
16:01 GCC 4.0.1-beta20050507 miscompiles openssl-0.9.7g with-ftree-loop-linear Zan Lynx
16:00 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Dams, Dennis (Dennis)
15:56 RE: Is -static a link-only switch? Gary Funck
15:50 Re: Is -static a link-only switch? Ian Lance Taylor
15:47 Re: Is -static a link-only switch? Andrew Pinski
15:46 stack alginment code xiaolei zhang
15:45 Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:43 Re: Is -static a link-only switch? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:42 RE: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Gary Funck
15:38 Is -static a link-only switch? Gary Funck
15:36 Re: packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Ian Lance Taylor
14:46 packaging a GCC binary distribution so it can be installed at arbitrary locations? Gary Funck
14:19 Re: check_ext_dependent_givs Canqun Yang
14:11 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Joern RENNECKE
13:12 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) H. J. Lu
13:01 Re: volatile semantics Paul Koning
12:42 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) Joern RENNECKE
12:36 RE: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Casper Hornstrup
11:33 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Theodore Papadopoulo
10:51 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Etienne Lorrain
09:45 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Etienne Lorrain
08:52 Re: successful build on i686-pc-cygwin Jørgen Havsberg Seland
07:08 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 R Hill
06:36 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
06:13 Re: ld and R_386_GOTOFF relocs Peter S. Mazinger
00:10 Re: Exporting structure layout Mike Stump

May 11, 2005
23:46 gcc-3.3-20050511 is now available gccadmin
23:44 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Aldy Hernandez
23:32 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris James E Wilson
23:01 Re: ld and R_386_GOTOFF relocs H. J. Lu
22:30 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Daniel Berlin
22:22 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Daniel Berlin
22:16 Re: volatile semantics Geoffrey Keating
22:10 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Wolfgang Bangerth
21:55 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
21:47 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Bernd Jendrissek
21:46 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Laurent GUERBY
21:43 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Andrew Pinski
21:37 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
21:29 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Dale Johannesen
21:27 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Giovanni Bajo
20:55 Re: Exporting structure layout Joe Buck
20:50 Re: Exporting structure layout Florian Weimer
20:45 Re: Exporting structure layout Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Gerald Pfeifer
20:37 Re: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Roman Kennke
20:36 Re: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Andreas Tobler
20:20 Re: Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:18 Moving the pkgconfig directory from lib/ to libdata/? Gerald Pfeifer
20:12 Re: Exporting structure layout Florian Weimer
20:11 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
20:11 Re: How to use a fast scratchpad-RAM for fill/spill ? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:07 Re: Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Wolfgang Bangerth
19:00 Re: How to use a fast scratchpad-RAM for fill/spill ? Greg McGary
18:42 Proposed resolution to aliasing issue. Mark Mitchell
18:35 Re: How to use a fast scratchpad-RAM for fill/spill ? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:32 How to use a fast scratchpad-RAM for fill/spill ? Greg McGary
18:13 Re: Exporting structure layout Paolo Bonzini
18:09 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Andrew Pinski
17:54 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Dan Nicolaescu
17:45 Re: mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) Andrew Pinski
17:34 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Aldy Hernandez
17:32 Exporting structure layout Florian Weimer
17:27 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Giovanni Bajo
17:00 mainline boostrap comparison failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with gcc 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-49) Joern RENNECKE
16:57 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Etienne Lorrain
16:01 GCC 4.0.0 build succeeded using NETBSD Jochem Berndsen
15:59 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Giovanni Bajo
15:07 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Etienne Lorrain
14:20 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Russell Shaw
14:00 tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion causes gcc.c-torture/execute/20031214-1.cICE Richard Guenther
13:52 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Florian Weimer
13:41 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Paul Koning
12:49 RE: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Ingrid Marson
12:39 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Ranjit Mathew
12:27 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Florian Weimer
12:20 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Ranjit Mathew
12:20 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Steven Bosscher
12:03 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Florian Weimer
11:40 Re: Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Paolo Bonzini
11:16 Borland software patent restricting GNU compiler development Ingrid Marson
09:16 Re: emit_conditional_move w/o compare insn (was: Full comparisonin 'cbranchsi4' leads to error in gcc 4.0) Richard Earnshaw
09:01 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
06:35 GCC 3.4.4 RC1 Mark Mitchell
03:22 Re: Recog - unrecognized insn when clobber present Ian Lance Taylor
03:16 RE: Recog - unrecognized insn when clobber present Vasanth Asokan
01:53 Re: Validating a C++ back-end Mike Stump
01:17 Re: Recog - unrecognized insn when clobber present Ian Lance Taylor
00:59 The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.3 is released H. J. Lu
00:52 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Joe Buck

May 10, 2005
23:43 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Mark Mitchell
23:08 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Jason Bucata
23:08 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" E. Weddington
23:04 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Joe Buck
22:47 Recog - unrecognized insn when clobber present Vasanth
22:30 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" E. Weddington
22:21 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Ian Lance Taylor
21:38 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Stan Shebs
20:56 Re: A question about tree-if-conv.c:tree_if_convert_stmt. Kazu Hirata
20:44 Re: A question about tree-if-conv.c:tree_if_convert_stmt. Devang Patel
20:38 A question about tree-if-conv.c:tree_if_convert_stmt. Kazu Hirata
20:36 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Joe Buck
20:33 Post-Lillehammer WG14 mailing Joseph S. Myers
19:21 Can gcc select vector mode instruction patterns itself? Ling-hua Tseng
19:19 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Steve Kargl
19:05 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Rainer Orth
18:55 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c Diego Novillo
18:26 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Ian Lance Taylor
18:18 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
18:06 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Andrew Pinski
18:05 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
18:05 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Joern RENNECKE
18:02 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Aldy Hernandez
18:00 Re: ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Andrew Pinski
17:54 ppc-eabisim is broken in mainline Joern RENNECKE
17:53 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Karel Gardas
17:50 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
17:29 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
17:06 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: use of preserve_temp_slots in copy_blkmode_from_reg Richard Kenner
16:32 Re: emit_conditional_move w/o compare insn (was: Full comparisonin 'cbranchsi4' leads to error in gcc 4.0) Sami Khawam
16:30 Re: Validating a C++ back-end Nathan Sidwell
16:23 Re: Validating a C++ back-end Vasanth
16:18 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Jonathan Wakely
15:56 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Bernard Leak
15:51 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Bob Proulx
15:50 RE: Error building gcc 4.0.0 on AIX Box Dave Korn
15:44 [gnu.org #232556] GNU Mirror: SWITCHmirror replaces Swiss SunSITE John Sullivan
15:19 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous Richard Guenther
15:15 Error building gcc 4.0.0 on AIX Box Carlo Corridore
15:00 use of preserve_temp_slots in copy_blkmode_from_reg Jan Beulich
14:58 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Jonathan Wakely
14:36 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Bernard Leak
13:59 Re: Validating a C++ back-end chris jefferson
13:53 RE: Mail. Mail! Mail? Dave Korn
13:36 RE: Re: information MIMEsweeper
13:06 RE: Mail. Mail! Mail? Daniel Berlin
13:06 Re: Validating a C++ back-end Nathan Sidwell
12:56 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken in varasm.c Nathan Sidwell
12:22 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
12:04 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
11:57 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
11:47 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
10:41 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
10:29 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
10:06 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
09:56 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Giovanni Bajo
09:47 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
09:43 RE: Mail. Mail! Mail? Dave Korn
09:08 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Jason Bucata
08:51 RE: Full comparison in 'cbranchsi4' leads to error in gcc 4.0 Gary Funck
08:38 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
08:17 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
07:51 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
07:23 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
06:59 GCC 3.4.4 Froze Mark Mitchell
05:20 Validating a C++ back-end Vasanth
02:35 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Zack Weinberg
01:49 GCC 3.4.4 near-freeze Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Kazu Hirata
01:13 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ frontend Paul Schlie
00:58 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ frontend Paul Schlie
00:41 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken in varasm.c Mark Mitchell
00:36 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken in varasm.c Steve Kargl
00:33 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Mark Mitchell
00:29 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ frontend Paul Schlie
00:09 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Mark Mitchell
00:04 Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Giovanni Bajo
00:03 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken in varasm.c Mark Mitchell

May 09, 2005
22:32 GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions? Jason Bucata
20:05 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Andreas Schwab
20:02 Mainline bootstrap broken in varasm.c Steve Kargl
19:57 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Zack Weinberg
19:34 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Georg Bauhaus
19:12 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Matthew Woodcraft
19:06 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Georg Bauhaus
18:38 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Zack Weinberg
18:13 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Georg Bauhaus
16:43 gcc 4.0.0 build on RH Enterprise 4 brian_buras
16:40 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Richard Henderson
16:35 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Richard Earnshaw
16:15 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Richard Henderson
16:06 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Bernard Leak
15:59 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
15:44 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Paolo Bonzini
15:17 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Jeffrey A Law
15:09 Re: gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning William S Fulton
15:07 Full comparison in 'cbranchsi4' leads to error in gcc 4.0 Sami Khawam
14:55 compiling cross-compiler Gergely Buday
14:53 Re: Use $(VARRAY_H) in dependencies? Paul Brook
14:45 GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
14:00 unexpected speedup from gcc-4.1-20050508 tbp
11:53 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Richard Earnshaw
11:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Earnshaw
10:54 RE: Targets using implicit extern "C" Dave Korn
10:50 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Joseph S. Myers
09:28 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic tbp
08:30 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Ralf Corsepius
08:12 Re: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
05:54 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Zack Weinberg
04:54 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Ralf Corsepius
04:36 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Zack Weinberg
04:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Fernando Lozano
03:55 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Ralf Corsepius
03:44 Re: Use $(VARRAY_H) in dependencies? Daniel Berlin
02:56 Re: Use $(VARRAY_H) in dependencies? Matt Kraai
02:08 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Daniel Berlin
02:04 Re: Use $(VARRAY_H) in dependencies? Paul Brook
01:56 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" David Edelsohn
01:28 Use $(VARRAY_H) in dependencies? Matt Kraai
00:54 Re: GCC 3.3.6 - anomalous debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
00:23 Re: Targets using implicit extern "C" Andrew Pinski
00:10 Targets using implicit extern "C" Joseph S. Myers

May 08, 2005
23:41 GCC 3.3.6 - anomalous debug info? Gary Funck
23:37 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Zack Weinberg
22:51 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Bob Proulx
22:02 Re: Mail. Mail! Mail? Zack Weinberg
21:37 Mail. Mail! Mail? Bernard Leak
21:32 Re: structures with zero length arrays Richard Henderson
21:25 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Richard Henderson
20:53 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ frontend Paul Schlie
20:36 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Steven Bosscher
20:36 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Richard Henderson
20:27 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Steven Bosscher
19:45 Re: Constant propagation and address arithmetic Richard Henderson
18:08 gcc-4.1-20050508 is now available gccadmin
17:28 structures with zero length arrays Herman ten Brugge
16:07 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Stefan Strasser
15:03 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Steven Bosscher
14:50 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Nathan Sidwell
14:41 Constant propagation and tail calls Steven Bosscher
14:34 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Kazu Hirata
14:34 Constant propagation and address arithmetic Steven Bosscher
13:32 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Nathan Sidwell
12:52 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Stefan Strasser
10:38 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Steinar Bang
08:46 Re: Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Steven Bosscher
04:13 Questions about a constant array reference in the C++ front end Kazu Hirata

May 07, 2005
23:47 gcc-4.0-20050507 is now available gccadmin
23:29 Re: successful build on i686-pc-cygwin Christopher Faylor
17:22 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
16:41 Building a cross-language aspect weaver in GCC 4.0 Bram Adams
15:44 RE: successful build on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
12:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andi Kleen
11:03 Testing the performance of Instruction Scheduler.. Sachin Vijay Sonawane
10:57 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
03:16 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Richard Henderson
03:07 Re: Missed optimizations: Constant propagation / algebraic simplification re-run after after reload.? Richard Henderson
01:20 [RFC] Problem with altivec_vmrghb pattern in altivec.md Fariborz Jahanian
01:15 Re: restrict and char pointers Michael Matz
00:05 GCC 4.0.0 on i586-pc-linux-gnu: Bootstrap (C, C++) Success Raul Tosa

May 06, 2005
23:58 Re: PowerPC DWARF2 information mismatch Mark Mitchell
23:55 Re: PowerPC DWARF2 information mismatch Andrew Pinski
23:54 gcc-3.4-20050506 is now available gccadmin
23:49 PowerPC DWARF2 information mismatch Mark Mitchell
22:32 successful build on i686-pc-cygwin Jørgen Havsberg Seland
22:01 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Daniel Jacobowitz
21:45 Re: Missed optimizations: Constant propagation / algebraicsimplification re-run after after reload.? Paul Schlie
21:38 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Steve Ellcey
21:04 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction David Edelsohn
21:03 Re: How can I write an empty conversion instruction Daniel Jacobowitz
20:59 How can I write an empty conversion instruction Steve Ellcey
20:21 Re: new bounds-checking patches Herman ten Brugge
20:19 Re: Missed optimizations: Constant propagation / algebraic simplification re-run after after reload.? Andrew Pinski
20:16 Missed optimizations: Constant propagation / algebraic simplification re-run after after reload.? Björn Haase
20:03 Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator Richard Henderson
20:00 Re: new bounds-checking patches Gerald Pfeifer
19:49 new bounds-checking patches Herman ten Brugge
19:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Haren Visavadia
18:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
17:46 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
17:27 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
17:23 GCC4.0.0 - Query Sachin Vijay Sonawane
17:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marcin Dalecki
16:32 Bug in multifile operation? Paolo Bonzini
16:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Rutger Ovidius
16:29 Re: Stage1 ? Stephane Wirtel
16:14 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
15:51 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? wfor
15:49 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Rutger Ovidius
15:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Per Bothner
15:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mark Wielaard
15:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
14:25 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Rutger Ovidius
13:36 Re: RFD: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Andrew Pinski
13:34 Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator Andrew Pinski
13:28 Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator chris jefferson
12:58 Re: How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator Gabriel Dos Reis
11:09 RE: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Dave Korn
11:05 Re: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Björn Haase
10:09 RE: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Dave Korn
10:03 Re: __builtin_isless, __builtin_islessequal on mips targets Richard Sandiford
09:56 How to get MIN_EXPR without using deprecated min operator Michael Cieslinski
08:47 Re: RFD: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Mike Stump
08:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
08:15 RFD: Is there a helper function like "print_rtx_to_stdout" ? Björn Haase
07:37 Re: check_ext_dependent_givs Paolo Bonzini
07:35 Re: __builtin_isless, __builtin_islessequal on mips targets Eric Christopher
07:21 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paolo Bonzini
07:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Paolo Bonzini
07:17 Re: Stage1 ? Mike Stump
07:16 Re: Stage1 ? Eric Christopher
06:37 Automatically choosing registers for register variables? Sam Lauber
06:36 Automatically choosing registers for register variables? Sam Lauber
06:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ranjit Mathew
06:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jason Mancini
05:06 Stage1 ? Stephane Wirtel
03:11 Re: volatile semantics Paul Schlie
02:58 RE: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Gary Funck
02:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mike Stump
02:37 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
02:29 check_ext_dependent_givs Canqun Yang
02:18 Re: FORTH frontend? Marcin Dalecki
02:04 Re: FORTH frontend? Sam Lauber
01:42 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
00:45 Re: volatile semantics Paul Koning

May 05, 2005
23:38 Re: volatile semantics Kai Henningsen
23:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
21:54 C++ template inlines being emitted as GLOBAL WEAK Mike Hearn
21:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andi Vajda
21:35 Re: restrict and char pointers Daniel Berlin
21:13 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Daniel Berlin
21:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Rutger Ovidius
21:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Daney
20:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Henderson
20:11 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Mark Mitchell
20:10 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Mark Mitchell
19:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
18:51 Re: PROBLEM WITH CONFIGURING GCC WHEN G++ WORKS Mike Stump
18:44 PROBLEM WITH CONFIGURING GCC WHEN G++ WORKS Tobe Olisa
18:40 Re: why i can't send mail to gcc@gcc.gnu.org? Mike Stump
18:35 why i can't send mail in the gcc mail list? ji tai
18:28 why i can't send mail to gcc@gcc.gnu.org? ji tai
17:47 Re: RFC: May <inttypes.h> be used by testcases of the C-testsuite? Joseph S. Myers
17:46 Successful bootstrap of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.4 (all lang but Java) Chris Douty
17:37 bootstrap build results for GCC 4.0.0 Brett Neumeier
17:34 RFC: May <inttypes.h> be used by testcases of the C-testsuite? BjÃrn Haase
16:56 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Diego Novillo
16:19 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Daniel Berlin
16:16 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Daniel Berlin
16:01 [Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de: Re: [rth@redhat.com: libjava build times]] Joe Buck
15:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
15:52 RE: Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Dave Korn
15:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Per Bothner
15:42 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Devang Patel
15:38 Re: Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Ian Lance Taylor
15:31 Re: FORTH frontend? Tom Tromey
15:28 Re: FORTH frontend? Andrew Haley
15:12 FORTH frontend? Sam Lauber
14:57 RE: Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Dave Korn
14:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Tom Tromey
14:23 Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Satendra Pratap
13:24 Re: Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Ian Lance Taylor
12:40 Global Objects Problem NOT SOLVED!!! Satendra Pratap
12:09 __builtin_isless, __builtin_islessequal on mips targets Nadezhda Ivanоvna Vyukova
11:54 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Martin Koegler
10:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ranjit Mathew
10:10 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Paolo Bonzini
09:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Steven Bosscher
07:04 gcc 3.4.3 on Solaris_8_x86 jordan
06:57 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Dorit Naishlos
06:51 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Dmitry Kurochkin
06:48 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ranjit Mathew
06:13 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions Paul Schlie
05:40 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-05-04) Mark Mitchell
03:40 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alan Modra
02:35 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Thorsten Glaser
01:58 Re: Packing booleans? Sam Lauber
01:51 Re: Packing booleans? Sam Lauber
01:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? David Daney
00:41 Re: restrict and char pointers Diego Novillo
00:22 gcc-3.3-20050504 is now available gccadmin
00:09 Re: restrict and char pointers James E Wilson
00:04 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Per Bothner

May 04, 2005
23:24 Re: restrict and char pointers Jeroen Dobbelaere
22:51 Re: restrict and char pointers James E Wilson
22:29 Re: question on semantics Chris Friesen
21:45 Re: question on semantics Mike Stump
21:31 Re: question on semantics Chris Friesen
21:27 Re: restrict and char pointers Jeroen Dobbelaere
21:15 Re: question on semantics Diego Novillo
20:47 Re: question on semantics Chris Friesen
20:29 Re: restrict and char pointers James E Wilson
20:23 Re: question on semantics David Daney
20:22 Re: Missing type info in debug data in 4.0.0 Paul Koning
20:22 Re: question on semantics Diego Novillo
20:19 Re: Missing type info in debug data in 4.0.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:16 Re: Missing type info in debug data in 4.0.0 Paul Koning
20:16 Re: question on semantics Diego Novillo
19:58 Re: Missing type info in debug data in 4.0.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
19:53 Missing type info in debug data in 4.0.0 Paul Koning
19:49 Re: question on semantics Chris Friesen
19:21 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
19:19 Re: question on semantics Mike Stump
19:16 Re: Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture James E Wilson
18:32 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions Paul Koning
18:22 Re: question on semantics chris jefferson
18:19 Re: question on semantics Diego Novillo
18:11 successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.3.9 (bootstrap, only C) Bojan Antonovic
18:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
18:01 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions James E Wilson
18:01 Re: volatile semantics Paul Koning
17:59 question on semantics Chris Friesen
17:45 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
17:08 RE: Can't build 3.3.5 without getting java? Hugh Sasse
16:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture Anuradha Suraparaju
16:38 RE: Can't build 3.3.5 without getting java? Dave Korn
16:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
16:22 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Andrew Haley
16:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? H. J. Lu
16:10 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Thorsten Glaser
16:00 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
15:56 3rd Annual - GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Andrew J. Hutton
15:52 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Paul Brook
15:50 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Steven Bosscher
15:40 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Biagio Lucini
15:36 Re: g++, initialization of Array if its is a class member. Jonathan Wakely
15:27 Re: operand swapping in get_expr_operands. Andrew MacLeod
15:19 Re: g++, initialization of Array if its is a class member. Wlodzimierz Lipert
15:16 g++, initialization of Array if its is a class member. Wlodzimierz Lipert
15:07 Re: operand swapping in get_expr_operands. Jeffrey A Law
14:46 Can't build 3.3.5 without getting java? Hugh Sasse
14:37 Re: gcc 3.4.2 stack variable lifetime analysis Jakub Jelinek
14:36 Re: gcc 3.4.2 stack variable lifetime analysis Steven Bosscher
14:29 operand swapping in get_expr_operands. Andrew MacLeod
14:23 gcc 3.4.2 stack variable lifetime analysis Earl Chew
13:54 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Andrew Haley
13:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
13:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? H. J. Lu
13:34 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Paul Brook
13:30 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Thorsten Glaser
13:00 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions Paul Koning
12:57 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
12:31 Re: Packing booleans? Nathan Sidwell
12:25 Re: Packing booleans? Richard Guenther
12:22 Re: Packing booleans? Mattias Karlsson
12:20 Re: Packing booleans? Nix
12:15 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Biagio Lucini
11:35 Re: gij problem (3.4.4) Andrew Haley
11:30 gij problem (3.4.4) Thorsten Glaser
10:55 Re: volatile semantics Gabriel Dos Reis
10:32 Re: Packing booleans? Nathan Sidwell
10:23 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Andrew Haley
10:18 Re: volatile semantics Andrew Haley
10:01 restrict and char pointers Jeroen Dobbelaere
08:18 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Martin Koegler
08:08 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
08:02 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Richard Henderson
07:51 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Martin Koegler
06:26 Packing booleans? Sam Lauber
05:57 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea tbp
01:18 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
00:55 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Richard Henderson
00:51 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin James E Wilson
00:49 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Henderson
00:48 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Ian Lance Taylor
00:44 Re: Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers James E Wilson
00:40 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Diego Novillo
00:38 Re: [wwwdocs] patch for Re: Access to benchmark page from our front page Diego Novillo
00:38 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
00:37 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
00:24 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Ian Lance Taylor
00:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter O'Gorman
00:02 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dave Korn

May 03, 2005
23:58 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions James E Wilson
23:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter O'Gorman
23:47 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Dave Korn
23:29 Re: Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture James E Wilson
23:23 Re: Global Objects initialization Problem....... James E Wilson
22:59 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Richard Henderson
22:50 Re: No link to benchmarks page ? Gerald Pfeifer
22:48 [wwwdocs] patch for Re: Access to benchmark page from our front page Gerald Pfeifer
22:20 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
22:04 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
21:27 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
21:19 Re: volatile semantics Thorsten Glaser
21:18 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Alexander Strange
21:17 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
21:16 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Lars Segerlund
20:59 Access to benchmark page from our front page Diego Novillo
20:55 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Diego Novillo
20:49 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Scott Robert Ladd
20:43 [gomp] OpenMP IL design notes Diego Novillo
20:29 Re: parse bug in 4.0.0? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
20:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
19:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Alexandre Oliva
19:25 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
19:21 parse bug in 4.0.0? Paul Koning
18:54 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
18:54 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris James E Wilson
18:37 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
18:35 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
18:32 Re: volatile semantics Paul Koning
18:03 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
17:40 Re: Code generation clarification (Submodels) Andrew Walrond
17:04 Re: volatile semantics Dale Johannesen
16:09 Re: problems with -fdump-tree options (gcc 4.0.0) Diego Novillo
15:58 problems with -fdump-tree options (gcc 4.0.0) Nico Moser
15:24 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
15:16 No link to benchmarks page ? hartmut . schirmer
14:41 Re: volatile semantics Nathan Sidwell
14:38 Re: Code generation clarification (Submodels) Ian Lance Taylor
14:31 RE: volatile semantics Dave Korn
14:23 Re: Code generation clarification (Submodels) Andrew Walrond
14:19 Re: PLEASE HELP! Ian Lance Taylor
14:16 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Diego Novillo
14:14 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous Jeffrey A Law
13:58 PLEASE HELP! R Lokesh babu
12:52 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Michael Matz
09:55 Re: big slowdown gcc 3.4.3 vs gcc 3.3.4 (64 bit) Giovanni Bajo
09:53 Re: volatile semantics Giovanni Bajo
08:52 Re: volatile semantics Paolo Bonzini
08:41 volatile semantics Mike Stump
08:37 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Andreas Schwab
08:32 gcc-3_3-branch frozen Gabriel Dos Reis
08:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mike Stump
07:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Mike Stump
06:34 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Mike Stump
06:04 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Mike Stump
05:56 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Mike Stump
05:10 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous Jeffrey A Law
01:46 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
01:01 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea tbp

May 02, 2005
23:14 Re: Revamp WWW review process? Gerald Pfeifer
21:54 RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin James E Wilson
21:43 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem (SOLVED) Tom Tromey
19:35 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Daniel Kegel
18:04 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Joe Buck
17:37 big slowdown gcc 3.4.3 vs gcc 3.3.4 (64 bit) Kenneth P.. Massey
17:27 Re: GCC 4.0 blacklisted for kde? Andrew Pinski
17:25 Re: GCC 4.0 blacklisted for kde? Daniel Berlin
17:14 GCC 4.0 blacklisted for kde? Biagio Lucini
16:23 GCCNews #16 (events of Dec 04) is out. R. D. Flowers
15:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
15:26 Q about Ada and value ranges in types Diego Novillo
15:25 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Gerald Pfeifer
14:46 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter O'Gorman
14:26 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Mark Mitchell
13:23 GCC 4.0 Review Scott Robert Ladd
13:14 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Eric Botcazou
13:14 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea Scott Robert Ladd
12:18 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
12:01 Code generation clarification (Submodels) Andrew Walrond
11:22 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Kai Ruottu
11:17 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Kai Ruottu
10:18 gcc 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken (again) Clemens Koller
09:46 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29) Richard Guenther
09:41 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Michael Matz
09:35 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin Kai Ruottu
09:21 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly? Michael Matz
08:51 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marc Espie
08:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Marc Espie
04:54 Re: libjava build times Richard Henderson
03:40 re: array type has incomplete element type Daniel Kegel
02:19 Re: GCCNews #15 (events of Nov 04) is out. Andrew Pinski
02:08 GCCNews #15 (events of Nov 04) is out. R. D. Flowers
00:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Giovanni Bajo
00:15 4.0.0 openbsd J.D. Bronson

May 01, 2005
22:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Kai Henningsen
22:37 Re: libjava build times Thorsten Glaser
22:29 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem (SOLVED) Thorsten Glaser
20:35 Re: possible compiler bug Robert Dewar
19:27 Re: i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-* Gerald Pfeifer
19:26 array type has incomplete element type David Yu
18:43 Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE Kazu Hirata
18:37 Re: doubts in gimple code Diego Novillo
18:33 Re: possible compiler bug Diego Novillo
18:16 possible compiler bug Friends
18:12 gcc-4.1-20050501 is now available gccadmin
18:08 Re: i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-* Gerald Pfeifer
17:26 FAIL: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc Paolo Carlini
17:24 Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE Zdenek Dvorak
17:20 Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE Nathan Sidwell
17:15 doubts in gimple code Virender Kashyap
15:25 Incomplete instatitiation of virtual registers Martin Koegler
13:47 Re: i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-* Gerald Pfeifer
09:16 Re: libjava build times Andrew Haley
08:58 Fw: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler Ayal Zaks
03:48 libjava build times Richard Henderson
02:57 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Andrew Pinski
02:51 Re: PPC 64bit library status? Bill Northcott
01:51 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Jason Thorpe


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3