23:30 |
RE: Ada and bad configury architecture. |
Gary Funck |
23:08 |
Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c) |
Geoffrey Keating |
23:08 |
Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc |
Geoffrey Keating |
22:20 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
Alexandre Oliva |
22:07 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
Alexandre Oliva |
22:02 |
Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) |
James E Wilson |
21:43 |
Re: Where did the include files go? |
James E Wilson |
20:15 |
Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious |
Zack Weinberg |
20:03 |
Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious |
Bruce Lilly |
19:06 |
Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines |
Paolo Carlini |
18:58 |
libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines |
Panagiotis Papadakos |
18:32 |
Re: sjlj exceptions? |
Mike Stump |
18:02 |
Re: Re[2]: object code execution statistics |
James E Wilson |
17:55 |
RE: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Gary Funck |
17:50 |
Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Bruce Lilly |
16:32 |
Re: object code execution statistics |
Joe Buck |
15:59 |
Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
15:13 |
Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc |
Olivier Hainque |
15:10 |
Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious |
Joseph S. Myers |
15:06 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Vladimir Makarov |
14:46 |
New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious |
Bruce Lilly |
14:16 |
RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Jon Beniston |
14:07 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Nathan Sidwell |
13:49 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
David Edelsohn |
13:42 |
RE: EABI stack alignment for ppc |
Dave Korn |
13:42 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Vladimir Makarov |
13:33 |
Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Bernd Jendrissek |
13:25 |
EABI stack alignment for ppc |
Olivier Hainque |
12:44 |
RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Richard Earnshaw |
12:40 |
Build report for AIX 5.1 |
Mario Linke |
12:28 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Nathan Sidwell |
12:13 |
RE: Free-Standing Implementation |
Dave Korn |
11:52 |
RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Jon Beniston |
11:40 |
Free-Standing Implementation |
Sriharsha Vedurmudi |
11:29 |
Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) |
Nathan Sidwell |
10:59 |
Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) |
Paul Thomas |
10:57 |
Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Nathan Sidwell |
10:50 |
Re: Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler |
Nathan Sidwell |
08:59 |
Re[2]: object code execution statistics |
Sergei Tovpeko |
08:01 |
sjlj exceptions? |
Thorsten Glaser |
06:57 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Zdenek Dvorak |
06:39 |
Successful Build Report for GCC 4.0.0 C and C++ |
Simon G Best |
05:02 |
Re: Regression involving COMMON(?) |
Andrew Pinski |
04:16 |
Re: Fixing of bug 18877 |
James E Wilson |
03:46 |
Ada and bad configury architecture. |
Nathanael Nerode |
02:38 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
02:37 |
Re: object code execution statistics |
James E Wilson |
02:32 |
Re: gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning |
James E Wilson |
01:18 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
01:15 |
Re: tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem? |
James E Wilson |
00:54 |
Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Zack Weinberg |
00:48 |
Re: c54x port |
James E Wilson |
00:45 |
Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Andrew Pinski |
00:43 |
Re: about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend |
James E Wilson |
00:41 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Zdenek Dvorak |
00:40 |
Re: benchmark call malloc a lot? |
James E Wilson |
00:36 |
Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Sebastian Biallas |
00:35 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
00:32 |
Re: spill_failure |
James E Wilson |
00:26 |
Re: Stack frame question on x86 code generation |
James E Wilson |
00:15 |
gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.) |
Bruce Lilly |
00:02 |
Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves |
James E Wilson |
00:01 |
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html |
Giovanni Bajo |
23:23 |
Re: gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris |
James E Wilson |
23:19 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
23:18 |
Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions |
James E Wilson |
23:02 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
22:36 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
22:36 |
Re: Where did the include files go? |
Mike Stump |
22:30 |
Where did the include files go? |
Øystein Johansen |
22:28 |
Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? |
H. J. Lu |
21:56 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
20:33 |
Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 |
Sebastian Biallas |
20:32 |
Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? |
H. J. Lu |
20:28 |
Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418 |
James E Wilson |
20:22 |
Re: The subreg question |
James E Wilson |
19:38 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
19:37 |
Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler |
Jon Beniston |
19:34 |
Store scheduling with DFA scheduler |
Jon Beniston |
19:06 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Zdenek Dvorak |
19:05 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
18:59 |
Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? |
Richard Kenner |
18:38 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
18:35 |
Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong? |
Steve Ellcey |
18:07 |
Re: Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful |
Janis Johnson |
17:09 |
Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) |
Joseph S. Myers |
16:38 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
16:21 |
Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces) |
Martin Koegler |
16:20 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
16:02 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
15:47 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
15:33 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Kazu Hirata |
15:30 |
Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces |
Paul Schlie |
15:22 |
Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces) |
Joseph S. Myers |
15:11 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Rainer Orth |
15:08 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Jeroen Scheerder |
15:08 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Andrew MacLeod |
15:06 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
15:06 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Rainer Orth |
15:05 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Jeroen Scheerder |
15:01 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
14:58 |
Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces) |
Martin Koegler |
14:53 |
tree-cleanup-branch is now closed |
Diego Novillo |
14:26 |
Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available |
Richard Earnshaw |
14:10 |
Re: how small can gcc get? |
Paul Koning |
13:42 |
Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes |
Joern RENNECKE |
12:39 |
RE: Register allocation in GCC 4 |
Jon Beniston |
11:38 |
Successful gcc4.0.0 build (Redhat 9. Kernel 2.4.25) |
Jeff Clifford |
11:23 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Rainer Orth |
11:12 |
Re: Register allocation in GCC 4 |
Nathan Sidwell |
11:08 |
Re: Register allocation in GCC 4 |
Nathan Sidwell |
10:35 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Jeroen Scheerder |
10:28 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Rainer Orth |
10:25 |
Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support |
Rainer Orth |
09:57 |
Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces |
Etienne Lorrain |
09:55 |
Register allocation in GCC 4 |
Jon Beniston |
09:13 |
Submission Status: CRX port ? |
Paul Woegerer |
08:53 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Steven Bosscher |
08:48 |
Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node |
Zdenek Dvorak |
07:48 |
Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory? |
Nathan Sidwell |
06:13 |
object code execution statistics |
Sergei Tovpeko |
04:36 |
gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning |
William S Fulton |
03:58 |
Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces |
Paul Schlie |
01:57 |
Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ |
Mark Mitchell |
01:30 |
tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem? |
Gary Funck |
01:03 |
Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++ |
Joe Buck |
00:32 |
GCC 4.0.0: (mostly) successful build and installation on GNU/LinuxPowerPC |
Luca Saiu |
23:05 |
re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro |
Daniel Kegel |
21:58 |
Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. |
Eric Botcazou |
21:24 |
Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. |
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng |
20:37 |
Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" |
James E Wilson |
19:21 |
Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types |
Kumar Gala |
19:12 |
Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types |
David Edelsohn |
18:59 |
use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types |
Kumar Gala |
18:44 |
Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF |
Toon Moene |
18:13 |
Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. |
Eric Botcazou |
17:53 |
Re: specs file |
Zack Weinberg |
17:41 |
Re: Illegal promotion of bool to int.... |
Joe Buck |
17:32 |
specs file |
Marek Krzyzowski |
17:14 |
Illegal promotion of bool to int.... |
sjhill |
16:33 |
Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF |
David Edelsohn |
16:12 |
Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Denis Vlasenko |
16:04 |
gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro |
Clemens Koller |
15:46 |
RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... |
Dave Korn |
15:38 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
Mark Mitchell |
15:36 |
3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs. |
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng |
15:26 |
Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Paolo Bonzini |
14:51 |
RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation |
Mile Davidovic |
13:48 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
E. Weddington |
13:42 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp |
13:25 |
RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... |
Aaron Gaudio |
13:23 |
Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized |
Ranjit Mathew |
13:20 |
RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Richard B. Johnson |
13:03 |
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* |
Karl Berry |
13:02 |
Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized |
Diego Novillo |
12:57 |
HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized |
Andrew Haley |
12:39 |
Re: Input and print statements for Front End? |
Paul Brook |
12:36 |
Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Andrew Haley |
12:23 |
Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement |
tbp |
12:08 |
Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement |
tbp |
12:06 |
Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Christophe Saout |
12:00 |
Input and print statements for Front End? |
Harry Goulding |
11:56 |
RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Dave Korn |
11:53 |
RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Dave Korn |
11:38 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp |
11:13 |
RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Dave Korn |
11:06 |
RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Dave Korn |
10:52 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
Joseph S. Myers |
10:15 |
Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy |
Denis Vlasenko |
09:37 |
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0 |
Richard Earnshaw |
09:28 |
RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 -> SparcSolaris 10 (& others)... |
Dave Korn |
06:25 |
Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices |
Eric Christopher |
04:20 |
Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" |
feng qiu |
02:57 |
about alias analysis |
zouq |
01:37 |
Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" |
James E Wilson |
01:19 |
Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement |
James E Wilson |
01:16 |
Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices |
nkavv |
00:46 |
Re: 4.0-20050319 / 4-020050402 build error due to --enable-mappedlocation |
James E Wilson |
23:39 |
Re: HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!) |
John David Anglin |
23:32 |
HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!) |
Joe Buck |
23:31 |
Re: call for testers! |
John David Anglin |
23:29 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Nix |
23:26 |
GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05) |
Mark Mitchell |
22:57 |
Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? |
Alexandre Oliva |
22:45 |
Re: call for testers! |
Geoffrey Keating |
22:36 |
Re: call for testers! |
Joe Buck |
22:36 |
Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? |
Dale Johannesen |
22:28 |
Re: call for testers! |
David Edelsohn |
22:22 |
Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? |
Alexandre Oliva |
21:48 |
call for testers! |
Geoffrey Keating |
21:36 |
Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? |
Dale Johannesen |
21:33 |
Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? |
Alexandre Oliva |
20:49 |
Major bootstrap time regression on March 30 |
Steven Bosscher |
20:43 |
Re: specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc |
James A. Morrison |
20:05 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Marcin Dalecki |
20:00 |
Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation |
Richard Sandiford |
19:48 |
specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc |
Marek Krzyzowski |
19:24 |
Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? |
Robert Dewar |
19:13 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Pinski |
19:12 |
Re: Cross-compiling for PPC405 core... |
Mike Stump |
18:33 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Pinski |
18:14 |
Cross-compiling for PPC405 core... |
François Mainguy |
17:47 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Dale Johannesen |
17:01 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Haley |
16:59 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Devang Patel |
16:49 |
Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? |
Devang Patel |
16:48 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Giovanni Bajo |
16:33 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Haley |
16:29 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Joe Buck |
16:26 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Haley |
16:26 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Giovanni Bajo |
16:25 |
Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? |
Joe Buck |
16:21 |
Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Joe Buck |
15:08 |
4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed |
Andrew Haley |
14:17 |
gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement |
tbp |
14:07 |
Re: "personal" branch? |
Gerald Pfeifer |
14:01 |
"personal" branch? |
Ben Elliston |
12:07 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Jonathan Wakely |
12:03 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Jonathan Wakely |
11:08 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
tbp |
11:08 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Nathan Sidwell |
11:08 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Jonathan Wakely |
11:05 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Jonathan Wakely |
11:03 |
Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt |
Aldy Hernandez |
11:03 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
tbp |
10:56 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
tbp |
10:50 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Jonathan Wakely |
10:22 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Nathan Sidwell |
10:15 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
tbp |
09:54 |
Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
Nathan Sidwell |
09:48 |
gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem |
tbp |
09:30 |
Re: PR 20505 |
Nathan Sidwell |
08:55 |
Re: about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code" |
Steven Bosscher |
08:35 |
about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code" |
zouq |
08:33 |
Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1? |
Nathan Sidwell |
03:34 |
Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? |
Robert Dewar |
01:08 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Robert Dewar |
00:31 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Geert Bosch |
00:03 |
Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level |
Georg Bauhaus |