This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:30:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503071108220.12023-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <422CA252.9010004@codesourcery.com> <200503072002.40924.stevenb@suse.de> <422CA63A.4080709@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503071941330.5151@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <422CB031.9020603@codesourcery.com> <xyp7jkdx1b4.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com>

Jason Merrill wrote:

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:49:05 -0800, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

IMO, if these are C++-only, it's relatively easy to deprecate these
extension -- but I'd like to hear from Jason and Nathan, and also the user
community before we do that.  Of all the extensions we've had, this one
really hasn't been that problematic.

I agree it hasn't been problematic.  I suspect that part of the reason for
that is that it hasn't been used.  I would not object to deprecating the
syntax extension.

Nathan, what say you? I think that if you're in agreement, we can go ahead and deprecate this extension.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

References:
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warningabout returning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]