This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: testsuite execution question
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:33:47PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:35:54PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:29:45AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > Is command line processing relevant for embedded targets? (I have no
> > > idea.) Tests that pass options to the test program could be skipped
> > > for embedded targets and for other kinds of testing where it isn't
> > > reliable. The dg-program-options directive could warn when it's used
> > > in an environment for which it's not supported.
> >
> > Sounds good to me, at least in theory.
>
> Any ideas on how the testsuite can decide for which targets it supports
> command line arguments? Would it be reasonable to support them if the
> target is not remote?
Well, remote_load already accepts arguments. And there's a 'noargs' in
lots of board files. I don't know how accurate that is.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC