This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>, Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:09:01 -0500
Subject: Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502281702440.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <1109611436.662.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050301182537.GA4832@us.ibm.com>

Janis Johnson wrote:

I also find it annoying that the dump files aren't cleaned up.  Should
the dump files for failing tests be left, or would it be OK to remove
all of them?

Much as I don't use the failing executables left behind by the testsuite, I wouldn't use the dump files. They can be easily recreated.

But, I can see valid reasons to wanting dump files for failing tests be left behind. The dump files for successful should be removed, though.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

References:
- Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]