23:55 |
Successful bootstrap/install of current gcc 4.0 and 4.1 snapshots on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 using the latest odcctools |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
23:26 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how todeal with when writing testcases. |
Daniel Berlin |
22:56 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. |
Robert Dewar |
22:52 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. |
Joe Buck |
22:24 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. |
Robert Dewar |
22:21 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. |
Robert Dewar |
20:24 |
Re: [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy |
Denis Vlasenko |
20:23 |
[PATCH] fix i386 memcpy |
Denis Vlasenko |
20:21 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Joe Buck |
20:14 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. |
Mike Stump |
19:24 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Andrew Haley |
19:20 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Tom Tromey |
19:19 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Zack Weinberg |
19:15 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Tom Tromey |
19:02 |
RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation |
Eric Christopher |
18:17 |
Re: combine.c |
Ian Lance Taylor |
18:10 |
combine.c |
Rajkishore Barik |
17:54 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
Paul Schlie |
17:41 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
Marc Espie |
17:27 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
Joe Buck |
16:50 |
Re: Gcc help |
Eljay Love-Jensen |
16:47 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
Paul Koning |
16:43 |
Gcc help |
andre |
15:48 |
Re: Name of files and functions etc. |
Andrew Pinski |
15:42 |
Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel |
Andrew Pinski |
15:28 |
Name of files and functions etc. |
David Pettersson |
15:19 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. |
Daniel Berlin |
15:13 |
Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel |
Jakub Jelinek |
15:10 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. |
Richard Kenner |
15:09 |
Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel |
Nathan Sidwell |
15:07 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. |
Daniel Berlin |
15:06 |
Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel |
Richard Guenther |
15:01 |
Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end |
Stefan Strasser |
14:37 |
memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel |
Denis Vlasenko |
13:55 |
Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers |
Gerald Pfeifer |
13:50 |
Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. |
Florian Weimer |
13:44 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Gerald Pfeifer |
11:47 |
i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end |
"하태준" |
10:11 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
Marc Espie |
10:07 |
Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? |
Mostafa Hagog |
09:46 |
gcc 3.4.2 |
Levent Erbuke |
09:09 |
RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation |
Mile Davidovic |
08:13 |
Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing |
Nathan Sidwell |
08:06 |
Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler |
tm_gccmail |
07:48 |
Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler |
Marcin Dalecki |
07:44 |
Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... |
Christian Joensson |
05:25 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
Paul Schlie |
04:38 |
Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) |
Mark Mitchell |
04:35 |
Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) |
Jason Merrill |
03:59 |
Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler |
Wei Qin |
03:30 |
Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? |
zhongknocken |
02:26 |
Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 |
tm_gccmail |
02:24 |
Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. |
Steve Kargl |
01:58 |
Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. |
James E Wilson |
01:34 |
Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 |
James E Wilson |
01:25 |
Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers onsparc64-linux... |
Daniel Berlin |
00:49 |
Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 |
zouq |
00:04 |
Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 |
James E Wilson |
23:54 |
Re: Questions about trampolines |
Robert Dewar |
21:14 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Dorit Naishlos |
21:09 |
Re: Questions about trampolines |
Andreas Schwab |
21:00 |
Re: Questions about trampolines |
Zack Weinberg |
20:30 |
Re: Questions about trampolines |
Paul Brook |
20:27 |
Re: Questions about trampolines |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
20:23 |
Questions about trampolines |
Øyvind Harboe |
19:35 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
Kai Henningsen |
19:22 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Nathan Sidwell |
18:47 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paul Schlie |
18:40 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Mark Mitchell |
18:30 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
18:22 |
Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol |
Richard Henderson |
18:09 |
gcc-4.1-20050313 is now available |
gccadmin |
16:04 |
Dear adventurers of math! (was Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))) |
Daniel Berlin |
16:00 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Steven Bosscher |
15:53 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Daniel Berlin |
15:42 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Steven Bosscher |
15:31 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Daniel Berlin |
14:56 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
14:36 |
Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports |
Andrew Pinski |
14:32 |
Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member |
Jonathan Wakely |
14:30 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
13:13 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
13:11 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
13:01 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
10:54 |
FYI: ACATS/bugzilla on GCC wiki |
Laurent GUERBY |
08:54 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Razya Ladelsky |
06:01 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paul Schlie |
05:55 |
Non-bootstrap build status reports |
Aaron W. LaFramboise |
05:00 |
Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" |
feng qiu |
04:58 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
01:16 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
Steven Bosscher |
01:11 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
James E Wilson |
01:07 |
Re: Merging calls to `abort' |
James E Wilson |
00:33 |
Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL |
James E Wilson |
00:18 |
Re: are link errors caused by mixing of versions? |
James E Wilson |
23:25 |
gcc-4.0-20050312 is now available |
gccadmin |
21:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Kai Henningsen |
21:05 |
Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol |
Kai Henningsen |
20:56 |
DR#236 update |
Joseph S. Myers |
20:12 |
RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers |
Diego Novillo |
19:07 |
Re: Received welcome message. |
Steve Kargl |
19:06 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paul Schlie |
18:52 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Mike Stump |
18:43 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Steve Kargl |
18:08 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Mike Stump |
18:02 |
Re: Root Node of AST |
Rajesh Babu |
17:36 |
Re: PR debug/19345 |
Daniel Berlin |
15:19 |
Re: Root Node of AST |
Diego Novillo |
13:28 |
PRE in GCC-3.3.3 |
Rajesh Babu |
13:16 |
Root Node of AST |
Rajesh Babu |
07:24 |
Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL |
Balaji S |
06:54 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
Christopher Faylor |
06:52 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
Christopher Faylor |
06:27 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
06:04 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paul Schlie |
03:12 |
Received welcome message. |
Feng Wang |
03:00 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Neil Booth |
02:54 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
Ian Lance Taylor |
02:40 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Steve Kargl |
02:21 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
James E Wilson |
02:08 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
02:07 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
02:04 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
02:04 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Neil Booth |
01:52 |
Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol |
James E Wilson |
01:49 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
Ian Lance Taylor |
01:39 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
James E Wilson |
00:12 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
Mike Stump |
00:02 |
Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". |
Joe Buck |
23:27 |
Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity |
Joe Buck |
22:41 |
Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol |
James E Wilson |
22:28 |
Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity |
Andrew Muraco |
22:15 |
Re: mthumb in specs file |
James E Wilson |
22:14 |
Re: Specifying a linker script from the specs file |
James E Wilson |
22:09 |
Re: what's the proper way to configure/enable/disable C exception handling? |
James E Wilson |
21:55 |
Re: Help : Instruction Scheduling |
James E Wilson |
21:49 |
Re: gcc-3.4.4-20050211: maybe a danger behaviour |
James E Wilson |
21:28 |
Re: Spill cost |
James E Wilson |
21:22 |
Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation |
Zdenek Dvorak |
21:20 |
Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL |
James E Wilson |
21:18 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
geoffk |
21:18 |
Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL |
James E Wilson |
21:10 |
Re: How is lang.opt processed? |
James E Wilson |
21:01 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Thorsten Glaser |
20:56 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Daniel Berlin |
20:44 |
patch: document 8540 in -mcpu docs |
Aldy Hernandez |
20:39 |
Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity |
James E Wilson |
20:21 |
Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" |
James E Wilson |
19:47 |
Re: Bad link on webpage |
James E Wilson |
18:03 |
Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Nathan Sidwell |
17:37 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
David Carlton |
17:19 |
Re: Bad link on webpage |
Joe Buck |
17:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
17:03 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
16:48 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
14:58 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
14:30 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
14:23 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
13:20 |
Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation |
Andrew Pinski |
12:46 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Geert Bosch |
11:49 |
advice needed regarding c++ name mangling |
Razya Ladelsky |
11:23 |
Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation |
Zdenek Dvorak |
11:05 |
Strange missing tree constant propagation |
Steven Bosscher |
08:44 |
Re: Bad link on webpage |
Giovanni Bajo |
07:07 |
RE: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts |
Gary Funck |
04:11 |
Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug |
Mark Mitchell |
03:00 |
Re: Creating assembler comments from RTL |
DJ Delorie |
02:45 |
Creating assembler comments from RTL |
HutchinsonAndy |
02:32 |
Bad link on webpage |
Marcus |
01:02 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Joe Buck |
00:09 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
00:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
23:39 |
PR 19893 & array_ref bug |
Steve Ellcey |
23:28 |
gcc-3.3-20050309 is now available |
gccadmin |
23:21 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Diego Novillo |
23:21 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Andrew Pinski |
23:15 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Greg Schafer |
23:08 |
Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Steven Bosscher |
22:52 |
GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) |
Mark Mitchell |
22:19 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Sundell Software |
21:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
19:54 |
A plea for help |
Andrew Haley |
19:52 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Robert Dewar |
17:48 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Giovanni Bajo |
17:39 |
Gcc successful build |
Shawn Begin |
16:55 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
16:42 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
16:38 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Giovanni Bajo |
16:16 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
16:09 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
13:44 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* |
Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos |
13:44 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
12:39 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
11:47 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
11:18 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Giovanni Bajo |
11:13 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Vincent Lefevre |
11:11 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Olivier Galibert |
08:44 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Nathan Sidwell |
08:19 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
06:30 |
Re: RFC: New pexecute interface |
Zack Weinberg |
06:12 |
Re: RFC: New pexecute interface |
Ian Lance Taylor |
06:11 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
05:42 |
Re: RFC: New pexecute interface |
Zack Weinberg |
05:39 |
Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros |
Zack Weinberg |
05:00 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Frank Heckenbach |
02:59 |
Re: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts |
James E Wilson |
00:52 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Mark Mitchell |
00:46 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Zack Weinberg |
00:18 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Mark Mitchell |
23:23 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Alexandre Oliva |
23:15 |
Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes? |
James E Wilson |
22:41 |
Re: Building GCC on Native Platform |
James E Wilson |
19:19 |
Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Eric Botcazou |
19:11 |
Shall we take a short break from my fold changes? |
Kazu Hirata |
18:42 |
RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Dave Korn |
18:42 |
RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Dave Korn |
18:27 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paul Schlie |
18:25 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Zack Weinberg |
18:25 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Richard Henderson |
17:55 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Tom Tromey |
17:43 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Nathan Sidwell |
17:32 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Jeffrey A Law |
17:31 |
RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Dave Korn |
17:25 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Paul Brook |
17:16 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Jeffrey A Law |
17:06 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Mark Mitchell |
17:04 |
Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Kunal Parmar |
16:47 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Alexandre Oliva |
16:27 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Andreas Schwab |
16:14 |
Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Andrew Pinski |
16:12 |
Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
16:08 |
Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Kunal Parmar |
15:59 |
Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression |
Nathan Sidwell |
15:21 |
Re: problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Vladimir Makarov |
15:15 |
Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Roland Lengfeldner |
15:14 |
Re: matching constraints in asm operands question |
Michael Matz |
15:14 |
Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Vladimir Makarov |
14:51 |
problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Kunal Parmar |
14:36 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Andrew Pinski |
14:10 |
problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 |
Kunal Parmar |
13:56 |
problem with the scheduler |
Kunal Parmar |
13:54 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
13:42 |
Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Jonathan Wakely |
13:31 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
13:11 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
13:08 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
13:07 |
Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Giovanni Bajo |
13:05 |
Deprecating min/max extension in C++ |
Giovanni Bajo |
13:04 |
Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" |
feng qiu |
13:02 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
13:02 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
11:57 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
11:51 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
11:50 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
11:49 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Richard Henderson |
11:39 |
Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
11:30 |
Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Chris Jefferson |
11:30 |
Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Chris Jefferson |
11:08 |
are link errors caused by mixing of versions? |
Michael Cieslinski |
10:15 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Frank Heckenbach |
10:11 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
10:03 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
09:43 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
09:42 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
09:31 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Florian Weimer |
08:46 |
Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Eric Botcazou |
08:37 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
08:26 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
08:18 |
Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Roland Lengfeldner |
07:32 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Alexandre Oliva |
06:35 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
06:29 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Alexandre Oliva |
06:20 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Ranjit Mathew |
05:54 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
05:51 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
04:46 |
Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' |
James E Wilson |
04:38 |
re: GCC generating invalid assembly |
Sam Lauber |
04:37 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
04:06 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
David Starner |
04:04 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Mark Mitchell |
04:02 |
Re: A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included) |
Mark Mitchell |
04:01 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
03:59 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Mark Mitchell |
03:56 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Mark Mitchell |
03:30 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Roger Sayle |
03:19 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
03:07 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
David Starner |
02:50 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Richard Henderson |
02:25 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
01:55 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
01:46 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
01:16 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
01:11 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
01:08 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
01:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
01:03 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
01:01 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
01:01 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
00:59 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Joe Buck |
00:58 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
00:53 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
00:49 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
00:47 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
00:42 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
00:32 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
00:21 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
00:20 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
00:15 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
00:12 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
00:05 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Ronny Peine |
23:19 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
23:19 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
23:18 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Marcin Dalecki |
23:16 |
*** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Laurent GUERBY |
23:16 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Tom Tromey |
21:40 |
Re: RFC: New pexecute interface |
Ian Lance Taylor |
21:36 |
Re: RFC: New pexecute interface |
E. Weddington |
21:09 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Joe Buck |
21:01 |
RFC: New pexecute interface |
Ian Lance Taylor |
20:52 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
20:51 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
20:43 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
DJ Delorie |
20:32 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
20:16 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
DJ Delorie |
20:02 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
19:49 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
19:43 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Joseph S. Myers |
19:24 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Joe Buck |
19:23 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Andrew Pinski |
19:14 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Giovanni Bajo |
19:07 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
DJ Delorie |
19:06 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
19:03 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Steven Bosscher |
19:00 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Paolo Carlini |
18:56 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
DJ Delorie |
18:51 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Richard Kenner |
18:50 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
18:32 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Roger Sayle |
18:24 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Joseph S. Myers |
17:58 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
17:57 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Joe Buck |
17:54 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Richard Kenner |
17:52 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Geert Bosch |
17:50 |
Re: Using fold() in frontends |
Mark Mitchell |
17:41 |
Using fold() in frontends |
Giovanni Bajo |
17:40 |
GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity |
Andrew Muraco |
17:33 |
GDC |
Denis Washington |
17:00 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Roger Sayle |
16:55 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary |
Alexandre Oliva |
16:50 |
Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Eric Botcazou |
16:33 |
Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a |
Roland Lengfeldner |
16:31 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
16:26 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Andreas Schwab |
16:23 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Chris Jefferson |
16:18 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Mark Mitchell |
16:10 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Duncan Sands |
16:01 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Richard Guenther |
15:55 |
Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary |
Roger Sayle |
15:51 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
15:48 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
David Edelsohn |
15:42 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
15:41 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
15:39 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Andrew Haley |
15:37 |
Re: Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors |
Tom Tromey |
15:15 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Robert Dewar |
14:55 |
Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
14:20 |
__builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) |
Paolo Carlini |
13:52 |
GCC 3.2.2 works for BSD/OS 4.3.1 |
The Doctor |
13:19 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Sebastian Pop |
12:27 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Diego Novillo |
12:16 |
Re: extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6))) |
Joseph S. Myers |
11:06 |
Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance |
Robert Dewar |
09:04 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Aaron W. LaFramboise |
08:27 |
Re: request for timings - makedepend |
Paolo Bonzini |
08:23 |
extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6))) |
kevin lyda |
08:07 |
request for timings - makedepend |
Zack Weinberg |
07:50 |
Re: tag request |
Mike Stump |
07:21 |
Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors |
Ranjit Mathew |
07:20 |
A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included) |
Kazu Hirata |
06:15 |
Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance |
Alan Modra |
06:08 |
Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
06:07 |
Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
06:00 |
Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
06:00 |
Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
02:51 |
Re: tag request |
Ed Smith-Rowland |
01:28 |
Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names |
Mark Mitchell |
01:17 |
tag request |
Alfonso Urdaneta |
00:37 |
Re: GCC generating invalid assembly |
Andrew Pinski |
00:34 |
re: GCC generating invalid assembly |
Dan Kegel |
23:47 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
James A. Morrison |
23:40 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Joseph S. Myers |
23:25 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Mark Mitchell |
23:16 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
E. Weddington |
23:00 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Mark Mitchell |
22:59 |
Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format |
Daniel Berlin |
22:55 |
Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call |
Mark Mitchell |
22:21 |
Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format |
Joseph S. Myers |
22:13 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Benjamin Redelings I |
22:02 |
Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format |
Daniel Berlin |
21:36 |
Re: testsuite execution question |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
21:00 |
Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format |
Joseph S. Myers |
20:52 |
re: cross compiling |
Daniel Kegel |
20:40 |
SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format |
Daniel Berlin |
19:42 |
Re: Question regarding c++ constructors |
Mike Stump |
19:25 |
Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) |
Mark Mitchell |
19:12 |
Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) |
Caroline Tice |
19:09 |
Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? |
Diego Novillo |
19:05 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
18:59 |
Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? |
Janis Johnson |
18:44 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Steven Bosscher |
18:30 |
Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) |
Geoffrey Keating |
18:29 |
Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? |
Andrew Pinski |
18:29 |
Re: testsuite execution question |
Janis Johnson |
18:25 |
Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? |
Janis Johnson |
18:05 |
Re: Identifying rule responsible for lookahead |
Henrik Sorensen |
18:00 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
15:49 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
15:46 |
Re: 3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility? |
Paolo Carlini |
15:44 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Richard Earnshaw |
15:41 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Paul Brook |
15:35 |
3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility? |
Steve Snyder |
15:30 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Petko Manolov |
15:14 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
14:27 |
Re: Different sized data and code pointers |
E. Weddington |
14:21 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
James A. Morrison |
13:47 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Prof A Olowofoyeku (The Africa |
13:41 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
13:39 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Paul Brook |
13:31 |
Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) |
Steven Bosscher |
13:30 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Steven Bosscher |
13:29 |
Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) |
Richard Guenther |
13:28 |
Re: Pascal front-end integration |
Steven Bosscher |
13:20 |
RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros |
Dave Korn |
13:18 |
Pascal front-end integration |
James A. Morrison |
13:11 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
12:46 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
12:41 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Steven Bosscher |
12:36 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
12:30 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
11:26 |
Different sized data and code pointers |
Thomas Gill |
11:02 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Richard Earnshaw |
10:55 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Vladimir Ivanov |
10:42 |
Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x |
Richard Earnshaw |
10:31 |
Re: GCC 4.1 Projects |
Richard Earnshaw |
10:25 |
<A> at web: /install/specific.html |
Alec Voropay |
10:10 |
Re: GIV optimizations |
Zdenek Dvorak |
10:02 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Richard Guenther |
07:21 |
Re: GCC 4.1 Projects |
Eric Botcazou |
06:54 |
cross compiling |
vivek sukumaran |
06:52 |
gnattools folder and GCC snapshots |
Ranjit Mathew |
03:09 |
Re: GIV optimizations |
Andrew Pinski |
03:04 |
Re: GIV optimizations |
Canqun Yang |
01:49 |
RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html |
Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\) |
01:45 |
Re: testsuite execution question |
Daniel Jacobowitz |
01:38 |
Re: GCC 4.1 Projects |
Mark Mitchell |
01:30 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Steven Bosscher |
01:21 |
Re: GCC 4.1 Projects |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
01:04 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
01:02 |
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html |
Giovanni Bajo |
00:38 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Steven Bosscher |
00:33 |
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns |
Jan Hubicka |
00:30 |
Re: Apologies to Mark |
Mark Mitchell |
00:27 |
RE: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build |
Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
00:22 |
Re: testsuite execution question |
Steve Kargl |
00:15 |
Apologies to Mark |
Nathanael Nerode |
00:14 |
Re: testsuite execution question |
Janis Johnson |
00:01 |
Re: GCC 4.1 Projects |
Steven Bosscher |