gcc archive
date index for March, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2005
23:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoffrey Keating
23:47 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoffrey Keating
23:41 Re: [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr] Joseph S. Myers
23:36 [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr] Ajoy K Thamattoor
23:08 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Diego Novillo
23:01 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Andrew Pinski
22:46 What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:05 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
21:33 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Daniel Jacobowitz
21:26 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
20:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoff Keating
20:44 Re: GNU toolchain for blackfin processor James E Wilson
20:33 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Dale Johannesen
20:23 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Dale Johannesen
20:18 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Mike Stump
19:57 Re: PR 20505 James E Wilson
19:49 Re: gcc 3.4.2 James E Wilson
19:33 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux James E Wilson
19:15 Re: symbol_ref constants James E Wilson
19:13 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Stan Shebs
18:52 bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
18:37 Re: -fno-common Daniel Jacobowitz
18:33 -fno-common Dave Korn
17:06 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Devang Patel
16:13 RE: FASTCALL support Rupert Wood
15:46 FASTCALL support Ivan Leo Puoti
15:36 GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux Zagorodnev, Grigory
14:11 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
13:56 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:55 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:42 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang
08:36 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
08:04 Getting access to g++ tree from front end. Brendon Costa
06:56 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
06:36 PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
06:24 RE: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
06:16 RE: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
04:58 Re: about new_regalloc Andrew Pinski
03:16 about new_regalloc zouq
02:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Daniel Kegel
00:23 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Zack Weinberg
00:16 SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Aldy Hernandez

March 30, 2005
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050330 is now available gccadmin
21:57 Re: symbol_ref constants Mike Stump
21:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation James E Wilson
20:47 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
19:54 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
19:27 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Toon Moene
19:20 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
18:39 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
18:22 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
18:10 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
17:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:08 RE: symbol_ref constants Rupert Wood
17:08 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Dan Kegel
16:07 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Ulrich Weigand
15:09 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
14:28 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
14:23 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
13:57 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Daniel Jacobowitz
13:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Marcin Dalecki
13:01 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
12:53 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt (solved) Clemens Koller
12:43 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
12:28 Re: PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
12:25 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
12:20 GNU toolchain for blackfin processor Vinayak Ghate
11:57 symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
07:44 Re: Name of files and functions etc. David Pettersson
07:30 PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Dan Kegel
06:44 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Peter Barada
06:16 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
05:15 successful GCC build Taso N. Devetzis
05:09 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
03:13 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:12 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt James E Wilson
02:52 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS James E Wilson
02:12 Re: PR 20505 James E Wilson

March 29, 2005
23:55 Successful bootstrap/install of current gcc 4.0 and 4.1 snapshots on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 using the latest odcctools Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
23:26 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how todeal with when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
22:56 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
22:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
20:24 Re: [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy Denis Vlasenko
20:23 [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy Denis Vlasenko
20:21 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Joe Buck
20:14 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
19:24 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Andrew Haley
19:20 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Tom Tromey
19:19 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Zack Weinberg
19:15 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Tom Tromey
19:02 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
18:17 Re: combine.c Ian Lance Taylor
18:10 combine.c Rajkishore Barik
17:54 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:41 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Marc Espie
17:27 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
16:50 Re: Gcc help Eljay Love-Jensen
16:47 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Koning
16:43 Gcc help andre
15:48 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Andrew Pinski
15:42 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Andrew Pinski
15:28 Name of files and functions etc. David Pettersson
15:19 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
15:13 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Jakub Jelinek
15:10 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Richard Kenner
15:09 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Nathan Sidwell
15:07 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
15:06 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Richard Guenther
15:01 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end Stefan Strasser
14:37 memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
13:55 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Gerald Pfeifer
13:50 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Florian Weimer
13:44 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gerald Pfeifer
11:47 i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end "하태준"
10:11 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Marc Espie
10:07 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? Mostafa Hagog
09:46 gcc 3.4.2 Levent Erbuke
09:09 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
08:13 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Nathan Sidwell
08:06 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler tm_gccmail
07:48 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler Marcin Dalecki
07:44 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
05:25 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
04:38 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
04:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Jason Merrill
03:59 Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler Wei Qin
03:30 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? zhongknocken
02:26 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 tm_gccmail
02:24 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. Steve Kargl
01:58 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. James E Wilson
01:34 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 James E Wilson
01:25 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers onsparc64-linux... Daniel Berlin
00:49 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 zouq
00:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 James E Wilson

March 28, 2005
23:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 James E Wilson
23:19 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 James E Wilson
22:27 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Mike Stump
22:18 Re: Any SMS loop example? Mostafa Hagog
20:57 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
20:13 assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
19:27 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch Biagio Lucini
18:25 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Janis Johnson
18:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
18:04 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Zack Weinberg
17:59 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
17:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Andrew Pinski
17:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
17:28 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
14:39 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF (fwd) M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
14:31 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Daniel Berlin
14:15 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
14:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Steven Bosscher
13:54 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch Diego Novillo
12:37 Any SMS loop example? zhongknocken
08:56 Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with whenwriting testcases. Toon Moene
07:58 about gcc-4.1-20050327 zouq
05:38 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
03:05 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
02:51 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
02:07 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
01:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
00:30 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:23 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang

March 27, 2005
23:39 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Geoff Keating
21:36 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Gabriel Dos Reis
21:30 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Mike Stump
21:07 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Mike Stump
20:41 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Mike Stump
20:08 Re: Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product Mike Stump
19:58 dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Per Bothner
18:11 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 gcc-4.1-20050327 is now available gccadmin
18:05 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Zdenek Dvorak
17:37 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Gabriel Dos Reis
17:21 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:17 gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Mostafa Hagog
17:08 Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product anderson shin
16:56 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
12:07 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Andreas Tobler
12:00 Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Geert Bosch
10:13 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
06:32 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
04:46 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
03:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 - Questions concerning the AVR target Ian Lance Taylor
03:32 Re: uclibc patches Simon Richter
02:29 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
01:52 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
01:37 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:08 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host Dave Murphy

March 26, 2005
23:25 gcc-4.0-20050326 is now available gccadmin
18:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Richard Guenther
17:02 Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
15:24 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
15:10 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host E. Weddington
15:00 Re: Heads up: 4.0 libjava failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0 Bradley Lucier
12:47 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Eric Botcazou
11:53 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Graham Stott
11:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Steven Bosscher
10:45 bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
08:39 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
07:19 new cctools for powerpc-darwin7 required for HEAD Geoff Keating
06:30 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
06:22 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Joe Buck
06:10 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
05:52 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
05:38 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
05:25 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:19 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
05:09 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:55 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
03:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
01:18 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
01:06 [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:30 gcc-3.4-20050325 is now available gccadmin

March 25, 2005
22:55 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
21:07 ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:43 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07 Re: getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets Ian Lance Taylor
19:05 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
18:58 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:44 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Timothy J . Wood
18:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
18:29 Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. Steve Kargl
17:53 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
17:52 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Joe Buck
17:47 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Joe Buck
17:34 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
17:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
16:57 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Timothy J . Wood
16:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
15:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug David Edelsohn
14:27 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
14:06 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Daniel Jacobowitz
13:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
12:55 Re: reload question Alan Lehotsky
12:43 Re: reload question Ian Lance Taylor
12:30 Re: reload question tm_gccmail
11:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
11:09 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Eric Botcazou
10:48 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
10:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug Giovanni Bajo
10:23 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
09:37 maybe a gcc bug zouq
09:23 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
08:00 Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Mark Mitchell
07:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Eric Botcazou
07:29 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
05:49 BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
03:31 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
03:28 getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets Aaron W. LaFramboise
01:20 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Andrew Pinski
01:10 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson
00:40 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Andrew Pinski
00:31 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson

March 24, 2005
23:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
23:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
23:18 Re: What does --enable-altivec do? James E Wilson
23:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Dale Johannesen
23:08 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) James E Wilson
22:28 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson
21:39 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Richard Henderson
21:27 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Joseph S. Myers
21:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Richard Henderson
21:10 Re: RFA: PR 19225 Dale Johannesen
21:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Zack Weinberg
20:48 Re: inefficient code output? James E Wilson
20:35 Re: RFA: PR 19225 James E Wilson
20:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Daniel Berlin
20:08 building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host Dave Murphy
19:29 Re: Help procob Mike Stump
19:29 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:50 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Zack Weinberg
18:24 Help procob Galli Andrea
17:51 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Richard Henderson
16:45 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:23 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:17 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:08 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Roberto Bagnara
15:56 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Paolo Carlini
15:25 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Paolo Carlini
15:25 Re: Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN. Mark Mitchell
15:20 GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating array withsize zero (`0')" Roberto Bagnara
12:28 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
10:58 gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt Clemens Koller
08:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
07:02 Re: PR 20505 Mark Mitchell
03:21 Re: Questions about trampolines Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:01 [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Peter Barada
01:52 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
01:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
01:00 Re: gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1? James A. Morrison
00:14 Interesting issue in gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
00:03 Re: Installation Instructions Joe Buck

March 23, 2005
23:59 gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1? Rene Rebe
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050323 is now available gccadmin
23:36 Installation Instructions Alf . Lacis
23:06 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
22:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
21:20 ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch Steven Bosscher
19:40 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
18:35 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
17:18 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
16:50 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
16:35 [gomp] Broken gomp branch Biagio Lucini
16:10 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Richard Kenner
15:56 A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
15:06 What does --enable-altivec do? Michael LeBlanc
13:48 Links exchange with http://www.mirror5.com. Dave Wooly
13:39 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Geert Bosch
13:13 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
10:54 PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
09:20 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Nick Clifton
03:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Per Bothner
03:04 Re: expand_binop misplacing results? DJ Delorie
01:56 RFA: PR 19225 Dale Johannesen
00:22 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. James E Wilson

March 22, 2005
22:16 Re: Keep dwarf.h in sync? DJ Delorie
22:07 Keep dwarf.h in sync? Ben Elliston
21:30 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Henderson
21:29 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
20:04 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion James E Wilson
19:59 Re: GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates Andrew Pinski
19:56 GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates Peter Soetens
19:55 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 James E Wilson
18:56 Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
18:26 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Dale Johannesen
18:22 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
18:06 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Dale Johannesen
17:39 Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN. Kazu Hirata
16:53 Re: reload question Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Andrew Haley
16:33 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
16:15 Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
16:14 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Nix
15:32 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Jon Grimm
14:45 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Joseph S. Myers
14:11 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Kazu Hirata
13:29 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:22 Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
11:57 inefficient code output? Stefan Strasser
11:20 Re: removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc) Eric Botcazou
09:52 Re: gcc and vfp instructions Richard Earnshaw
09:40 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
09:19 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Andrew Haley
09:06 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Steven Bosscher
08:52 gcc and vfp instructions aram bharathi
08:52 gcc and vfp instructions aram bharathi
08:17 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Andrew Haley
08:16 Re: gcc with arm -vfp instructions Nick Clifton
07:26 gcc with arm -vfp instructions aram bharathi
06:48 fyi: gcc_update merged to release branches Zack Weinberg
06:33 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Zack Weinberg
06:13 ICE in gcc-4.0-20050305 for m68k Dan Kegel
04:50 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions John Marshall
04:44 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Mark Mitchell
04:33 Re: expand_binop misplacing results? Roger Sayle
03:18 Re: java on darwin8? Andrew Pinski
03:10 java on darwin8? Mike Stump
02:57 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
02:49 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Robert Dewar
02:47 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
02:45 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Robert Dewar
02:39 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
01:47 expand_binop misplacing results? DJ Delorie
01:26 A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Kazu Hirata
00:22 RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Jon Grimm
00:07 Re: Licensing question about libobjc Mike Stump

March 21, 2005
23:45 Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Kazu Hirata
23:08 Licensing question about libobjc Andrew Pinski
22:53 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Mike Stump
19:31 removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc) Garrett D'Amore
19:00 Runtime-library versioning patch checked in Zack Weinberg
18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:53 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code Jeffrey A Law
17:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
17:49 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Denis Chertykov
17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
17:18 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Geert Bosch
16:03 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Nick Burrett
15:41 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
15:27 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Uros Bizjak
15:22 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Geert Bosch
14:35 Re: Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43 Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:28 [autovect] Bootstrap failure on i686 Richard Guenther
14:24 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Uros Bizjak
14:00 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
13:56 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Dorit Naishlos
13:53 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Dorit Naishlos
13:53 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Guenther
13:29 Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Guenther
12:55 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
12:45 Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
12:32 GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
07:55 Ada and ARM build assertion failure Nick Burrett
03:21 Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43 Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:29 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Richard Henderson
00:12 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz

March 20, 2005
21:01 PL/I Frontend for GCC version 0.0.10 released Henrik Sorensen
20:14 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
19:50 Re: reload-branch created Ulrich Weigand
19:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
19:36 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
19:27 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
19:26 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
18:41 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
18:09 gcc-4.1-20050320 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:06 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:00 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
15:46 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Henderson
15:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
15:35 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 Rajesh Babu
15:19 Re: [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue Björn Haase
15:12 Re: reload-branch created Toon Moene
13:20 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
10:55 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
10:36 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Arnaud Charlet
04:44 [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue HutchinsonAndy
03:30 Re: For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md... Bob Wilson
02:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
02:40 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
02:32 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Brook
01:59 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Giovanni Bajo
01:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
00:52 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Geert Bosch

March 19, 2005
23:41 gcc-4.0-20050319 is now available gccadmin
23:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
23:16 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
23:14 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
22:06 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
21:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
20:59 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
20:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
20:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Laurent GUERBY
20:10 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
19:52 converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Per Bothner
19:01 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
18:51 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Björn Haase
17:51 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:08 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:53 AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
15:23 Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Bernd Schmidt
13:34 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
13:34 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
13:15 Build and test results: gcc-3.4.3 on Red Hat 8.0 Anna Aret
13:14 Re: gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb Paul Brook
12:22 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
12:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" Thorsten Glaser
09:49 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Björn Haase
07:51 gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb Carl van_Schaik
07:33 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
01:23 Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0) Giovanni Bajo
00:44 Re: reload-branch created Ulrich Weigand
00:16 Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
00:04 gcc-3.4-20050318 is now available gccadmin

March 18, 2005
23:48 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Bernardo Innocenti
23:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
23:19 Re: Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-codedassembly language function Andreas Schwab
23:00 Re: Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code Joe Buck
22:46 Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code JCA
22:35 Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-coded assembly language function JCA
20:38 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Frank Ch. Eigler
20:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
20:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Paul Schlie
20:02 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Janis Johnson
19:21 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Mike Stump
18:16 reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0) Bernd Schmidt
17:25 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code Zdenek Dvorak
16:56 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:55 Weird behavior in ivopts code Jeffrey A Law
16:21 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
16:10 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
15:53 CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
14:04 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Michael Matz
13:52 Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Diego Novillo
13:01 Merge to tree-profiling Jan Hubicka
12:27 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
12:24 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
11:08 Re: reload question Miles Bader
10:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
10:34 Re: help regarding ld Nick Clifton
10:03 Re: Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++ Giovanni Bajo
09:59 help regarding ld aram bharathi
09:55 Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++ John Vickers
06:14 Re: reload question Miles Bader
05:52 Re: RTL? James E Wilson
05:44 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
05:36 Re: supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64 James E Wilson
05:33 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches Steve Kargl
05:21 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches James E Wilson
02:23 Re: short int and conversions Paul Schlie
02:17 Re: RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers Andrew MacLeod
00:26 Re: short int and conversions Andrea

March 17, 2005
23:21 Re: coverage mismatch Mike Stump
23:16 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
23:16 coverage mismatch Rajkishore Barik
23:01 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
22:51 re: problems compiling gcc-3.3.1 Daniel Kegel
21:47 Re: libgcc-std.ver question Mike Stump
20:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Stefan Strasser
20:47 false spam positive from gcc-patches Thomas Koenig
20:22 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700fix. Jeff Johnston
19:51 For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md... Kazu Hirata
19:37 help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Mike Stump
17:54 GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steve Ellcey
17:45 Re: short int and conversions Joseph S. Myers
17:25 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Joe Buck
16:59 short int and conversions Andrea
15:52 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
14:40 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
14:36 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
14:02 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
13:36 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
13:26 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Jonathan Wakely
13:21 problems compiling gcc-3.3.1 Amit Thakar
12:27 Re: libgcc-std.ver question Richard Henderson
12:14 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Jonathan Wakely
10:04 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Giovanni Bajo
09:32 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
09:09 Re: Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias Andreas Schwab
08:34 Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Topi Maenpaa
08:31 Re: Question about how to compile multiple files with g++ Mike Stump
08:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
07:05 Question about how to compile multiple files with g++ Yen
05:17 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
02:34 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix. Giovanni Bajo
02:02 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Ken Raeburn
01:46 Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix. Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:43 libgcc-std.ver question Mike Stump

March 16, 2005
23:59 RE: bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared Jason Mancini
23:41 supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64 Nitin Gupta
23:30 bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared Jason Mancini
23:26 gcc-3.3-20050316 is now available gccadmin
23:26 Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias Benjamin Redelings I
22:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joseph S. Myers
22:02 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
21:58 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
21:49 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
21:37 SVN repo updated Daniel Berlin
20:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joseph S. Myers
19:54 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
19:49 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
19:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
18:31 RE: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Dave Korn
17:57 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:54 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
17:47 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
17:42 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
17:41 Re: using test suite outside of build directory Mike Stump
17:34 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
17:32 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 E. Weddington
17:24 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Richard Kenner
16:57 using test suite outside of build directory Jack Howarth
16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:22 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Steven Bosscher
16:11 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
16:07 Re: Installation into 'const' directory Michael Matz
15:59 Re: request for timings - makedepend Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:54 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF Ted Teah via RT
15:26 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
15:21 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Richard Kenner
15:17 Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
15:03 Installation into 'const' directory Art Haas
14:58 Re: Questions about trampolines Jonathan Wakely
14:49 RE: Questions about trampolines Manuel Baez
14:33 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
13:50 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
13:38 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
11:41 Re: reload question Bernd Schmidt
11:38 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
11:37 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
10:43 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Jonathan Wakely
10:33 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Dorit Naishlos
10:08 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Giovanni Bajo
09:37 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
09:34 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
08:45 Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Topi Maenpaa
07:20 Re: [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands(): Eric Botcazou
05:34 reload question Miles Bader
05:25 RE: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Gary Funck
05:24 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
05:19 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
05:10 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
04:45 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Zack Weinberg
04:44 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
04:42 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
04:31 RTL? "하태준"
03:57 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
03:38 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Benjamin Kosnik
03:15 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Joe Buck
02:23 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
02:21 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Richard Kenner
02:00 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Joe Buck
01:52 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Giovanni Bajo
01:44 Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. jc-nospam
01:40 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support David Edelsohn
01:33 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Miles Bader
01:15 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Andrew Pinski
01:01 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:50 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Andrew Pinski
00:48 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
00:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joe Buck
00:42 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
00:35 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:31 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Geoffrey Keating
00:24 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
00:17 Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey

March 15, 2005
22:55 Re: a problem about cross-compile for powerpc James E Wilson
22:24 Re: PR 20225 Benjamin Redelings I
22:22 [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands(): Christian Joensson
22:13 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 James E Wilson
22:06 Re: Root Node of AST James E Wilson
21:36 Re: `make uninstall' and GCC James E Wilson
20:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" James E Wilson
19:54 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Alexandre Oliva
19:51 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Eric Christopher
19:20 RE: Merging calls to `abort' Dave Korn
18:58 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time Zack Weinberg
18:52 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Kenner
18:40 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time Dale Johannesen
18:39 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
18:33 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time Zack Weinberg
18:21 RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time Dale Johannesen
10:47 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Clifford Wolf
10:21 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Earnshaw
10:00 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Clifford Wolf
05:31 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
05:28 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
04:01 Re: `make uninstall' and GCC Ben Elliston
03:55 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Ben Elliston
02:06 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Daniel Jacobowitz
01:32 Re: Questions about trampolines Joe Buck
01:18 Re: Questions about trampolines Russell Shaw
00:51 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Eric Christopher
00:43 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Jeffrey A Law
00:32 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Mark Mitchell
00:17 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
00:07 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck

March 14, 2005
23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
22:28 Re: Questions about trampolines Waldek Hebisch
22:10 Re: Questions about trampolines E. Weddington
21:56 Re: Questions about trampolines Michael N. Moran
21:53 Re: Questions about trampolines Alexander Strange
20:44 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
19:55 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Dale Johannesen
19:52 Re: Questions about trampolines Waldek Hebisch
18:34 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Kenner
18:30 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
18:15 Re: Questions about trampolines Mike Stump
18:08 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
18:02 Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports Janis Johnson
17:33 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:31 Re: Questions about trampolines E. Weddington
17:29 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) David Carlton
16:25 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
16:25 Re: Questions about trampolines Gabriel Dos Reis
16:19 Re: Dear adventurers of math! (was Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:16 Re: Questions about trampolines H. J. Lu
16:05 `make uninstall' and GCC Sam Lauber
14:36 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF Ted Teah via RT
14:32 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
14:14 Re: Questions about trampolines Marc Espie
14:02 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Nathan Sidwell
13:58 Re: Questions about trampolines Andreas Schwab
13:45 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
13:44 Re: Questions about trampolines Marc Espie
13:34 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
13:33 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
13:28 Re: Questions about trampolines Andreas Schwab
13:25 Re: Questions about trampolines Joseph S. Myers
13:24 Re: Questions about trampolines Giovanni Bajo
13:20 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
13:12 Re: Questions about trampolines Marc Espie
10:40 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Earnshaw
10:26 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
10:01 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Steven Bosscher
09:43 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
09:31 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Andreas Schwab
08:19 Re: Questions about trampolines Eric Botcazou
07:34 Re: Questions about trampolines Øyvind Harboe
06:12 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Marcin Dalecki
05:22 Re: memory checkers and gcc support Nicholas Nethercote
05:03 RE: Merging calls to `abort' Gary Funck
04:20 Re: memory checkers and gcc support Diego Novillo
03:00 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
02:42 memory checkers and gcc support J. Hart
01:33 a problem about cross-compile for powerpc 邹琼
00:23 Successful build of gcc-3.4.3 Red Hat 8.0, Kernel 2.6.11.2 Pinar Kondu

March 13, 2005
23:54 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
21:14 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Dorit Naishlos
21:09 Re: Questions about trampolines Andreas Schwab
21:00 Re: Questions about trampolines Zack Weinberg
20:30 Re: Questions about trampolines Paul Brook
20:27 Re: Questions about trampolines Daniel Jacobowitz
20:23 Questions about trampolines Øyvind Harboe
19:35 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Kai Henningsen
19:22 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Nathan Sidwell
18:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paul Schlie
18:40 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Mark Mitchell
18:30 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Richard Henderson
18:09 gcc-4.1-20050313 is now available gccadmin
16:04 Dear adventurers of math! (was Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))) Daniel Berlin
16:00 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Steven Bosscher
15:53 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Daniel Berlin
15:42 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Steven Bosscher
15:31 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Daniel Berlin
14:56 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:36 Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports Andrew Pinski
14:32 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member Jonathan Wakely
14:30 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:13 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
13:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
13:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
10:54 FYI: ACATS/bugzilla on GCC wiki Laurent GUERBY
08:54 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Razya Ladelsky
06:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paul Schlie
05:55 Non-bootstrap build status reports Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:00 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" feng qiu
04:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Steven Bosscher
01:11 Re: Merging calls to `abort' James E Wilson
01:07 Re: Merging calls to `abort' James E Wilson
00:33 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL James E Wilson
00:18 Re: are link errors caused by mixing of versions? James E Wilson

March 12, 2005
23:25 gcc-4.0-20050312 is now available gccadmin
21:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Kai Henningsen
21:05 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Kai Henningsen
20:56 DR#236 update Joseph S. Myers
20:12 RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers Diego Novillo
19:07 Re: Received welcome message. Steve Kargl
19:06 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paul Schlie
18:52 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Mike Stump
18:43 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Steve Kargl
18:08 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Mike Stump
18:02 Re: Root Node of AST Rajesh Babu
17:36 Re: PR debug/19345 Daniel Berlin
15:19 Re: Root Node of AST Diego Novillo
13:28 PRE in GCC-3.3.3 Rajesh Babu
13:16 Root Node of AST Rajesh Babu
07:24 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL Balaji S
06:54 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". Christopher Faylor
06:52 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". Christopher Faylor
06:27 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
06:04 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paul Schlie
03:12 Received welcome message. Feng Wang
03:00 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Neil Booth
02:54 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". Ian Lance Taylor
02:40 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Steve Kargl
02:21 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". James E Wilson
02:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:07 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:04 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:04 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Neil Booth
01:52 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol James E Wilson
01:49 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". Ian Lance Taylor
01:39 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". James E Wilson
00:12 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Mike Stump
00:02 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". Joe Buck

March 11, 2005
23:57 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None". James E Wilson
23:47 gcc-3.4-20050311 is now available gccadmin
23:42 Re: How is lang.opt processed? James E Wilson
22:32 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warningabout returning a reference to a temporary Jason Merrill
22:22 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Joe Buck
22:13 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Kai Henningsen
20:28 Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
20:06 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Mike Stump
19:48 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member Fariborz Jahanian
19:42 Write after approval - processed by "None". Toon Moene
19:25 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member Andrew Pinski
19:22 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Toon Moene
19:15 C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member Fariborz Jahanian
19:02 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Zack Weinberg
18:02 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Per Bothner
17:20 Re: Documentation on writing testcases now in GCC Wiki Giovanni Bajo
17:12 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Janis Johnson
16:48 Documentation on writing testcases now in GCC Wiki Michael Cieslinski
16:34 Re: Revamp WWW review process? Daniel Berlin
16:12 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:12 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Richard Henderson
14:59 gcc.dg/20001117-1.c and callee cleanup Øyvind Harboe
13:13 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Giovanni Bajo
12:23 Revamp WWW review process? Giovanni Bajo
12:04 Re: documentation on writing testcases? Joseph S. Myers
11:45 Re: Bad link on webpage Joseph S. Myers
11:11 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
11:02 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
10:44 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy
10:40 RE: Bad link on webpage Dave Korn
10:21 Re: Bad link on webpage Giovanni Bajo
09:38 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Florian Weimer
09:33 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Richard Guenther
09:07 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Richard Guenther
08:34 documentation on writing testcases? Per Bothner
08:02 Re: Bad link on webpage Giovanni Bajo
06:23 Re: How is lang.opt processed? Steve Kargl
05:51 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol James E Wilson
04:14 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:34 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol James E Wilson
03:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Mark Mitchell
02:55 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Mark Mitchell
01:48 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:47 Re: gnattools folder and GCC snapshots James E Wilson
01:36 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol James E Wilson
00:59 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity Andrew Muraco
00:55 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:06 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity James E Wilson

March 10, 2005
23:27 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity Joe Buck
22:41 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol James E Wilson
22:28 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity Andrew Muraco
22:15 Re: mthumb in specs file James E Wilson
22:14 Re: Specifying a linker script from the specs file James E Wilson
22:09 Re: what's the proper way to configure/enable/disable C exception handling? James E Wilson
21:55 Re: Help : Instruction Scheduling James E Wilson
21:49 Re: gcc-3.4.4-20050211: maybe a danger behaviour James E Wilson
21:28 Re: Spill cost James E Wilson
21:22 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation Zdenek Dvorak
21:20 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL James E Wilson
21:18 Re: request for timings - makedepend geoffk
21:18 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL James E Wilson
21:10 Re: How is lang.opt processed? James E Wilson
21:01 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Thorsten Glaser
20:56 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Daniel Berlin
20:44 patch: document 8540 in -mcpu docs Aldy Hernandez
20:39 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity James E Wilson
20:21 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" James E Wilson
19:47 Re: Bad link on webpage James E Wilson
18:03 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Nathan Sidwell
17:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) David Carlton
17:19 Re: Bad link on webpage Joe Buck
17:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
17:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
16:48 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
14:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:30 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
14:23 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
13:20 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation Andrew Pinski
12:46 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Geert Bosch
11:49 advice needed regarding c++ name mangling Razya Ladelsky
11:23 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation Zdenek Dvorak
11:05 Strange missing tree constant propagation Steven Bosscher
08:44 Re: Bad link on webpage Giovanni Bajo
07:07 RE: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts Gary Funck
04:11 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
03:00 Re: Creating assembler comments from RTL DJ Delorie
02:45 Creating assembler comments from RTL HutchinsonAndy
02:32 Bad link on webpage Marcus
01:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Joe Buck
00:09 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis

March 09, 2005
23:39 PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
23:28 gcc-3.3-20050309 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Diego Novillo
23:21 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Andrew Pinski
23:15 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Greg Schafer
23:08 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Steven Bosscher
22:52 GCC Status Report (2005-03-09) Mark Mitchell
22:19 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Sundell Software
21:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
19:54 A plea for help Andrew Haley
19:52 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Robert Dewar
17:48 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Giovanni Bajo
17:39 Gcc successful build Shawn Begin
16:55 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
16:38 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Giovanni Bajo
16:16 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:09 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:44 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2* Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
13:44 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
11:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
11:18 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Giovanni Bajo
11:13 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
11:11 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Olivier Galibert
08:44 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Nathan Sidwell
08:19 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
06:30 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface Zack Weinberg
06:12 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface Ian Lance Taylor
06:11 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
05:42 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface Zack Weinberg
05:39 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
05:00 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
02:59 Re: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts James E Wilson
00:52 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Mark Mitchell
00:46 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Zack Weinberg
00:18 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Mark Mitchell

March 08, 2005
23:23 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Alexandre Oliva
23:15 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes? James E Wilson
22:41 Re: Building GCC on Native Platform James E Wilson
19:19 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Eric Botcazou
19:11 Shall we take a short break from my fold changes? Kazu Hirata
18:42 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Dave Korn
18:42 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Dave Korn
18:27 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paul Schlie
18:25 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Zack Weinberg
18:25 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Richard Henderson
17:55 Re: request for timings - makedepend Tom Tromey
17:43 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Nathan Sidwell
17:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend Jeffrey A Law
17:31 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Dave Korn
17:25 Re: request for timings - makedepend Paul Brook
17:16 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Jeffrey A Law
17:06 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Mark Mitchell
17:04 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 Kunal Parmar
16:47 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Alexandre Oliva
16:27 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Andreas Schwab
16:14 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Andrew Pinski
16:12 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:08 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 Kunal Parmar
15:59 Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression Nathan Sidwell
15:21 Re: problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911 Vladimir Makarov
15:15 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Roland Lengfeldner
15:14 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Michael Matz
15:14 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 Vladimir Makarov
14:51 problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911 Kunal Parmar
14:36 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Andrew Pinski
14:10 problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911 Kunal Parmar
13:56 problem with the scheduler Kunal Parmar
13:54 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
13:42 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Jonathan Wakely
13:31 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
13:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
13:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
13:07 Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Giovanni Bajo
13:05 Deprecating min/max extension in C++ Giovanni Bajo
13:04 Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" feng qiu
13:02 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
13:02 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
11:57 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
11:51 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
11:50 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
11:49 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Richard Henderson
11:39 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
11:30 Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Chris Jefferson
11:30 Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Chris Jefferson
11:08 are link errors caused by mixing of versions? Michael Cieslinski
10:15 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
10:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
10:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
09:43 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
09:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
09:31 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Florian Weimer
08:46 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Eric Botcazou
08:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
08:26 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
08:18 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Roland Lengfeldner
07:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend Alexandre Oliva
06:35 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
06:29 Re: request for timings - makedepend Alexandre Oliva
06:20 Re: Using fold() in frontends Ranjit Mathew
05:54 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
05:51 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
04:46 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' James E Wilson
04:38 re: GCC generating invalid assembly Sam Lauber
04:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
04:06 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) David Starner
04:04 Re: request for timings - makedepend Mark Mitchell
04:02 Re: A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included) Mark Mitchell
04:01 Re: request for timings - makedepend Daniel Jacobowitz
03:59 Re: Using fold() in frontends Mark Mitchell
03:56 Re: request for timings - makedepend Mark Mitchell
03:30 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Roger Sayle
03:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
03:07 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) David Starner
02:50 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Richard Henderson
02:25 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
01:55 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
01:46 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
01:16 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
01:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
01:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
01:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
01:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
01:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
01:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
00:59 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Joe Buck
00:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
00:53 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
00:49 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
00:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
00:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
00:32 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
00:21 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
00:20 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
00:15 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
00:12 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
00:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine

March 07, 2005
23:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
23:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
23:18 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Marcin Dalecki
23:16 *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: request for timings - makedepend Laurent GUERBY
23:16 Re: request for timings - makedepend Tom Tromey
21:40 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface Ian Lance Taylor
21:36 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface E. Weddington
21:09 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Joe Buck
21:01 RFC: New pexecute interface Ian Lance Taylor
20:52 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
20:51 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
20:43 Re: request for timings - makedepend DJ Delorie
20:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
20:16 Re: request for timings - makedepend DJ Delorie
20:02 Re: request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
19:49 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
19:43 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Joseph S. Myers
19:24 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Joe Buck
19:23 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Andrew Pinski
19:14 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Giovanni Bajo
19:07 Re: request for timings - makedepend DJ Delorie
19:06 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
19:03 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Steven Bosscher
19:00 Re: request for timings - makedepend Paolo Carlini
18:56 Re: request for timings - makedepend DJ Delorie
18:51 Re: Using fold() in frontends Richard Kenner
18:50 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
18:32 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Roger Sayle
18:24 Re: Using fold() in frontends Joseph S. Myers
17:58 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
17:57 Re: request for timings - makedepend Joe Buck
17:54 Re: Using fold() in frontends Richard Kenner
17:52 Re: Using fold() in frontends Geert Bosch
17:50 Re: Using fold() in frontends Mark Mitchell
17:41 Using fold() in frontends Giovanni Bajo
17:40 GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity Andrew Muraco
17:33 GDC Denis Washington
17:00 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Roger Sayle
16:55 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary Alexandre Oliva
16:50 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Eric Botcazou
16:33 Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a Roland Lengfeldner
16:31 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
16:26 Re: request for timings - makedepend Andreas Schwab
16:23 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Chris Jefferson
16:18 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Mark Mitchell
16:10 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Duncan Sands
16:01 Re: request for timings - makedepend Richard Guenther
15:55 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary Roger Sayle
15:51 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
15:48 Re: request for timings - makedepend David Edelsohn
15:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
15:41 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
15:39 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Andrew Haley
15:37 Re: Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors Tom Tromey
15:15 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Robert Dewar
14:55 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
14:20 __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Paolo Carlini
13:52 GCC 3.2.2 works for BSD/OS 4.3.1 The Doctor
13:19 Re: request for timings - makedepend Sebastian Pop
12:27 Re: request for timings - makedepend Diego Novillo
12:16 Re: extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6))) Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance Robert Dewar
09:04 Re: request for timings - makedepend Aaron W. LaFramboise
08:27 Re: request for timings - makedepend Paolo Bonzini
08:23 extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6))) kevin lyda
08:07 request for timings - makedepend Zack Weinberg
07:50 Re: tag request Mike Stump
07:21 Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors Ranjit Mathew
07:20 A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included) Kazu Hirata
06:15 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance Alan Modra
06:08 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Gabriel Dos Reis
06:07 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Gabriel Dos Reis
06:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Gabriel Dos Reis
06:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Gabriel Dos Reis
02:51 Re: tag request Ed Smith-Rowland
01:28 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Mark Mitchell
01:17 tag request Alfonso Urdaneta
00:37 Re: GCC generating invalid assembly Andrew Pinski
00:34 re: GCC generating invalid assembly Dan Kegel

March 06, 2005
22:38 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Ian Lance Taylor
21:54 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
21:53 successfully built gnu 3.4.3 Henddher Pedroza
21:38 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Joseph S. Myers
21:25 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Joseph S. Myers
21:22 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
21:20 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
21:00 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Joseph S. Myers
20:43 GCC generating invalid assembly Sam Lauber
19:43 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Nathan Sidwell
19:41 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
19:38 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
18:57 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:53 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Joseph S. Myers
18:45 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
18:38 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Ian Lance Taylor
18:34 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look) Joseph S. Myers
18:21 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Joseph S. Myers
18:12 gcc-4.1-20050306 is now available gccadmin
17:46 Re: [PING] [PATCH]: New Port(MAXQ) Mark Mitchell
17:40 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Sam Lauber
17:39 SVN Repo updated (please look) Daniel Berlin
17:06 PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Ian Lance Taylor
16:45 Bug in libiberty configure Sam Lauber
15:55 Statically linking fortify functions Mike Hearn
14:20 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Robert Dewar
14:19 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Robert Dewar
13:29 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Laurent GUERBY
12:13 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Bernd Trog
04:12 Re: [PING] [PATCH]: New Port(MAXQ) Giovanni Bajo
03:54 Re: invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist Giovanni Bajo
03:07 Re: mudflap abort Eyal Lebedinsky
02:45 How is lang.opt processed? Steve Kargl
01:31 Re: Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN Kazu Hirata
01:10 Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN Kazu Hirata

March 05, 2005
23:26 gcc-4.0-20050305 is now available gccadmin
22:26 cgraph_remove_node still slow Richard Guenther
19:08 Re: MetaC++ announcement Stefan Strasser
18:41 Re: MetaC++ announcement Florian Weimer
18:21 MetaC++ announcement Stefan Strasser
15:04 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question amylaar
14:41 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Jason Merrill
14:29 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning. Jonathan Wakely
14:01 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Michael N. Moran
12:45 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
12:30 SV: Where did Acovea go? Christian Joensson
12:25 Where did Acovea go? Ben Elliston
07:59 mudflap abort Eyal Lebedinsky
07:57 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Andrew Pinski
06:48 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
05:24 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question amylaar
04:49 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Joe Buck
04:03 Re: testsuite execution question Daniel Jacobowitz
03:05 Re: C99 variable length arrays for numerical code? Joseph S. Myers
02:29 C99 variable length arrays for numerical code? Perrin Meyer
02:08 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning. David Carlton
02:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning. Chris Lattner
01:37 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance Andrew Pinski
01:31 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning. Mark Mitchell
01:26 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning. Chris Lattner
01:16 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning. Mark Mitchell
01:09 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning. Chris Lattner
01:06 Re: Pascal front-end integration Waldek Hebisch
01:06 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning. Mark Mitchell
01:03 Re: Pascal front-end integration Waldek Hebisch
00:53 gcc-3.4-20050304 is now available gccadmin
00:33 Re: testsuite execution question Janis Johnson

March 04, 2005
23:58 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance David Edelsohn
22:59 PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance Edmar Wienskoski
22:57 Re: invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist Geoffrey Keating
22:53 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Peter Barada
22:43 invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist Devang Patel
22:33 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning. Florian Weimer
20:39 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning. Chris Lattner
20:07 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Karel Gardas
19:57 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning. Frank Ch. Eigler
19:14 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Richard Henderson
17:14 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
15:19 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning. Jonathan Wakely
14:57 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning. Mws
14:52 Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning. Karel Gardas
14:40 Re: Extension compatibility policy E. Weddington
10:53 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Thomas Gill
09:32 Re: I have a question for gcc Robert Dewar
08:10 I have a question for gcc "하태준"
07:42 GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts Gary Funck
05:03 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL Paul Schlie
04:38 Re: I have a question for gcc front-end Zack Weinberg
04:21 Re: A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR. Roger Sayle
04:16 Re: A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR. Zack Weinberg
04:05 I have a question for gcc front-end "하태준"
04:01 A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR. Kazu Hirata
03:42 Re: Pascal front-end integration Andrew Pinski
03:39 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Bradley Lucier
03:35 Re: Pascal front-end integration Tom Tromey
03:31 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
02:29 Re: Question about ObjC++ state Mike Stump
02:19 Re: GIV optimizations Canqun Yang
01:30 Re: Question about ObjC++ state Mark Mitchell
01:11 Re: Question about ObjC++ state Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
00:15 successful 3.4.3 bootstrap on powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0 Steve Rawley

March 03, 2005
23:28 Re: instrumentation injection & trees Andrew Pinski
23:22 instrumentation injection & trees jason
22:40 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Andrew Pinski
22:39 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Christian Joensson
22:33 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Eric Botcazou
20:13 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Andrew Pinski
18:19 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Julian Brown
17:36 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Eric Botcazou
16:32 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Jeffrey A Law
16:23 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Paul Schlie
15:43 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Christian Joensson
15:08 RE: HELP!!!! Dave Korn
12:59 Re: HELP!!!! Jonathan Wakely
12:37 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Christian Joensson
12:33 bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc Bradley Lucier
11:55 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Thomas Gill
05:32 Target specific memory attributes from RTL Balaji S
03:05 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
02:07 Re: Error help Michael Matz
01:51 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
01:15 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
00:55 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
00:37 Re: Pascal front-end integration Waldek Hebisch
00:19 Error help Rajkishore Barik

March 02, 2005
23:26 gcc-3.3-20050302 is now available gccadmin
23:13 Re: Weeeeee! ;))) Gerald Pfeifer
22:55 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Janis Johnson
22:02 [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32? Bernd Trog
21:36 HELP!!!! Jesus Christ
21:22 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frameaddressduringcodegeneration Vladimir Makarov
21:11 Re: Extension compatibility policy Bernardo Innocenti
20:21 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frameaddressduringcodegeneration Øyvind Harboe
20:04 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050301) on MICO sources Karel Gardas
19:45 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame addressduringcodegeneration Vladimir Makarov
19:24 Spill cost Rajkishore Barik
19:00 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Thorsten Glaser
18:52 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Richard Kenner
18:42 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Jeffrey A Law
18:41 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Jeffrey A Law
18:07 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' Jonathan Wakely
17:54 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame addressduringcodegeneration Øyvind Harboe
17:47 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address duringcodegeneration Vladimir Makarov
17:32 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address duringcodegeneration Øyvind Harboe
17:14 Re: Pascal front-end integration Frank Heckenbach
16:58 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
16:50 Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 1/n Mark Mitchell
16:39 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call Mark Mitchell
16:32 Re: Fortran libs. Paul Brook
16:24 Re: Extension compatibility policy E. Weddington
16:14 Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 1/n Roger Sayle
15:59 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Thomas Gill
15:10 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
15:04 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address during codegeneration Vladimir Makarov
14:46 Mudlfap disable doesn't work as expected. Marcin Dalecki
13:54 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call Helge Bahmann
13:12 Re: Extension compatibility policy Joseph S. Myers
12:55 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
12:12 Difference between stack pointer and frame address during codegeneration Øyvind Harboe
09:42 Re: Pascal front-end integration Steven Bosscher
04:50 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Peter Barada
04:34 Re: Pascal front-end integration Marcin Dalecki
04:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration Ed Smith-Rowland
03:46 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
03:23 Re: Pascal front-end integration Waldek Hebisch
03:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration James A. Morrison
03:09 Re: Question about ObjC++ state Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
02:52 Re: Question about ObjC++ state Mike Stump
02:52 Re: Pascal front-end integration Andrew Pinski
02:46 Re: Pascal front-end integration Marcin Dalecki
02:38 Fortran libs. Marcin Dalecki
02:36 Re: Pascal front-end integration Andrew Pinski
02:29 Re: Pascal front-end integration Marcin Dalecki
02:23 Re: Pascal front-end integration Ed Smith-Rowland
02:20 Re: about gcc -XLinker -M Mike Stump
02:18 Re: Extension compatibility policy Joseph S. Myers
02:17 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd) Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
02:09 Re: hacking frameworks for linux Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
02:07 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd) Mike Stump
02:04 Re: hacking frameworks for linux Mike Stump
01:45 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:13 Re: Extension compatibility policy Paul Schlie
00:59 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question Andrew Pinski
00:55 matching constraints in asm operands question Peter Barada
00:22 Re: Extension compatibility policy Joseph S. Myers
00:20 Re: Different sized data and code pointers Paul Schlie
00:06 Re: Extension compatibility policy Bernardo Innocenti

March 01, 2005
23:47 Re: Pascal front-end integration James A. Morrison
23:40 Re: Pascal front-end integration Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: Pascal front-end integration Mark Mitchell
23:16 Re: Pascal front-end integration E. Weddington
23:00 Re: Pascal front-end integration Mark Mitchell
22:59 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format Daniel Berlin
22:55 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call Mark Mitchell
22:21 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format Joseph S. Myers
22:13 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Benjamin Redelings I
22:02 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format Daniel Berlin
21:36 Re: testsuite execution question Daniel Jacobowitz
21:00 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format Joseph S. Myers
20:52 re: cross compiling Daniel Kegel
20:40 SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format Daniel Berlin
19:42 Re: Question regarding c++ constructors Mike Stump
19:25 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Mark Mitchell
19:12 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Caroline Tice
19:09 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Diego Novillo
19:05 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
18:59 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Janis Johnson
18:44 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
18:30 Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) Geoffrey Keating
18:29 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Andrew Pinski
18:29 Re: testsuite execution question Janis Johnson
18:25 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Janis Johnson
18:05 Re: Identifying rule responsible for lookahead Henrik Sorensen
18:00 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
15:49 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
15:46 Re: 3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility? Paolo Carlini
15:44 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Richard Earnshaw
15:41 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Paul Brook
15:35 3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility? Steve Snyder
15:30 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Petko Manolov
15:14 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
14:27 Re: Different sized data and code pointers E. Weddington
14:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration James A. Morrison
13:47 Re: Pascal front-end integration Prof A Olowofoyeku (The Africa
13:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
13:39 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Paul Brook
13:31 Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) Steven Bosscher
13:30 Re: Pascal front-end integration Steven Bosscher
13:29 Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge) Richard Guenther
13:28 Re: Pascal front-end integration Steven Bosscher
13:20 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Dave Korn
13:18 Pascal front-end integration James A. Morrison
13:11 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
12:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
12:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
12:36 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
12:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
11:26 Different sized data and code pointers Thomas Gill
11:02 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Richard Earnshaw
10:55 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Vladimir Ivanov
10:42 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Richard Earnshaw
10:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Richard Earnshaw
10:25 <A> at web: /install/specific.html Alec Voropay
10:10 Re: GIV optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
10:02 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
07:21 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Eric Botcazou
06:54 cross compiling vivek sukumaran
06:52 gnattools folder and GCC snapshots Ranjit Mathew
03:09 Re: GIV optimizations Andrew Pinski
03:04 Re: GIV optimizations Canqun Yang
01:49 RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\)
01:45 Re: testsuite execution question Daniel Jacobowitz
01:38 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
01:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
01:21 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Gabriel Dos Reis
01:04 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
01:02 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Giovanni Bajo
00:38 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
00:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
00:30 Re: Apologies to Mark Mark Mitchell
00:27 RE: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
00:22 Re: testsuite execution question Steve Kargl
00:15 Apologies to Mark Nathanael Nerode
00:14 Re: testsuite execution question Janis Johnson
00:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Steven Bosscher

February 28, 2005
23:59 Re: testsuite execution question Janis Johnson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3