This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Major regression on mainline
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:24:58 -0800, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> Bad news. The problem is still present in HEAD, ie., source from
> 3 hours ago. Even worse news is cutting down the BLAS test
> program can be a chore. I'll see what I can do.
>
> To be clear, gfortran works fine with -D '2005-02-12 22:30' sources,
> which excludes the above commit. The -D '2005-02-12 22:45' sources
> include the above commit and gfortran has a serious regression. You
> reverted the entire commit, then re-applied what portion of the
> commit? ChangeLog does not reflect any of these manipulations
> with any kind of accurate date.
Yes, I just added a [reverted temporarily] note to the ChangeLog entry. I
reapplied the portion marked c++/16405, which doesn't have the [reverted]
note on it.
I suspect that the problem is that the transformations fold_indirect_ref_1
is doing on arrays don't mix well with how fortran handles arrays. Could
someone familiar with the fortran frontend take a look at that function?
Jason