This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).)

Vladius wrote:

It is not professionally made. It looks like a vector package test, but not as a final result. I don't say it is very bad, but it is not good, I'm quite sure.
New logo meets those, I think. 

I strongly agree with the sentiment that the proposed new "logo" is
quite unsuitable. It is indeed more like work of art, than a logo,
and I find it quite unsuitable. I really don't see what objective
is being attempted.

As is, without going through that discussion in advance, I think there is zero change that your pictures will be accepted as a new logo.


I hope You are wrong. 

He is absolutely right, you seem to regard a logo as a piece of
art. It is not, it is a commercial/social/political/advertising
symbol :-) And you have to decide what you are trying to achieve.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]