This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: "Sam Lauber" <sam124 at operamail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:28:07 -0500
Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
References: <20050107012552.DE4E23982EF@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com>

On Jan 6, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Sam Lauber wrote:

In my opinion, new-ra has gotten so bad because no one has
bothered to try it or debug it. -fnew-ra on nontrival code
in 3.4.3 works perfectly well! One of the points of the
development model gcc and many other free software packages
use is everyone is encouraged to try it, break it, debug it,
and fix it.


Well nobody wants to update which is why it got bit rotten like
most other source which gets bit rotten.
If you want to debug it and fix it, go ahead but nobody else
wanted to do it.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Sam Lauber

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]