gcc archive
date index for January, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2005
23:45 Re: wordsize.h Jan Zizka
23:43 Re: optimisation question Joe Buck
23:25 MODES_TIEABLE_P issue. Forwarded test results for libc library routines. Björn Haase
22:33 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
22:15 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend Matt Austern
22:08 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend Gabriel Dos Reis
21:33 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL James E Wilson
21:22 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend Matt Austern
21:12 Re: g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend Matt Austern
21:06 g++: 'protected' member function cannot be declared friend Fariborz Jahanian
21:04 Re: Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO Paul Brook
20:54 Using HAVE_FOO_H and HAVE_FOO François-Xavier Coudert
20:09 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks Daniel Jacobowitz
20:06 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxWorks jf
19:30 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD... Marc Espie
19:16 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double Mark Mitchell
19:12 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD... Richard Henderson
19:02 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Jonathan Wakely
18:48 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD... Marc Espie
18:38 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double Mark Mitchell
18:29 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Jonathan Wakely
18:25 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Fariborz Jahanian
18:21 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Matt Austern
18:16 Re: g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializerto a double Mark Mitchell
17:43 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
17:34 g++4.0 diagnostic on casting a static const member initializer to a double Fariborz Jahanian
17:24 Re: exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD... Richard Henderson
16:52 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Ian Lance Taylor
16:26 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Marc Espie
16:07 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Florian Weimer
16:06 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed? Ian Lance Taylor
15:57 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Marc Espie
15:42 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Florian Weimer
15:13 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Paolo Bonzini
15:12 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Marc Espie
15:11 wordsize.h James Tung
14:55 Re: assembler generated code Karel Gardas
14:48 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Paolo Bonzini
14:37 PATCH: get PCH to fail reliably on OpenBSD Marc Espie
14:34 Re: optimisation question Chris Jefferson
14:27 optimisation question Remy X.O. Martin
13:44 Re: OpenBSD pch, take 2 Gunther Nikl
13:27 exceptions on sparc64 OpenBSD... Marc Espie
13:24 assembler generated code san bangalore
12:16 OpenBSD pch, take 2 Marc Espie
10:15 Re: New option? Paolo Bonzini
09:54 Re: Bootstrap broken because of warning Martin Reinecke
09:49 Bootstrap broken because of warning Martin Reinecke
09:20 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed? Øyvind Harboe
08:56 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050127) on MICO sources Karel Gardas
08:46 tree-ssa-dom.c Bug or not? Marcin Dalecki
07:14 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase
05:03 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? Ian Lance Taylor
04:52 Re: Why is there no arg_pointer_needed? Ian Lance Taylor
03:40 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Mike Stump
03:24 Re: <netdb.h> Jan Zizka
01:38 <netdb.h> James Tung

January 30, 2005
23:32 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works Ben Elliston
20:22 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase
19:57 gcc-4.0-20050130 is now available gccadmin
18:46 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding? Ramana Radhakrishnan
17:09 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy
17:00 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy
16:32 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Andy Hutchinson
16:16 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase
07:09 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Eric Botcazou
06:23 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding? Paul Schlie
05:44 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identifiedfor setjump coding? Paul Schlie
05:05 Re: How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified for setjump coding? Ramana Radhakrishnan
04:54 How should -ffixed-@var{reg} global registers be identified forsetjump coding? Paul Schlie
03:02 Sorry my website was down! Want something for Free? OK it
01:59 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Gabriel Dos Reis
01:23 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
01:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? Sam Lauber
00:28 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
00:24 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? James A. Morrison

January 29, 2005
23:34 Re: template_decl's Stefan Strasser
23:20 Re: -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? Falk Hueffner
23:08 -march prescott: GENERAL_REGS error; but -msseX Ok ? sean darcy
20:48 Why is there no arg_pointer_needed? Øyvind Harboe
18:28 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Andy Hutchinson
15:55 template_decl's Stefan Strasser
15:45 Re: MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no Björn Haase
13:44 Status of PR19300? Christian Joensson
02:02 New option? Sam Lauber
01:31 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen
01:15 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle
00:52 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen

January 28, 2005
23:52 gcc-3.4-20050128 is now available gccadmin
23:43 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen
23:39 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL James E Wilson
23:38 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
22:24 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Øyvind Harboe
21:59 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
21:54 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Mike Stump
21:50 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Richard Henderson
21:50 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle
21:43 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
21:39 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Mike Stump
21:08 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Richard Henderson
20:59 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c Andrew MacLeod
20:57 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
20:44 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen
19:58 linear_search_fdes problem on linux Sanjiv Pandey
19:39 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Gabriel Dos Reis
19:15 Re: TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Devang Patel
19:01 TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of arrays of qualified type Joseph S. Myers
18:36 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
18:09 new mirror Mr david deng
17:00 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
16:23 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
16:10 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers
16:10 Re: typeof throws away the reference Gabriel Dos Reis
16:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference Gabriel Dos Reis
15:54 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
15:31 Re: Continuing GCCNews Daniel Berlin
15:16 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo
15:15 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Remy X.O. Martin
15:07 Re: typeof throws away the reference Andrew Pinski
15:06 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo
15:04 Re: typeof throws away the reference Giovanni Bajo
14:58 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Remy X.O. Martin
14:48 typeof throws away the reference Jari Petter Sundell
13:54 Failures in gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c execution on i686 Uros Bizjak
13:53 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Jonathan Wilson
13:27 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers
12:18 Re: Building Supergraph (at call graph level) Steven Bosscher
12:04 Building Supergraph (at call graph level) Virender Kashyap
10:52 Re: Continuing GCCNews Giovanni Bajo
08:46 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help Olivier Hainque
08:44 Re: Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help Olivier Hainque
08:38 Re: [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Steven Bosscher
08:12 [PATCH]: Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Uros Bizjak
08:05 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Øyvind Harboe
07:07 doubts in adding new instruction aram bharathi
05:54 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Miles Bader
05:50 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Andi Kleen
05:49 Re: Continuing GCCNews rd flowers
05:32 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
05:09 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Stan Shebs
04:34 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Dale Johannesen
04:22 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Matt Austern
03:27 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Alexander Strange
03:18 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Stan Shebs
02:27 Bootstrap broken on x86-64 Diego Novillo
00:43 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Richard Henderson
00:42 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Andrew Pinski
00:21 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen
00:04 Re: RFC: PR 19650 Roger Sayle

January 27, 2005
23:24 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
23:20 RFC: PR 19650 Dale Johannesen
22:55 Re: link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge Ian Lance Taylor
22:21 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Mike Stump
22:18 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Mike Stump
22:05 Re: Any issue with anon CVS? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
22:04 Re: Any issue with anon CVS? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:55 link problem: BFD: Warning: Writing section `.text' to huge Virgil Anuichi
21:55 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Andrew Pinski
21:47 Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Remy X.O. Martin
21:46 Solaris Users: pthread mutex initializer help Bruce Korb
21:41 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc3.4.x Remy X.O. Martin
21:19 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marc Espie
20:48 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c Daniel Berlin
20:41 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Mike Stump
20:15 Re: mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c Jeffrey A Law
18:08 Re: Any issue with anon CVS? Karel Gardas
17:53 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Alfred M. Szmidt
17:39 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Marcin Dalecki
17:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Marcin Dalecki
17:03 Any issue with anon CVS? Karel Gardas
16:47 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
16:37 Re: Continuing GCCNews E. Weddington
16:24 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Uros Bizjak
16:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Alfred M. Szmidt
15:41 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Tommy Vercetti
15:40 Continuing GCCNews R. D. Flowers
15:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Dan Kegel
15:20 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
13:17 Re: -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles Uros Bizjak
12:44 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC Kazu Hirata
11:36 -mfpmath=sse -mno-80387 troubles tbp
11:31 Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Joseph S. Myers
11:20 Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators Miles Bader
09:56 Re: meaning of floating-point comparison operators Richard Earnshaw
09:01 meaning of floating-point comparison operators Miles Bader
08:39 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Rene Rebe
07:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Jakub Jelinek
07:12 setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite Øyvind Harboe
04:29 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
04:22 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC John David Anglin
04:06 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Marcin Dalecki
04:03 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use James E Wilson
03:51 Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler? James E Wilson
02:11 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Ian Lance Taylor
02:10 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Dan Kegel
01:02 MODES_TIEABLE_P yes or no HutchinsonAndy
00:19 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

January 26, 2005
23:52 Re: float returned in xmm0 Steven Bosscher
23:47 gcc-3.3-20050126 is now available gccadmin
23:40 float returned in xmm0 Maurizio Monge
23:17 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Jakub Jelinek
22:27 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Randy.Dunlap
22:22 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Joe Buck
22:21 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Alfred M. Szmidt
22:01 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
21:58 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
21:56 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Alfred M. Szmidt
21:54 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Joe Buck
21:23 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
20:08 mark_operand_necessary in tree-ssa-dce.c Daniel Berlin
19:48 Re: how to pack data using gcc compiler? Ian Lance Taylor
19:44 how to pack data using gcc compiler? Michael Sung
19:42 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn James E Wilson
19:21 Re: make header flag James E Wilson
18:27 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC Jeffrey A Law
18:26 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
18:17 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Richard Henderson
18:05 Re: define_constants and tm.h Zack Weinberg
17:23 Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!? Daniel Berlin
17:22 Re: Bugzilla misbehaving?!? Frank Ch. Eigler
17:17 Bugzilla misbehaving?!? Paolo Carlini
16:34 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Alfred M. Szmidt
16:30 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC Kazu Hirata
16:29 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
16:22 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
16:12 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
16:02 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Marcin Dalecki
16:01 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
16:00 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Andrew Pinski
15:56 Re: A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC John David Anglin
15:53 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
15:48 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
15:48 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
14:59 [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Ted Teah via RT
14:54 A question about fold_rtx when it attempts to fold PC Kazu Hirata
14:27 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
14:21 define_constants and tm.h Bernd Jendrissek
14:05 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use Paolo Bonzini
11:38 PUSH and POP next to first/last register use Sami Khawam
11:02 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Jonathan Wakely
09:18 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
08:58 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
08:44 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse? Uros Bizjak
07:14 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Marcus Meissner
06:47 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Dan Kegel
03:28 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Zack Weinberg
02:38 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
02:34 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
02:07 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Nicola Pero
02:04 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mark Mitchell
01:56 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mike Stump
01:54 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Richard Henderson
01:38 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard Kenner
01:32 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. 浅尾 忍
01:28 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Nicola Pero
01:17 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Andrew Pinski
01:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Steven Bosscher
01:14 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Nicola Pero
01:13 Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL Steve Ellcey
00:48 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Gregory John Casamento
00:32 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard Kenner
00:29 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them alwaysinto long data James E Wilson
00:17 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data Richard Henderson
00:12 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data Steve Ellcey
00:06 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Richard Henderson

January 25, 2005
23:40 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mike Stump
23:39 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Marcin Dalecki
23:33 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Robert Dewar
23:29 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Steven Bosscher
23:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
23:15 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Helge Hess
22:55 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Patrick McFarland
22:50 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Robert Dewar
22:38 Re: Building gcc Mike Stump
22:11 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
21:02 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
21:00 Re: GCC Wiki Gabriel Dos Reis
20:50 Re: PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them alwaysinto long data James E Wilson
20:49 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Benjamin Redelings
20:45 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
20:42 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Andrew Pinski
20:37 Fw: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:15 Re: GCC Wiki Daniel Berlin
20:07 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Ulrich Weigand
20:05 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Tom Tromey
20:04 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
20:00 Copyright assignment François-Xavier Coudert
19:45 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
19:39 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Pete French
19:39 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Anthony Juckel
19:35 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Tom Tromey
19:19 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse? Benjamin Redelings
19:15 Re: FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse? Paolo Bonzini
19:11 FP math builtins disabled with --fpmath=sse? Benjamin Redelings
19:11 Re: Stable gcc release E. Weddington
19:05 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
19:02 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
19:00 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
18:30 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Gabriel Dos Reis
18:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Stefan Strasser
18:18 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Andrew Pinski
18:08 Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Toon Moene
18:08 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
18:04 PR 7013 [IA64] redeclaring volatile objects forces them always into long data Steve Ellcey
18:03 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Helge Hess
18:02 Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Andrew Pinski
18:02 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 David Edelsohn
17:59 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function... Benjamin Redelings
17:54 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Chris Jefferson
17:44 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Steven Bosscher
17:24 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Helge Hess
17:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
17:12 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
17:07 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
17:07 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Joe Buck
17:02 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
16:58 Re: Aliasing not honouring const? Richard Guenther
16:43 GCC Wiki Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
16:36 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Steven Bosscher
16:24 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Helge Hess
16:21 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:18 Re: Missing release information of 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 releases Gabriel Dos Reis
16:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Helge Hess
16:12 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Andrew Pinski
16:05 Re: PING: gimplifier ICE fix / broken GCC 4.0 Helge Hess
16:02 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Jacobowitz
15:55 Aliasing not honouring const? Richard Guenther
15:43 Missing release information of 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 releases Tikkanen Tuomo (Nokia-NRC/Hels
15:41 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Richard Earnshaw
15:36 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Adrian Robert
15:35 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
15:34 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
15:30 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Robert Dewar
15:18 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Adrian Robert
15:16 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Gabriel Dos Reis
15:12 Re: [BENCHMARK] 3.4.4-pre Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Richard Guenther
15:04 [BENCHMARK] 3.4.4-pre Povray official benchmark scores for 387 andSSE insn sets Uros Bizjak
14:47 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
14:30 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mark Mitchell
14:22 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Robert Dewar
14:15 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Adrian Robert
13:46 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
13:06 libstdc++ compile problem in head F. Heitkamp
12:13 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Patrick McFarland
12:02 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Giovanni Bajo
10:14 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSEinsn sets Paolo Bonzini
09:22 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Jakub Jelinek
09:05 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
09:01 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Richard Henderson
08:55 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Richard Guenther
08:30 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Gerald Pfeifer
08:13 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Eric Botcazou
07:32 re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relativedynamic linking Dan Kegel
07:30 Re: Stable gcc release E. Weddington
07:24 Stable gcc release Amit Chordia
07:01 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Dan Kegel
05:58 make header flag Lucaz _
04:29 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Richard Kenner
04:19 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? James E Wilson
03:26 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mark Mitchell
03:24 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Richard Kenner
02:56 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? James E Wilson
02:50 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Zack Weinberg
02:49 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
02:47 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
02:15 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Alex Perez
01:53 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Joe Buck
01:40 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Tommy Vercetti
01:09 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
00:55 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Mark Mitchell
00:55 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
00:51 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Ulrich Weigand
00:29 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Daniel Jacobowitz
00:17 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
00:10 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
00:01 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko

January 24, 2005
23:52 Re: SSE scalar/float transition tbp
23:49 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Ulrich Weigand
23:43 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Richard Henderson
23:38 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Richard Henderson
23:24 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
23:20 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
23:20 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Dale Johannesen
23:10 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Richard Henderson
23:09 Re: SSE scalar/float transition Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Mike Frysinger
23:04 Re: [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insn sets Richard Henderson
22:56 Re: forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
22:49 Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Daniel Berlin
22:43 Objective-C bugs and GCC releases Gregory John Casamento
22:32 forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking Edward Peschko
22:32 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation Alan Modra
21:15 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Andreas Schwab
20:36 SSE scalar/float transition tbp
19:48 Re: RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation Ian Lance Taylor
19:11 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Dale Johannesen
18:29 Re: Building gcc Paul Brook
18:19 Building gcc Halldór Ísak Gylfasson
17:47 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
17:43 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
17:42 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Joe Buck
17:40 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Joe Buck
17:33 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joe Buck
17:29 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
17:27 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
17:25 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Joe Buck
17:21 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
17:07 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
17:05 Re: Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Paolo Carlini
16:59 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
16:58 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Geert Bosch
16:58 Wiki moved to gcc.gnu.org Daniel Berlin
16:57 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works Nix
16:54 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
16:50 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Andreas Schwab
16:44 [BENCHMARK] Povray official benchmark scores for 387 and SSE insnsets Uros Bizjak
16:35 Re: typeof and bitfields Olly Betts
16:32 Re:Incorrect C++ code or regression? Pierre Chatelier
16:23 Re: Incorrect C++ code or regression? Giovanni Bajo
16:16 Re: bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Geert Bosch
16:07 Incorrect C++ code or regression? Grumble
16:05 Re: -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:43 Re: ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b tm_gccmail
14:58 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
14:46 Re: PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Daniel Berlin
14:23 Away from email Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
14:23 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Andrew Pinski
14:20 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Daniel Jacobowitz
14:17 -mno-80387 / -mno-fp-ret-in-387 question Uros Bizjak
14:09 Re: What to do with the transparent_union attribute Andrew Pinski
14:08 What to do with the transparent_union attribute Steven Bosscher
13:54 Strange compiler error with g++ 3.3 Peter Cech
13:29 bundle boundaries in ia64 assembly output? Jan Beulich
13:03 PRE (sometimes) confuses ivopts/scev? Richard Guenther
12:04 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
11:56 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Mostafa Hagog
11:44 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Georg Bauhaus
02:55 Re: Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? J.T. Conklin
02:42 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Sam Lauber
02:38 Migrate to Autotest for testing framework? Sam Lauber
00:28 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc James A. Morrison
00:04 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joseph S. Myers

January 23, 2005
23:59 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Andrew Pinski
23:58 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Daniel Berlin
23:56 Re: wikidata dir added to htdocs Joseph S. Myers
23:44 wikidata dir added to htdocs Daniel Berlin
18:33 gcc-4.0-20050123 is now available gccadmin
18:27 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Mark Mitchell
15:34 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
15:34 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Robert Dewar
14:05 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Andreas Schwab
14:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21] Steven Bosscher
13:34 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Virender Kashyap
13:17 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc Tommy Vercetti
13:11 Re: can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc James A. Morrison
12:55 can't compile gcc head, this time on sparc Tommy Vercetti
12:42 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Clifford Wolf
04:43 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
04:34 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status Roger Sayle
02:07 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Richard Henderson
00:54 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy Martin
00:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Andrew Pinski
00:28 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy Martin
00:05 Re: postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ayal Zaks

January 22, 2005
23:30 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Richard Henderson
23:09 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Robert Dewar
22:43 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Jonathan Wakely
22:43 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Daniel Jensen
22:16 Re: GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58 GCC rejecting (I think) valid code Sam Lauber
21:36 Re: Gcc certification jf
18:51 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu
18:37 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Eric Botcazou
18:08 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Ulrich Weigand
17:44 Re: longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Andrew Pinski
17:41 longjmp()/setjmp() difference between gcc 3.3 (Apple) and gcc 3.4.x Remy X.O. Martin
17:38 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Andrew Pinski
17:36 Re: HELP (change in control flow desired) Daniel Berlin
17:35 Re: Ada failures due to -largs Eric Botcazou
17:35 HELP (change in control flow desired) Virender Kashyap
17:32 Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn Robert Baruch
13:21 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? Marc Espie
09:47 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Marc Espie
02:12 Re: pragma pack on hp-ux John David Anglin
01:56 Re: RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists Janis Johnson
01:54 Ada failures due to -largs Ulrich Weigand
01:33 RFC: Properly handle protected data symbol with copy relocation H. J. Lu
01:18 Re: Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
00:53 array of unknown bound handling Steven L. Zook
00:03 x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16byte struct Paul Schlie

January 21, 2005
23:48 gcc-3.4-20050121 is now available gccadmin
23:43 Deprecated -I-, any good replacement? Sam Ravnborg
23:20 Arguments for Obj-C++ in GCC 4.0 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
20:55 pragma pack on hp-ux Eric Frias
20:51 Re: Gcc certification Toon Moene
20:30 RFC: logical expression in test directive target lists Janis Johnson
20:04 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Mark Mitchell
19:47 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Andrew Pinski
19:38 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Mark Mitchell
18:23 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Paul Brook
18:10 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
18:04 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Jeffrey A Law
17:46 GCC 4.0 Status Report [2005-01-21] Mark Mitchell
17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
17:34 GCC-3.3.6 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:31 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Mark Mitchell
17:28 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Joe Buck
16:51 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
16:20 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Marcin Dalecki
16:16 Re: Bootstrap failure? Bruce Korb
15:04 Re: a question about fix-header.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:54 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Steven Bosscher
14:47 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Kelley Cook
10:52 Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Jakub Jelinek
10:51 Successful build of gcc 3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1. Raffaele Rubino
10:38 fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>? Richard Guenther
10:34 Re: a question about fix-header.c Kai Ruottu
08:25 Re: typeof and bitfields Nathan Sidwell
07:59 Re: Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Mark Mitchell
07:56 Obsolete/broken targets in 4.0.0 Eric Botcazou
06:45 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu
06:39 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Zack Weinberg
06:26 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? Ian Lance Taylor
06:15 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Andrew Pinski
06:06 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. 浅尾 忍
05:52 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu
05:46 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? Ian Lance Taylor
05:37 Re: Bootstrap failure? Eric Botcazou
05:18 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu
05:13 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Zack Weinberg
05:07 Re: RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? Ian Lance Taylor
04:57 RFC: Disallow protected data symbol with copy relocation? H. J. Lu
04:56 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. 浅尾 忍
04:26 Re: a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. Zack Weinberg
03:11 Bootstrap failure? Bruce Korb
02:16 a question about Linux target dependence on GNU compiler. 浅尾 忍
01:59 x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct Gary Funck
00:24 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Gabriel Dos Reis
00:15 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Diego Novillo
00:10 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Joe Buck
00:05 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Daniel Berlin
00:00 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Joe Buck

January 20, 2005
23:56 Re: bug in head, can't compile Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
23:47 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
23:46 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Steven Bosscher
23:44 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Diego Novillo
23:40 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Gabriel Dos Reis
23:35 bug in head, can't compile Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
23:29 Re: Gcc certification Joe Buck
23:05 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Daniel Berlin
23:01 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
22:50 Re: Gcc certification Joe Buck
22:48 Re: Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Joe Buck
22:43 Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080 Extremeliquidators.com
22:41 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
22:41 Computer to Plate - Digital - Mitsubishi Genesis DPX 5080 Extremeliquidators.com
21:40 Links between bugzilla and gccwiki Daniel Berlin
21:06 Re: Gcc certification jf
20:57 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
20:51 Re: Gcc certification jf
20:44 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
20:43 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
20:37 Re: Is mainline still in Stage 3? Ian Lance Taylor
20:25 Re: Gcc certification jf
20:19 Re: Gcc certification jf
20:18 Re: current mainline, port status Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17 Re: Gcc certification jf
20:13 Re: Gcc certification jf
19:59 archive of http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers/ Benjamin Kosnik
19:47 Re: a question about fix-header.c Daniel Berlin
19:41 Re: a question about fix-header.c Zack Weinberg
19:27 postreload-gcse heuristics broken? Ulrich Weigand
19:19 Re: Sign extension of const_int rtx Richard Henderson
19:12 Re: a question about fix-header.c Daniel Berlin
19:10 Re: a question about fix-header.c Zack Weinberg
19:04 Re: a question about fix-header.c Daniel Berlin
19:03 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Richard Henderson
18:56 Re: a question about fix-header.c Zack Weinberg
18:48 Re: a question about fix-header.c Daniel Berlin
18:46 Re: a question about fix-header.c Zack Weinberg
18:42 Re: a question about fix-header.c Zack Weinberg
18:38 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works Ted Sung
18:31 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Steve Ellcey
18:30 Re: a question about fix-header.c Bruce Korb
18:16 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Richard Henderson
18:14 Re: a question about fix-header.c Kenneth Zadeck
17:40 Re: a question about fix-header.c Kenneth Zadeck
17:29 Is mainline still in Stage 3? Peter Barada
17:26 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Steve Ellcey
17:21 Sign extension of const_int rtx Paul Brook
17:21 Re: a question about fix-header.c Bruce Korb
17:13 Re: a question about fix-header.c Bruce Korb
13:22 gcc-bugs ml archive [Thread-Prev] == [Date-Prev] Brian Inglis
11:39 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers Neil Booth
10:59 Successful build of gcc 3.4.3 Paul Hunt
08:14 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Ralf Wildenhues
04:42 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3 James E Wilson
04:16 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs Geert Bosch
03:53 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3 Edward Peschko
03:48 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs Richard Henderson
03:18 Re: 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3 Giovanni Bajo
02:45 3.4.3 unable to compile 2.95.3 Edward Peschko
02:22 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Joseph S. Myers
02:20 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs DJ Delorie
02:06 Re: cmov and movnti in gcc James E Wilson
01:56 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers Andrew Pinski
01:45 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers Matt Austern
01:43 Re: correct way to access gcc's own static libs? James E Wilson
01:42 Re: typedefs and elaborated type specifiers Mark Mitchell
01:36 Re: dynamic library version crashes but static version works James E Wilson
01:19 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs James E Wilson
00:23 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler David Edelsohn
00:20 typedefs and elaborated type specifiers Matt Austern
00:14 Re: IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Richard Henderson
00:13 gcc-3.3-20050119 is now available gccadmin

January 19, 2005
23:43 Re: Gcc certification Robert Dewar
21:44 Re: Gcc certification Joe Buck
21:32 Re: Gcc certification Janis Johnson
21:15 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Tobias Schlüter
21:15 Re: Gcc certification E. Weddington
20:51 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Toon Moene
20:41 Gcc certification jf
19:49 Re: Issues with gcc 3.4.2 Philipp Thomas
19:05 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley
18:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler David Edelsohn
18:23 Re: [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Diego Novillo
18:13 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley
17:48 Re: Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler David Edelsohn
17:47 IA64 alignment problem / how to fix? Steve Ellcey
17:26 Version 3.4.3: ix86-linux -> powerpc-aix4.2 Cross-Compiler Scott Dudley
15:56 Moving to bugzilla 2.19.2 sometime in the next few months Daniel Berlin
15:38 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Mark Mitchell
15:26 correct way to access gcc's own static libs? Jack Howarth
15:03 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Dave Korn
13:17 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
12:17 Re: cmov and movnti in gcc Tommy Vercetti
12:08 cmov and movnti in gcc Tommy Vercetti
09:21 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
09:10 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Zdenek Dvorak
09:04 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Ralf Wildenhues
08:21 [Gomp] Status of the gomp branch? Biagio Lucini
05:20 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
03:02 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Daniel Jacobowitz
01:59 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Mike Stump
00:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ulrich Weigand
00:35 Re: I have a problem, help me ... Ben Elliston
00:32 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Mark Mitchell
00:18 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner
00:16 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner
00:14 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner
00:08 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Toon Moene
00:06 RE: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Steven L. Zook
00:03 Re: cvs access problems Ian Lance Taylor

January 18, 2005
23:57 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Henderson
23:53 cvs access problems Bud Davis
23:50 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Chris Lattner
23:41 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Richard Henderson
23:32 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). James E Wilson
23:12 Re: Incorrect warning message? Denis Zaitsev
23:12 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gerald Pfeifer
23:05 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Ralf Wildenhues
23:05 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Steven Bosscher
23:04 Re: ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Diego Novillo
22:55 ivtmp problem in ACATS c85006e Richard Kenner
22:51 Re: I have a problem, help me ... Gerald Pfeifer
22:37 Re: precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Mike Stump
22:36 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
22:30 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Chris Lattner
22:28 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Richard Henderson
22:06 precompiled headers and -I- resp. iquote Ralf Wildenhues
22:03 Re: Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Mark Mitchell
21:39 dynamic library version crashes but static version works Ted Sung
21:37 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Chris Lattner
21:35 Re: No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support? James E Wilson
21:24 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). James E Wilson
21:15 Anonymous structs with duplicate members within unions Steven L. Zook
21:07 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Robert Dewar
20:39 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Marc Espie
20:38 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Henderson
20:09 Floating point problems (accuracy). Phil Prentice
20:06 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Eljay Love-Jensen
20:01 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Andrew Pinski
20:00 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
19:57 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Mark Mitchell
19:57 Re: PCH relocation ? Mark Mitchell
19:55 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Mark Mitchell
19:54 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
19:52 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Joe Hughes
19:52 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Giovanni Bajo
19:51 Re: PCH relocation ? Richard Guenther
19:47 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Mark Mitchell
19:44 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Richard Henderson
19:39 Re: PCH relocation ? Mark Mitchell
19:27 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
19:15 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Joe Buck
19:08 Re: typeof and bitfields Matt Austern
18:54 Re: typeof and bitfields Tom Tromey
18:53 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
18:43 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
18:42 RE: typeof and bitfields Dave Korn
18:31 Re: trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Zack Weinberg
18:29 Re: typeof and bitfields Mark Mitchell
18:07 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
18:05 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
17:28 Re: typeof and bitfields Mark Mitchell
17:18 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
17:12 Re: typeof and bitfields Andreas Schwab
17:04 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
16:40 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Jonathan Wakely
16:27 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
16:23 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
16:19 Re: openssl speed tests Giovanni Bajo
16:02 openssl speed tests Tommy Vercetti
16:01 Re: typeof and bitfields Andreas Schwab
15:56 Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block. Diego Novillo
15:55 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ulrich Weigand
15:52 Re: Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block. Zdenek Dvorak
15:25 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Giovanni Bajo
15:25 Questions about tree-cfg.c:remove_forwarder_block. Kazu Hirata
15:20 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot Michael Cieslinski
15:03 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
14:44 Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl] Alexandre Oliva
14:33 Re: [Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634' Andrew Pinski
14:27 Re: openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] Tommy Vercetti
14:01 [Ada] Can't bootstrap gcc cvs 20050118 on i686-cygwin: ada/exp_ch2.adb:722: undefined reference to `_exp_ch2__expand_current_value__in_appropriate_scope.634' Christian Joensson
12:52 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
12:50 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
12:42 Re: [dj@redhat.com: ./ diff Makefile.def Makefile.in Makefile.tpl] Kelley Cook
11:57 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
11:22 trampolines: __disable_execute_stack ? Marc Espie
09:59 No .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support? Dr. Franz Fehringer
09:30 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
08:34 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Olivier Hainque
08:28 Re: typeof and bitfields Mark Mitchell
07:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marcin Dalecki
07:51 I have a problem, help me ... labam at rambler dot ru labam
06:37 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Kevin Puetz
06:20 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
05:45 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marcin Dalecki
05:00 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
04:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
03:36 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marcin Dalecki
03:35 RE: a treelang question about printf. Der-Johng Sun
03:33 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marcin Dalecki
03:14 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Marcin Dalecki
02:39 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
01:08 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
01:00 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
00:26 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Mike Stump
00:15 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Joseph S. Myers

January 17, 2005
23:41 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
23:24 Re: PCH relocation ? Marc Espie
23:21 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
23:15 Re: Issues with gcc 3.4.2 Neil Booth
22:51 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Georg Bauhaus
22:51 Re: PCH relocation ? Geoffrey Keating
22:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Georg Bauhaus
22:31 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
22:22 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Andreas Schwab
22:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
22:10 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
22:08 computation_cost too blind to hard regs DJ Delorie
22:06 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
22:05 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
22:05 Issues with gcc 3.4.2 Schouten, Frits JF
22:03 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Florian Weimer
21:58 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Georg Bauhaus
21:58 PCH relocation ? Marc Espie
21:45 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
21:13 It's On. Toon Moene
21:06 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Georg Bauhaus
20:28 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Florian Weimer
20:18 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? James E Wilson
20:14 Re: SPE configuration in GCC E. Weddington
20:02 Re: typeof and bitfields Ian Lance Taylor
19:59 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Stan Shebs
19:53 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
19:44 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
19:38 Re: typeof and bitfields Alexandre Oliva
19:35 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
19:31 Re: SPE configuration in GCC David Edelsohn
19:22 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
19:22 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot Jeffrey A Law
19:20 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
19:14 Re: New GCC logotype development. Alexandre Oliva
19:13 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
19:09 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
19:01 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
19:01 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Diego Novillo
18:59 Re: SPE configuration in GCC David Edelsohn
18:51 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? Robert Dewar
18:49 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? Robert Dewar
18:46 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Aldy Hernandez
18:44 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
18:32 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness Alexandre Oliva
18:28 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Jeffrey A Law
18:21 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Tom Tromey
18:14 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Daniel Berlin
18:09 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Tom Tromey
18:05 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Ian Lance Taylor
18:01 Re: are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Tom Tromey
17:51 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Christoph Hellwig
17:46 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
17:44 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Giovanni Bajo
17:36 Re: SPE configuration in GCC David Edelsohn
17:24 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
17:24 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Paul Brook
17:16 Re: SPE configuration in GCC David Edelsohn
17:15 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Andrew Pinski
17:09 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
17:08 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Kumar Gala
17:06 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Paul Koning
17:04 Re: SPE configuration in GCC Aldy Hernandez
17:02 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Joe Buck
17:00 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Joe Buck
16:54 SPE configuration in GCC Mark Mitchell
16:49 Re: Incorrect warning message? Joe Buck
16:44 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
16:22 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Andrew Pinski
15:48 are malloc/new calls annotated if they may return NULL? Diego Novillo
15:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
14:57 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
14:31 Re: a treelang question about printf. James A. Morrison
13:32 Re: C++ lexical analysis rework Marc Espie
12:34 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
12:26 a treelang question about printf. Der-Johng Sun
12:25 Re: -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
12:25 Implementation of exceptions Halldór Ísak Gylfasson
11:16 -funswitch-loops not effective? Richard Guenther
07:25 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions? Steven Bosscher
06:09 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions? Lin Gu
03:16 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
02:45 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Ian Lance Taylor
02:36 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
02:30 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Ian Lance Taylor
02:20 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis
01:08 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Ian Lance Taylor
01:06 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
00:32 Re: openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] James A. Morrison
00:23 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gabriel Dos Reis

January 16, 2005
21:29 Re: Status of 3.3.5 release and 3.3 branch Gerald Pfeifer
21:16 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
21:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ulrich Weigand
20:43 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Joseph S. Myers
20:34 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
20:32 Re: typeof and bitfields Joseph S. Myers
19:52 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Joseph S. Myers
19:37 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Falk Hueffner
18:09 gcc-4.0-20050116 is now available gccadmin
16:54 cross gnat tools on head question Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Marc Espie
04:22 Re: How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation? Andrew Pinski
04:18 How to obtain info about `-ffixed-reg' at a compilation? Dmitry K.
03:14 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
03:05 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Tom Tromey
02:48 Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body (SYM:01012470573105447031) Administrator
00:10 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Zack Weinberg

January 15, 2005
23:44 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? jlh
23:19 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:59 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] Tommy Vercetti
22:49 openssl crashes when compiled with 4.0 [was Re: can't compile 4.0 here] Tommy Vercetti
22:32 Re: Incorrect warning message? Denis Zaitsev
22:07 Re: can't compile 4.0 here Andrew Pinski
22:05 Re: Incorrect warning message? Andreas Schwab
22:04 can't compile 4.0 here Tommy Vercetti
21:41 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Denis Zaitsev
21:29 Re: Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Dale Johannesen
21:22 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
21:22 Are string literals _always_ allocated in the RO section? Denis Zaitsev
21:08 Incorrect warning message? Denis Zaitsev
17:02 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Andrew Pinski
15:21 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh
15:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh
14:58 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam
14:42 Re: how to add new instruction Ian Lance Taylor
14:12 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Robert Dewar
13:36 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me? jlh
13:27 Re: The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c" jlh
13:24 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs? Luca Benini
12:38 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Eric Botcazou
12:36 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Marc Espie
12:26 Re: Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Geert Bosch
12:10 The meaning of number in output of "gcc -E mycode.c" gan_xiao_jun
11:38 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
09:58 Re: does gcc remember register values through into functions? Marcel Cox
06:41 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Tom Tromey
05:26 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
04:53 Re: how to add new instruction apollo
04:47 Re: make install fails? Daniel Jacobowitz
04:28 does gcc remember register values through into functions? Lin Gu
03:52 Re: make install fails? Sam Lauber
03:39 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam
03:09 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Nick NoSpam
01:56 Re: how to add new instruction James E Wilson
01:53 Re: Test failure, documentation bugs? James E Wilson
01:48 Re: GCC 3.4.4 ? Andrew Pinski
01:20 GCC 3.4.4 ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier
01:06 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery
00:32 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery

January 14, 2005
23:47 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Gabriel Dos Reis
23:40 gcc-3.4-20050114 is now available gccadmin
23:27 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Christopher Faylor
22:40 RE:: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 ctmb1mf
22:09 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery
21:49 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report) H. J. Lu
21:34 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? James E Wilson
20:33 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:28 RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 ctmb1mf
20:25 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Toon Moene
19:43 RE: typeof and bitfields Dave Korn
19:41 RE: typeof and bitfields Dave Korn
19:21 RE: typeof and bitfields Andrew Haley
19:21 RE: typeof and bitfields Andrew Haley
18:27 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
17:19 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdumpbug-report) E. Weddington
16:50 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
16:45 RE: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
16:36 Re: typeof and bitfields Andreas Schwab
16:11 Re: typeof and bitfields Ian Lance Taylor
16:11 RE: \bintuils and gcc system requirements Dave Korn
16:00 RE: typeof and bitfields Dave Korn
15:48 Re: valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug Robert Dewar
15:33 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
14:54 Re: Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Ian Lance Taylor
13:38 Re: \bintuils and gcc system requirements Andrew Pinski
13:32 \bintuils and gcc system requirements kslindee
12:08 gcc 3.4.3 installed succefully on Debian 3.0 i586-pc-linux-gnu linux-2.4.27 libc6-2.2.5 cp
11:47 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Mircea Namolaru
11:44 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
10:26 Optimization/clarity coding : what is gcc able to do for me ? Pierre Chatelier
10:23 Re: typeof and bitfields Andreas Schwab
10:14 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays? Paul Brook
09:17 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays? Richard Guenther
07:32 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report) Bernd Jendrissek
06:31 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
06:11 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report) Allan B. Cruse
04:27 Re: how to add new instruction apollo
04:16 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
04:05 Re: typeof and bitfields Matt Austern
03:21 Re: how to add new instruction Ian Lance Taylor
03:03 Re: typeof and bitfields Ian Lance Taylor
02:46 Re: typeof and bitfields Neil Booth
02:12 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
01:35 Re: [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays? James E Wilson
01:35 Re: typeof and bitfields Paul Schlie
01:33 Re: typeof and bitfields Matt Austern
00:59 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report) Alan Modra
00:50 Re: typeof and bitfields Gabriel Dos Reis
00:37 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Alan Modra
00:27 Re: PATCH: Fix i386 disassembler with index == 0x4 in SIB (Re: objdump bug-report) H. J. Lu
00:19 Re: typeof and bitfields Andrew Pinski
00:17 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Alan Modra
00:15 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Thorsten Glaser
00:13 Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit tbp
00:13 Re: typeof and bitfields Matt Austern
00:04 Re: sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit Richard Henderson

January 13, 2005
23:59 Re: typeof and bitfields Andrew Pinski
23:56 typeof and bitfields Matt Austern
23:51 sse min/max argument re-ordering post i386 sse pattern audit tbp
23:06 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Paolo Carlini
23:02 Re: Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Gabriel Dos Reis
22:48 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 H. J. Lu
22:41 Blacklisted from the libstdc++ list :-( Paolo Carlini
22:09 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:32 how to add new instruction apollo
21:24 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? James E Wilson
21:17 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius
21:09 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson
21:06 Re: Will someone answear me? Gerald Pfeifer
20:33 Re: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Allan B. Cruse
19:35 Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 H. J. Lu
19:33 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
19:24 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
19:11 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
18:44 NEW YEAR BONAZA PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT. checkpoint_05lottery
18:29 valgrind shows ada/i-cobol.adb real bug Laurent GUERBY
18:18 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning
18:17 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Ian Lance Taylor
18:00 Re: Stack Frame Problem Joe Buck
17:58 Winning Notification checkpoint_05lottery
17:37 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning
17:19 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only onefrom multi-lib configuration. Ralf Corsepius
17:14 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Eric Botcazou
16:52 Re: [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one from multi-lib configuration. Ian Lance Taylor
16:42 [crosscompiling] howto configure libstdc++ to build only one frommulti-lib configuration. Karel Gardas
16:41 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Duncan Sands
16:20 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Geert Bosch
15:28 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
15:17 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
15:16 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Bradley Lucier
15:03 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
14:49 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Mircea Namolaru
14:33 Re: Stack Frame Problem Ian Lance Taylor
12:38 GraphViz is now free software Florian Weimer
12:28 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Richard Earnshaw
10:39 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Marc Espie
09:14 Stack Frame Problem Peter Bühler
08:35 Re: make install fails? Paolo Bonzini
08:22 make install fails? Uros Bizjak
07:40 Re: mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Eric Botcazou
07:37 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
06:42 Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 huangzb_np
06:20 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness Ranjit Mathew
05:11 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics tbp
05:04 Re: _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics Andrew Pinski
05:02 _mm_cast*, icc8.1 new intrinsics tbp
04:45 Re: About support for architecture: Andrew Pinski
04:42 About support for architecture: siddharth godbole
00:53 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
00:46 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Geoffrey Keating
00:10 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT Richard Henderson
00:00 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson

January 12, 2005
23:54 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Duncan Sands
23:42 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Olly Betts
23:41 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Ian Lance Taylor
23:30 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning
23:24 gcc-3.3-20050112 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: Linking static and dynamic libraries Ben Elliston
23:21 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:11 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson
22:27 Re: "make bubblestrap" weirdness Kelley Cook
22:21 mail-report-with-warnings.log has 0 bytes Bradley Lucier
21:47 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Matt Austern
21:20 I think I understood what You want.(Was:Re: New logo gone vectorised.(SVG format)) Vladius
20:44 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
20:23 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:21 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
19:58 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT James A. Morrison
19:47 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
19:33 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
19:32 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson
19:27 Re: Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT Steve Kargl
19:25 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
18:43 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
18:39 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
18:39 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
18:34 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions David Edelsohn
18:32 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Thorsten Glaser
18:31 Test failure, documentation bugs? Luca Benini
18:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
18:23 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
18:21 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions David Edelsohn
18:18 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
18:18 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
18:08 Linking static and dynamic libraries Roman Pagac
18:07 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
17:53 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
17:42 "make bubblestrap" weirdness Kelley Cook
17:15 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
16:55 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
15:59 Vague answer "better" rd flowers
15:58 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Vladius
15:43 Re: New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Ian Lance Taylor
15:30 comment / code incosistency in cfgcleanup.c:flow_find_cross_jump Joern RENNECKE
14:32 New logo gone vectorised. (SVG format) Vladius
13:27 Fortran, complex types, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT James Morrison
12:45 Re: New GCC logotype development. Robert Dewar
12:02 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
11:59 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
11:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. Florian Weimer
11:46 Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32 Ranjit Mathew
11:35 "make bubblestrap" weirdness Ranjit Mathew
10:54 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Duncan Sands
10:36 ACATS tests that fail valgrind - differences between pre-ssa and current Duncan Sands
10:20 ACATS tests that fail valgrind check - pre-ssa baseline Duncan Sands
10:16 Re: ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Arnaud Charlet
10:10 ACATS tests that fail valgrind check Duncan Sands
09:50 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson
09:20 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
09:10 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson
08:56 Re: new-new-ra thoughts Eric Botcazou
08:09 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Paolo Bonzini
08:06 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
07:14 Re: OpenGL works! Was: Re: GCJ and OpenGL under Win32 Ranjit Mathew
02:55 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars James E Wilson
01:55 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Neil Booth
01:32 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Robert Dewar
01:15 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
01:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) James A. Morrison
01:12 Re: ChangeLog rotated Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:10 Re: ChangeLog rotated Ian Lance Taylor
00:31 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars DJ Delorie
00:21 Re: new-new-ra thoughts James E Wilson
00:18 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Neil Booth

January 11, 2005
23:47 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
23:21 Re: ChangeLog rotated Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:05 Re: Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot James E Wilson
22:52 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars James E Wilson
22:06 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Luca Benini
21:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
21:44 Re: ChangeLog rotated Ian Lance Taylor
21:42 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Ian Lance Taylor
21:37 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
21:31 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Richard Kenner
21:30 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Robert Dewar
21:29 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Robert Dewar
21:19 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:09 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
21:03 Re: [Ada] testsuite failures on sparc-linux: Feedback? Laurent GUERBY
21:00 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Andrew Pinski
20:58 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
20:57 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
20:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Matt Austern
20:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
20:47 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
20:40 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Matt Austern
20:39 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Joern RENNECKE
20:29 Re: GCC development for microcontrollers E. Weddington
20:06 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotypeversion1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
20:05 GCC development for microcontrollers Fco. Javier Rodríguez G.
19:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
19:38 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
19:20 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Andrew Pinski
19:15 Re: ChangeLog rotated Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:14 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Luca Benini
19:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
18:59 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Joe Buck
18:48 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
18:40 Re: need for instruction attributes (ia64) Richard Henderson
18:01 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Tristan Wibberley
17:49 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Richard Earnshaw
17:00 Re: Builtin argument type conversion and ftrapv-2.c failure Eric Botcazou
16:31 Builtin argument type conversion and ftrapv-2.c failure Ulrich Weigand
16:23 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Ian Lance Taylor
16:20 Re: ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
16:04 Re: Aw: Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Daniel Brockman
15:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
15:13 Re: ACATS c380004 ed schonberg
15:03 New GCC logo (EGCS) smaller version for ml. Vladius
14:57 Re: Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Paul Koning
14:52 need for instruction attributes (ia64) Jan Beulich
14:42 Re: ACATS c380004 Robert Dewar
14:39 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Robert Dewar
14:30 Re: ACATS c380004 Richard Kenner
14:30 Re: Will someone answear me? Robert Dewar
14:28 Query on UTF-32 encodings for letters Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
14:24 Re: ACATS c380004 Robert Dewar
14:10 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius
13:42 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch hartmut . schirmer
13:42 Re: ACATS c380004 ed schonberg
13:40 Re: Will someone answear me? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:38 Re: Will someone answear me? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:21 Re: ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
12:55 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Paolo Bonzini
12:51 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
12:41 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Paolo Bonzini
12:37 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
12:34 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius
12:28 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius
12:27 Ada broken in 4.0-20050109 ? Marc Espie
12:20 Re: Will someone answear me? Vladius
12:02 [Ada] testsuite failures on sparc-linux: Feedback? Christian Joensson
08:20 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Paolo Bonzini
07:15 Re: GCC for OS/2 Dave Parsons
06:08 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars Richard Henderson
06:05 Re: How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Richard Henderson
05:49 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Daniel Brockman
05:46 Re: Will someone answear me? Joe Buck
05:40 Re: enumeration value ... not handled in switch Daniel Brockman
05:33 Re: Varasm.c change. Alan Modra
05:16 Re: Varasm.c change. Richard Henderson
05:06 Re: Will someone answear me? Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:31 Re: Will someone answear me? Per Bothner
04:07 Re: Varasm.c change. Alan Modra
00:25 Re: Varasm.c change. Eric Christopher

January 10, 2005
23:42 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
23:40 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars DJ Delorie
23:20 RFD: apply_change_group variant that doesn't apply changes Joern RENNECKE
22:32 Re: suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars Joe Buck
22:14 Re: Varasm.c change. Toon Moene
21:51 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Kai Henningsen
21:51 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Kai Henningsen
21:50 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:56 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Matt Austern
20:38 Re: ACATS c380004 Richard Kenner
20:36 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Matt Austern
20:30 suggestion for projects page: sort frame vars DJ Delorie
20:18 Re: ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
20:12 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Robert Dewar
19:32 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Joe Buck
19:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Mike Stump
19:15 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
18:52 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Luca Benini
18:47 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Thorsten Glaser
16:59 Re: New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
16:55 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Robert Dewar
16:42 New GCC logotype development. (Was:Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6(Sorry, I forgot to attach the image).) Vladius
16:19 Re: Still fldl/fstpl use with fpmath=sse? Uros Bizjak
16:02 Varasm.c change. Toon Moene
16:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Michael Veksler
15:55 How to handle subreg(mem(X)) after reload? Robert Baruch
15:14 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Robert Dewar
15:04 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Oscar Fuentes
15:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Neil Booth
14:56 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Neil Booth
14:34 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Michael Veksler
14:34 Still fldl/fstpl use with fpmath=sse? Richard Guenther
14:31 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Robert Dewar
14:24 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Robert Dewar
14:17 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Andrew Pinski
14:12 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Oscar Fuentes
14:06 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Richard Guenther
13:49 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Robert Dewar
13:37 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Michael Matz
12:54 Strange ICE with actual GCC40 snapshot Michael Cieslinski
12:50 [gfortran] Calling conventions for assumed shaped arrays? Richard Guenther
12:41 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
12:37 Re: how to debug gcc Robert Dewar
12:27 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Robert Dewar
12:26 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Luca Benini
12:06 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
11:54 Re: ARM thumb interworking hole? Richard Earnshaw
11:06 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Lars Segerlund
08:43 Re: Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese ! Florian Weimer
07:52 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Zdenek Dvorak
07:41 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Michael Veksler
06:35 Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese ! Dirk Zakofski
06:29 Ich bekomm noch ne Kriese ! Dirk Zakofski
06:02 ARM thumb interworking hole? Charles Manning
05:58 Re: how to debug gcc Ranjit Mathew
05:37 Re: how to debug gcc saurabh verma
04:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:25 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Robert Dewar
03:18 Re: GCC for OS/2 Robert Dewar
02:00 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Mike Stump
01:30 GCC for OS/2 McDevitt Tavis J 1stLt 66 RQS/
01:25 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Mark Mitchell
01:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Paul Brook
00:29 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Giovanni Bajo
00:07 Re: Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Zdenek Dvorak
00:02 Help installing gcc dor kelman

January 09, 2005
21:06 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Geert Bosch
20:32 Empty loop elimination in 4.0 ? Michael Veksler
18:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Richard Guenther
18:37 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Paul Brook
18:20 gcc-4.0-20050109 is now available gccadmin
16:35 Re: pr18241 tests Diego Novillo
15:31 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Andrew Pinski
13:11 Re: __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Alan Modra
13:04 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Toon Moene
12:42 Re: pr18241 tests Andreas Jaeger
11:22 pr18241 tests Michael Ritzert
09:43 __uint128_t missing in gcc4, scalar_mode_supported_p not set? Olaf Hering
07:05 Re: how to debug gcc Russell Shaw
06:46 how to debug gcc aram bharathi
04:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Giovanni Bajo
01:50 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Matt Austern
00:42 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Gabriel Dos Reis
00:36 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Gabriel Dos Reis
00:14 Re: [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Mathieu Malaterre

January 08, 2005
23:42 [MAC] 'static const std::string' in a header file Mathieu Malaterre
23:37 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
23:26 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
22:40 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
22:10 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
21:11 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Russ Allbery
19:35 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
19:32 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
18:57 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ? Marc Espie
18:36 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
17:21 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
16:45 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Olaf Hering
16:43 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
16:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
16:33 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Olaf Hering
16:31 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
16:30 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ? Andrew Pinski
16:27 Re: how can I tell ada it's been moved around ? Florian Weimer
16:23 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
16:05 how can I tell ada it's been moved around ? Marc Espie
16:03 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Olaf Hering
15:59 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Olaf Hering
13:50 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Luca Benini
12:27 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Toon Moene
10:16 Will someone answear me? Vladius
10:04 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
06:39 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber
06:30 Successfull gcc-3.4.3 Installation On SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 Benben
05:50 Re: avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue Denis Chertykov
05:50 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
00:40 avr-back-end: instruction splitting issue Bj=F6rn=20Haase
00:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
00:25 gcc-3.4-20050107 is now available gccadmin

January 07, 2005
23:39 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
23:18 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
23:14 Re: Bug in mudflap? Frank Ch. Eigler
22:41 Re: Bug in mudflap? Frank Ch. Eigler
22:37 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
22:33 Re: Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Gabriel Dos Reis
22:33 Re: Bug in mudflap? Benjamin Redelings I
22:11 Re: Bug in mudflap? Frank Ch. Eigler
22:09 Viewing patches in bugzilla just got easier and nicer Daniel Berlin
21:52 Bug in mudflap? Benjamin Redelings I
21:36 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Toon Moene
21:19 Re: ACATS c380004 Laurent GUERBY
21:13 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Matthias Klose
21:12 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Andreas Jaeger
21:07 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
21:03 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Steven Bosscher
20:44 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
20:41 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
20:39 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Toon Moene
20:35 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
20:28 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
20:20 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
20:10 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Diego Novillo
20:04 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
20:03 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
20:00 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
19:59 RE: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Dave Korn
19:58 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
19:57 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
19:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
19:22 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Luca Benini
18:20 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
18:06 Re: New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
17:54 New GCC logotype version 1.6 (Sorry, I forgot to attach the image). Vladius
17:51 New GCC logotype version 1.6. Vladius
16:58 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andi Kleen
16:54 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Marcin Dalecki
15:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
15:46 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
15:38 Re: ACATS c380004 Florian Weimer
15:32 Re: ACATS c380004 Robert Dewar
15:23 Re: ACATS c380004 Richard Kenner
15:17 TMS320C54x Port Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
15:07 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Georg Bauhaus
15:00 Re: ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
14:55 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
14:51 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Diego Novillo
14:38 Re: ACATS c380004 Arnaud Charlet
14:34 Re: ACATS c380004 Richard Kenner
14:31 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
13:56 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Diego Novillo
13:54 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Robert Dewar
13:53 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Robert Dewar
13:47 ACATS c43214c Duncan Sands
13:43 ACATS c380004 Duncan Sands
13:31 RE: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Dave Korn
12:33 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:22 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Georg Bauhaus
11:22 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Georg Bauhaus
10:42 Thanh ly laptop, Mua Ban free, Gui thiep tieng viet, choi game online, phim vui vui, mua ban rao vat tai www.baomuabanraovat.com BaoMuabanRaovat . Com
09:31 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Marcin Dalecki
09:19 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Zdenek Dvorak
09:18 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
08:04 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
06:50 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
06:01 RE: strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha ? Jim McCarthy
05:08 Thanh ly laptop, Mua Ban free, Gui thiep tieng viet, choi game online, phim vui vui, mua ban rao vat tai www.baomuabanraovat.com BaoMuabanRaovat . Com
05:04 Thanh ly laptop, Mua Ban free, Gui thiep tieng viet, choi game online, phim vui vui, mua ban rao vat tai www.baomuabanraovat.com BaoMuabanRaovat . Com
04:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
03:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Daniel Berlin
02:59 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Robert Dewar
02:51 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Richard Kenner
02:47 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
02:26 Re: is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Robert Dewar
02:22 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Daniel Berlin
01:32 is this GNAT error message confusing or am I confused or both? Georg Bauhaus
01:28 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Andrew Pinski
01:26 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber
00:12 Re: Bootstrap time regressions Steven Bosscher
00:09 Re: Bootstrap time regressions Andrew Pinski
00:07 Bootstrap time regressions Greg Schafer

January 06, 2005
23:59 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Robert Dewar
23:42 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Richard Henderson
23:11 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Joe Buck
22:58 Re: discouraging register use Geoffrey Keating
22:55 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Toon Moene
20:49 Re: c++ stub generator Nick Ing-Simmons
20:31 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
20:24 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Diego Novillo
20:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:13 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
20:05 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
19:55 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Mark Mitchell
19:50 Re: Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Daniel Berlin
19:48 Thoughts about semantics of BB_VISITED Diego Novillo
19:45 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Marcin Dalecki
19:40 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Steve Kargl
18:55 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Richard Henderson
18:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
17:59 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Kai Henningsen
17:51 Re: new-new-ra thoughts Denis Chertykov
17:51 Re: new-new-ra thoughts Denis Chertykov
17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
17:42 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Denis Chertykov
17:23 Re: strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha? Nick Clifton
17:07 ANN: Linux Function Reordering Tool v0.1b Brandan C Lennox
17:00 strip incompatible with gcc -Wl,-taso linker option on Alpha ? Jim McCarthy
16:44 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
16:20 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Mark Mitchell
15:43 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andrew Pinski
15:42 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Steve Kargl
15:36 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Richard Sandiford
13:44 A question about a test Luca Benini
13:44 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
13:35 Re: Adding new register Paul Brook
13:28 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
12:47 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
11:41 Re: ia64 vector mode support Jan Beulich
10:58 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Robert Dewar
10:37 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Luca Benini
10:13 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andreas Jaeger
09:13 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Luca Benini
07:49 Re: Download Mostafa Hagog
07:46 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andreas Jaeger
07:39 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Luca Benini
07:29 Download Rajkishore Barik
07:21 Re: Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Andreas Jaeger
07:10 Trying to include Ada in powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu build Toon Moene
06:52 Adding new register Petar Penchev
06:43 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andreas Jaeger
00:13 Re: some remarks about gcc4.0 Richard Henderson

January 05, 2005
23:33 gcc-3.3-20050105 is now available gccadmin
23:13 some remarks about gcc4.0 tbp
22:55 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:45 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:41 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Ken Raeburn
22:40 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:33 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
22:31 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
22:30 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:26 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:17 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
22:10 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:04 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
21:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
21:21 Re: ia64 mulv8qi3 expander Richard Henderson
21:04 Re: [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build. Karel Gardas
20:06 Re: -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Andrew Pinski
20:04 -mno-sse and -mno-sse2 broken on opteron? Steve Kargl
19:24 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Richard Kenner
19:05 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Mike Hearn
18:50 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions Joe Buck
18:48 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
18:47 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Mike Hearn
18:35 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions Andrew Pinski
18:28 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
18:21 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
17:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Joe Buck
17:48 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions Joe Buck
17:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer
17:21 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
17:17 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
17:16 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
17:09 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Mike Hearn
17:06 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer
17:01 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
17:01 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Andreas Schwab
16:48 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
16:40 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Richard Kenner
16:27 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
16:27 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer
16:23 Re: gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available Thorsten Glaser
14:48 Re: discouraging register use Joern RENNECKE
14:41 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
14:38 ia64 mulv8qi3 expander Jan Beulich
14:18 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
13:24 Re: C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions Frank Ch. Eigler
12:49 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue Richard Henderson
12:05 Adding new register Petar Penchev
12:02 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Andreas Jaeger
11:53 Re: Question about instruction packing Balaji S
11:47 Re: c++ stub generator Ken Raeburn
11:45 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue Jan Beulich
11:45 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
11:11 Re: another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue Richard Henderson
10:53 another ia64 (and maybe generic) vector mode issue Jan Beulich
10:43 Re: Question about instruction packing Steven Bosscher
10:38 Re: c++ stub generator Nick Ing-Simmons
10:32 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Ayal Zaks
09:45 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer
09:30 Re: new-new-ra thoughts Steven Bosscher
08:48 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek
08:14 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-01-05) Mark Mitchell
07:00 about gcc on Solaris8 Vadim Karamov
05:55 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
05:46 Re: Question about instruction packing Balaji S
05:34 Re: discouraging register use Richard Henderson
05:00 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
04:53 C++ :: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions Raghu Annaluru
03:50 new-new-ra thoughts Nathanael Nerode
03:40 new-new-ra thoughts Nathanael Nerode
03:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
02:33 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
02:16 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Richard Kenner
02:14 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
02:05 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Andrew Pinski
00:42 Re: isysroot and various headers Daniel Jacobowitz
00:41 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:18 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
00:12 Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule Geoffrey Keating
00:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Geoffrey Keating

January 04, 2005
23:39 Re: isysroot and various headers Devang Patel
23:31 Re: make check problems on multilib systems in libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik
23:16 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
23:09 Re: isysroot and various headers Daniel Jacobowitz
23:07 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Andrew Pinski
23:07 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
22:59 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:57 Re: regmove and regclasses James E Wilson
22:53 Re: isysroot and various headers Devang Patel
22:45 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Marcin Dalecki
22:30 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:30 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
22:29 Re: isysroot and various headers Daniel Jacobowitz
22:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Mark Mitchell
22:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
22:18 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
22:10 Re: isysroot and various headers Devang Patel
22:06 Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:01 [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so? Denis Zaitsev
21:41 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Mark Mitchell
20:54 Re: Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers Daniel Jacobowitz
20:49 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Gabriel Dos Reis
20:47 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Gabriel Dos Reis
20:46 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Gabriel Dos Reis
20:39 Re: Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers Andrew Cagney
20:33 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
19:55 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
19:52 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
19:44 Re: discouraging register use Joern RENNECKE
19:31 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Luca Benini
19:30 RE: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Dave Korn
19:02 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Jason Merrill
18:57 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
18:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Mark Mitchell
18:45 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Daniel Jacobowitz
18:38 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Janis Johnson
18:35 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Janis Johnson
18:30 Re: Having dg-skip-if on the branches? Janis Johnson
18:26 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets Janis Johnson
17:58 Re: default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL Richard Henderson
17:15 Re: ia64 vector mode support Richard Henderson
17:12 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
17:03 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
16:53 ia64 vector mode support Jan Beulich
16:46 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Daniel Jacobowitz
16:24 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
16:21 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
16:05 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Daniel Berlin
16:04 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
15:55 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Daniel Berlin
15:47 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 David Edelsohn
15:29 binutils 2.15 / gcc-3.3.5 (3.4.3) produce text relocations on arm Peter S. Mazinger
15:03 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
15:02 Re: Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions( with 3.2.3) Giovanni Bajo
14:59 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
14:42 Re: [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build. Paul Brook
14:32 RE: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Dave Korn
14:22 RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Dave Korn
14:18 Re: discouraging register use Richard Earnshaw
14:03 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Richard Earnshaw
14:00 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:49 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bernd Schmidt
13:09 c++ stub generator Ivan Rachev
12:55 Re: bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Luca Benini
12:54 Re: Any specific documentation for gcc3.4.3 Ian Lance Taylor
12:09 bootstrap failure current CVS in Ada Andreas Jaeger
11:50 Re: discouraging register use Nick Ing-Simmons
11:48 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
11:35 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
11:17 Any specific documentation for gcc3.4.3 vivek sukumaran
11:15 Re: I require gcc4.0.0 source Steven Bosscher
11:12 I require gcc4.0.0 source vivek sukumaran
11:11 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Nick Ing-Simmons
10:54 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Jan Vroonhof
09:36 [gcc3.4.0] ARM/uClinux libstdc++ build. Karel Gardas
08:39 Re: C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Andrew Pinski
08:03 Re: Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Andreas Jaeger
07:33 Running 32-bit testsuite on x86_64 - dg-skip-if help Andreas Jaeger
07:13 C++ header file problem - is this a bug? Bill Northcott
06:09 Stack array bounds write purify error with exceptions( with 3.2.3) Raghu Annaluru
01:49 Re: isysroot and various headers Daniel Jacobowitz
01:34 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Richard Kenner
01:09 isysroot and various headers Devang Patel
00:39 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Richard Henderson
00:16 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Richard Kenner
00:12 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek

January 03, 2005
20:33 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Richard Henderson
20:25 Having dg-skip-if on the branches? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:24 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Richard Henderson
20:22 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
20:13 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber
19:58 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Paul Schlie
17:15 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
17:05 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
16:58 Re: ChangeLog rotated Gerald Pfeifer
16:55 Re: ChangeLog rotated Joseph S. Myers
16:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
16:40 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
15:24 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
14:11 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
14:08 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Robert Dewar
13:50 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Daniel Berlin
13:17 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp
13:15 Re: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Giovanni Bajo
12:32 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Florian Weimer
12:26 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
12:08 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Gerald Pfeifer
10:45 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Volker Reichelt
10:33 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek
10:11 Re: SSE testcase failure Anders Carlsson
10:05 Re: SSE testcase failure Uros Bizjak
09:47 default_section_type_flags and SECTION_SMALL Jan Beulich
09:30 Re: SSE testcase failure Anders Carlsson
09:29 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp
09:05 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Uros Bizjak
08:19 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp
07:53 Re: Question about instruction packing Steven Bosscher
07:45 Re: SSE testcase failure Luca Benini
07:34 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Arnaud Charlet
07:34 Re: Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Andreas Jaeger
07:32 Re: gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression Uros Bizjak
07:21 Re: Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Andreas Jaeger
07:20 Bug Report: gcc34 failed after adding "-g" option Hao Qian
06:50 Question about instruction packing Balaji S
06:46 gcc4.0 recent >15% runtime performance regression tbp
05:53 Ada in gcc-3.4.3 on x86_64 Dean Kolosiek
05:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
02:49 Re: [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete Mark Mitchell
01:16 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber

January 02, 2005
23:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
22:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Guenther
22:46 SSE testcase failure Anders Carlsson
21:47 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
21:29 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
21:25 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Gabriel Dos Reis
21:09 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Sam Lauber
20:51 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Nathanael Nerode
18:48 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Matt Austern
18:43 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets Bj=F6rn=20Haase
18:25 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Andreas Schwab
18:16 Re: philosophical argument / width of int for gcc targets Bj=F6rn=20Haase
18:12 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Mike Stump
18:07 gcc-4.0-20050102 is now available gccadmin
17:54 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Mike Stump
17:49 Re: What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets Mike Stump
17:36 Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5 Bradley Lucier
16:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
16:46 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
16:39 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Giovanni Bajo
16:35 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Daniel Berlin
16:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
16:28 Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Paul Brook
15:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
15:14 MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE vs. __attribute__(mode) vs. ABIs Roger Sayle
14:50 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Guenther
14:35 What is the most suitable way to exclude test cases for specific targets Bj=F6rn=20Haase
14:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
14:26 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Kai Henningsen
13:57 What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Bj=F6rn=20Haase
13:40 [C++] warn_synth considered obsolete gcc
13:04 What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
12:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Kai Henningsen
10:59 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Gabriel Dos Reis
10:45 Re: Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5 Steven Bosscher
09:15 Re: Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
07:47 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Richard Henderson
07:39 Re: Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
07:27 Some benchmarks comparing gcc-3.4.3 and 4.0.0 on PowerPC G5 Bradley Lucier
07:12 Re: Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
05:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
03:54 Re: Debugging with gdb Ian Lance Taylor
03:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Martin Dalecki
03:23 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Timothy J . Wood
03:01 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
01:30 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
01:29 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Gabriel Dos Reis
01:27 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations David Edelsohn
01:22 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
01:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Schlie
01:09 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
00:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Giovanni Bajo
00:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
00:29 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Gabriel Dos Reis
00:09 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Giovanni Bajo

January 01, 2005
22:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Berlin
22:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
22:47 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
22:28 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Dale Johannesen
22:27 regmove and regclasses Steven Bosscher
22:05 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
21:59 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Steven Bosscher
21:48 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:35 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Guenther
21:15 Re: ChangeLog rotated Eric Christopher
21:11 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Björn Haase
21:11 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
21:04 Re: Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass? Björn Haase
20:56 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Giovanni Bajo
20:50 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
20:38 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
20:37 Re: SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Jacobowitz
20:02 Re: Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
19:54 Extra 4.0 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:15 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
17:44 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
17:25 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Jacobowitz
17:15 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
17:13 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
17:09 Re: Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
17:08 Extra 3.4 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Jacobowitz
16:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
16:53 Re: ChangeLog rotated Ian Lance Taylor
16:51 Re: Debugging with gdb Ian Lance Taylor
16:46 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
16:41 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
16:35 Extra 3.3 -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures on i686-unknown-linux-gnu Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:24 ChangeLog rotated Steven Bosscher
16:21 Re: Debugging backend with gdb Vaclav Haisman
15:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Steven Bosscher
15:53 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Olivier Galibert
15:38 Debugging backend with gdb Russell Shaw
15:20 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
14:54 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Berlin
14:54 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
13:11 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Paul Brook
12:39 SRA and DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN Gabriel Dos Reis
12:18 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
10:12 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Henderson
09:33 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Andi Kleen
07:36 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations David Edelsohn
06:49 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Robert Dewar
06:22 Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ???? Dean Kolosiek
05:31 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Richard Stallman
05:31 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Richard Stallman
04:41 Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
03:59 Debugging with gdb Russell Shaw
02:15 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Berlin
00:57 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Henderson
00:36 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Kenner
00:29 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
00:13 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Florian Weimer


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3