This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New option?

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au dot ibm dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 20 Dec 2004 11:48:16 +1100
Subject: Re: New option?
References: <20041218174638.3FB4F23CE9@ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com>

"Sam Lauber" <sam124@operamail.com> writes:

> I think an option -D should be added (as in -c, -S, -E), that would
> be the same as -S except it would imply -g and it would only dump
> the stabs (or stabs+, or whatever) debugging information, not the
> actual assembly. That would be useful to (1) check proper working of
> the debugging generation code (2) study the output, etc.

Is it that difficult to read the debugging information in the .s
output?

Ben

References:
- New option?
  - From: Sam Lauber

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]