gcc archive
date index for December, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2004
23:25 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Richard Henderson
23:20 gcc-3.4-20041231 is now available gccadmin
22:03 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
21:57 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
21:54 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
21:50 Re: -funsafe-loop-optimizations Daniel Berlin
21:50 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
21:14 -funsafe-loop-optimizations Zdenek Dvorak
20:16 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
20:15 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
20:11 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
20:09 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
20:09 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
20:08 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
19:59 Re: bug Daniel Jacobowitz
19:57 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
19:26 Re: bug Ian Lance Taylor
19:09 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Devang Patel
19:04 bug Najib Bakari
19:03 Gdb complaints Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers H. J. Lu
18:44 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
17:21 Re: rtl semantics Russell Shaw
17:00 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
16:38 Re: gcc 4.0 generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
16:14 Re: rtl semantics Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 Re: rtl semantics Russell Shaw
15:50 Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ???? James A. Morrison
15:31 Re: rtl semantics Ian Lance Taylor
15:26 rtl semantics Russell Shaw
14:44 Re: discouraging register use Ian Lance Taylor
12:05 Re: gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ???? Andreas Schwab
08:32 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Timothy J . Wood
06:41 gcc 3.4.3 x86_64 built on Fedora Core 2 ???? Dean Kolosiek
06:21 Re: discouraging register use Richard Henderson
04:52 Re: __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Andrew Pinski
03:52 __APPLE_CC__ defined on head of mainline Timothy J . Wood
03:28 Re: discouraging register use Ian Lance Taylor
02:29 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
02:22 RE: discouraging register use Dave Korn
01:10 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
00:56 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Steven Bosscher
00:56 Re: discouraging register use DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: discouraging register use Steven Bosscher
00:35 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin

December 30, 2004
23:54 discouraging register use DJ Delorie
22:03 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Joe Buck
21:05 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
21:01 Guidance on address expression optimization in CSE HutchinsonAndy
20:56 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Berlin
20:52 Gdb generates DW_OP_fbreg in location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
20:28 Re: Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base Daniel Jacobowitz
20:23 Gdb generates location list without DW_AT_frame_base H. J. Lu
20:07 Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists Daniel Jacobowitz
20:02 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Mike Hearn
19:56 Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists H. J. Lu
19:36 Re: GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists H. J. Lu
19:35 Re: A workaround for PR 19038 Mostafa Hagog
19:24 GDB 6.3 assumes that DW_AT_frame_base exists H. J. Lu
18:45 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Matt Austern
18:14 Re: Gcc mirrors checking Luca Benini
17:56 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Mark Mitchell
16:17 Re: Gcc mirrors checking Luca Benini
15:26 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
15:20 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Roger Sayle
14:41 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Gabriel Dos Reis
14:34 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: Gcc mirrors checking Gerald Pfeifer
14:20 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
13:47 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Steven Bosscher
13:23 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Gabriel Dos Reis
13:18 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
13:03 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Mike Hearn
12:33 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
12:21 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Mike Hearn
08:58 Re: Hacker guide? Steven Bosscher
08:35 Hacker guide? vivek
03:52 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
02:53 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Stefan Strasser
02:35 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Robert Dewar
02:11 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Stefan Strasser
01:49 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
01:47 Re: Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Robert Dewar
01:45 Suggestion for improving C++ parser memory usage Roger Sayle
01:40 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini
01:33 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
01:29 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Robert Dewar
00:30 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Pjotr Kourzanov
00:05 Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Jeffrey A Law

December 29, 2004
23:39 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ken Raeburn
23:32 Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher
23:21 gcc-3.3-20041229 is now available gccadmin
23:07 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
22:48 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Jakub Jelinek
22:16 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
22:16 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
22:12 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
22:11 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
22:05 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
22:03 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Marc Espie
21:56 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini
21:54 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Brook
21:52 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini
21:45 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
20:47 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
20:32 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Toon Moene
20:22 Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Jeffrey A Law
19:52 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
19:40 Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher
19:30 Re: PR19038 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Jeffrey A Law
19:30 Re: A workaround for PR 19038 Jeffrey A Law
18:14 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08 Gcc mirrors checking Luca Benini
16:12 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
16:06 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
15:00 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Jakub Jelinek
14:46 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
14:07 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Sebastian Pop
14:07 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Sebastian Pop
08:27 Re: sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant Christian Joensson
07:14 Re: sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant Christian Joensson
06:53 How to enable instruction scheduling? Balaji S
04:58 Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Bob Gustafson

December 28, 2004
23:04 A workaround for PR 19038 Mostafa Hagog
20:58 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (041228)on MICO sources Karel Gardas
20:50 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
20:09 sparc/sparc.c:502: error: initializer element is not constant Christian Joensson
19:44 Extra from email addresses and incoming bugzilla handling Daniel Berlin
18:49 Re: [Bug debug/19124] [4.0 regression] gcc generates incorrectdwarf2 debug info Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
16:52 Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Paolo Bonzini
16:39 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher
16:37 Re: may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Andrew Pinski
16:33 may be a typo somewhere in the gcc4 build files? Bob Gustafson
16:31 Re: [arm-gnu] how to add new command line option for arm gcc Mark Mitchell
15:05 Re: [ECOS] arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem Gary Thomas
14:26 arm-elf-g++ ver3.2.1 problem Ryos Suzuki
12:06 Re: Problems with vector definition Oscar Fuentes
11:10 Problems with vector definition Juan Roberto Jiménez Pérez
11:06 Multilib test problems with libgcc_s in gfortran, libstdc++ tests Andreas Jaeger
08:44 Re: Please Help Me with Dev-C++ Sisyphus
08:18 make check problems on multilib systems in libstdc++ Andreas Jaeger
04:13 Please Help Me with Dev-C++ Wes Ripley
04:08 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
04:07 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Giovanni Bajo
04:05 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev
03:57 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Andrew Pinski
03:54 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev
03:50 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Andrew Pinski
03:44 [BUG] GCC 3.4-20041224: __attribute__ ((regparm)) misbehaviour Denis Zaitsev
00:17 Re: RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule Andrew Pinski
00:06 RFC: Rename --enable-intermodule Kelley Cook

December 27, 2004
22:57 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Jeffrey A Law
21:41 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
21:40 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
21:36 Re: Help with constraint for single register E. Weddington
21:25 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
21:14 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
17:43 Re: Help with constraint for single register Daniel Jacobowitz
17:40 Re: Help with constraint for single register Daniel Jacobowitz
17:07 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Giovanni Bajo
16:03 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
16:01 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Kenner
15:50 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
15:43 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
15:40 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Kenner
15:37 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
15:20 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Kenner
15:18 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Florian Weimer
15:09 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Kenner
14:53 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
14:49 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
14:29 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Kenner
14:21 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Florian Weimer
14:11 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Andrew Pinski
14:05 Re: GCC 3.4.3 and fiend decleration. Andrew Pinski
14:04 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
13:56 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Florian Weimer
13:52 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Florian Weimer
13:40 GCC 3.4.3 and fiend decleration. Georg Grabler
13:31 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
13:00 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Giovanni Bajo
12:13 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Guenther
11:39 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Robert Dewar
11:01 Re: Wrong RTL instruction deleted Richard Guenther
07:57 Wrong RTL instruction deleted Uros Bizjak
01:38 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
00:26 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
00:01 Emmanuelle EG GUITTON FRAGNAUD/CCIB est absent(e). EGUITTONFRAGNAUD

December 26, 2004
21:26 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
18:06 gcc-4.0-20041226 is now available gccadmin
11:14 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Toon Moene
01:13 Re: Help with constraint for single register Richard Henderson
01:01 Re: Help with constraint for single register Daniel Jacobowitz
00:45 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch

December 25, 2004
21:06 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini
20:59 Re: G++ enums 'underlying type' Paul Schlie
17:32 G++ enums 'underlying type' Paolo Carlini
17:14 Data dependence dumps Flavio _
15:20 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Richard Stallman
14:51 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Gerald Pfeifer
11:53 Re: Help with constraint for single register0 Ulrich Weigand
04:52 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber
04:28 Re: Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
01:55 Re: Help with constraint for single register Ian Lance Taylor

December 24, 2004
23:20 gcc-3.4-20041224 is now available gccadmin
18:49 Help with constraint for single register Robert Baruch
16:32 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Giovanni Bajo
15:15 Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p Olivier Hainque
14:54 Re: Bug in int_fits_type_p Richard Kenner
13:25 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Steven Bosscher
11:30 Re: PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Roger Sayle
08:59 PR19039 causes regression of 3.9% in SPEC int Mostafa Hagog
05:27 Bug in int_fits_type_p Roger Sayle
03:50 Re: comment error Ben Elliston
03:44 Re: gcc command-line option parsing doc Ben Elliston
03:07 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor
02:32 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch
00:26 Re: GTY and const Marc Espie
00:25 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ulrich Weigand

December 23, 2004
23:23 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch
23:10 RE: Help with define_insn and constraints Dave Korn
23:00 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Richard Henderson
22:38 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson
22:28 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
22:15 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
22:09 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Eric Botcazou
21:45 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
21:37 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor
21:36 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor
21:34 RE: Help with define_insn and constraints Dave Korn
21:21 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch
21:17 Re: RFC (proposed fix for PR18916) Richard Henderson
21:04 Re: assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Richard Henderson
20:55 RE: query reg. gcc Dave Korn
20:33 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump
20:30 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump
20:28 assign_parm_setup_block handling of parallels Aldy Hernandez
20:09 Re: query reg. gcc Mike Stump
20:04 RE: query reg. gcc Dave Korn
19:56 Re: GTY and const Robert Dewar
19:42 FAMILY & HOME PROTECTION Correction Bob
19:06 RFC (proposed fix for PR18916) Fariborz Jahanian
18:39 Re: query reg. gcc Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: query reg. gcc Shachindra Sharma
17:31 Re: SMS improvements branch Devang Patel
17:13 Re: Help with define_insn and constraints Ian Lance Taylor
17:09 RE: how to fix Heisenbug Dave Korn
17:01 Re: Re: GTY and const Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
16:59 Help with define_insn and constraints Robert Baruch
15:14 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Jan Hubicka
14:40 Re: SMS improvements branch Mostafa Hagog
13:12 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Uros Bizjak
12:00 Re: FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Jan Hubicka
11:19 FP compares and TARGET_SSE_MATH Uros Bizjak
09:18 comment error Mathieu Lacage
08:59 bad include search order in top level configure.in Jan Beulich
08:56 gcc command-line option parsing doc Mathieu Lacage
05:39 Re: Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass? Ben Elliston
05:30 Re: GTY and const Daniel Berlin
05:15 Re: query reg. gcc Zack Weinberg
05:07 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg
04:40 Re: query reg. gcc Dale Johannesen
04:32 Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Robert Baruch
04:12 Re: query reg. gcc Deepak Soi
03:43 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? Daniel Jacobowitz
01:23 Re: GTY and const Geoff Keating
01:18 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Ian Lance Taylor
01:00 Re: Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Richard Henderson
00:49 broken build on powerpc64-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
00:23 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Paul Brook
00:11 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Mike Stump
00:05 Help with "unable to generate reloads for..." error? Robert Baruch

December 22, 2004
23:50 Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Robert Baruch
23:44 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber
23:38 Re: New Makefile targets? Ben Elliston
23:24 gcc-3.3-20041222 is now available gccadmin
23:11 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg
23:06 Re: GTY and const Daniel Berlin
22:20 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
22:05 Re: Bootstrap failure due to your latest change Andrew Pinski
22:03 Bootstrap failure due to your latest change Richard Kenner
20:41 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Mike Stump
20:13 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
20:07 Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building Mike Stump
19:56 [Fwd: Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc?] Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:47 Re: Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
19:45 Bootstrap broken on x86_64-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
19:25 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Devang Patel
18:56 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner
18:54 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner
18:42 Re: type gimplification, continued Andrew Pinski
18:25 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu
18:20 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
18:09 Re: type gimplification, continued Alexandre Oliva
17:59 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Dorit Naishlos
17:54 Re: [Fwd: Re: Popping Registers] Robert Dewar
17:28 Re: Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Bobby McNulty
17:03 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Mark Mitchell
17:03 Merge cc1, cc1plus, etc? Sam Lauber
16:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Joe Buck
16:02 Re: query reg. gcc Ian Lance Taylor
15:58 Re: performing updates from gcc cvs and building Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful peter.kourzanov
15:53 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Ian Lance Taylor
15:42 Re: Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Ian Lance Taylor
14:55 query reg. gcc Deepak Soi
14:50 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Paul Koning
14:39 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Eric Botcazou
14:18 Re: .bss section and uninitialised variables Kevin Puetz
13:57 performing updates from gcc cvs and building Mathieu Lacage
13:02 .bss section and uninitialised variables Gisle Grimen
12:28 Re: type gimplification, continued Richard Kenner
11:09 Re: Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? Nick Clifton
11:00 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Steven Bosscher
08:42 type gimplification, continued Richard Henderson
06:08 Re: RFA: how to fix Heisenbug Jeffrey A Law
04:39 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
04:34 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
04:06 Re: [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
03:48 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 James A. Morrison
03:42 [BUG] GCC 3.4.3/x86: -fomit-frame-pointer cause a lot of test failures for libstdc++ Denis Zaitsev
03:36 Help with new port: infinite looping in reload Robert Baruch
03:24 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2004-12-21) Mark Mitchell
02:55 Denied post to the www mailing list owner-www
01:28 New Makefile targets? Sam Lauber
01:16 Is this a gcc, gdb or readelf bug? H. J. Lu

December 21, 2004
23:47 RFA: how to fix Heisenbug Dale Johannesen
23:39 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
23:39 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
22:42 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
22:00 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizerquestions Paul Schlie
21:42 Revision to 4.0 release critieria: add arm-none-elf Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
19:19 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
19:18 [Fwd: Re: Popping Registers] Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:18 [Fwd: Re: gimplify_parameters] Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
19:01 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg
18:26 Re: GTY and const Geoffrey Keating
18:16 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
18:14 Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary)) Jakub Jelinek
18:03 Re: Popping registers Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
18:00 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
17:48 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
17:48 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
17:43 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
17:13 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizerquestions Paul Schlie
16:56 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
16:27 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
16:00 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
15:11 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
15:04 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
15:03 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
14:51 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
14:46 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
14:10 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
13:40 FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! Manish Shah
13:25 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
13:19 Re: FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! jf
13:05 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Richard Kenner
12:50 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
12:41 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
12:35 Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary)) Richard Henderson
10:04 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
09:36 Re: FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! jf
09:25 FW: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! Manish Shah
08:11 Re: fix c/18282, for 4.0 Eric Botcazou
07:45 Re: RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary)) Andreas Jaeger
07:33 RFC: __attribute__ ((forced_stack_boundary)) Uros Bizjak
07:23 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Marcus Meissner
05:55 Re: Popping registers Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:47 Re: Popping registers Peter Barada
05:02 Re: Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance. Ranjit Mathew
03:14 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
03:07 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
02:45 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
02:41 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
02:40 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
02:39 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
02:26 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
02:25 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
02:21 Re: Popping registers Sam Lauber
02:20 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner
02:14 RE: Popping registers Dave Korn
02:04 Re: Popping registers Zack Weinberg
02:00 RE: Popping registers Dave Korn
01:58 Re: Popping registers Peter Barada
01:48 Re: Popping registers Sam Lauber
01:47 RE: Popping registers Dave Korn
01:43 Re: gimplify_parameters Richard Henderson
01:26 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Andrew Pinski
01:23 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Mike Stump
01:23 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Joe Buck
01:09 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Joe Buck
00:56 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Joseph S. Myers
00:52 Re: Popping registers Richard Henderson
00:46 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Mike Stump
00:45 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Stefan Strasser
00:42 Re: gcc 4.0 libgcc_eh static linking Richard Henderson
00:16 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Paul Schlie
00:08 gimplify_parameters Richard Kenner

December 20, 2004
23:18 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Gabriel Dos Reis
23:16 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
23:11 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
22:51 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Andrew Pinski
22:48 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
22:47 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Joe Buck
22:47 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
22:44 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Joe Buck
22:37 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Pjotr Kourzanov
22:36 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
22:33 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
22:31 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Eric Botcazou
22:27 Re: Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance. E. Weddington
22:26 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
22:23 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Gabriel Dos Reis
22:20 Crossgcc FAQ. In perpetual maintenance. Tiriac, Steve
22:17 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Gabriel Dos Reis
22:08 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
22:04 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
22:02 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Tom Tromey
21:54 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
21:50 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Zack Weinberg
21:48 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
21:39 Re: [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Andrew Pinski
21:37 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Ian Lance Taylor
21:37 Re: Compiling gnat with a different gcc Luke A. Guest
21:36 [PATCH] GCC 3.4.3: libobjc build failure Denis Zaitsev
21:23 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Gabriel Dos Reis
21:02 Re: Compiling gnat with a different gcc Florian Weimer
20:59 The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.2 is released H. J. Lu
20:55 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Andrew Pinski
20:47 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Paul Schlie
20:46 Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty Alexandre Oliva
20:24 Re: gcc pragma pack on hpux Eric Frias
20:23 Popping registers Sam Lauber
20:14 Compiling gnat with a different gcc Luke A. Guest
19:58 Re: Warning for different pointer signedness Andrew Pinski
19:56 Warning for different pointer signedness Paul Schlie
18:45 Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty H. J. Lu
18:41 Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty Andrew Pinski
18:39 Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty H. J. Lu
17:37 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question) Joe Buck
17:35 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Joe Buck
17:28 Re: PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty Alexandre Oliva
17:27 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Joe Buck
16:06 Re: Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! jf
15:40 Building GCC crosscompiler for powerpc platform !! Manish Shah
15:16 Warning for different pointer signedness Giovanni Bajo
14:48 The problem compiling s-fileio.adb Richard Kenner
14:08 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Richard Kenner
13:55 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Graham Stott
13:44 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Eric Botcazou
13:26 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Richard Kenner
13:23 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Richard Kenner
12:26 gcc 4.0 libgcc_eh static linking Roland Lengfeldner
09:02 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Andreas Jaeger
08:51 Re: CVS Head: libada build fails Christian Joensson
08:47 CVS Head: libada build fails Andreas Jaeger
08:31 Compiling for FreeBSD DarkPhoton
03:48 Re: cp tree question Stefan Strasser
02:40 Paradoxical subregs and !INSN_SCHEDULING. Why? Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:10 Re: New option? Sam Lauber
01:52 Re: Fix longstanding bugzilla anoyance Kelley Cook
01:22 Fix longstanding bugzilla anoyance Daniel Berlin
01:11 Re: Modifing Gcc Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:57 Re: Modifing Gcc Ben Elliston
00:47 Re: New option? Ben Elliston
00:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin

December 19, 2004
23:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
23:26 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
23:22 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Zdenek Dvorak
23:12 Request for documentation: Do "define_instruction_and_split" patterns apply also in the combiner pass? Björn Haase
23:08 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
23:08 Modifing Gcc Sridat Kota
20:51 Re: Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al Richard Henderson
20:35 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Aaron W. LaFramboise
20:05 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Pjotr Kourzanov
18:59 Q about REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P et al Robert Baruch
18:23 gcc-4.0-20041219 is now available gccadmin
17:31 RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Gary Funck
12:27 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Arnd Bergmann
10:37 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Robert Dewar
08:23 Re: x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Richard Henderson
07:37 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Paul Schlie
03:42 PATCH: Ignore --disable-static in libiberty H. J. Lu
02:40 Re: [discuss] x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Jan Hubicka
00:56 RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Joseph S. Myers
00:20 Re: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Giovanni Bajo
00:17 Re: 3.4.3 problem with fix for PR/17384 Richard Henderson
00:14 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Richard Henderson

December 18, 2004
23:03 x86-64 abi, regarding vector types Richard Henderson
20:52 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Stefan Strasser
17:46 New option? Sam Lauber
16:23 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Gabriel Dos Reis
15:14 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Paul Brook
15:12 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Bobby McNulty
15:01 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:35 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Gabriel Dos Reis
13:33 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:32 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:28 Re: cp tree question Gabriel Dos Reis
12:08 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Florian Weimer
10:54 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Marc Espie
10:18 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful Zack Weinberg
09:54 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question) Stefan Strasser
09:39 Re: -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp tree question) Nathan Sidwell
09:33 -fdump-translation-unit considered harmful (was Re: cp treequestion) Zack Weinberg
08:32 Re: Danny Smith to become maintainer of our Windows ports Patrick McFarland
07:27 cp tree question Stefan Strasser
03:39 List of regressions that are assigned and not have moved Andrew Pinski
03:17 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Zack Weinberg
02:42 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
02:29 RE: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Gary Funck
01:26 Re: gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Giovanni Bajo
01:11 Re: genrecog: match_code "bug"? Zack Weinberg
01:10 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
00:49 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Joseph S. Myers
00:24 genrecog: match_code "bug"? DJ Delorie
00:16 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Steven Bosscher
00:07 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions David Edelsohn

December 17, 2004
23:50 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
23:41 gcc-3.4-20041217 is now available gccadmin
23:23 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Andrew Pinski
22:15 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Eric Botcazou
21:29 Re: Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Daniel Berlin
21:25 Serious performance regression -- some tree optimizer questions Ulrich Weigand
21:03 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:03 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:59 Re: Danny Smith to become maintainer of our Windows ports Gabriel Dos Reis
20:43 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Richard Henderson
20:34 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? E. Weddington
20:30 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Richard Henderson
20:25 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Steven Bosscher
20:09 gcc 4.0 front-end infrastructure for C dialects - plans? Gary Funck
20:03 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? E. Weddington
19:49 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Thorsten Glaser
19:45 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Matt Austern
19:31 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Nathanael Nerode
19:11 Re: Danny Smith to become maintainer of our Windows ports Christopher Faylor
19:07 Danny Smith to become maintainer of our Windows ports Gerald Pfeifer
16:48 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Mike Stump
15:12 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Laura Tosoratto
14:57 3.4.3 problem with fix for PR/17384 Jan Beulich
14:30 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
14:10 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Gunther Nikl
13:53 RE: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
13:47 RE: g++ optimization issue?? Dave Korn
13:44 RE: g++ optimization issue?? Dave Korn
13:33 RE: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
13:29 Re: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
13:26 Re: g++ optimization issue?? Robert Dewar
13:24 Re: g++ optimization issue?? Robert Dewar
13:19 Re: g++ optimization issue?? Robert Dewar
13:18 RE: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
13:05 RE: g++ optimization issue?? Dave Korn
13:04 Re: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
12:59 RE: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
12:53 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:51 Re: g++ optimization issue?? Lars Segerlund
12:48 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:43 RE: g++ optimization issue?? Steven Bosscher
12:39 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Joseph S. Myers
12:36 RE: g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
12:31 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
12:29 RE: g++ optimization issue?? Dave Korn
12:18 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Thorsten Glaser
12:16 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Thorsten Glaser
12:13 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Gerald Pfeifer
12:13 g++ optimization issue?? ColinLaney
12:11 RE: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Dave Korn
12:06 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Steven Bosscher
12:02 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Steven Bosscher
12:01 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Marcel Cox
11:38 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Eric Botcazou
10:47 Re: [gpc] GCC integration? Thorsten Glaser
10:29 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Joseph S. Myers
10:01 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Robert Dewar
09:48 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Steven Bosscher
09:46 Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Steven Bosscher
08:57 Re: PR 18501. Before I mark it WONTFIX. Nathan Sidwell
08:54 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Richard Sandiford
07:14 [gpc] Re: GCC integration? Thorsten Glaser
04:05 RE: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 David Daney
02:34 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 David Wuertele
02:07 Re: PR 18501. Before I mark it WONTFIX. Giovanni Bajo
01:50 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Eric Christopher
01:24 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 David Wuertele
00:33 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Eric Christopher
00:30 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Eric Christopher
00:26 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Zack Weinberg

December 16, 2004
23:46 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 David Wuertele
23:16 Re: gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 Joe Buck
23:07 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Zdenek Dvorak
23:04 gcc cross mips output sizes, 2.95.3 vs 3.3.3 David Wuertele
22:21 RE: Need Help Building gcc on tru64 v5.1b Hogan, Audrey M.
22:01 Re: gcc pragma pack on hpux John David Anglin
21:18 Re: mem model defines for various platforms Kai Henningsen
20:40 PR 18501. Before I mark it WONTFIX. Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Zack Weinberg
19:18 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
19:00 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Richard Henderson
18:44 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
18:33 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
18:31 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
18:19 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Peter Barada
18:14 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Laura Tosoratto
17:56 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
17:45 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Pascal Chaperon
17:16 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Peter Barada
17:09 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Pascal Chaperon
17:04 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
16:56 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
16:47 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
16:45 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Ian Lance Taylor
16:45 RE: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Dave Korn
16:40 Re: Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Richard Earnshaw
16:33 Different multiply operator for pointers and integers Laura Tosoratto
16:29 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Pascal Chaperon
16:10 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Diego Novillo
16:09 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
16:06 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? David Edelsohn
16:04 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
16:01 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Diego Novillo
15:58 Re: Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
15:57 Scheduling complete loop unrolling early and unconditional? Richard Guenther
14:14 RE: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Dave Korn
12:21 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Richard Sandiford
10:39 Re: How to use '-finstrument-functions' in C++ programs ? Andrew Haley
10:29 Re: How to use '-finstrument-functions' in C++ programs ? Perret Yannick
10:14 How to use '-finstrument-functions' in C++ programs ? Dmitry Antipov
10:01 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Jakub Jelinek
09:19 Re: C++ constructor bug? (and what are the semantics of a RANGE_EXPR?) Nathan Sidwell
08:43 C++ constructor bug? (and what are the semantics of a RANGE_EXPR?) Steven Bosscher
07:04 Re: GCC 3.4 branch bootstrap failure on x86-64/Linux Andreas Jaeger
06:54 Re: GCC 3.4 branch bootstrap failure on x86-64/Linux Andrew Pinski
06:52 GCC 3.4 branch bootstrap failure on x86-64/Linux Andreas Jaeger
06:19 Re: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Mike Stump
04:20 Re: Please,help with Ada compiler Robert Dewar
02:47 Please,help with Ada compiler Serguei Kouratov
01:32 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
01:18 Re: wrong-code regressions review Bradley Lucier
01:17 Re: AVR testing [was: Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0] Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:14 Re: C++ ABI and ILP64 Joe Buck
01:06 Re: AVR testing [was: Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0] Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:03 C++ ABI and ILP64 Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer

December 15, 2004
23:41 gcc-3.3-20041215 is now available gccadmin
23:32 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Richard Kenner
22:41 AVR testing [was Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0] E. Weddington
22:32 Re: A Stale Lock? Eric Christopher
22:31 Re: A Stale Lock? Andrew Pinski
22:28 A Stale Lock? Ziemowit Laski
22:25 AVR testing [was: Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0] E. Weddington
22:16 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Bernardo Innocenti
21:58 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:58 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Bernardo Innocenti
21:37 Re: wrong-code regressions review Giovanni Bajo
21:29 Re: wrong-code regressions review Daniel Jacobowitz
21:23 Re: wrong-code regressions review Bradley Lucier
21:19 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
21:16 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Christian Joensson
20:58 Re: ENUM_BITFIELD and -fshort-enums Mark Mitchell
20:13 Re: GCC-3.3.6 Kevin Handy
20:07 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Alexandre Oliva
20:05 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
19:48 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
19:22 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 E. Weddington
19:13 Re: GCC-3.3.6 Gerald Pfeifer
19:12 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Peter Barada
19:00 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Mark Mitchell
18:44 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Rainer Orth
18:43 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Ian Lance Taylor
18:37 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:31 Re: How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Peter Barada
18:23 Re: problem with templates and iterators Oscar Fuentes
18:09 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Robert Dewar
18:07 problem with templates and iterators Ryan Boder
18:03 RE: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function" message Dave Korn
18:01 RE: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Dave Korn
18:00 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Robert Dewar
17:58 GCC-3.3.6 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:58 How to generate the LIBGCC.A for mc68000 Pascal Chaperon
17:54 Re: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Joe Buck
17:54 Re: SPE scalar float instructions Kumar Gala
17:52 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function" message Florian Weimer
17:37 make bootstrap successful on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Pete Fritchman
17:34 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Robert Dewar
17:33 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function" message Joe Buck
17:33 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function" message Florian Weimer
17:29 RE: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Richard Guenther
17:28 Re: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Steven Bosscher
17:26 RE: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Dave Korn
17:16 Re: SPE scalar float instructions Aldy Hernandez
17:14 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 E. Weddington
16:55 Re: Strange IV choices? Giovanni Bajo
16:44 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Giovanni Bajo
16:36 Re: Strange IV choices? Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
15:51 Re: Strange IV choices? Sebastian Pop
15:24 Re: SPE scalar float instructions Kumar Gala
15:20 RE: a problem of "IDENTIFIER_NODE_CHECK" Dave Korn
15:19 Re: a problem of "IDENTIFIER_NODE_CHECK" Steven Bosscher
15:15 a problem of "IDENTIFIER_NODE_CHECK" 邱晓鹏
15:15 Re: wrong-code regressions review Giovanni Bajo
15:10 Re: wrong-code regressions review Bradley Lucier
15:00 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:54 Re: wrong-code regressions review Bradley Lucier
14:43 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Ed Smith-Rowland
13:42 Re: wrong-code regressions review Andrew Pinski
13:12 Re: wrong-code regressions review Giovanni Bajo
12:52 Re: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Richard Guenther
12:46 Re: GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Steven Bosscher
12:35 GCC not (optimally) exploiting restrict pointers? Richard Guenther
12:06 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Robert Dewar
10:02 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Nathan Sidwell
09:00 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Dmitry Antipov
08:09 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Richard Henderson
06:56 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Alexandre Oliva
04:41 Re: Help regarding the Site containing the .Exe of G++ 3.4.2 version Ramana Radhakrishnan
04:35 Help regarding the Site containing the .Exe of G++ 3.4.2 version sreevidya maguluri
03:54 Hey, ya! =)) 3E65F5E1 . 7060209
03:53 SPE scalar float instructions Zack Weinberg
01:45 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
01:28 Re: wrong-code regressions review Bradley Lucier
00:28 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Zdenek Dvorak

December 14, 2004
22:31 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Richard Henderson
22:20 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Paolo Carlini
22:17 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Zdenek Dvorak
22:12 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
22:05 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Gabriel Dos Reis
22:05 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Paolo Carlini
21:56 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Daniel Berlin
21:55 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Andrew Pinski
21:44 Re: mem model defines for various platforms Bruce Korb
21:43 Re: Optimising std::find on x86 and PPC Gabriel Dos Reis
21:41 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
21:20 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Alexandre Oliva
21:09 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Bruce Korb
21:01 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Zack Weinberg
20:59 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Bruce Korb
20:57 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
20:53 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Alexandre Oliva
20:49 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Andrew Pinski
20:47 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Bruce Korb
20:46 Re: wrong-code regressions review David Edelsohn
20:46 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Andrew Pinski
20:41 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Bruce Korb
20:38 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Andrew Pinski
20:36 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted on ia64-linux? Andrew Pinski
20:33 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Gerald Pfeifer
20:32 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted? Zack Weinberg
20:27 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted? Bruce Korb
20:18 Re: Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted? Zack Weinberg
20:14 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
19:58 Why isn't ``-milp32'' accepted? Bruce Korb
19:56 Re: wrong-code regressions review Jeffrey A Law
19:52 wrong-code regressions review Nathanael Nerode
18:35 Re: GTY and const Zack Weinberg
18:34 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Bernardo Innocenti
18:26 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: FSF mainline bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
18:07 FSF mainline bootstrap failure on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
18:02 GCC 3.4.3 successfully build Vincenzo Testa
17:04 patch for PR/17684 Jan Beulich
17:00 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message Nathan Sidwell
16:40 Re: Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function"message E. Weddington
16:22 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Bernd Schmidt
15:38 Re: [scev] Re: Strange IV choices? Richard Guenther
15:23 Dubious "'foo' might be used uninitialized in this function" message Dmitry Antipov
15:22 [scev] Re: Strange IV choices? Richard Guenther
15:13 Re: Strange IV choices? Steven Bosscher
15:02 Re: Strange IV choices? Richard Guenther
15:01 Re: Strange IV choices? Steven Bosscher
14:56 Strange IV choices? Richard Guenther
14:44 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Richard Kenner
14:34 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
14:24 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
13:29 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Richard Kenner
12:34 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Rainer Orth
10:30 Re: GTY and const Steven Bosscher
08:26 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Bernardo Innocenti
07:29 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
07:28 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
07:16 RE: New target for Coldfire v4e? C Jaiprakash, Noida
07:00 GTY and const Matt Kraai
05:39 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 E. Weddington
05:28 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Ralf Corsepius
02:34 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
02:24 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
02:06 Re: [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Richard Henderson
01:42 Re: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xstormy16/below100.S DJ Delorie
01:33 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/xstormy16/below100.S Kelley Cook
01:29 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
01:14 Re: [rfc] towards a defined abi for libgfortran Mike Stump
01:08 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Bernardo Innocenti
00:58 Re: [rfc] towards a defined abi for libgfortran Mike Stump
00:54 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Daniel Kegel
00:49 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Peter Barada
00:44 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Peter Barada
00:26 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
00:20 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
00:13 Re: Good news about increased jump threading from my PHI mergepatch Kazu Hirata
00:04 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell

December 13, 2004
23:50 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Benjamin Kosnik
23:36 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Ben Elliston
22:56 Re: Good news about increased jump threading from my PHI mergepatch Jeffrey A Law
22:52 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 E. Weddington
22:47 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Daniel Kegel
22:08 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Albert Chin
21:26 Re: --with-libiconv-prefix messes up libjava Tom Tromey
21:20 [RFC] avoiding too narrow register classes in reload Alexandre Oliva
18:43 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
18:40 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
18:26 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Bernardo Innocenti
18:13 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Bernardo Innocenti
17:57 Re: Good news about increased jump threading from my PHI mergepatch Kazu Hirata
17:44 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Paul Schlie
17:16 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Rainer Orth
16:45 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Peter Barada
16:43 Re: Regression in 4.0 (sort of) Dale Johannesen
16:38 Re: Good news about increased jump threading from my PHI mergepatch Jeffrey A Law
16:12 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Bernardo Innocenti
16:11 Re: gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Daniel Jacobowitz
15:33 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Richard Earnshaw
15:24 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
14:41 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Paul Schlie
14:30 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Peter Barada
14:22 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Robert Dewar
13:27 Re: New target for Coldfire v4e? Bernardo Innocenti
13:01 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Richard Kenner
12:56 Regression: bootstrap failure of gcc-4.0-20041212 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 (i686-apple-darwin7.2.1) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
12:55 gcc -m64 for Solaris10 x86 Guenter Feldmann
12:38 Re: Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Richard Earnshaw
11:03 Re: SMS improvements branch Sebastian Pop
09:46 Re: [autovect][PATCH]: Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Sebastian Pop
08:20 Re: [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Eric Botcazou
07:20 New target for Coldfire v4e? C Jaiprakash, Noida
07:12 [ada] can't build g-awk.adb in gcc cvs trunk 20041212 on sparc-linux: GCC error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:6047, Error detected at g-awk.adb:1316:24 Christian Joensson
06:16 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Ranjit Mathew
04:07 Re: Regression in 4.0 (sort of) Zack Weinberg
03:53 Regression in 4.0 (sort of) Dale Johannesen
03:05 Re: Undocumented option Ian Lance Taylor
02:09 Revised release criteria for GCC 4.0 Mark Mitchell
00:53 Re: Undocumented option Sam Lauber

December 12, 2004
22:41 Re: Undocumented option Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:33 Re: Undocumented option Ben Elliston
21:22 Undocumented option Sam Lauber
19:28 CTI_MAX multiply defined? Gary Funck
18:16 gcc-4.0-20041212 is now available gccadmin
18:14 Re: anononymous cvs problems at g.g.o and s.r.c John David Anglin
18:06 Re: anononymous cvs problems at g.g.o and s.r.c Daniel Berlin
18:02 Re: [autovect][PATCH]: Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Daniel Berlin
17:59 Re: [autovect][PATCH]: Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Devang Patel
17:34 Re: multiple problems with SSE / cmpunordps, QNaNs and -ffast-math tbp
15:16 Re: [autovect][PATCH]: Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Dorit Naishlos
14:19 Re: [wwwdocs] Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Gerald Pfeifer
11:49 [wwwdocs] Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Steven Bosscher
11:35 Re: SMS improvements branch Dorit Naishlos
10:33 Re: Mysterious C++ Nathan Sidwell
07:48 Re: anononymous cvs problems at g.g.o and s.r.c Eric Botcazou
04:36 Re: Mysterious C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:59 Mysterious C++ Sam Lauber
03:58 [autovect][PATCH]: Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Daniel Berlin
03:44 anononymous cvs problems at g.g.o and s.r.c John David Anglin
03:24 Re: Bug? Aaron W. LaFramboise
01:49 Re: Bug? Giovanni Bajo
01:45 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Peter Barada
01:33 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Ian Lance Taylor
01:20 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Ian Lance Taylor
00:58 Bug? Sam Lauber
00:38 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Steven Bosscher
00:13 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Peter Barada
00:09 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Peter Barada

December 11, 2004
18:10 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Robert Dewar
18:06 Re: problem on x86_64 while Building runtime libraries Laurent GUERBY
17:45 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Gerald Pfeifer
17:21 Re: [wwwdocs] CVS annotate brings me to GNATS Gerald Pfeifer
17:00 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Eric Botcazou
16:42 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Nathan Sidwell
16:29 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber
16:26 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber
16:15 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber
15:45 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Andreas Schwab
15:40 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Nathan Sidwell
12:58 Re: gcc 4.0 branch? Giovanni Bajo
11:53 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Kai Henningsen
11:08 Re: multiple problems with SSE / cmpunordps, QNaNs and -ffast-math tbp
10:49 multiple problems with SSE / cmpunordps, QNaNs and -ffast-math tbp
07:25 Good news about increased jump threading from my PHI merge patch Kazu Hirata
06:57 Re: [rfc] towards a defined abi for libgfortran Andrew Pinski
03:55 Re: [rfc] towards a defined abi for libgfortran Andrew Pinski
03:30 Re: Лада Власовна
02:44 RE: Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber
02:37 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber

December 10, 2004
23:54 gcc-3.4-20041210 is now available gccadmin
21:12 Re: problem with iv-opts and valid gimple Zdenek Dvorak
20:52 Re: problem with iv-opts and valid gimple Andrew Pinski
20:48 problem with iv-opts and valid gimple Andrew Pinski
20:28 gcc 4.0 branch? Jack Howarth
19:38 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Ian Lance Taylor
19:31 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Peter Barada
18:38 Re: More OLD PROBLEMS problems Ian Lance Taylor
18:09 [OT] RE: Unomitted frame pointers Dave Korn
17:54 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Nathan Sidwell
17:26 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Paul Brook
16:55 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Thomas R. Truscott
16:51 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Steve Ellcey
16:41 RE: Unomitted frame pointers Dave Korn
16:40 RE: Unomitted frame pointers Dave Korn
16:39 Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Daniel Berlin
16:34 Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Daniel Berlin
16:33 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Andreas Schwab
16:30 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Nathan Sidwell
16:27 Re: LLVM 1.4 Released! Chris Lattner
16:25 RE: Unomitted frame pointers Dave Korn
16:21 Re: Simple loops not interchanged? Andrew Pinski
16:05 Re: Unomitted frame pointers jlh
15:44 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Thomas R. Truscott
15:36 Simple loops not interchanged? Richard Guenther
14:40 Re: [wwwdocs] CVS annotate brings me to GNATS Daniel Berlin
14:37 [wwwdocs] CVS annotate brings me to GNATS Steven Bosscher
14:29 More OLD PROBLEMS problems Steven Bosscher
13:12 Re: LLVM 1.4 Released! Paolo Carlini
10:29 Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X Gerald Pfeifer
09:08 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Richard Guenther
07:22 Re: Unomitted frame pointers Eric Botcazou
05:26 Unomitted frame pointers Sam Lauber
03:18 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Paul Schlie
03:03 Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X The Doctor
01:12 Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X Joe Buck
00:49 Re: intermittent gcc bug with /usr/ccs/bin/as Edward Peschko

December 09, 2004
23:53 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Joe Buck
23:48 Re: intermittent gcc bug with /usr/ccs/bin/as Joe Buck
23:38 Re: intermittent gcc bug with /usr/ccs/bin/as Geoffrey Keating
23:36 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Geoffrey Keating
23:12 LLVM 1.4 Released! Chris Lattner
22:55 intermittent gcc bug with /usr/ccs/bin/as Edward Peschko
22:54 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Paul Schlie
21:34 Re: [PATCH] PR18002: Undo fold_single_bit_test in do_jump Paul Schlie
20:46 Re: SEGV building qt-3.3.3 with GCC 3.4.3 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Michael Matz
20:41 SMS improvements branch Mostafa Hagog
20:20 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Joseph S. Myers
20:14 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Joe Buck
20:11 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Paul Jarc
19:41 Re: memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Joe Buck
19:33 memcpy / Language Lawyer / optimization question Steve Ellcey
18:16 Re: ENUM_BITFIELD and -fshort-enums Steven Bosscher
18:09 Reminder: delete_trivially_dead insns regression Joern RENNECKE
18:03 Re: C++ compiler Nathan Sidwell
18:00 Re: ENUM_BITFIELD and -fshort-enums Daniel Jacobowitz
17:57 C++ compiler Stan Gosselin
17:53 Re: [PATCH] PR18002: Undo fold_single_bit_test in do_jump Eric Botcazou
17:46 ENUM_BITFIELD and -fshort-enums Daniel Jacobowitz
17:26 Re: [PATCH] PR18002: Undo fold_single_bit_test in do_jump Roger Sayle
14:41 Re: fold bug with multiply and cast and conditional Roger Sayle
13:48 Re: How to mark a single set as not frame related? Andreas Krebbel
10:14 How to mark a single set as not frame related? Andreas Krebbel
09:31 Re: Multiple (serialized) messages in Objective-C Mike Stump
07:46 Re: mh-mingw32 Danny Smith
05:47 Re: fold bug with multiply and cast and conditional Andrew Pinski
05:24 Re: fold bug with multiply and cast and conditional Roger Sayle
04:23 fold bug with multiply and cast and conditional Andrew Pinski
04:07 Re: Multiple (serialized) messages in Objective-C Ernest L. Williams Jr.
02:35 Re: Multiple (serialized) messages in Objective-C Pupeno

December 08, 2004
23:45 --with-libiconv-prefix messes up libjava Sean McNeil
23:18 gcc-3.3-20041208 is now available gccadmin
20:14 gcc 3.4.3 - libstdc++ - vxworks5.4 jf
19:58 Re: native gcc for vxworks jf
16:08 Re: mh-mingw32 Christopher Faylor
15:36 mh-mingw32 Joern RENNECKE
09:53 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Daniel Towner
01:27 Re: native gcc for vxworks DJ Delorie
01:09 Re: native gcc for vxworks Mike Stump
01:00 Re: native gcc for vxworks Robert Dewar
00:43 Real or personal property protected krystle taylor

December 07, 2004
22:38 Re: Mention addition of TR1 to C++ for GCC-4.0.0 Paolo Carlini
22:33 Re: Mention addition of TR1 to C++ for GCC-4.0.0 Joe Buck
22:15 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Vladimir N. Makarov
21:37 Re: native gcc for vxworks Mike Stump
17:50 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Richard Henderson
16:56 Re: Debugging a port Eric Botcazou
16:24 Re: Debugging a port Peter Barada
16:12 Re: gcc/g++ 4.0.0, 20041205 snapshot, bug #18073 still present Nathan Sidwell
16:09 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Dorit Naishlos
16:09 Re: Debugging a port Nathan Sidwell
15:58 Debugging a port Russell Shaw
15:56 Re: SEGV building qt-3.3.3 with GCC 3.4.3 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Nix
15:41 Re: SSA annotations memory use. Andrew MacLeod
14:54 Re: SSA annotations memory use. Jan Hubicka
14:39 Re: SSA annotations memory use. Andrew MacLeod
14:21 Re: gcc/g++ 4.0.0, 20041205 snapshot, bug #18073 still present tbp
14:14 SSA annotations memory use. Jan Hubicka
13:59 Re: Mention addition of TR1 to C++ for GCC-4.0.0 chris jefferson
13:59 Gcc complex division (default) algorithm Paolo Carlini
13:52 Mention addition of TR1 to C++ for GCC-4.0.0 Ed Smith-Rowland
13:40 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Daniel Berlin
13:26 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Jeffrey A Law
13:15 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Steven Bosscher
13:01 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Steven Bosscher
10:59 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Daniel Towner
06:52 Re: native gcc for vxworks Robert Dewar
05:21 Enable dynamic for cross to sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:29 discussion of ObjC test results on Darwin(/x86) (lengthy) Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
01:45 Re: objc data structure design Ziemowit Laski
01:24 RE: Multithreading problems Daniel Kegel

December 06, 2004
21:59 Re: Unreachable code in reload.c Kazu Hirata
21:38 Unreachable code in reload.c Martin Koegler
20:52 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Richard Henderson
20:42 gcc/g++ 4.0.0, 20041205 snapshot, bug #18073 still present tbp
19:58 search for a patch which can defend stack smash gpmn
19:47 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Dorit Naishlos
19:45 RE: Building gcc compiler Patara, Nishchal
19:44 RE: Building gcc compiler Patara, Nishchal
19:31 Re: Building gcc compiler Nathan Sidwell
19:29 Re: Building gcc compiler Chris Jefferson
19:23 Building gcc compiler Patara, Nishchal
19:14 Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X The Doctor
19:01 RTL alias annotation Iman Narasamdya
17:39 Re: About #sccs Manfred Hollstein
17:30 RE: Multithreading problems Ciorecan Marius
17:26 Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X Janis Johnson
17:26 Re: Multithreading problems David Edelsohn
17:12 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Vladimir Makarov
16:40 re: Multithreading problems [on AIX with gcc-2.9-aix51-020209] Dan Kegel
16:30 Re: About #sccs Luca Benini
16:27 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Daniel Towner
15:37 Multithreading problems Ciorecan Marius
15:34 Re: native gcc for vxworks Jean-François Morcillo
15:14 Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X The Doctor
15:11 Re: native gcc for vxworks Nathan Sidwell
15:07 Re: native gcc for vxworks Jean-François Morcillo
14:05 Re: Unrolling/peeling of constant rolling loops Zdenek Dvorak
13:37 Unrolling/peeling of constant rolling loops Richard Guenther
12:40 Re: -fabi-version doing nothing? Mike Hearn
12:31 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Steven Bosscher
12:30 Re: Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Nathan Sidwell
12:24 Re: About #sccs Nathan Sidwell
11:53 Re: -fabi-version doing nothing? Nathan Sidwell
11:30 Incorrect DFA scheduling of output dependency. Daniel Towner
10:48 [tree-profiling] Bootstrap failure Richard Guenther
10:48 Re: About #sccs Luca Benini
10:28 Re: About #sccs Patrick McFarland
08:39 About #sccs Luca Benini

December 05, 2004
18:11 Re: IA-64 and const Richard Henderson
18:07 gcc-4.0-20041205 is now available gccadmin
16:39 Re: DR#236 analysis Michael Veksler
12:09 IA-64 and const Thomas Koenig
11:59 Re: Size of basic types Kai Henningsen
11:10 Re: Migration-to-gcc-3.4 guides? Vladimir Merzliakov

December 04, 2004
22:36 Migration-to-gcc-3.4 guides? Dan Kegel
18:34 Re: Gcc 3.4.2 -> 3.4.3 change of behaviour; Bug or broken code? Andrew Walrond
18:04 gnatmem & libaddr2line.a Luke A. Guest
17:56 Re: Gcc 3.4.2 -> 3.4.3 change of behaviour; Bug or broken code? Richard Henderson
16:42 Re: VxWorks specs vs fixincl, machname.h and machine_name_test jf
16:36 Re: Size of basic types Paul Schlie
15:56 Re: tree_list not supported by dump_type (Historical Question) Giovanni Bajo
15:19 Re: tree_list not supported by dump_type (Historical Question) Giovanni Bajo
14:13 tree_list not supported by dump_type (Historical Question) Ernest L. Williams Jr.
11:05 Re: Heap allocation on Linux Steven Bosscher
10:34 Re: Heap allocation on Linux jec
10:33 Re: Compilation broken? jlh
10:17 Heap allocation on Linux jec
08:22 Gcc 3.4.2 -> 3.4.3 change of behaviour; Bug or broken code? Andrew Walrond
06:24 Re: Compilation broken? Zack Weinberg
05:28 Compilation broken? Sam Lauber
05:25 Re: objc data structure design Ziemowit Laski
04:56 Re: Size of basic types Robert Dewar
03:43 Re: Size of basic types Zack Weinberg
03:24 Re: Size of basic types Paul Schlie
03:14 Re: DR#236 analysis Paul Schlie
02:47 Re: Size of basic types Zack Weinberg
02:07 Re: DR#236 analysis Paul Brook
00:36 Re: DR#236 analysis Paul Schlie
00:35 Re: VxWorks specs vs fixincl, machname.h and machine_name_test Phil Edwards
00:26 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Eric Botcazou
00:08 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Roger Sayle
00:08 VxWorks specs vs fixincl, machname.h and machine_name_test Earl Chew

December 03, 2004
23:22 gcc-3.4-20041203 is now available gccadmin
23:17 Re: [PATCH] Document target_fold_builtin Richard Henderson
23:16 Re: New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Richard Henderson
22:58 Re: DR#236 analysis Ian Lance Taylor
22:45 ACATS PR status update 20041203 Laurent GUERBY
22:41 -fabi-version doing nothing? Mike Hearn
21:21 Re: DR#236 analysis Geoff Keating
21:07 New Fortran / Libfortran maintainer proposed. Toon Moene
20:56 Re: Missing DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name specifier for constructor debug info Daniel Jacobowitz
20:55 Re: DR#236 analysis Ian Lance Taylor
20:42 Re: DR#236 analysis Geoffrey Keating
20:31 Missing DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name specifier for constructor debug info Jeff Johnston
20:07 Re: clarification on use of --enable-threads Nathan Sidwell
17:54 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20041201 on sparc64-linux: libstdc++ configure chokes: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. H. J. Lu
17:52 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20041201 on sparc64-linux: libstdc++ configure chokes: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. Janis Johnson
17:49 intermediate files Mark Newman
17:25 Re: clarification on use of --enable-threads Aniruddha Jahagirdar
17:18 Re: clarification on use of --enable-threads Nathan Sidwell
17:13 Re: SEGV building qt-3.3.3 with GCC 3.4.3 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Albert Chin
16:44 clarification on use of --enable-threads Aniruddha Jahagirdar
15:51 Re: Size of basic types jec
15:32 Re: Size of basic types Gabriel Paubert
15:12 Re: [PATCH] Document target_fold_builtin Roger Sayle
14:22 Re: DR#236 analysis Ian Lance Taylor
13:16 New and undocumented target hooks (cf. PR3386, a regression) Steven Bosscher
11:11 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew Łuszpiński
11:03 RE: Size of basic types Dave Korn
10:46 Re: Size of basic types Matthias B.
09:24 Re: A lot of gfortran failures on sparc-linux and sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
09:15 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20041202 on sparc64-linux: libstdc++ configure chokes: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. Christian Joensson
09:11 Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20041201 on sparc64-linux: libstdc++ configure chokes: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. Christian Joensson
08:38 Re: Size of basic types Allan Sandfeld Jensen
07:37 NTU can not connect your web server! Mei-Wen Li
07:13 Re: DR#236 analysis Geoffrey Keating
05:47 How tosolve" error: thread-local storage not supported for this target " wj
04:15 Re: DR#236 analysis Daniel Berlin
03:31 DR#236 analysis Joseph S. Myers
02:27 Re: Mirror request Gerald Pfeifer
01:53 Mirror request Paul Schou
01:18 Re: A strange behavior of apple-ppc-branch on darwin7.3.0 Bill Northcott
00:21 Re: Size of basic types Paul Schlie
00:08 Re: SEGV building qt-3.3.3 with GCC 3.4.3 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Joe Buck

December 02, 2004
22:46 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Joe Buck
22:33 SEGV building qt-3.3.3 with GCC 3.4.3 on RH 7.1/RHEL 2.1 Albert Chin
22:14 Re: native gcc for vxworks Zack Weinberg
22:06 Re: Size of basic types Luca Benini
21:50 Re: Size of basic types Daniel Jacobowitz
21:34 Re: Size of basic types Jean-Eric Cuendet
21:33 Re: Size of basic types Jean-Eric Cuendet
21:16 native gcc for vxworks jf
21:11 Re: Size of basic types Zack Weinberg
21:04 Re: Size of basic types Jean-Eric Cuendet
20:59 Re: Size of basic types Zack Weinberg
20:38 Size of basic types Jean-Eric Cuendet
19:55 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Mike Stump
19:30 Still seeing ivopts problem Richard Kenner
18:23 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Joe Buck
17:52 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Gerald Pfeifer
17:49 RE: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Dave Korn
17:42 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Andreas Schwab
17:33 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Giovanni Bajo
17:31 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Mark Mitchell
17:29 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Peter Barada
17:17 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Nathan Sidwell
17:16 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Joe Buck
17:15 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Joe Buck
17:12 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Richard Guenther
17:05 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Steven Bosscher
17:03 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Ian Lance Taylor
16:34 Re: Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Joseph S. Myers
16:08 Compiler uses a lot of memory for large initialized arrays Ian Lance Taylor
15:19 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Nix
14:01 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Jonathan Wilson
13:37 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Giovanni Bajo
12:58 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Paolo Carlini
12:57 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Steven Bosscher
12:54 Re: what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Paolo Carlini
12:42 Blocked email to freetalk2@mail.welltech.com.tw mail_admin
12:22 what are the "primary targets" for GCC? Jonathan Wilson
11:08 Re: PR 16373: -fomit-frame-pointer when optimizing on x86 Jakub Jelinek
11:07 PR 16373: -fomit-frame-pointer when optimizing on x86 Jakub Jelinek
10:17 Blocked email to freetalk2@mail.welltech.com.tw mail_admin
09:57 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
09:37 How to use __thread wj
08:23 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Kai Henningsen
06:56 successfully built and installed GCC with Debian 3.1 Chung C Chen
05:35 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Nick NoSpam
05:00 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Jeffrey A Law
01:54 Re: A strange behavior of apple-ppc-branch on darwin7.3.0 Sam Lauber
01:22 Re: Static nested functions James A. Morrison
00:12 problem on x86_64 while Building runtime libraries Laurent GUERBY
00:06 Multiple (serialized) messages in Objective-C Pupeno

December 01, 2004
23:26 gcc-3.3-20041201 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Richard Sandiford
22:40 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:27 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Mike Stump
22:17 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:12 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Richard Sandiford
22:12 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Mike Stump
21:53 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:46 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
21:35 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Andreas Schwab
21:34 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:32 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
21:28 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Andreas Schwab
21:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
21:09 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) hgbasm
20:51 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:43 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:39 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Richard Henderson
20:27 Re: RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Mike Stump
20:12 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
20:11 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew Łuszpiński
19:16 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Bobby McNulty
19:07 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Joe Buck
18:51 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Bobby McNulty
18:41 Re: Request for bugmasters Andrew Pinski
18:35 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Richard Henderson
18:34 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Richard Henderson
18:30 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) hgbasm
18:21 RFC: Replace -isysroot with --sysroot? Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:09 Request for bugmasters Mark Mitchell
18:07 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Paolo Carlini
18:05 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Daniel Jacobowitz
18:03 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Joe Buck
17:57 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Paolo Carlini
17:56 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Daniel Jacobowitz
17:56 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Daniel Jacobowitz
17:55 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Joe Buck
17:51 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Paul Brook
17:50 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
17:49 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Joe Buck
17:49 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Zack Weinberg
17:43 Re: Static nested functions Joseph S. Myers
17:38 Re: Static nested functions Zack Weinberg
17:38 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Joe Buck
17:36 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
17:36 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Geert Bosch
17:35 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew ÅuszpiÅski
17:20 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Richard Henderson
17:19 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Richard Henderson
17:18 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
17:09 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Richard Henderson
17:00 Cross build of libgfortran Steve Ellcey
16:25 crosscompiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to ppc604/vxworks5.4 Jean-François Morcillo
16:17 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Nick NoSpam
16:13 Welkom Belservice.nl
15:56 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
15:41 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima
15:38 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Andrew Pinski
15:32 Mainline bootstrap failure in toplev.c Wolfgang Bangerth
15:06 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Ian Lance Taylor
14:48 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
14:43 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Kaz Kojima
14:40 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Daniel Berlin
14:38 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ranjit Mathew
13:49 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Daniel Berlin
13:41 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mikael Kilpeläinen
13:33 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Earnshaw
13:14 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
13:12 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Kenner
13:11 Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mikael Kilpeläinen
12:29 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
11:58 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Robert Dewar
11:55 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Robert Dewar
11:40 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Robert Dewar
11:05 Re: Static nested functions Joseph S. Myers
11:05 Re: How to disable gcov build when crosscompiling gcc Nathan Sidwell
10:42 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Zbigniew Łuszpiński
10:20 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Paolo Carlini
10:17 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Nick NoSpam
10:14 Re: tree-ssa: a weird (mis)optimization Andrew Haley
10:08 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Nick NoSpam
10:06 How to disable gcov build when crosscompiling gcc Jean-François Morcillo
09:39 Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types Paolo Carlini
09:23 Making strings of arbitrary character types Nick NoSpam
08:39 A strange behavior of apple-ppc-branch on darwin7.3.0 Mostafa Hagog
08:10 Re: Gcc mirros check Luca Benini
07:36 Re: Static nested functions Zack Weinberg
07:24 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Nix
07:12 Static nested functions James A. Morrison
06:52 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ranjit Mathew
06:46 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ranjit Mathew
06:41 Re: Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Richard Kenner
06:20 Bootstrap Failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ranjit Mathew
04:02 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) hgbasm
03:24 Re: What happen if... (related GPL & src) Ian Lance Taylor
03:22 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Paul Schlie
03:20 What happen if... (related GPL & src) hgbasm
03:17 Re: i?86-pc-windows agian? Aaron W. LaFramboise
03:07 Re: i?86-pc-windows agian? Zack Weinberg
02:59 Re: gcc 3.4.1 and CPU optimization Ian Lance Taylor
02:29 i?86-pc-windows agian? Sam Lauber
00:39 Re: INT_MIN % -1 Robert Dewar
00:37 RE: Partial aggregate initialization warning proposal Steven L. Zook
00:05 Re: Partial aggregate initialization warning proposal Andrew Pinski

November 30, 2004
23:59 Partial aggregate initialization warning proposal Steven L. Zook


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3