This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 Nov 2004 21:43:07 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
- References: <co397v$tju$1@sea.gmane.org>
"Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it> writes:
> I (and others) believe that it would be useful to automatically assign a PR
> about a regression to the author of the patch which caused/exposed the
> regression. Of course, this does not want to be a way to coerce people to
> work on something: the maintainer can just unassign the PR if he does not
> want/have time to work on that, or if he can't fix the exposed bug for some
> reason.
I don't think this would be a good change.
I think there should be a way to identify, in the bugzilla database,
the person who caused a regression, when that is known. However, I
don't think using the Assigned field is the right mechanism. As
others have said, it means that we can no longer tell whether somebody
is actually working on the bug. In a volunteer project, in which some
patches come from people who just e-mail them in, to get approved and
applied by more active maintainers, we can not reasonably expect every
contributor to use bugzilla.
(Daniel, I can supply kittens if you need them.)
Ian