This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
- From: "Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Richard Guenther'" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>,"'Daniel Berlin'" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: "'Giovanni Bajo'" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:56:33 -0000
- Subject: RE: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Richard Guenther
> Sent: 25 November 2004 16:32
> To: Daniel Berlin
> Cc: Giovanni Bajo; gcc
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
>
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:28:39 -0500, Daniel Berlin
> <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 10:44 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > Can't we have a caused-by-patch field in bugzilla where
> we could link the patch
> > > causing the failure and a caused-by field with the author (and
> > > automatically CC'ing
> > > him)? I don't think it is a great idea overloading the
> assigned-to field.
> >
> > Everytime you ask me to add another custom field, God kills
> a kitten.
> > Please, think of the kittens.
>
> Don't kittens have nine lifes? :)
>
> Richard.
If I were to ask Daniel to add a field for the number of remaining
kitten-lives, would it end up auto-decrementing?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....