This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:14:11 -0700
Subject: Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
References: <10411241707.AA28576@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1101317880.27318.347.camel@localhost.localdomain> <140A21AA-3E53-11D9-8F73-000393A91CAA@apple.com>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 11:57 -0800, Devang Patel wrote:
> Related question, Why do find_equivalent_equality_comparison() only for 
> EQ and NE ?
I can't think of a good reason offhand.  I might have been
overly paranoid about whether or not we can apply that
tranformation with relational tests.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr
  - From: Devang Patel

References:
- Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Question about simplify_cond_and_lookup_avail_expr
  - From: Devang Patel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]