This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Please review 3.4 patches
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 12:22:08AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:01:47PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >
> >>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00795.html
> >>
> >>This last one, at least, is clearly wrong.
> >>
> >>You're now defaulting to --enable-shared, even on systems that may not
> >>support shared libraries at all.
> >>
> >>What's wrong with Joe's suggested solution: set LD_LIBRARY_PATH when
> >>running programs from the stage1/ or stage2/ directories?
> >>
> >>Also, do we have a list of the patches that went in post GCC 3.4.2 that
> >>are causing problems? I want to know what we will have to take out if
> >>we have to take things out.
> >
> >
> >I think the libunwind patch is the most problematic one and should not made
> >it into the stable branch, just HEAD (and even there I don't like it very
> >much).
>
> Can you produce a candidate reversion patch that we could consider for
> the 3.4 branch?
I hate to see gcc 3.4.3 don't follow the ia64 unwind ABI. Please
keep in mind that this change only affects Linux/ia64, whose
purpose is to conform the Linux ia64 unwind ABI.
H.J.