Re: GCC IMA & general future proposal

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

On 27/10/2004, at 11:54 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > > > It's short, but has a complicated diagram. It is intended for
> > > > discussion
> > > > at the meeting in a few hours.
> > >
> > > Has anyone seriously considered using or adopting LLVM
> > > (http://llvm.org)?
> > > It seems to provide just about everything on your diagram, and is 
> > > also
> > > quite efficient.
> > >
> > > Even if it is not an option, I would really be interested to hear why
> > > not and what is missing.  In particular, LLVM is mutable, and it's
> > > easier to add things to it than to reinvent the whole thing.  :)
> >
> > It's the part where you have to add everything that GCC has that LLVM
> > doesn't that seems to be the problem.
>
> Heh, likewise, you're talking about adding everything that LLVM has to
> GCC.  :)

Right.  So, which is the larger source base, LLVM or GCC?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature